1-20 OF 189 RESULTS FOR

Sarvak Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2010
DOI: 10.1144/SP329.9
EISBN: 9781862395770
... Abstract A high resolution sequence stratigraphic model has been constructed for the mid-Cretaceous Sarvak Formation (in the High Zagros region of SW Iran) which was deposited close to the eastern margin of the Arabian Plate. The exceptional outcrop quality, displaying the detailed facies...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2010
DOI: 10.1144/SP330.12
EISBN: 9781862395787
... Abstract The Sarvak Formation (Cenomanian–Turonian) forms one of the main reservoir rocks in many oilfields in southern Iran. Extensive lateral and vertical facies variations as well as effects caused mainly by the subaerial exposure associated with the regional Turonian unconformity have...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2018
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2018) 92 (4): 491–497.
... and Sarvak Formation is mostly comprised of the carbonated rocks. Electric imaging of the borehole wall using FMI logs of the well formation determined the number of fractures, the dip average, layering direction and the fractures’ relative frequency in different zones. Also the stresses excreted...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Simplified stratigraphy of the Sarvak Formation depicting the major lithologic successions and the thickness of the upper and lower formations (adapted from Abdollahie Fard et al., 2006; Figure 3).
Published: 23 February 2022
Figure 1. Simplified stratigraphy of the Sarvak Formation depicting the major lithologic successions and the thickness of the upper and lower formations (adapted from Abdollahie Fard et al., 2006 ; Figure 3).
Image
Photographs showing details of the neritic facies of the Sarvak Formation in the eastern plunge of the Anjir anticline. Location of the photographs is shown in Fig. 5b.
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 11. Photographs showing details of the neritic facies of the Sarvak Formation in the eastern plunge of the Anjir anticline. Location of the photographs is shown in Fig. 5 b.
Image
Three major sequences in a well from the upper Sarvak Formation, showing facies, texture, accommodation and diagenetic processes, together with gamma-ray, neutron, density and effective porosity well logs. SB, sequence boundary; RST, regressive systems tract; TST, transgressive systems tract; MFS, maximum flooding surface.
Published: 01 May 2006
Fig. 5 Three major sequences in a well from the upper Sarvak Formation, showing facies, texture, accommodation and diagenetic processes, together with gamma-ray, neutron, density and effective porosity well logs. SB, sequence boundary; RST, regressive systems tract; TST, transgressive systems
Image
Examples of typical microfacies in the upper Sarvak Formation. (a) Benthic foraminiferal wackestone deposited in a lagoonal environment. Euhedral dolomite crystals have been distributed in the matrix. PPL. (b) Rudist floatstone in a benthic foraminiferal wackestone that may have been derived from a patch reef. PPL. (c) Peloidal bioclastic grainstone deposited in a shoal environment. Micritization can be seen around the echinoid grains. Intergranular porosity is high and the pores have been filled occasionally by late coarse calcite cement. CPL. (d) Rudist packstone interpreted as a reef deposit. PPL. (e) Rudist wackestone in a fore-reef containing echinoid grains and a mixture of large and very small rudist fragments. CPL. (f) Echinoid packstone deposited in a shallow-marine environment. Syntaxial overgrowth cement can be seen around the echinoid grains. PPL. (g) Orbitolina packstone/grainstone deposited in a shallow-marine environment. Intragranular porosity is indicated in blue. CPL. (h) Bioclastic wackestone/packstone. Large Praealveolina and echinoid grains in association with pelagic foraminifera may be indicative of an outer-shelf environment. CPL. (i) Mixed bioclastic-pelagic wackestone/packstone typical of an outer-shelf environment. The bioclasts contain echinoids, shell fragments and Oilgostegina. PPL. (j) Oligostegina wackestone typical of a deep intrashelf basinal environment. PPL. (PPL, Plane polarized light; CPL, cross-polarized light.)
Published: 01 May 2006
Fig. 4 Examples of typical microfacies in the upper Sarvak Formation. ( a ) Benthic foraminiferal wackestone deposited in a lagoonal environment. Euhedral dolomite crystals have been distributed in the matrix. PPL. ( b ) Rudist floatstone in a benthic foraminiferal wackestone that may have been
Image
Diagenetic processes in the upper part of the Sarvak Formation. (a) Massive recrystallization in a meteoric zone; the original fabric is difficult to recognize and only some rudist debris can be seen on the right of the photomicrograph. (b) Dissolution effects in shallow shelf deposits. The dominant grains are rudist debris. Common vuggy and mouldic porosity result in a highly porous interval beneath sequence USF1. (c) Blocky mosaic calcite cement in a peloidal grainstone deposited in a shoal environment; cements fill all primary intergranular pore spaces. (d) Syntaxial overgrowth cement around echinoid grains in an echinoid wackestone lithofacies, shallow open-marine environment. Small-scale vuggy porosity can also be seen in this sample. (e) Late calcite cement and syntaxial overgrowth cement in a peloidal/bioclastic grainstone lithofacies from a shoal deposit. Primary intergranular porosity has been reduced partly by calcite cementation; micritization can also be seen around the echinoid grain in the left of the photomicrograph. (f) Dolomitization in lagoonal deposits. The original fabric seems to be a benthic foraminiferal wackestone. The dolomite crystals are fine- to medium-grained and euhedral. (g) Dolomitization in a fore-reef setting in a rudist wackestone lithofacies. The dolomite crystals are fine to medium-grained and mainly of the cloudy core-clear rim variety (CCCR). Vuggy porosity has been created by leaching. Rudist debris and echinoid grains can be recognized. This type of dolomite forms porous intervals in sequence USF1. (h) Dolomitization in a pelagic lithofacies. The dolomite crystals are fine- to medium-grained and euhedral. All plane polarized light.
Published: 01 May 2006
Fig. 7 Diagenetic processes in the upper part of the Sarvak Formation. ( a ) Massive recrystallization in a meteoric zone; the original fabric is difficult to recognize and only some rudist debris can be seen on the right of the photomicrograph. ( b ) Dissolution effects in shallow shelf deposits
Image
Depositional model of the upper Sarvak Formation (mid-Cenomanian to early Turonian). (Modified from Aqrawi et al. 1998.)
Published: 01 May 2006
Fig. 3 Depositional model of the upper Sarvak Formation (mid-Cenomanian to early Turonian). (Modified from Aqrawi et al . 1998 .)
Image
Diagenetic history of the upper Sarvak Formation.
Published: 01 May 2006
Fig. 6 Diagenetic history of the upper Sarvak Formation.
Image
Karstification in the uppermost part of the Sarvak Formation (sequence USF3) below sequence boundary SB4, which represents the early Turonian unconformity. (a) Vuggy and mouldic porosity (yellow arrows) in rudist floatstone deposits (patch reef in a lagoonal background) with hairline vertical fractures. Dissolution suggests a fall in sea-level. (b) Brecciation and vuggy porosity in lagoonal deposits below the overlying Surgah Shale. Note that the shale is infilling the vugs (yellow arrow).
Published: 01 May 2006
Fig. 9 Karstification in the uppermost part of the Sarvak Formation (sequence USF3) below sequence boundary SB4, which represents the early Turonian unconformity. ( a ) Vuggy and mouldic porosity (yellow arrows) in rudist floatstone deposits (patch reef in a lagoonal background) with hairline
Image
Photograph of the Badangun tectonic klippe (3, Sarvak Formation) from the SW (location with arrow indicates view direction on Fig. 3). Sisakht valley and village are in the left middle-ground (1, Pabdeh/Gurpi Formation and younger). The Dinar Range is in the left background (2, Khami Formation and Palaeozoic).
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 8 Photograph of the Badangun tectonic klippe (3, Sarvak Formation) from the SW (location with arrow indicates view direction on Fig. 3 ). Sisakht valley and village are in the left middle-ground (1, Pabdeh/Gurpi Formation and younger). The Dinar Range is in the left background (2, Khami
Image
—Section exposing Fahliyan, Gadvan, Dariyan, Kazhdumi, and Sarvak Formations. Near Fahliyan village, Fars Province. (Photo—A. J. Wells)
Published: 01 December 1965
Fig. 25. —Section exposing Fahliyan, Gadvan, Dariyan, Kazhdumi, and Sarvak Formations. Near Fahliyan village, Fars Province. (Photo—A. J. Wells)
Image
Type section of the Sarvak Formation.
Published: 01 December 1965
Fig. 33. Type section of the Sarvak Formation.
Image
—Sarvak Formation. Massive upper unit forming vertical cliff. Argillaceous limestone of basal Sarvak forming round shoulder overlying Kazhdumi. Kuh-e Bangestan, near Agha Jari.
Published: 01 December 1965
Fig. 36. —Sarvak Formation. Massive upper unit forming vertical cliff. Argillaceous limestone of basal Sarvak forming round shoulder overlying Kazhdumi. Kuh-e Bangestan, near Agha Jari.
Image
—Sarvak Formation; basal nodular, argillaceous limestone. Type section, Kuh-e Bangestan.
Published: 01 December 1965
Fig. 37. —Sarvak Formation; basal nodular, argillaceous limestone. Type section, Kuh-e Bangestan.
Image
—Trocholina-Orbitolina fauna of Mauddud Member of the Sarvak Formation. Cenomanian. ×35.
Published: 01 December 1965
Fig. 38. —Trocholina-Orbitolina fauna of Mauddud Member of the Sarvak Formation. Cenomanian. ×35.
Image
—Praealveolina limestone from upper Sarvak Formation of Khuzestan. Cenomanian. ×25.
Published: 01 December 1965
Fig. 40. —Praealveolina limestone from upper Sarvak Formation of Khuzestan. Cenomanian. ×25.
Image
—Detrital rudist limestone facies of upper Sarvak Formation. Fars Province. Cenomanian. ×25.
Published: 01 December 1965
Fig. 41. —Detrital rudist limestone facies of upper Sarvak Formation. Fars Province. Cenomanian. ×25.
Image
—Typical “Oligostegina” limestone from upper Sarvak Formation. Fars Province. Cenomanian. ×50.
Published: 01 December 1965
Fig. 42. —Typical “Oligostegina” limestone from upper Sarvak Formation. Fars Province. Cenomanian. ×50.