Update search
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
- Abstract
- Affiliation
- All
- Authors
- Book Series
- DOI
- EISBN
- EISSN
- Full Text
- GeoRef ID
- ISBN
- ISSN
- Issue
- Keyword (GeoRef Descriptor)
- Meeting Information
- Report #
- Title
- Volume
NARROW
Format
Article Type
Journal
Publisher
Section
GeoRef Subject
-
all geography including DSDP/ODP Sites and Legs
-
Mexico
-
Baja California (1)
-
Chiapas Mexico (1)
-
Chihuahua Mexico (1)
-
Oaxaca Mexico (8)
-
Sonora Mexico (1)
-
-
South America
-
Andes (1)
-
Brazil
-
Parana Brazil (1)
-
-
Parana Basin (1)
-
-
-
fossils
-
Chordata
-
Vertebrata (1)
-
-
Graptolithina (1)
-
Hemichordata (1)
-
Invertebrata
-
Brachiopoda
-
Articulata
-
Productida (1)
-
Rhynchonellida (1)
-
Spiriferida (1)
-
-
Inarticulata (1)
-
-
Bryozoa
-
Cryptostomata (1)
-
-
Cnidaria (1)
-
Mollusca
-
Rostroconchia (1)
-
-
-
Metazoa (1)
-
microfossils
-
Conodonta (3)
-
-
Pterobranchia (1)
-
-
geologic age
-
Paleozoic
-
Cambrian
-
Upper Cambrian
-
Furongian (1)
-
-
-
Carboniferous
-
Mississippian
-
Lower Mississippian
-
Osagian (1)
-
-
Upper Mississippian
-
Serpukhovian (1)
-
-
-
Pennsylvanian
-
Lower Pennsylvanian
-
Bashkirian (1)
-
-
Middle Pennsylvanian
-
Moscovian (1)
-
-
-
-
Devonian
-
Ponta Grossa Formation (1)
-
-
Ordovician
-
Lower Ordovician
-
Tremadocian (2)
-
-
-
-
-
Primary terms
-
biogeography (3)
-
Chordata
-
Vertebrata (1)
-
-
earthquakes (1)
-
education (1)
-
Graptolithina (1)
-
Hemichordata (1)
-
Invertebrata
-
Brachiopoda
-
Articulata
-
Productida (1)
-
Rhynchonellida (1)
-
Spiriferida (1)
-
-
Inarticulata (1)
-
-
Bryozoa
-
Cryptostomata (1)
-
-
Cnidaria (1)
-
Mollusca
-
Rostroconchia (1)
-
-
-
Mexico
-
Baja California (1)
-
Chiapas Mexico (1)
-
Chihuahua Mexico (1)
-
Oaxaca Mexico (8)
-
Sonora Mexico (1)
-
-
paleoecology (1)
-
paleogeography (4)
-
Paleozoic
-
Cambrian
-
Upper Cambrian
-
Furongian (1)
-
-
-
Carboniferous
-
Mississippian
-
Lower Mississippian
-
Osagian (1)
-
-
Upper Mississippian
-
Serpukhovian (1)
-
-
-
Pennsylvanian
-
Lower Pennsylvanian
-
Bashkirian (1)
-
-
Middle Pennsylvanian
-
Moscovian (1)
-
-
-
-
Devonian
-
Ponta Grossa Formation (1)
-
-
Ordovician
-
Lower Ordovician
-
Tremadocian (2)
-
-
-
-
Pterobranchia (1)
-
sedimentary rocks
-
clastic rocks
-
black shale (1)
-
sandstone (1)
-
-
-
sediments
-
marine sediments (1)
-
-
South America
-
Andes (1)
-
Brazil
-
Parana Brazil (1)
-
-
Parana Basin (1)
-
-
-
sedimentary rocks
-
sedimentary rocks
-
clastic rocks
-
black shale (1)
-
sandstone (1)
-
-
-
-
sediments
-
sediments
-
marine sediments (1)
-
-
GeoRef Categories
Era and Period
Epoch and Age
Book Series
Date
Availability
Santiago Ixtaltepec Mexico
New productide brachiopods (Productoidea) from the Carboniferous of Ixtaltepec Formation, Oaxaca, Mexico
Map of northwestern Oaxaca state, Mexico. ( 1 ) Geographic map of the Nochi...
New rhynchonellid and spire-bearing brachiopods from the Carboniferous of Mexico. Paleogeographical significance of the Oaxacan brachiopod fauna through the Serpukhovian–Moscovian
Figure 1. Map showing the location of the two Lower Paleozoic successions (...
Generalized locality maps. (a) Terminal Cambrian and lowest Ordovician outl...
PSEUDOMULCEODENS : A MISSISSIPPIAN ROSTROCONCH FROM MEXICO
Terminal Cambrian and lowest Ordovician succession of Mexican West Gondwana: biotas and sequence stratigraphy of the Tiñu Formation
Linguliform Brachiopods from the Terminal Cambrian and Lowest Ordovician of the Oaxaquia Microcontinent (Southern Mexico)
Abstract The Permian marine and continental sedimentary sequences in south central México and the biota contained in them are analyzed in this paper. The fossil flora and fauna are contained in Permian strata that correspond to the Guacamaya Formation in the states of Hidalgo and Veracruz; to the Patlanoaya, Los Hornos, Cuxtepeque, and Matzitzi Formations in the state of Puebla; to the Olinalá Formation in the state of Guerrero; to the Ihualtepec, Ixtaltepec, and Yododeñe Formations in the state of Oaxaca; and to the Paso Hondo Formation in the state of Chiapas. The microfaunistic association of Olinalá fusulinids can be correlated with the Guadalupe Mountains and the La Mar Formation of Texas in the U.S.A., and with the Difunta Formation of Coahuila and strata of the states of Sonora, Guerrero, and Oaxaca in Mexico. Fusulinids from the Olinalá, Ihualtepec, and Yododeñe Formations suggest that during the Late Permian (Wordian-Capitanian), these organisms were part of the same paleogeographic province that comprised Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and California in the United States, and northern Sonora, Chihuahua, Coahuila, extending into central Mexico.
Cambrian origin of all skeletalized metazoan phyla—Discovery of Earth's oldest bryozoans (Upper Cambrian, southern Mexico)
Late Cambrian Pywackia is a cnidarian, not a bryozoan: Insights from skeletal microstructure
H/V Analysis in Juchitán de Zaragoza, Oaxaca, Following the 2017 M 8.2 Tehuantepec, México, Earthquake
Ordovician stratigraphy and biota of Mexico
Abstract In Mexico, Ordovician sedimentary rocks are exposed in the states of Baja California, Sonora, Chihuahua and Oaxaca, comprising approximately 30 stratigraphic successions ranging from Lower to Upper Ordovician. The ages of the sequences have been established primarily by utilizing conodonts and graptolites, which have also allowed us to differentiate between platform and oceanic basin environments. The State of Sonora has the most complete Ordovician stratigraphic sequences, ranging from Tremadocian to Hirnantian. The deposits in Baja California are Floian in age, while the sequences of Chihuahua range from Sandbian to Katian, and the deposits in Oaxaca are Tremadocian. The Ordovician deposits of northern Mexico (Baja California, Sonora, and Chihuahua) present a palaeogeographic relationship to the North American craton, mainly owing to faunal interspecific affinities, while the southern deposits (Oaxaca) are controversial owing to the high degree of endemism of the faunas; however, they show affinity with Gondwana, Baltica and Avalonia, with a possible insular origin. The biotic assemblages of the Ordovician of Mexico include a variety of taxa, including algae, poriferans, corals, bryozoans, brachiopods, molluscs, trilobites, echinoderms, graptolites and conodonts as predominant elements. Despite many years of field studies in Mexican Ordovician localities, biostratigraphic correlations are as yet insufficient and incomplete or are based on limited interpretations. Thus, the Ordovician biostratigraphic data from Mexico compiled in the present paper have great potential and significant value. The advancement in the knowledge of the Ordovician biostratigraphy of Mexico will contribute to a major understanding of the relationships with the Ordovician System to a continental scale. Future advances will come mainly through increasing the amount and quality of data as well as improving biocorrelations among the Ordovician sequences of Mexico.
Schellwienella clarkei (Orthotetida, Brachiopoda): a new species from the Devonian of the Paraná Basin, Brazil
Abstract Detrital zircon age populations from Palaeozoic sedimentary and metasedimentary rocks in Mexico support palinspastic linkages to the northwestern margin of Gondwana (Amazonia) during the late Proterozoic–Palaeozoic. Age data from: (1) the latest Cambrian-Pennsylvanian cover of the c . 1 Ga Oaxacan Complex of southern Mexico; (2) the ?Cambro-Ordovician to Triassic Acatlán Complex of southern Mexico's Mixteca terrane; and (3) the ?Silurian Granjeno Schist of northeastern Mexico's Sierra Madre terrane, collectively suggest Precambrian provenances in: (1) the c . 500–650 Ma Brasiliano orogens and c . 600–950 Ma Goias magmatic arc of South America, the Pan-African Maya terrane of the Yucatan Peninsula, and/or the c . 550–600 Ma basement that potentially underlies parts of the Acatlán Complex; (2) the Oaxaquia terrane or other c . 1 Ga basement complexes of the northern Andes; and (3) c . 1.4–3.0 Ga cratonic provinces that most closely match those of Amazonia. Exhumation within the Acatlán Complex of c . 440–480 Ma granitoids prior to the Late Devonian–early Mississippian, and c . 290 Ma granitoids in the early Permian, likely provided additional sources in the Palaeozoic. The detrital age data support the broad correlation of Palaeozoic strata in the Mixteca and Sierra Madre terranes, and suggest that, rather than representing vestiges of Iapetus or earlier oceanic tracts as has previously been proposed, both were deposited along the southern, Gondwanan (Oaxaquia) margin of the Rheic Ocean and were accreted to Laurentia during the assembly of Pangaea in the late Palaeozoic.
ABSTRACT Provenance determinations of sediment deposited in circum–Gulf of Mexico basins rely on understanding the geologic elements present in the basement provinces located from northeast Mexico to Honduras. Relevant geologic features of these provinces are herein summarized in text and pictorial form, and they include the Huizachal-Peregrina uplift, western Gulf of Mexico, Huayacocotla, Zapoteco, Mixteca, Xolapa, Juchatengo, Cuicateco, Mixtequita, south-central Chiapas, southeast Chiapas, western Guatemala, central Guatemala, Maya Mountains, and the Chortis block. We recognized basement elements of local character that serve as fingerprints for specific source areas. However, many elements are ubiquitous, such as 1.4–0.9 Ga, high-grade metamorphic rocks that occur both as broad exposures and as inliers in otherwise reworked crust. Xenocrystic and detrital zircon of Mesoproterozoic age is very common and hence not diagnostic of provenance. Neoproterozoic rocks are very scarce in Mexican basement provinces. However, Ediacaran–Cambrian detrital zircon grains are found in Mexican Paleozoic strata; these were possibly derived from distant sources in Gondwana and Pangea. Ordovician–Silurian magmatism is present in approximately half the provinces; magmatic detrital zircon of such age is somewhat informative in terms of provenance. More useful populations are detrital zircon grains with Ordovician–Silurian metamorphic overgrowth, which seem to be mainly sourced from the Mixteca region or the southern Chiapas Massif. Devonian basement has only been discovered in the Maya Mountains of Belize, and detrital zircon of such age seems to be characteristic of that source. A similar case can be made about Carboniferous zircon and the Acatlán Complex, Middle Pennsylvanian zircon and Juchatengo plutons, and Late Triassic zircon and the basement exposed in central Guatemala. In all these cases, the age and geographic extent of the zircon source are restricted and serve as a distinct fingerprint. Plutons of Permian–Early Triassic age are widespread, and detrital zircon grains from them are rather nonspecific indicators of source area. Future dating of detrital white mica using 40 Ar- 39 Ar could help in recognizing Carboniferous–Triassic schist from more restricted schist occurrences such as west Cuicateco (Early Cretaceous) and central Guatemala (Late Cretaceous).
Abstract Precambrian and Palaeozoic basements are present in southern Mexico and Central America, where several crustal blocks are recognized by their different geological record, and juxtaposed along lateral faults. Pre-Mesozoic reconstructions must take into account the nature of such crustal blocks, their geological history, age and petrology. Some of those crustal blocks are currently located between southernmost north America (the Maya Block) and Central America (Chortís Block).To better understand the geology of these crustal blocks, and to establish comparisons between their geological history, we performed U–Pb dating of both igneous and metasedimentary key units cropping out in central and western Guatemala. In the Altos Cuchumatanes (Maya Block) granites yield both Permian (269±29 Ma) and Early Devonian (391±7.4 Ma) U–Pb ages. LA-ICPMS detrital zircon ages from rocks of the San Gabriel sequence, interpreted as the oldest metasedimentary unit of the Maya Block, and overlain by the Late Palaeozoic Upper Santa Rosa Group, yield Precambrian detrital zircons bracketed between c . 920 and c . 1000 Ma. The presence of these metasedimentary units, as well as Early Devonian to Silurian granites in the Mayan continental margin, from west (Altos Cuchumatanes), to east (Maya Mountains of Belize) indicates a more or less continuous belt of Lower Palaeozoic igneous activity, also suggesting that the continental margin of the Maya Block can be extended south of the Polochic fault, up to the Baja Verapaz shear zone. A metasedimentary sample belonging to the Chuacús Complex yielded detrital zircons with ages between c . 440 and c . 1325 Ma. The younger ages are similar to the igneous ages reported from the entire southern Maya continental margin, and show proximity of the Complex in the Middle-Late Palaeozoic. The S. Diego Phyllite, which overlies high-grade basement units of the Chortís Block, contains zircons that are Lower Cambrian ( c . 538 Ma), Mesoproterozoic ( c . 980 to c . 1150 Ma) and even Palaeoproterozoic ( c . 1820 Ma). Absence of younger igneous zircons in the San Diego Phyllite indicates that either its sedimentation took place in a close range of time, during the Late Cambrian, or absence of connection between Chortís and Maya Blocks during the Early–Mid-Palaeozoic. The Precambrian zircons could have come from southern Mexico (Oaxaca and Guichicovi Complexes), or from Mesoproterozoic Massifs exposed in Laurentia and Gondwana. Palaeogeographic models for Middle America are limited to post-Jurassic time. The data presented here shed light on Palaeozoic and, possibly, Precambrian relationships. They indicate that Maya and the Chortís did not interact directly until the Mesozoic or Cenozoic, as they approached their current position.