1-20 OF 41 RESULTS FOR

Rockcliffe Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Selected facies of the Rockcliffe Formation. A) Slabbed section of the local basal erosional contact between thin-laminated dolostone (a) of the Carillon Formation and gravel conglomerate (facies Cg) of the Rockcliffe Formation. From Loc. 4; scale bar  =  5 cm. B) Thinly interstratified siltstone and sandstone (facies S1a) preserving evidence of combined-flow (upper arrow) and reverse-(tidal)-flow transport (lower arrow). The symmetric ripple form (upper arrow) contains unidirectional-current cross-lamination, whereas a thin low-angle cross-lamination (lower arrow) forms a thin mantle of sediment showing reverse flow relative to the cross-lamination of the underlying sandstone. Scale bar in centimeters. C) Oblique view of thick sandstones of facies S2: lateral termination of well developed large-scale cross-bed (b; dipping away from viewer) overlying more massive but similarly dipping strata (a), all underlying horizontally oriented sandstone. Measuring stick is 1.2 m in length. D) Small-scale cross-lamination highlighted by discontinuous shale laminae in a medium-grained (S1a) sandstone. Scale bar  =  2.5 cm.
Published: 01 June 2013
Figure 11 Selected facies of the Rockcliffe Formation. A) Slabbed section of the local basal erosional contact between thin-laminated dolostone (a) of the Carillon Formation and gravel conglomerate (facies Cg) of the Rockcliffe Formation. From Loc. 4; scale bar  =  5 cm. B) Thinly
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 1997
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1997) 34 (5): 588–597.
...Osman Salad Hersi; George R. Dix Abstract The Hog's Back Formation, exposed in Ottawa, Ontario, is a new stratigraphic unit that disconformably overlies the Rockcliffe Formation and underlies, with apparent conformity, the Pamelia Formation of the Ottawa Group. The Hog's Back Formation is 14.3 m...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1998
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1998) 35 (6): 603–619.
...George R Dix; Marianne P Molgat Abstract In eastern Ontario, a Middle Ordovician disconformity that separates predominantly sandstone of the Rockcliffe Formation from underlying dolomite of the Carillon Formation (Beekmantown Group) has, historically, been considered equivalent to the Sauk...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2013
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2013) 83 (6): 451–474.
...Figure 11 Selected facies of the Rockcliffe Formation. A) Slabbed section of the local basal erosional contact between thin-laminated dolostone (a) of the Carillon Formation and gravel conglomerate (facies Cg) of the Rockcliffe Formation. From Loc. 4; scale bar  =  5 cm. B) Thinly...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Tectonostratigraphy of the Chazyan (Late Middle–Ea...
Second thumbnail for: Tectonostratigraphy of the Chazyan (Late Middle–Ea...
Third thumbnail for: Tectonostratigraphy of the Chazyan (Late Middle–Ea...
Image
Core photographs of rhythmic stratification in the Carillon and lower Rockcliffe formations. (A) Dolomudstone (grey), sandstone (white), and shale (dark) interlaminated with apparent large burrow filled with sandstone and dolomite intraclasts. Core photograph. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) Subfacies F4b sandstone and siltstone forming unit X at locality 5. Scale bar = 1 cm. (C) Lower 1 m of the Rockcliffe Formation at locality 2, showing rhythmic interlamination of coarse- and fine-grained sandstone. Scale bar = 2 cm.
Published: 28 November 2006
Fig. 7. Core photographs of rhythmic stratification in the Carillon and lower Rockcliffe formations. (A) Dolomudstone (grey), sandstone (white), and shale (dark) interlaminated with apparent large burrow filled with sandstone and dolomite intraclasts. Core photograph. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B
Image
Lithic characteristics of formations and their boundaries. A) Cross-bedded skeletal limestone, part of a carbonate-rich interval of the Laval Formation, Loc. 12. Hammer for scale. B) Dolostone (a) of the Carillon Formation overlain disconformably by pebble conglomerate (b), then quasi-planar-stratified sandstone (c) of the Rockcliffe Formation; Loc. 4. Section of meter stick (left) is 50 cm in height. C) Shale and sandstone of the basal Hog's Back shale overlying a gravel-lined, burrowed, erosional surface (arrow) developed on Rockcliffe sandstone; Loc. 5. Width of core is 7 cm. D) River exposure at Loc. 6 showing the Rockcliffe Formation (a) overlain by the shale-rich lower Hog's Back Formation (b), and thick-bedded carbonate (set back in the trees) of the upper Hog's Back Formation. Vertical scale bar  =  1 m. E) Basal shale of the Pamelia Formation in core, Loc. 9, overlying burrowed dolomudstone of the Hog's Back Formation. Vertical ruler is in centimeters (left) and inches (right). F) Argillaceous carbonate (dolomitic dedolomite) of the upper Hog's Back Formation at Loc. 6 and resistant thin (< 5–15 cm) beds (white arrows) of skeletal limestone. G) Contact (at water line) between lowermost shale (a) of the Pamelia Formation and the Hog's Back Formation. The uppermost thin skeletal limestone of the latter formation (lower arrow) occurs ∼ 20 cm beneath the formation contact (at the water line), and displays a disrupted, convoluted geometry (see Fig. 14B). Thick-bedded sandstone (upper arrow), shale, and limestone of the lowermost Pamelia Formation is exposed.
Published: 01 June 2013
), then quasi-planar-stratified sandstone (c) of the Rockcliffe Formation; Loc. 4. Section of meter stick (left) is 50 cm in height. C) Shale and sandstone of the basal Hog's Back shale overlying a gravel-lined, burrowed, erosional surface (arrow) developed on Rockcliffe sandstone; Loc. 5. Width of core is 7
Image
Succession of events leading to the Rockcliffe–Hog's Back formation transition, Loc. 8. A) Deposition of sandstone, shale, and anomalous facies S3. B) Local erosion at Loc. 8a removes ∼ 0.5 m of sandstone. C) Two possible solutions are related to structural control: solution Ci incorporates a fault between Loc. 8a and 8b, with subsidence allowing an additional 1.5 m of Rockcliffe-like sandstone, including facies S4, formation of several disconformities, and disrupted bedding; solution Cii incorporates a fault east of Loc. 8a, coincident with the trace of a present-day fault that offsets Carillon and Rockcliffe strata (see inset map in Fig. 8). D) Re-establishment of deposition accommodates high-order stratigraphic continuity in the Hog's Back Formation overlapping the disconformity-bounded body of Rockcliffe strata between Loc. 8a and 8b.
Published: 01 June 2013
Figure 15 Succession of events leading to the Rockcliffe–Hog's Back formation transition, Loc. 8. A) Deposition of sandstone, shale, and anomalous facies S3. B) Local erosion at Loc. 8a removes ∼ 0.5 m of sandstone. C) Two possible solutions are related to structural control: solution Ci
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1964
AAPG Bulletin (1964) 48 (10): 1730–1732.
... been previously named, in addition to preoccupation of the name Ottawa by Selwyn (1897). The first use of Ottawa Formation for a Middle Ordovician carbonate in Eastern Ontario was by Wilson (1937 , p. 46) as above an erosional interval with the St. Martin and Rockcliffe Formations of the Upper...
Journal Article
Published: 28 November 2006
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2006) 43 (9): 1367–1387.
...Fig. 7. Core photographs of rhythmic stratification in the Carillon and lower Rockcliffe formations. (A) Dolomudstone (grey), sandstone (white), and shale (dark) interlaminated with apparent large burrow filled with sandstone and dolomite intraclasts. Core photograph. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: A new geological framework for the Middle Ordovici...
Second thumbnail for: A new geological framework for the Middle Ordovici...
Third thumbnail for: A new geological framework for the Middle Ordovici...
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 2012
DOI: 10.1306/13331506M983505
EISBN: 9781629810201
...% reduction of the thickness of the unit moving into the interior of the em-bayment (Figure 5 ). The contact of the formation with the overlying Chazyan Rockcliffe Formation (Figure 3 ) was considered to be a significant disconformity ( Wilson, 1946 ; Barnes et al., 1981 ; Barnes, 1984 ; Williams, 1991...
Image
A, B) Two alternate stratigraphic correlations of the uppermost Carillon–lowermost Pamelia formation succession along a ∼ 15-km wireline (gamma-ray) transect. See inset map (Fig. 2) for section spacing and location. Detailed lithologic section (inset box) for core from Loc. 9 is compared to the gamma-ray log at this same site. See Table 1 for facies designations. Units a to d are highlighted to emphasize lateral patterns of intraformational (Rockcliffe, Hog's Back) stratigraphy; horizontal black bars refer to additional levels of pebbly sandstone to gravel conglomerate; and numbered thick black lines identify interpreted faults to accommodate offset gamma-ray expressions. The datum for Section A is a shale unit that overlies a local coarse-grained facies that is traced (lowermost shaded unit) by twin gamma-ray peaks. This body of sediment is restricted to an apparent small-scale graben developed on the Carillon paleoplatform. Units c and d appear restricted to shallow depressions on the Rockcliffe paleosurface that may be either depositional troughs (Fig. 9A) or local fault-bound depressions (Fig. 9B). Datum for Section B is the base of a regional (80+ km long) stromatolitic biostromal interval in the lower Pamelia Formation (see Fig. 7). In this interpretation, the basal conglomerate drapes over a small-scale horst, likely an artifact created by local erosion of the Carillon Formation, whereas units c and d remain restricted to fault-controlled depressions on the Rockcliffe paleosurface.
Published: 01 June 2013
Figure 9 A , B) Two alternate stratigraphic correlations of the uppermost Carillon–lowermost Pamelia formation succession along a ∼ 15-km wireline (gamma-ray) transect. See inset map ( Fig. 2 ) for section spacing and location. Detailed lithologic section (inset box) for core from Loc. 9
Image
Lithostratigraphic correlation between Loc. 8, with its three closely spaced sections (see inset for geographic positions), and Loc. 6, which is the type section of the Hog's Back Formation (Salad Hersi and Dix 1997). Correlative beds between Loc. 8 and 6 occur only above a single bed of a dark gravel-bearing wacke (facies S3, labeled B) at Loc. 6. Symbols are the same as in Figure 7. Also shown are sandstone facies (e.g., S1a; see Table 1); and the stratigraphic positions of reported faunal assemblages: open star, ostracodes: Copeland et al. (1989); black star, brachiopod-rich (R. plena) bed: Wilson (1946) and Salad Hersi and Dix (1997), with additional sites for this brachiopod marked by an inverted black triangle; and, gray star for conodonts (McCracken 1995). At Loc. 8, the Hog's Back Formation oversteps a disconformity-bounded wedge (A) of Rockcliffe strata that pinches out to the west. The sedimentary wedge contains intervals of deformed bedding and gravelly facies (S4). Loc. 8a is adjacent to the trace of a present-day fault juxtaposing the Carillon (C) and Rockcliffe (R) formations (see inset map; based on Williams et al. 1984).
Published: 01 June 2013
-rich ( R. plena ) bed: Wilson (1946) and Salad Hersi and Dix (1997) , with additional sites for this brachiopod marked by an inverted black triangle; and, gray star for conodonts ( McCracken 1995 ). At Loc. 8, the Hog's Back Formation oversteps a disconformity-bounded wedge (A) of Rockcliffe
Image
A) Disrupted sandstone and siltstone beds in the lower Rockcliffe red-bed (S1b) facies, Loc. 1. The interval of disruption is capped by a planar erosional surface (upper arrow) overlain by siltstone. The lower arrow points to a near-horizontal continuous base of sandstone overlying horizontally bedded strata. Coin (above erosional surface) is 2 cm in diameter. B) Deformed bedding (arrows) of the uppermost skeletal limestone in the Hog's Back Formation at Loc. 6, and only ∼ 20 cm beneath the Pamelia Formation.
Published: 01 June 2013
Figure 14 A) Disrupted sandstone and siltstone beds in the lower Rockcliffe red-bed (S1b) facies, Loc. 1. The interval of disruption is capped by a planar erosional surface (upper arrow) overlain by siltstone. The lower arrow points to a near-horizontal continuous base of sandstone overlying
Image
Regional stratigraphic patterns in the Chazyan platform succession. Westward thinning into the western Ottawa Embayment is associated with a change in ichnofacies assemblages in the siliciclastic Rockcliffe, lower Laval, and Day Point formations. Sediment isopach data are based on Hofmann (1963), Oxley and Kay (1959), and this study, whereas the abrupt thickness variation defining apparent small-scale synsedimentary graben and horst structures in the Montreal region, corresponding spatially to present-day fault traces (Ministère de l'Énergie et des Ressources 1991), is an interpretation discussed in this study.
Published: 01 June 2013
Figure 4 Regional stratigraphic patterns in the Chazyan platform succession. Westward thinning into the western Ottawa Embayment is associated with a change in ichnofacies assemblages in the siliciclastic Rockcliffe, lower Laval, and Day Point formations. Sediment isopach data are based
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2008
Scottish Journal of Geology (2008) 44 (2): 97–110.
...D. W. Holliday; N. S. Jones; A. A. McMillan Synopsis Two formations, the St Bees Sandstone and Kirklinton Sandstone, have been mapped in the past within the Triassic Sherwood Sandstone Group of the eastern part of the Carlisle Basin, Cumbria, and adjacent parts of Dumfries and Galloway, UK. However...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Lithostratigraphical subdivision of the Sherwood S...
Second thumbnail for: Lithostratigraphical subdivision of the Sherwood S...
Third thumbnail for: Lithostratigraphical subdivision of the Sherwood S...
Image
Details of the disconformity-bounded Rockcliffe strata at Loc. 8a (see Fig. 8). A) Two intervals (1 and 2) of facies S4 bracket an interval of facies S1a in which are two intervals (a and b) of enrolled bedding separated by an undulating sloping shale lamina (lower arrow) that defines either an erosional surface or a low-angle thrust fault. Length of measuring stick is ∼ 50 cm. B) Isolated bodies (a and b) of enrolled sediment of facies S1a in similar host strata. The left body displays a planar erosional upper boundary (black arrow) beneath a thin shale lamina and sandstone. Laminations of coarser-grained sediment of facies S4 (c) downlap onto the surface of a paleodepression (marked by white arrows) eroded into facies S1a, and are overlain abruptly by shale of the Hog's Back Formation (d).
Published: 01 June 2013
Figure 12 Details of the disconformity-bounded Rockcliffe strata at Loc. 8a (see Fig. 8 ). A) Two intervals (1 and 2) of facies S4 bracket an interval of facies S1a in which are two intervals (a and b) of enrolled bedding separated by an undulating sloping shale lamina (lower arrow
Image
(a) Outcrop at Prince of Wales Falls, Ottawa (loc. 13). Normal fault (black arrows and intervening line) divides the outcrop into two blocks of which the northern block (lower part of the photo) displays the contact between the Rockcliffe (R) and the Hog’s Back (H) formations (lower, white dashed line), whereas the upper block shows the Hog’s Back (H) – Pamelia (P) formational contact (upper, white dashed line). The vertical white line indicates the section shown in Fig. 6b. (b) Unit I of the Pamelia Formation is characterized by interbedded sandstone (thick beds at the bottom and top of the photo), shale and limestone facies. The hammer is 25 cm long. (c) Erosional contact between the lower and upper members of the Pamelia Formation; loc. 25. The disconformity is better developed in the southeastern part of the Embayment (loc. 22, 25, and 28). The hammer is 33 cm long. (d) Dolostone and limestone interbeds of the Pamelia Formation (loc. 25). Lighter units, 1 and 2, are the dolostone lithofacies of T-1 and T-2, respectively. The sandstone facies of unit III (or T-3) lies in the upper part of the photo (3). Upper most dark and light grey interbeds represent the lower part of the limestone and dolostone interbeds of unit IV. The section is 15 m high.
Published: 01 March 2000
Fig. 6. ( a ) Outcrop at Prince of Wales Falls, Ottawa (loc. 13). Normal fault (black arrows and intervening line) divides the outcrop into two blocks of which the northern block (lower part of the photo) displays the contact between the Rockcliffe (R) and the Hog’s Back (H) formations (lower
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2004
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2004) 74 (5): 718–729.
...) illustrates two types of the fining-upward "transgressive" units on the ravinement surfaces from the Falher Member of the Spirit River Formation and the Rockcliffe Formation. These units are both overlain by coarsening-upward regressive deposits, and contrast with each other in their grain-size distributions...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Preservation and Grain-Size Trends of Holocene Wav...
Second thumbnail for: Preservation and Grain-Size Trends of Holocene Wav...
Third thumbnail for: Preservation and Grain-Size Trends of Holocene Wav...
Journal Article
Published: 20 August 2014
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2014) 51 (9): 862–876.
... the Lower Ordovician Oxford Formation on the south. The exact vertical separation is unknown, but conservatively assuming it to equal the entire thickness of the Rockcliffe Formation, which is overlain by the Black River Group and underlain by the Oxford Formation, it would be on the order of 40–60 m...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: A low-relief hill in eastern Ontario, Canada, cove...
Second thumbnail for: A low-relief hill in eastern Ontario, Canada, cove...
Third thumbnail for: A low-relief hill in eastern Ontario, Canada, cove...
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2001
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society (2001) 53 (3): 253–255.
... the upper surfaces of some of the sandstones situated near to the base of the Zone of Ammonites margaritatus at Hawsker, Staithes, Rockcliff, Hummersea, Huntcliff, and Coatham Scars, on the coast, and inland at Hutton, near Guisboro', and in Danby-dale. It is found on the same horizon in Lorraine...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Dentalium giganteum Phillips: a serpulid worm tube
Second thumbnail for: Dentalium giganteum Phillips: a serpulid worm tube
Third thumbnail for: Dentalium giganteum Phillips: a serpulid worm tube