1-20 OF 30 RESULTS FOR

Raipur Group

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Chemostratigraphic correlation of the <b>Raipur</b> <b>Group</b> with some late Mesoprote...
Published: 02 October 2018
Fig. 6. Chemostratigraphic correlation of the Raipur Group with some late Mesoproterozoic sedimentary successions world wide. SG, supergroup; Gp, group; Fm, formation. Data sources: Whelan et al. (1990) , Azmy et al. (2001 , 2006 , 2008 ), Kah et al. (2001 , 2012 ), Bartley et al. (2007
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2013
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2013) 83 (4): 368–376.
... apply this petrographic criterion to evaluate the presumed unconformities that bound the Singhora, Chandarpur, Raipur, and the Kharsiya groups of the essentially Mesoproterozoic Chhattisgarh Supergroup in the Bastar craton – a critical Ur-craton vis à vis Columbia and Rodinia. Optical examination...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs, Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2015
DOI: 10.1144/M43.13
EISBN: 9781862397194
... Stromatolites, in a wide taxonomic range, cyanobacteria (filamentous and coccoid prokaryotes) and acritarchs are described from different formations of Raipur Group, Chandi limestone and Charmuria limestone in particular ( Srivastava 1977 ; Jairam & Banerjee 1980 ; Moitra 1986 , 1990...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 02 October 2018
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 56 (3): 335–346.
...Fig. 6. Chemostratigraphic correlation of the Raipur Group with some late Mesoproterozoic sedimentary successions world wide. SG, supergroup; Gp, group; Fm, formation. Data sources: Whelan et al. (1990) , Azmy et al. (2001 , 2006 , 2008 ), Kah et al. (2001 , 2012 ), Bartley et al. (2007...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2018
DOI: 10.1144/SP463.5
EISBN: 9781786203441
... et al. (1992) classified the Rajmahal Traps as Group I and Group II, with mantle plume and continental lithosphere as the possible sources, respectively. Recent studies by Ghatak and Basu (2011 , 2013 ) re-affirm the existence of these two geochemically distinct groups. The Group I basalts have...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Series: Reviews in Economic Geology, Reviews in Economic Geology
Published: 01 January 2008
DOI: 10.5382/Rev.15.11
EISBN: 9781629490229
... of the Chattisgarh Supergroup, Indravati, Albaka, and Penganga Groups (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2006 ). High-grade BIF-hosted iron ores come from three distinct BIF-bearing belts: the Dalli-Rajhara belt about 200 km south of Raipur, the Rowghat belt farther south, and the Bailadila belt near the southern end...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2006
South African Journal of Geology (2006) 109 (1-2): 183–192.
... Quartzite Deccan Trap –Unconformity (?)– Sat Nala Shale Raipur Group Gunderdehi Shale Jagdalpur Shale Owk shale –Unconformity– Chanda Limestone Sarangarh Limestone Kanger Limestone Narji Limestone Sahabad Limestone Formation Pranhita Sandstone Chandarpur Group Bijepur...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs, Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2015
DOI: 10.1144/M43.11
EISBN: 9781862397194
... 800±171, 967±72, 973±63 (A-1)Betul granite II (Navegaon) 850±15 (A-4) 1000–1075 Low-intensity deformation of the Sausar Group (SD 3 ); thermal imprints on Sausar amphibolite 1009±18 (A-1) Deposition of the Raipur Group 1075–1200 Dolerite dykes in Sausar Group 1116±58, 1112±77 (A-2...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 1998
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (1998) 31 (2): 147–157.
... . Pollution of limestone aquifer due to urban waste disposal around Raipur, Madhya Pradesh, India. Environmental Geology, 23 , 209 – 213 . British Geological Survey 1994 . United Kingdom Minerals Yearbook 1993, British Geological Survey, Keyworth. Dodge, E. D. 1984 . Les...
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2012
DOI: 10.1144/SP366.15
EISBN: 9781862396142
... Abstract In 2005, the Maghreb Petroleum Research Group (MPRG), University College London, initiated a major research programme focused on the relatively poorly understood Neoproterozoic petroleum systems of the world. A series of research projects were undertaken to understand the generation...
FIGURES
Image
Geological map of the Singhora area as per  GSI, 2004 ,  2005 . The stratig...
Published: 01 April 2013
Fig. 2.— Geological map of the Singhora area as per GSI, 2004 , 2005 . The stratigraphic relationships between the Singhora, Chandarpur, and Raipur groups are in dispute.
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2007
DOI: 10.1144/SP286.22
EISBN: 9781862395343
... and Raipur groups separated by an unconformity (Fig.  12 ). There is some disagreement in further subdivision of the Raipur Group: one proposal by Murti (1987) and another by Moitra (1990). However, two distinct stromatolitic zones have been noted (Moitra 2003). The lower zone contains the characteristic...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs, Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2015
DOI: 10.1144/M43.12
EISBN: 9781862397194
... succession also developed soon after the cessation of the fold-and-thrust belt deformation of the Somanpalli Group between c. 1500 and c. 1400 Ma ( Chaudhuri et al. 2012 ). A possible correlation of the Penganga succession and the Chandarpur–Raipur succession of the Chhattisgarh Supergroup...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2012
DOI: 10.1144/SP365.2
EISBN: 9781862396135
... supracrustal belts/cover sequences include the Dhanjori Group, the Singhbhum Group (including the Dalma volcanics and the Chandil Formation in eastern India), the Cuddapah Supergroup and the adjoining Nellore Schist Belt bordering the eastern Dharwar Craton, the Aravalli Supergroup in the Aravalli–Delhi Fold...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs, Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1144/M36.31
EISBN: 9781862394117
... Abstract Neoproterozoic glaciogenic deposits crop out widely across the Lesser Himalaya fold and thrust belt in NW India. Underlain by the siliciclastic Simla and Jaunsar Groups, the Blaini Formation (Fm.) includes at least two thick and regionally extensive diamictite units, separated...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 2011
GSA Bulletin (2011) 123 (1-2): 158–167.
... ( Chakraborty, 1991 ; Chakraborty and Chaudhuri, 1993 ). The Chattisgarh succession includes three major unconformity-bounded sequences ( Fig. 2 ) ( Das et al., 1992 ; Patranabis-Deb et al., 2007 ). Most workers classify the Chattisgarh succession into two groups, the Chandarpur and the Raipur Groups...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs, Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2015
DOI: 10.1144/M43.21
EISBN: 9781862397194
... ). Both these intracratonic basins are developed over the Precambrian basement rocks of the central Indian shield (Bastar Craton; Fig. 21.1 ). Stratigraphically the rocks of Chattisgarh Basin are classified into Singhora, Chandarpur and Raipur groups. The oldest of these, Singhora Group, comprises...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2012
DOI: 10.1144/SP366.4
EISBN: 9781862396142
...). The central portion of the middle Proterozoic Chhattisgarh Basin is composed of epicontinental or stable shelf sediments. The Chhattisgarh Supergroup is divisible into Chandrarpur Group and Raipur Group, the former being older with an intervening unconformity. The Chandrapur Group is predominantly arenaceous...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs, Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2015
DOI: 10.1144/M43.23
EISBN: 9781862397194
..., defining four stratigraphic groups (basal Singhora restricted to SE of basin, widespread Chadarpur and succeeding Raipur Groups, uppermost Kharsiya in the northern parts of the basin); eastern and western sub-basins, marked by different depositional styles appear to have persisted through basin evolution...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 2007
AAPG Bulletin (2007) 91 (6): 785–808.
... Chandarpur Group and the upper Raipur Group. The Chandarpur Group is about 860 m (2821 ft) thick, where the lower 800 m (2624 ft) is made up of coarse-grained immature siliciclastics and shales (Lohardih Formation and Gomarda Formation; Table 1 ). The Raipur Group conformably overlies the Chandarpur Group...
FIGURES | View All (12)