1-20 OF 975 RESULTS FOR

Ruby Valley

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Detailed map of Lake Franklin, which filled the Ruby Valley and part of the North Butte Valley east of the Ruby Mountains. Solid black lines indicate mapped beach ridges and other shoreline landforms of Lake Franklin. Dots mark locations of radiocarbon-dated samples. Labels identify localities of detailed study (referenced to other figures), or specific radiocarbon dates listed in Tables 3 and 4. The dashed box delineates the area of Figure 6. Outlines show reconstructions of Lake Franklin during several key intervals of the last pluvial cycle. YD—Younger Dryas; LGM—Last Glacial Maximum; NERV—Northeast Ruby Valley; FRB—Franklin River Bridge; RLNWR—Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge Quarry.
Published: 01 January 2013
Figure 2. Detailed map of Lake Franklin, which filled the Ruby Valley and part of the North Butte Valley east of the Ruby Mountains. Solid black lines indicate mapped beach ridges and other shoreline landforms of Lake Franklin. Dots mark locations of radiocarbon-dated samples. Labels identify
Image
Published: 01 January 2013
TABLE 1. STUDY SITES IN THE RUBY VALLEY
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2000
Rocky Mountain Geology (2000) 35 (2): 205–230.
...Peangta Satarugsa; Roy A. Johnson Abstract Seismic-reflection and borehole data along with crustal-scale refraction/reflection data provide new evidence for the Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Ruby Mountains metamorphic core complex and Huntington, Ruby, and Lamoille valleys. Analyses...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the <span class="se...
Second thumbnail for: Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the <span class="se...
Third thumbnail for: Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the <span class="se...
Image
Two-way time/depth structure contour maps. A, Contoured two-way time/depth to preEocene basement in Huntington and Ruby valleys. B, Contoured two-way time/depth interval between surface datum and the base of the Miocene–Holocene Humboldt Formation and younger sedimentary rocks. Surface datum for Huntington and Lamoille valleys is 1.65 km above mean sea level. Surface datum for Ruby Valley is 1.8 km above mean sea level.
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 4. Two-way time/depth structure contour maps. A , Contoured two-way time/depth to preEocene basement in Huntington and Ruby valleys. B , Contoured two-way time/depth interval between surface datum and the base of the Miocene–Holocene Humboldt Formation and younger sedimentary rocks
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 2013
GSA Bulletin (2013) 125 (3-4): 322–342.
...Figure 2. Detailed map of Lake Franklin, which filled the Ruby Valley and part of the North Butte Valley east of the Ruby Mountains. Solid black lines indicate mapped beach ridges and other shoreline landforms of Lake Franklin. Dots mark locations of radiocarbon-dated samples. Labels identify...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Latest Pleistocene history of pluvial Lake Frankli...
Second thumbnail for: Latest Pleistocene history of pluvial Lake Frankli...
Third thumbnail for: Latest Pleistocene history of pluvial Lake Frankli...
Image
Satellite image showing the massive shoreline at 1823 m that arcs across the northern Ruby Valley, highlighted by a dotted white line that traces the ridge crest. The Franklin River Bridge (FRB) site is located in a borrow pit just east of where the modern Franklin River breaches this ridge en route to its delta at the north end of the Franklin Lake playa. In total, five radiocarbon dates are available for this site. Ages are presented in 14C yr B.P.
Published: 01 January 2013
Figure 3. Satellite image showing the massive shoreline at 1823 m that arcs across the northern Ruby Valley, highlighted by a dotted white line that traces the ridge crest. The Franklin River Bridge (FRB) site is located in a borrow pit just east of where the modern Franklin River breaches
Image
Aerial photo showing sample sites and shorelines in the vicinity of Murphy Well. Shoreline crests are highlighted by dotted white lines. The main road on the east side of the Ruby Valley (CCC Road) travels along the crest of the 1846 m beach ridge. Samples MW and MWB were obtained from a small borrow pit on the 1843 m beach ridge. Sample 57800 of Lillquist (1994) likely came from a pit on the opposite side of the road. Ages are presented in 14C yr B.P.
Published: 01 January 2013
Figure 4. Aerial photo showing sample sites and shorelines in the vicinity of Murphy Well. Shoreline crests are highlighted by dotted white lines. The main road on the east side of the Ruby Valley (CCC Road) travels along the crest of the 1846 m beach ridge. Samples MW and MWB were obtained from
Image
Figure 11. Subsets of Plate 3 showing modern hot springs at which siliceous or travertine sinter deposits were identified using the ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) data. (A) Quartz identified at hot springs along east flank of Ruby Mountains in Ruby Valley, Elko County (H, Fig. 6). (B) Carbonate identified in travertine deposits at Potts Ranch and Diana's Punchbowl hot springs in Monitor Valley, Nye County (I, Fig. 6). (C) Quartz identified at the Geysers and Beowawe hot springs, Eureka County (G, Fig. 6). Geology polygons are not shown in B and C for simplicity. Significant quartz was identified between the Geysers and Beowawe that represents outflow deposits from the Geysers spring. Sinters and/or tufa deposits (QThs) from the geology coverage of Crafford (2007) are outlined in cyan in Plate 3. Quartz or carbonate was not identified at several of these deposits. ASTER emissivity spectra of the Beowawe, Diana's Punchbowl, and Potts Ranch hot springs are shown in Figure 5. To access a full-resolution PDF of this figure, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/GES00126.S10 or the full-text article on www.gsajournals.org.
Published: 01 February 2008
Figure 11. Subsets of Plate 3 showing modern hot springs at which siliceous or travertine sinter deposits were identified using the ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) data. (A) Quartz identified at hot springs along east flank of Ruby Mountains in Ruby Valley
Image
Published: 01 April 2003
Range; EP = Emigrant Pass; GR = Goshute-Toano Range; HD = HD Range; HP = Harrison Pass pluton, MV = Mount Velma; PH = Peko Hills; PM = Pequop Mountains, PR = Piñon Range; RM = Ruby Mountains; SM = Snake Mountains; SpM = Spruce Mountain; SRV = Sohio Ruby Valley no. 1 bore hole; T = Tuscarora; WH = Wood
Image
Figure 1. Map of western United States showing Great Basin (brown area), modern northern limit of Southwest Monsoon (blue line; as defined as &lt;20% annual precipitation received during June–August) (Douglas et al., 1993), and modern boundary between continental-dominated and Pacific-dominated moisture (green line) (Houghton, 1969). Studies cited in text: CL—Carp Lake, GC—Goshute Cave, FL—Fargher Lake, LB—Pluvial Lake Bonneville, LL—Little Lake, ML—Mono Lake, OL—Owens Lake, OP—Ocean Drilling Program Site 1020, PL—Pyramid Lake, RV—Ruby Valley, SB—Santa Barbara Basin, SL—Summer Lake, SrL—Searles Lake.
Published: 01 July 2007
moisture (green line) ( Houghton, 1969 ). Studies cited in text: CL—Carp Lake, GC—Goshute Cave, FL—Fargher Lake, LB—Pluvial Lake Bonneville, LL—Little Lake, ML—Mono Lake, OL—Owens Lake, OP—Ocean Drilling Program Site 1020, PL—Pyramid Lake, RV—Ruby Valley, SB—Santa Barbara Basin, SL—Summer Lake, SrL—Searles
Image
Early Oligocene ostracods of the Medicine Lodge and Upper Ruby River valleys and Horse Prairie, southwestern Montana State, United States. A) Candona rangliensis? Swain 1964 (Paper Shale Flora, YPM IP 545284). B) Candona sp. aff. Candona ohioensisFurtos 1933 (sensuSwain 1999) (Paper Shale Flora, YPM IP 540780). C) Candona? sp. 1 (Paper Shale Flora, YPM IP 545285). D) Candona? sp. 2 (Site 69, YPM IP 545281). E) Eucypris sp. aff. Eucypris bobcatensisSwain 1986 (sensuSwain 1987a) (Paper Shale Flora, YPM IP 540784). F) Paracypridopsis? sp. 1 (Paper Shale Flora, YPM IP 543611). G), Cyprois? sp. 1 (Paper Shale Flora, YPM IP 545283). H), Amplocypris? sp. 1 (Paper Shale Flora, YPM IP 543612). I), Amplocypris? sp. 2 (Paper Shale Flora, YPM IP 545282). J) Amplocypris? sp. 3 (Paper Shale Flora, YPM IP 540790). K) Cypricercus? sp. 1 (Site 69, YPM IP 540795).
Published: 16 April 2020
Fig. 3.— Early Oligocene ostracods of the Medicine Lodge and Upper Ruby River valleys and Horse Prairie, southwestern Montana State, United States. A ) Candona rangliensis ? Swain 1964 (Paper Shale Flora, YPM IP 545284). B ) Candona sp. aff. Candona ohioensis Furtos 1933 ( sensu Swain
Image
Previous geophysical data superimposed on our new interpretations. Colored images are resistivity models of Wannamaker and Doerner (2002) from magnetotelluric (MT) profiles (A) through Secret Pass ∼30 km NE of our RMSE profile B–B′; (C) through Harrison Pass, 0–20 km distant from Ruby Mountains Seismic Experiment (RMSE) C–C′; and (D) past Bald Mountain, 10–25 km south of Consortium for Continental Reflection Profiling (COCORP) line 4 (Hauser et al., 1987). (B) Generalized wide-angle seismic wave speed measured along Ruby Valley (Fig. 2A) immediately east of the Ruby Mountains metamorphic core complex (RMCC), with broad gray lines marking depth intervals of rapidly increasing wave speed (Stoerzel and Smithson, 1998). Magnetotelluric (MT) and seismic data in (A), (B), and (C) are overlain by receiver-function converters (solid black lines) labeled as in Figure 7 from this study, from RMSE profiles B–B′, A2–A2′, and C–C′, respectively. MT data in (D) are overlain by cartoon of crustal reflectivity along COCORP line 4; coarse stipple is Phanerozoic section; gray shading represents pervasive lower-crustal layering (after Hauser et al., 1987). RMSE profiles B–B′, A2–A2′, and C–C′ are placed so that the intersections of B–B′ with A2–A2′ and of C–C′ with A2–A2′ align vertically (dashed lines). In (B), the red dashed line represents approximate modern depth of ∼6 kb metamorphism, from outcrop in northern RMCC to &gt;10 km below surface in southern RMCC (∼3 kb at surface).
Published: 25 August 2017
Mountains Seismic Experiment (RMSE) C–C′; and (D) past Bald Mountain, 10–25 km south of Consortium for Continental Reflection Profiling (COCORP) line 4 ( Hauser et al., 1987 ). (B) Generalized wide-angle seismic wave speed measured along Ruby Valley ( Fig. 2A ) immediately east of the Ruby Mountains
Image
Location of Ruby–East Humboldt Range and Buena Vista Valley with respect to epicenter and physiographic maps of the Great Basin and surrounding areas (adapted from Goter et al., 1992).
Published: 01 June 2003
Figure 1. Location of Ruby–East Humboldt Range and Buena Vista Valley with respect to epicenter and physiographic maps of the Great Basin and surrounding areas (adapted from Goter et al., 1992 ).
Image
Representative seismic profiles with time migration applied (top figure is uninterpreted data; bottom figure shows interpretation). Locations of seismic lines are shown in Figure 1. A, Seismic profile across Huntington Valley. Interpreted section shows apparent thinning of basin-fill sedimentary units toward the west. Seismic character on the western flank of the basin displays onlap relation. The “wedge” outlined on the eastern flank of the basin near the fault plane suggests presence of fanglomerate deposits or slide blocks. Note that the “Elko Formation” sequence may include Eocene nonvolcanic units as well as middle to late Eocene volcanic or volcaniclastic deposits not specifically identified from borehole data. B, Seismic profile across Ruby Valley. Interpreted section shows strong reflections from the Humboldt Formation and younger sedimentary rocks. The “wedge” outlined at the base of the Humboldt Formation and younger sedimentary rocks near the western flank of the basin indicates possible fanglomerate or rock-slide deposits. C, Seismic profile across Lamoille Valley showing strong fault-plane reflection at the eastern margin of the basin. Note that basin-fill sedimentary rocks thicken toward the fault and show apparent growth relations.
Published: 01 January 2000
include Eocene nonvolcanic units as well as middle to late Eocene volcanic or volcaniclastic deposits not specifically identified from borehole data. B , Seismic profile across Ruby Valley. Interpreted section shows strong reflections from the Humboldt Formation and younger sedimentary rocks
Image
Representative seismic profiles with time migration applied (top figure is uninterpreted data; bottom figure shows interpretation). Locations of seismic lines are shown in Figure 1. A, Seismic profile across Huntington Valley. Interpreted section shows apparent thinning of basin-fill sedimentary units toward the west. Seismic character on the western flank of the basin displays onlap relation. The “wedge” outlined on the eastern flank of the basin near the fault plane suggests presence of fanglomerate deposits or slide blocks. Note that the “Elko Formation” sequence may include Eocene nonvolcanic units as well as middle to late Eocene volcanic or volcaniclastic deposits not specifically identified from borehole data. B, Seismic profile across Ruby Valley. Interpreted section shows strong reflections from the Humboldt Formation and younger sedimentary rocks. The “wedge” outlined at the base of the Humboldt Formation and younger sedimentary rocks near the western flank of the basin indicates possible fanglomerate or rock-slide deposits. C, Seismic profile across Lamoille Valley showing strong fault-plane reflection at the eastern margin of the basin. Note that basin-fill sedimentary rocks thicken toward the fault and show apparent growth relations.
Published: 01 January 2000
include Eocene nonvolcanic units as well as middle to late Eocene volcanic or volcaniclastic deposits not specifically identified from borehole data. B , Seismic profile across Ruby Valley. Interpreted section shows strong reflections from the Humboldt Formation and younger sedimentary rocks
Image
Representative seismic profiles with time migration applied (top figure is uninterpreted data; bottom figure shows interpretation). Locations of seismic lines are shown in Figure 1. A, Seismic profile across Huntington Valley. Interpreted section shows apparent thinning of basin-fill sedimentary units toward the west. Seismic character on the western flank of the basin displays onlap relation. The “wedge” outlined on the eastern flank of the basin near the fault plane suggests presence of fanglomerate deposits or slide blocks. Note that the “Elko Formation” sequence may include Eocene nonvolcanic units as well as middle to late Eocene volcanic or volcaniclastic deposits not specifically identified from borehole data. B, Seismic profile across Ruby Valley. Interpreted section shows strong reflections from the Humboldt Formation and younger sedimentary rocks. The “wedge” outlined at the base of the Humboldt Formation and younger sedimentary rocks near the western flank of the basin indicates possible fanglomerate or rock-slide deposits. C, Seismic profile across Lamoille Valley showing strong fault-plane reflection at the eastern margin of the basin. Note that basin-fill sedimentary rocks thicken toward the fault and show apparent growth relations.
Published: 01 January 2000
include Eocene nonvolcanic units as well as middle to late Eocene volcanic or volcaniclastic deposits not specifically identified from borehole data. B , Seismic profile across Ruby Valley. Interpreted section shows strong reflections from the Humboldt Formation and younger sedimentary rocks
Image
A, Velocity log and synthetic seismogram from the Amoco Jiggs-1 well in Huntington Valley. Density log computed from velocity log. Star represents core samples from a depth of 3,962 m analyzed by Waanders Palynology Consulting, Inc. Samples are considered to be from the Mississippian Chainman Shale/Diamond Peak Formation. B, Seismic-stratigraphic correlation for the Amoco Jiggs-1 well. Note that the “Elko Formation” sequence may include Eocene nonvolcanic units as well as middle to late Eocene volcanic or volcaniclastic deposits not specifically identified from borehole data. The well is projected ∼4.2 km south (∼parallel to strike line CT 19) to seismic line CT 10 (Fig. 1). C, Velocity log and synthetic seismogram from the Amoco Franklin-1 well in Ruby Valley. Stars #1 and #2 represent core samples of the Mississippian Chainman Shale and Mississippian-Devonian Pilot Shale, respectively. D, Seismic-stratigraphic correlation for the Amoco Franklin-1 well. The well is projected ∼1.0 km east to seismic line CZ 13 (Fig. 1).
Published: 01 January 2000
data. The well is projected ∼4.2 km south (∼parallel to strike line CT 19) to seismic line CT 10 ( Fig. 1 ). C , Velocity log and synthetic seismogram from the Amoco Franklin-1 well in Ruby Valley. Stars #1 and #2 represent core samples of the Mississippian Chainman Shale and Mississippian-Devonian
Image
A, Velocity log and synthetic seismogram from the Amoco Jiggs-1 well in Huntington Valley. Density log computed from velocity log. Star represents core samples from a depth of 3,962 m analyzed by Waanders Palynology Consulting, Inc. Samples are considered to be from the Mississippian Chainman Shale/Diamond Peak Formation. B, Seismic-stratigraphic correlation for the Amoco Jiggs-1 well. Note that the “Elko Formation” sequence may include Eocene nonvolcanic units as well as middle to late Eocene volcanic or volcaniclastic deposits not specifically identified from borehole data. The well is projected ∼4.2 km south (∼parallel to strike line CT 19) to seismic line CT 10 (Fig. 1). C, Velocity log and synthetic seismogram from the Amoco Franklin-1 well in Ruby Valley. Stars #1 and #2 represent core samples of the Mississippian Chainman Shale and Mississippian-Devonian Pilot Shale, respectively. D, Seismic-stratigraphic correlation for the Amoco Franklin-1 well. The well is projected ∼1.0 km east to seismic line CZ 13 (Fig. 1).
Published: 01 January 2000
data. The well is projected ∼4.2 km south (∼parallel to strike line CT 19) to seismic line CT 10 ( Fig. 1 ). C , Velocity log and synthetic seismogram from the Amoco Franklin-1 well in Ruby Valley. Stars #1 and #2 represent core samples of the Mississippian Chainman Shale and Mississippian-Devonian
Image
A, Velocity log and synthetic seismogram from the Amoco Jiggs-1 well in Huntington Valley. Density log computed from velocity log. Star represents core samples from a depth of 3,962 m analyzed by Waanders Palynology Consulting, Inc. Samples are considered to be from the Mississippian Chainman Shale/Diamond Peak Formation. B, Seismic-stratigraphic correlation for the Amoco Jiggs-1 well. Note that the “Elko Formation” sequence may include Eocene nonvolcanic units as well as middle to late Eocene volcanic or volcaniclastic deposits not specifically identified from borehole data. The well is projected ∼4.2 km south (∼parallel to strike line CT 19) to seismic line CT 10 (Fig. 1). C, Velocity log and synthetic seismogram from the Amoco Franklin-1 well in Ruby Valley. Stars #1 and #2 represent core samples of the Mississippian Chainman Shale and Mississippian-Devonian Pilot Shale, respectively. D, Seismic-stratigraphic correlation for the Amoco Franklin-1 well. The well is projected ∼1.0 km east to seismic line CZ 13 (Fig. 1).
Published: 01 January 2000
data. The well is projected ∼4.2 km south (∼parallel to strike line CT 19) to seismic line CT 10 ( Fig. 1 ). C , Velocity log and synthetic seismogram from the Amoco Franklin-1 well in Ruby Valley. Stars #1 and #2 represent core samples of the Mississippian Chainman Shale and Mississippian-Devonian
Image
Lower panel shows sample sites (triangles) and beach ridges at the Northeast Ruby Valley site over an aerial photo base. White dotted lines denote crests of beach ridges. The upper panel shows a topographic survey across the 1843 m and 1840 m beach ridge complexes from A to A′. Dashed survey line represents a gently sloping section devoid of beach ridges where no data were collected. The 1843 m beach ridge complex has three distinct crests; samples NERV-1 and NERV-2 from the outer two are similar in age, while the inner crest (samples NERV-3 and NERV-3b) is significantly younger. The outer crest of the 1840 m complex (NERV-4 and NERV-4b) yielded ages similar to the outer crests of the 1843 m feature. Ages are presented in 14C yr B.P. V.E. is vertical exaggeration.
Published: 01 January 2013
Figure 5. Lower panel shows sample sites (triangles) and beach ridges at the Northeast Ruby Valley site over an aerial photo base. White dotted lines denote crests of beach ridges. The upper panel shows a topographic survey across the 1843 m and 1840 m beach ridge complexes from A to A′. Dashed