1-20 OF 729 RESULTS FOR

Schmidt hammer methods

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 23 December 2015
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2016) 49 (1): 67–75.
... they do not require sample preparation; such methods include the Schmidt hammer rebound (SHR) and the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) tests. They also have the major advantages of portability, robustness, quickness, low cost and non-destructiveness, depending on use. In this regard, the use of the UPV...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2021
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2021) 97 (7): 744–750.
... using a popular non-destructive (Schmidt hammer) method which is relatively low cost and simple operating procedure. The most advantage of this method is that it can apply directly to an unprepared joint surface and can be used to obtain a direct estimate of the joint compressive strength (Hoek and Bray...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 25 October 2024
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2024) 57 (4): qjegh2024-069.
... in the Cerchar test; ( d ) BTS test performed on samples. The BTS tests ( Fig. 4d ) were performed according to German Recommendation No.10 for indirect tensile tests ( Lepique 2008 ) following the suggested methods of ISRM (1978) . The Schmidt hammer was applied to core samples to determine the rock...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2018
DOI: 10.1144/SP461.4
EISBN: 9781786203427
... is required to understand key questions posed by existing biotic datasets. Conclusions Rock surface hardness measured using Schmidt hammer rebounds provides a robust method of relative dating in the sub-Antarctic environment, especially in areas above the limit of peat-forming vegetation. South...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2011
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2011) 44 (1): 135–140.
...V. Gupta; R. Sharma; M.P. Sah Abstract Abstract The use of the Schmidt hammer to interpret the relative surface weathering of rocks at different elevation in the Satluj and Alaknanda valleys is outlined. The study carried out in the Higher Himalayan terrain on crystalline gneisses under similar...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 31 March 2017
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2017) 50 (2): 179–186.
...Hasan Arman; Osman Abdelghany; Waheed Hashem; Ala Aldahan Abstract The Schmidt hammer (SH) test, which is quick, inexpensive, non-destructive and simple to use, has been widely applied to determine hardness and to assess the unconfined compressive strength of rocks. Lithofacies (composition...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2017
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2017) 90 (1): 102–110.
... was calculated. Uniaxial compressive strength, dry unit weight, point load strength index, Schmidt hammer rebound, and P-wave velocity of the samples were determined in the laboratory. Simple regression analyses were performed using the laboratory results incorporating first TC and engineering parameters...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 09 December 2020
GSA Bulletin (2021) 133 (7-8): 1649–1664.
... and laboratory tensile testing. Strong positive correlations between rock strength and unit stream power, as well as between rock strength and river slope/width, were found in bedrock reaches of the river. Similarly, rock strength as measured by Schmidt hammer was shown to strongly correlate with river steepness...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2023
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2023) 99 (7): 975–985.
... description includes the calculation of the joint volume. The orientations of various discontinuities (joints, shear zones, and faults) and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) were determined in the field using the Schmidt hammer method, as suggested by the International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 2009
AAPG Bulletin (2009) 93 (11): 1459–1470.
... distributions. Layer competence and competence contrast, measured using a Schmidt hammer, allow the analysis of mechanical stratigraphy. Fault frequency and displacement distributions exhibit patterns that correlate to mechanical stratigraphy. In particular, the average competence contrast is related...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2012
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2012) 45 (4): 423–433.
... 11.60 57 VAET2/Vourinos 49 3.98 12.55 58 VVDSR1/Vourinos 40 2.50 19.10 50 KOZ1/Koziakas 60 5.36 6.94 56 KOZ2/Koziakas 58 4.70 8.58 57 The Schmidt hammer test is considered as a non-destructive method widely used in rock mechanics practice for a quick rock hardness...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2022
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2022) 98 (4): 538–544.
.... For fresh rock or boulder, the empirical equation (equation 1) suggested by Kilic and Teymen (2008) has been used for the estimation of uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) from the Schmidt hammer hardness (N), whereas Young’s modulus (E) is estimated from the equation (equation 2) given by Teymen (2021...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 23 February 2023
Geology (2023) 51 (4): 356–361.
... Be incision rates (and corresponding cross-section panels at right) and Schmidt hammer (SHED)–determined incision rate of strath terraces in the St. Francois Mountains (SFM) on a digital elevation model. Bedrock divide exposure age sites are also shown. (D) Catchment-wide denudation rate (CWDR) sample...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 25 April 2022
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2022) 55 (3): qjegh2021-062.
... , A . 2009 . ISRM suggested method for determination of the Schmidt hammer rebound hardness: revised version . International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences , 46 , 627 – 634 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.01.020 Ballato , P. , Uba , C. et al. 2011 . Arabia...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 14 September 2021
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (1): 419–437.
... for the same rocks. However, both direct tension and Brazilian test measurements are time‐consuming, expensive, and limited to small samples. In this survey, we chose to measure tensile strength in situ using a rebound hammer. Rebound hammers, such as the Schmidt hammer, were originally developed...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 February 2005
Geology (2005) 33 (2): 101–104.
... in the same beds of growth strata in the Oliana anticline in the Spanish Pyrenees may reflect changing mechanical properties (i.e., via diagenesis) during the folding process. Using a Schmidt hammer, we assess the rigidity contrast between the individual units and show that the present-day contrast...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2016
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2016) 88 (6): 799–807.
... of travertine levels for each location the minimum, maximum and average values are calculated and average values of Schmidt Hammer rebound and point load test results are used according to the methods suggested by ISRM (2007) . In addition to physico-mechanical test results, the results of field observations...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2022
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2022) 98 (12): 1737–1744.
... measurement. Several routine geologic measurements and analysis were performed in the laboratory and the field, which are described in this section. In situ rock stiffness measurements were carried out on nearly planar rock faces, using a Proceq digital Schmidt rebound hammer ( Figs. 3a and 3b...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2016
American Mineralogist (2016) 101 (4): 769–779.
... 2 O concentration in experimentally decompressed glasses from Martel and Schmidt (2003) , Brugger and Hammer (2010) , and Cichy et al. (2011) , in comparison with isobaric (solubility) data from Mangan and Sisson (2000) . Also shown is a rhyolite solubility curve from VolatileCalc ( Newman...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 2010
AAPG Bulletin (2010) 94 (2): 221–240.
... ). The normalized RMSE of the suite of models was calculated and used to rank each model ( Figure 8 ). Figure 2 Stratigraphic column of rocks exposed in the Big Brushy Canyon monocline. Schmidt hammer rebound values ( R ) as determined in the field for each mechanical stratigraphic unit are shown along...
FIGURES | View All (11)