1-20 OF 406 RESULTS FOR

SCAT

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 23 July 2019
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2020) 53 (1): 19–30.
... to such investigations applied in oil spill response is the Shoreline Cleanup Assessment Technique (SCAT) approach, which relies heavily on direct visual observations to assess the severity of oil contamination and guide cleanup efforts. Here, we compare SCAT observations of oil type, surface coverage and pit oiling...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 August 1997
The Leading Edge (1997) 16 (8): 1143–1150.
Image
(a) Observed waveforms and (b-d) simulated scattered waveforms from a point-like scatterer, after applying linear moveout with respect to the arrival time of the trough of the diffracted arrivals. (e) Stacked (averaged) trace (solid) of the observed waveforms in (a) along with its filtered version used for the waveform fitting (dashed). (f-h) Stacked (averaged) traces of the (black) observed and (red) diffracted waveforms simulated for various perturbed models with a scatterer of different cscat and ρscat. The values of cscat and ρscat are indicated in the figures. (b, c, g, and f) Effects of a scatterer with velocity (b and f) slower and (c and g) faster than the background medium (cscat<co), whereas ρscat is fixed as 2.0  g/cm3. (d and h) Effects of density of a scatterer, whereas cscat is fixed as 3.0  km/s (the same as [c]). The gray shaded areas of (e–h) indicate the perturbation of traces within ±σ.
Published: 14 May 2020
filtered version used for the waveform fitting (dashed). (f-h) Stacked (averaged) traces of the (black) observed and (red) diffracted waveforms simulated for various perturbed models with a scatterer of different c scat and ρ scat . The values of c scat
Image
Violation of the curvilinear DSR condition leading to the generation of artifacts in the angle gathers. The traveltimes associated with the ray segments indicated by ∥ are equal, and the imaging ambiguity here occurs between points (x~scatA,z~scatA) and (x~scatB,z~scatB).
Published: 15 December 2009
Figure 4. Violation of the curvilinear DSR condition leading to the generation of artifacts in the angle gathers. The traveltimes associated with the ray segments indicated by ∥ are equal, and the imaging ambiguity here occurs between points ( x ~ scat A , z ~ scat
Image
Overview of SCAT observations at sites L10-1 (top) and I49-1 (bottom) with pits, SCAT surface and subsurface oiling observations, and surface and subsurface TPH (mg kg−1). BO + BRO indicates black oil + brown oil. The locations of the sites are shown in Figure 4. Photographs by E. Gundlach.
Published: 23 July 2019
Fig. 3. Overview of SCAT observations at sites L10-1 (top) and I49-1 (bottom) with pits, SCAT surface and subsurface oiling observations, and surface and subsurface TPH (mg kg −1 ). BO + BRO indicates black oil + brown oil. The locations of the sites are shown in Figure 4 . Photographs by E
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 01 January 2010
PALAIOS (2010) 25 (2): 132–140.
...-walled vesicles of roughly spherical shape, 0.5–3 µm in diameter. These vesicles are interpreted as mineral pseudomorphs of organic particles, probably including fecal bacteria, existing in the original scat. This structurally well-preserved coprolite is likely derived from the scat of a bone-digesting...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 1990
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1990) 60 (3): 335–360.
Series: SEPM Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1989
DOI: 10.2110/pec.89.44.0063
EISBN: 9781565761056
Series: AAPG Studies in Geology
Published: 01 January 1977
DOI: 10.1306/St4393C12
EISBN: 9781629812076
Image
(a) The target area used for imaging, (b) image computed by the single-scattering method using data without free-surface effects, (c) image computed by the original Marchenko method using data without free-surface effects, (d) image computed by mirror migration using data with surface-related multiples, (e) image computed by the UD-RM imaging using dual-source data with surface-related multiples, and (f) image computed by the UD-RM imaging using single-source data with surface-related multiples.
Published: 29 October 2024
Figure 17. (a) The target area used for imaging, (b) image computed by the single-scattering method using data without free-surface effects, (c) image computed by the original Marchenko method using data without free-surface effects, (d) image computed by mirror migration using data with surface-r
Image
Scattered waveforms simulated from a perturbed model containing a circular scatterer with radii of (a and d) 12.5, (b and e) 25.0, (c and f) 50.0 m, cscat of (a-c) 1.4 and (d-f) 4.0  km/s and ρscat of 2.0  g/cm3. Note that direct waves are removed. The yellow lines depict waveforms at depths of 2 and 3 km. Waveforms are displayed after applying linear moveout with respect to the arrival time of diffracted waveforms estimated by a ray theory.
Published: 14 May 2020
Figure 8. Scattered waveforms simulated from a perturbed model containing a circular scatterer with radii of (a and d) 12.5, (b and e) 25.0, (c and f) 50.0 m, c scat of (a-c) 1.4 and (d-f) 4.0    km / s and ρ scat of 2.0    g / cm 3
Image
Published: 25 July 2022
Table 1.— Measurements of scats of selected middle-large-size carnivores.
Image
Modified diffraction stack migration (a) compared with diffraction coherency migration (b) for synthetic data resembling the 1998 Norman West survey. The DSM image of the plane (B) is brighter than that of the scatterer (A) (CmaxScat/CmaxRefl=0.4), whereas the DCM image of the scatterer is brighter than that of the plane (CmaxScat/CmaxRefl=1.25). Black lines indicate the nominal position of the dipping plane. (c) This shows an example seismogram with added noise and scaled diffraction response (see text). Diffraction tails are indicated by arrows.
Published: 07 September 2012
Figure 5. Modified diffraction stack migration (a) compared with diffraction coherency migration (b) for synthetic data resembling the 1998 Norman West survey. The DSM image of the plane (B) is brighter than that of the scatterer (A) ( Cmax Scat / Cmax Refl = 0.4
Image
The inverted result (MAP solution) for the BP TTI subset with a strong scattering volume. The images illustrate the elastic moduli C11,C33,C55,C66, and C13, respectively.
Published: 20 April 2023
Figure 27. The inverted result (MAP solution) for the BP TTI subset with a strong scattering volume. The images illustrate the elastic moduli C 11 , C 33 , C 55 , C 66 , and C 13 , respectively.
Image
Snapshot video of wave propagation and seismic records. (a) Wave propagation (do) computed from a background model. (c and e) Wave propagation (d) from a perturbed model containing a large circular scatterer with a radius of 50.0 m and a velocity perturbation cscat of (c) 1.4  km/s, and (e) 4.0  km/s. (g and i) Scattered-wave propagation (dscat) calculated by (c-a), and (e-a), respectively. The white lines indicate the location of a VSP borehole. (b, d, f, h, and j) Seismic records of (a, c, e, g, and i). The red lines indicate the time of the snapshot. The supplementary file is available through the following link: S2.
Published: 14 May 2020
scat of (c)  1.4    km / s , and (e)  4.0    km / s . (g and i) Scattered-wave propagation ( d scat ) calculated by (c-a), and (e-a), respectively. The white lines indicate the location of a VSP borehole. (b, d, f, h, and j) Seismic records of (a, c, e, g, and i
Image
Snapshot video of wave propagation and seismic records. (a) Wave propagation (do) computed from a background model. (c and e) Wave propagation (d) from a perturbed model containing a small circular scatterer with a radius of 12.5 m and a velocity perturbation cscat of (c) 1.4 and (e) 4.0  km/s. (g and i) Scattered-wave propagation (dscat) calculated by (c-a) and (e-a), respectively. The white lines indicate the location of a VSP borehole. (b, d, f, h, and j) Seismic records of (a, c, e, g, and i). The red lines indicate time of the snapshot. The supplementary file is available through the following link: S1.
Published: 14 May 2020
scat of (c) 1.4 and (e)  4.0    km / s . (g and i) Scattered-wave propagation ( d scat ) calculated by (c-a) and (e-a), respectively. The white lines indicate the location of a VSP borehole. (b, d, f, h, and j) Seismic records of (a, c, e, g, and i). The red lines indicate
Image
(a) A comparison of the seismogram obtained for three-layer model with scatterers reference model (solid blue line) and its URG model (dotted red line). (b) The difference between these two seismograms at the common-receiver locations.
Published: 09 May 2022
Figure 9. (a) A comparison of the seismogram obtained for three-layer model with scatterers reference model (solid blue line) and its URG model (dotted red line). (b) The difference between these two seismograms at the common-receiver locations.
Image
(a) The smoothed velocity of the Sigsbee 2A model and (b) the fracture scattering image calculated by the smoothed model.
Published: 15 June 2021
Figure 14. (a) The smoothed velocity of the Sigsbee 2A model and (b) the fracture scattering image calculated by the smoothed model.
Image
(a) Scatter plot between Ca+2+Mg+2 vs Total Cation (TZ+). (b) Scatter plot between Na++K+ vs Total Cation (TZ+). All concentration is in μeq/l.
Published: 01 March 2021
Fig.2. (a) Scatter plot between Ca +2 +Mg +2 vs Total Cation (TZ + ). (b) Scatter plot between Na + +K + vs Total Cation (TZ + ). All concentration is in μeq/l.
Image
—SCAT plots, contour map, and transverse cross section for plunge-reversal setting.
Published: 01 February 1981
FIG. 8 —SCAT plots, contour map, and transverse cross section for plunge-reversal setting.