1-20 OF 106 RESULTS FOR

Reguibat Shield

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 13 November 2013
Geological Magazine (2014) 151 (5): 885–898.
... the location of the West African Craton and the region of study. (b) Geological map of the Reguibat Shield and neighbouring basins. The reference cross-section is represented by the black bold line. The white star in the Mauritanian Adrar marks the location...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2008
DOI: 10.1144/SP297.3
EISBN: 9781862395459
... Abstract Two domains have previously been recognized in the Archaean Reguibat shield of NW Mauritania, based primarily on their gross lithological differences. New fieldwork has identified a major ductile shear zone (Tâçarât–Inemmaûdene Shear Zone) separating these domains and new...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2006
Journal of the Geological Society (2006) 163 (3): 549–560.
...D.I. Schofield; M.S.A. Horstwood; P.E.J. Pitfield; Q.G. Crowley; A.F. Wilkinson; H.Ch.O. Sidaty Abstract The Reguibat Shield of north Mauritania comprises a western Archaean terrane dominated by gneisses and granitic rocks and an eastern Eburnean terrane largely made up of Palaeoproterozoic...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 February 1979
Economic Geology (1979) 74 (1): 77–94.
Image
Geological map of the Reguibat Shield and location of the samples. (a) Geographical location of the study area. The Reguibat Shield belongs to the northern West African Craton, bounded to the east by the Panafrican suture, which separates it from the Tuareg Shield. Tf., Tindouf Basin; Td., Taoudeni Basin; Iu., Iullemeden Basin; Ah., Ahnet Basin; O.M., Oued Mya Basin; Gh., Ghadames Basin. (b) Geological map of the Reguibat Shield. TLDB, Tarfaya–Laayoune–Dakhla Basin. Samples have black or grey labels depending on whether they are published or new data, respectively. Mixed labels (e.g. TGH4072A) indicate that AFT data have been published but AHe data are new. Cret., Cretaceous. (c) Simplified stratigraphical log of the Tarfaya–Laayoune–Dakhla Basin (modified after Leprêtre et al. 2015). 1, Conglomerates and coarse detrital sediments; 2, coarse to fine sandstones; 3, shales with variable sandy proportion; 4, shales and clays, sometimes interbedded with limestones; 5, limestones.
Published: 15 May 2017
Fig. 1. Geological map of the Reguibat Shield and location of the samples. ( a ) Geographical location of the study area. The Reguibat Shield belongs to the northern West African Craton, bounded to the east by the Panafrican suture, which separates it from the Tuareg Shield. Tf., Tindouf Basin
Image
Segmentation of the Reguibat Shield based on the LTT results. The data are projected along a NW–SE transect, perpendicular to the Central Atlantic passive margin. AHe ages are corrected for alpha ejection with the ejection factor (FT). Errors for AFT and AHe ages are indicated at 2σ. The distinction between the three domains of the Reguibat Shield is indicated by the dispersion of the data. New data are indicated.
Published: 15 May 2017
Fig. 2. Segmentation of the Reguibat Shield based on the LTT results. The data are projected along a NW–SE transect, perpendicular to the Central Atlantic passive margin. AHe ages are corrected for alpha ejection with the ejection factor ( F T ). Errors for AFT and AHe ages are indicated at 2σ
Image
AFT age v. MTL plot for the whole Reguibat Shield. The grey bar indicates the timing and duration of the Jurassic rifting up to break-up, as defined by Labails et al. (2010).
Published: 15 May 2017
Fig. 3. AFT age v. MTL plot for the whole Reguibat Shield. The grey bar indicates the timing and duration of the Jurassic rifting up to break-up, as defined by Labails et al. (2010) .
Image
Corrected AHe ages v. eU plots: (a) for the eastern Reguibat Shield; (b) for the central Reguibat Shield; (c) for the western Reguibat Shield. (d–i) Raw AHe ages v. eU plots for the eastern Reguibat with expanded eU scale to better show the relationship between AHe age and eU. Light-coloured areas indicate the grouping of single-grain AHe ages.
Published: 15 May 2017
Fig. 5. Corrected AHe ages v. eU plots: ( a ) for the eastern Reguibat Shield; ( b ) for the central Reguibat Shield; ( c ) for the western Reguibat Shield. ( d–i ) Raw AHe ages v. eU plots for the eastern Reguibat with expanded eU scale to better show the relationship between AHe age and eU
Image
Representative individual modelling for each domain of the Reguibat Shield. (a) Thermal modelling of sample GH3 in the eastern Reguibat Shield. (b) Predicted single-grain AHe ages against measured ones. Ages are corrected for FT. (c) Predicted AFT data against measured ones. (d)–(f) show thermal modelling results for sample TGH3163 in the central Reguibat Shield, with the same legend as for (a)–(c), respectively. (g) and (h) show the thermal modelling results for sample AG167 in the western Reguibat Shield, with the same legend as for (a) and (c), respectively. Rectangular outlines show the time-temperature constraints used for modeling.
Published: 15 May 2017
Fig. 6. Representative individual modelling for each domain of the Reguibat Shield. ( a ) Thermal modelling of sample GH3 in the eastern Reguibat Shield. ( b ) Predicted single-grain AHe ages against measured ones. Ages are corrected for F T . ( c ) Predicted AFT data against measured ones. ( d
Image
Inverse thermal modellings for the three Reguibat Shield domains. (a–c) Thermal modelling results for the eastern Reguibat Shield (a), for the central Reguibat Shield (b) and for the western Reguibat Shield (after Leprêtre et al. 2015, for samples AOS, SC, TAS233 and TAS29) (c). The light grey box in each panel indicates the duration of the major cooling event. The dark grey box in (b) and (c) shows the duration of the subsequent reheating, which is not recorded in the eastern Reguibat Shield (a). For the western domain, black thermal paths correspond to the thermal modellings of Leprêtre et al. (2015). Owing to the new AHe data, we have carried out new thermal modelling for the data from the central domain obtained by Leprêtre et al. (2014).
Published: 15 May 2017
Fig. 7. Inverse thermal modellings for the three Reguibat Shield domains. ( a–c ) Thermal modelling results for the eastern Reguibat Shield ( a ), for the central Reguibat Shield ( b ) and for the western Reguibat Shield (after Leprêtre et al. 2015 , for samples AOS, SC, TAS233 and TAS29) ( c
Image
Forward modelling for the central Reguibat Shield. (a) Tested thermal paths with HeFTy software (Ketcham 2005). (b) Corresponding predicted AHe ages for each tested thermal path in (a). The measured FT-corrected single-grain AHe ages are also indicated to ensure direct comparison.
Published: 15 May 2017
Fig. 8. Forward modelling for the central Reguibat Shield. ( a ) Tested thermal paths with HeFTy software ( Ketcham 2005 ). ( b ) Corresponding predicted AHe ages for each tested thermal path in ( a ). The measured F T -corrected single-grain AHe ages are also indicated to ensure direct
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 22 April 2024
DOI: 10.1144/SP542-2023-14
EISBN: 9781786206398
... stage ( c. 350–300 Ma) records the indentation of the Reguibat Shield into the central Appalachian margin of Laurentia. This indentation led to thrusting of the Souttoufide and Akjoujt ‘nappes’ onto the Reguibat Shield, to southward motion of the Senegalese block (SB), and to strike-slip motion...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 15 May 2017
Journal of the Geological Society (2017) 174 (5): 817–835.
...Fig. 1. Geological map of the Reguibat Shield and location of the samples. ( a ) Geographical location of the study area. The Reguibat Shield belongs to the northern West African Craton, bounded to the east by the Panafrican suture, which separates it from the Tuareg Shield. Tf., Tindouf Basin...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 09 July 2021
DOI: 10.1144/SP502-2019-101
EISBN: 9781786209900
.... in 2005, on behalf of the Mauritanian Office for Geological Research (OMRG), in the frame of the Mining Institutional Strengthening Project (PRISM). It covers the western part of the Reguibat Shield. The data processing through various algorithms can be a powerful tool for identification of dykes...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 1991
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1991) 28 (7): 1121–1130.
... orogen was responsible for the sea regression to the south, while the proto-Atlantic opening was active to the north of the Reguibat shield. A large stable marine platform was present during Early and Middle Ordovician. A general regression and the formation of the West-African Inlandsis took place...
Image
Published: 11 August 2021
Table 1. Geological units of Mauritania (OMRG, 2015 ). Name of tectono-structural unit Age and rock associations Reguibat Shield (Bouclier Réguibat) Archaean to Palaeoproterozoic magmatic and high-grade metamorphic rocks, part of the West African Craton Taoudeni Basin (Bassin
Image
Figure 1.
Published: 13 November 2013
Figure 1. (a) Simplified map of West Africa (after Peucat et al . 2005 ) showing the location of the West African Craton and the region of study. (b) Geological map of the Reguibat Shield and neighbouring basins. The reference cross-section is represented
Image
Representative thermal paths from onshore eastern North America: (a) Nova Scotia, in the northern proximal passive margin (Grist & Zentilli 2003); (b) the Michigan Basin, deep in the interior of the continent (Wang et al. 1994); (c) the southern Canadian Shield (Lorencak et al. 2004); (d) the Northern Appalachians (Taylor & Fitzgerald 2011). Dark grey box defines the main period of uplift in the western and central Reguibat Shield domains in the conjugate African passive margin.
Published: 15 May 2017
et al. 2004 ); ( d ) the Northern Appalachians ( Taylor & Fitzgerald 2011 ). Dark grey box defines the main period of uplift in the western and central Reguibat Shield domains in the conjugate African passive margin.
Image
(a) Structural pattern of the Eburnean-Transamazonian orogen. Fabrics are in black and the shear zones in red. Fabrics in Africa (adapted from Jessell et al., 2016) derive from joint interpretation of medium-wavelength (> 30 km) Bouger gravity anomaly and magnetic data in exposed and buried Archean and Birimian crust. Shear zones in the Reguibat shield (northern outcrop of the West African craton) are adapted from Milési et al. (2010); (b) corresponding tectonic model (same frame as Fig. 10a).
Published: 07 February 2020
and buried Archean and Birimian crust. Shear zones in the Reguibat shield (northern outcrop of the West African craton) are adapted from Milési et al. (2010) ; (b) corresponding tectonic model (same frame as Fig. 10 a).
Image
Age-dependent rheology profiles (viscosity) for (A) Archean Baltica/Reguibat shield (Paleo-Proterozoic margins) and (B) Phanerozoic lithosphere involved in Africa-Europe convergence. Thickness, temperature and composition determine the depths and numbers of mechanical decoupling levels in crust and mantle. These two contrasting rheological profiled ultimately define lateral viscosity profiles that reproduce well the first order pattern of current stresses and basal traction exerted by mantle flow at the base of the continents (C). The mantle heat flux Qm is larger for the Phanerozoic lithosphere to explain the lack of thermal relaxation.
Published: 15 November 2021
Fig. 9 Age-dependent rheology profiles (viscosity) for (A) Archean Baltica/Reguibat shield (Paleo-Proterozoic margins) and (B) Phanerozoic lithosphere involved in Africa-Europe convergence. Thickness, temperature and composition determine the depths and numbers of mechanical decoupling levels