1-20 OF 690 RESULTS FOR

Rock Elm Structure

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 December 1985
Geology (1985) 13 (12): 891.
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 December 1985
Geology (1985) 13 (12): 891–892.
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 May 1985
Geology (1985) 13 (5): 372–374.
...William S. Cordua Abstract The Rock Elm structure is a nearly circular feature in western Wisconsin flat 44°43′N, long 92°14′W) in an area of otherwise little-deformed Cambrian and Ordovician shallow-marine sediments. The structure has a ring boundary fault with at least 50 m of vertical...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 2004
GSA Bulletin (2004) 116 (1-2): 200–218.
...Bevan M. French; William S. Cordua; J.B. Plescia Abstract The Rock Elm structure in southwest Wisconsin is an anomalous circular area of highly deformed rocks, ∼6.5 km in diameter, located in a region of virtually horizontal undeformed sedimentary rocks. Shock-produced planar microstructures (PMs...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Image
Published: 01 January 2004
TABLE 2. PLANAR MICRODEFORMATION FEATURES, ROCK ELM STRUCTURE, WISCONSIN
Image
Figure 1. Generalized geologic map of the Rock Elm structure, Pierce County, Wisconsin, showing the inferred ring boundary fault (dashed line) that marks the outer margin of the structure. The exposed part of the central uplift, ∼1 km in diameter, is outlined by black dots. Within this line, Cambrian Mt. Simon(?) Sandstone, which normally lies at least 250 m below the surface, is exposed in contact with the Rock Elm Shale (Or), a sedimentary unit interpreted as crater fill. The southern fault block occurs along the south-southwest margin, surrounding the “Op” symbol. For details of elevation and topography, see text. A more complete stratigraphy is presented in Table 1
Published: 01 January 2004
Figure 1. Generalized geologic map of the Rock Elm structure, Pierce County, Wisconsin, showing the inferred ring boundary fault (dashed line) that marks the outer margin of the structure. The exposed part of the central uplift, ∼1 km in diameter, is outlined by black dots. Within this line
Image
Figure 2. Topographic expression of the Rock Elm structure. View looking northeast across the structure from its southern edge. The break in the foreground is the trace of the ring boundary fault. The forested rise in the middle distance is the southern fault block. Trees on the skyline in the center mark the central uplift. The open ground between the two bands of trees marks the location of the ring basin, which is here underlain by Rock Elm Shale
Published: 01 January 2004
Figure 2. Topographic expression of the Rock Elm structure. View looking northeast across the structure from its southern edge. The break in the foreground is the trace of the ring boundary fault. The forested rise in the middle distance is the southern fault block. Trees on the skyline
Image
Figure 5. Results of gravity measurements on the Rock Elm structure. Circle shows location and current diameter (6.5 km) of structure. A (left): Complete Bouguer gravity map over area around the Rock Elm structure. Contour interval is 2 mgal. B (right): Residual gravity over the Rock Elm structure, calculated by removing a third-order polynomial surface from the Bouguer gravity field. Contour interval is 0.5 mgal. No significant gravity anomaly is apparent at the location of the Rock Elm structure
Published: 01 January 2004
Figure 5. Results of gravity measurements on the Rock Elm structure. Circle shows location and current diameter (6.5 km) of structure. A (left): Complete Bouguer gravity map over area around the Rock Elm structure. Contour interval is 2 mgal. B (right): Residual gravity over the Rock Elm structure
Image
Published: 01 January 2004
TABLE 1. STRATIGRAPHY OF PALEOZOIC UNITS IN THE VICINITY OF THE ROCK ELM STRUCTURE, PIERCE COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Image
Figure 4. Orientations of planar microstructures (PMs) in deformed quartz in several lithologies from the Rock Elm structure: A (left): Three quartzite pebbles in sandstone (combined measurements) (samples WRF-98-15A, -15B, and -15C). B (center): Individual grains in two sandstone samples (combined measurements) (samples WRF-98-14 and WRF-98-16). C (right): Quartz grains in a sample of fine breccia (sample WRF-98-25). In all plots, PM orientations are plotted as the percentage frequency of each planar set (y-axis) against the angle between the pole to the plane and the quartz c-axis (x-axis). Plots for each sample show P1 features (PFs or cleavage), P2 features (incipient PDFs), and combined (P1 + P2) features. Identification of specific planes was done manually by using a Wulff net (equal-area) stereonet and template (Stöffler and Langenhorst, 1994) (See Table 2). The strong concentrations parallel to specific planes, especially c(0001) (0°), ξ{11\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{2}\) \end{document}2} (48°), and r/z{10\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{1}\) \end{document}1} (52°), are typical for similar planar deformation features formed in porous sedimentary rocks subjected to shock waves in meteorite impact events. Orientations of P1 and P2 features are generally similar to each other, but a higher fraction of poles to P2 features (PDFs) than to P1 features (cleavage) are oriented at angles ≥50°
Published: 01 January 2004
Figure 4. Orientations of planar microstructures (PMs) in deformed quartz in several lithologies from the Rock Elm structure: A (left): Three quartzite pebbles in sandstone (combined measurements) (samples WRF-98-15A, -15B, and -15C). B (center): Individual grains in two sandstone samples (combined
Image
Graphs of orientations of planar microstructures (P1 + P2 features) in samples from the Decorah structure, Iowa (W-52450 [Fig. 17A] and H2-1-2 [Fig. 17B]) compared with similar plots for quartz grains in samples from established impact structures, the BP site (Libya) (Fig. 17C) (French et al., 1974, Figure 4, plot 1) and Rock Elm, Wisconsin (Fig. 17D) (French and Cordua, 1999, Fig. 3; French et al., 2004, Fig. 4A). (The BP and Rock Elm plots differ slightly from the original publications because they have been constructed by replotting the original data onto the same templates as the Decorah plots.) All plots show the same development of high concentrations of planes corresponding to specific orientations, e.g., (0001) (0°),  (23°),  (48°), and  (52°), which are typical and diagnostic for shock-produced deformation features in quartz grains from established impact structures.
Published: 08 August 2018
) ( French et al., 1974 , Figure 4 , plot 1) and Rock Elm, Wisconsin ( Fig. 17D ) ( French and Cordua, 1999 , Fig. 3 ; French et al., 2004 , Fig. 4A ). (The BP and Rock Elm plots differ slightly from the original publications because they have been constructed by replotting the original data onto
Image
Graphs of orientations of planar microstructures (P1 + P2 features) in samples from the Decorah structure, Iowa (W-52450 [Fig. 17A] and H2-1-2 [Fig. 17B]) compared with similar plots for quartz grains in samples from established impact structures, the BP site (Libya) (Fig. 17C) (French et al., 1974, Figure 4, plot 1) and Rock Elm, Wisconsin (Fig. 17D) (French and Cordua, 1999, Fig. 3; French et al., 2004, Fig. 4A). (The BP and Rock Elm plots differ slightly from the original publications because they have been constructed by replotting the original data onto the same templates as the Decorah plots.) All plots show the same development of high concentrations of planes corresponding to specific orientations, e.g., (0001) (0°),  (23°),  (48°), and  (52°), which are typical and diagnostic for shock-produced deformation features in quartz grains from established impact structures.
Published: 08 August 2018
) ( French et al., 1974 , Figure 4 , plot 1) and Rock Elm, Wisconsin ( Fig. 17D ) ( French and Cordua, 1999 , Fig. 3 ; French et al., 2004 , Fig. 4A ). (The BP and Rock Elm plots differ slightly from the original publications because they have been constructed by replotting the original data onto
Image
Graphs of orientations of planar microstructures (P1 + P2 features) in samples from the Decorah structure, Iowa (W-52450 [Fig. 17A] and H2-1-2 [Fig. 17B]) compared with similar plots for quartz grains in samples from established impact structures, the BP site (Libya) (Fig. 17C) (French et al., 1974, Figure 4, plot 1) and Rock Elm, Wisconsin (Fig. 17D) (French and Cordua, 1999, Fig. 3; French et al., 2004, Fig. 4A). (The BP and Rock Elm plots differ slightly from the original publications because they have been constructed by replotting the original data onto the same templates as the Decorah plots.) All plots show the same development of high concentrations of planes corresponding to specific orientations, e.g., (0001) (0°),  (23°),  (48°), and  (52°), which are typical and diagnostic for shock-produced deformation features in quartz grains from established impact structures.
Published: 08 August 2018
) ( French et al., 1974 , Figure 4 , plot 1) and Rock Elm, Wisconsin ( Fig. 17D ) ( French and Cordua, 1999 , Fig. 3 ; French et al., 2004 , Fig. 4A ). (The BP and Rock Elm plots differ slightly from the original publications because they have been constructed by replotting the original data onto
Image
Graphs of orientations of planar microstructures (P1 + P2 features) in samples from the Decorah structure, Iowa (W-52450 [Fig. 17A] and H2-1-2 [Fig. 17B]) compared with similar plots for quartz grains in samples from established impact structures, the BP site (Libya) (Fig. 17C) (French et al., 1974, Figure 4, plot 1) and Rock Elm, Wisconsin (Fig. 17D) (French and Cordua, 1999, Fig. 3; French et al., 2004, Fig. 4A). (The BP and Rock Elm plots differ slightly from the original publications because they have been constructed by replotting the original data onto the same templates as the Decorah plots.) All plots show the same development of high concentrations of planes corresponding to specific orientations, e.g., (0001) (0°),  (23°),  (48°), and  (52°), which are typical and diagnostic for shock-produced deformation features in quartz grains from established impact structures.
Published: 08 August 2018
) ( French et al., 1974 , Figure 4 , plot 1) and Rock Elm, Wisconsin ( Fig. 17D ) ( French and Cordua, 1999 , Fig. 3 ; French et al., 2004 , Fig. 4A ). (The BP and Rock Elm plots differ slightly from the original publications because they have been constructed by replotting the original data onto
Book Chapter

Author(s)
Ronald L. Shreve
Series: GSA Special Papers
Published: 01 January 1968
DOI: 10.1130/SPE108-p1
... older landslide, the Silver Reef, have many peculiarities of form and structure in common with the historic Elm, Frank, and Sherman landslides; and in lithology, provenance, size, and “coefficient of friction” they strongly resemble many of the monolithologic breccia deposits of possible landslide...
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 2012
DOI: 10.1306/13321469M97948
EISBN: 9781629810119
... of the oil generation window was divided into five continuous AUs: (1) Elm Coulee-Billings Nose AU, (2) Central Basin-Poplar Dome AU, (3) Nesson-Little Knife Structural AU, (4) Eastern Expulsion Threshold AU, and (5) Northwest Expulsion Threshold AU. One hypothetical conventional AU, a Middle Sandstone...
FIGURES | View All (30)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 April 2015
Geology (2015) 43 (4): 315–318.
... impact structure in Wisconsin, United States. These results are the first documented occurrence of reidite in a sedimentary target rock, and constitute the oldest known reidite in the geological record. Rock Elm is a 6.5-km-diameter impact crater in Paleozoic target rocks in western Wisconsin...
FIGURES
Image
Figure 3. Photomicrographs of planar microdeformation (PM) features in quartz grains from the central uplift of the Rock Elm structure. A: Three sets of closely spaced parallel P1 features (planar fractures [PFs] or cleavages), parallel to various faces of r/z{10\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{1}\) \end{document}1} in a large quartz grain from a quartzite pebble in sandstone. (Sample WRF-98-15B.) B: Combination of two sets of P1 features, parallel to c(0001) and r/z{10\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{1}\) \end{document}1}, in another quartzite pebble, with multiple P2 features (incipient planar deformation features [PDFs]) parallel to r/z{10\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{1}\) \end{document}1} and s{11\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{2}\) \end{document}1}. The P2 features (PDFs) do not cross the P1 features (cleavage), and they radiate from them, producing a distinctive “feather texture” also observed in shocked rocks from established impact structures. (Sample WRF-98-15C.) C: Combined P1 and P2 features, developed in a single large quartz grain in sandstone. P1 features are parallel to c(0001), ξ{11\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{2}\) \end{document}2}, and ρ{21\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{3}\) \end{document}1}. P2 features are parallel to ρ{21\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{3}\) \end{document}1}. D: Combined P1 and P2 features in a quartz grain from the enigmatic breccia collected as float blocks in the central uplift area (Cordua 1985). P1 features parallel to c{0001) and ξ{11\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{2}\) \end{document}2}; P2 features parallel to c(0001), r/z{10\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{1}\) \end{document}1}, and ρ{21\batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\overline{3}\) \end{document}1}. Note the presence of both P1 and P2 features parallel to the base c(0001). The surrounding matrix is dark red and opaque
Published: 01 January 2004
Figure 3. Photomicrographs of planar microdeformation (PM) features in quartz grains from the central uplift of the Rock Elm structure. A: Three sets of closely spaced parallel P1 features (planar fractures [PFs] or cleavages), parallel to various faces of r / z {10 \batchmode \documentclass
Series: GSA Field Guide
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1130/2011.0024(19)
EISBN: 9780813756240
... of these slump blocks (Stops Rock Elm 1 and 3). Later marine deposition filled the crater with a coarsening-upward sequence of the Rock Elm Shale and Washington Road Sandstone ∼440–470 million years ago (Stops Rock Elm 3 and 4). Minor reactivation of the structure, possibly due to continuing isostatic...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Image
The oil/(oil + water) ratio from zero (= no oil) to one (= all oil) is based on cumulative production data from 3379 Middle Bakken wells and shows the basin-centered continuous tight oil accumulation in the Middle Bakken reservoir rock. Depending on the abruptness of the transition from oil-rich (red) to water-rich (blue) areas, inferences can be made about whether hydrocarbons are allowed to dissipate (green arrow) or are held in place, potentially by a trapping mechanism (yellow arrows). The structurally low flanks of the Nesson anticline are areas with high water cuts, suggesting that hydrocarbons were able to migrate updip and most likely escaped north toward Canada. East-Sanish and Parshall fields (P), and Elm Coulee field (E) stand out as dominant sweet spots (Theloy, 2014).
Published: 15 October 2019
Figure 3. The oil/(oil + water) ratio from zero (= no oil) to one (= all oil) is based on cumulative production data from 3379 Middle Bakken wells and shows the basin-centered continuous tight oil accumulation in the Middle Bakken reservoir rock. Depending on the abruptness of the transition from