Blackhawk Mountain in southern California rises above southeastern Lucerne Valley at the eastern end of the rugged 4,000-foot escarpment that separates the San Bernardino Mountains on the south from the Mojave Desert on the north. Its summit is a resistant block of marble thrust northward over easily eroded uncemented sandstone and weathered gneiss. Spread out on the alluvial apron at the foot of the mountain is the prehistoric Blackhawk landslide, a lobe of nearly monolithologic marble breccia from 30 to 100 feet thick, 2 miles wide, and 5 miles long. The Blackhawk landslide and an adjacent older landslide, the Silver Reef, have many peculiarities of form and structure in common with the historic Elm, Frank, and Sherman landslides; and in lithology, provenance, size, and “coefficient of friction” they strongly resemble many of the monolithologic breccia deposits of possible landslide origin found associated with Tertiary faults and fanglomerates in the southwestern United States and elsewhere. The older rocks of the Blackhawk area consist of gneiss, quartzite, Carboniferous marble, and Cretaceous quartz monzonite, which originally underlay a landscape of relatively low relief. Uplift of Blackhawk Mountain, first by overthrusting from the south, and then by monoclinal folding along a northwest-trending axis, led in the late Tertiary and Quaternary to deep erosion of the mountain front accompanied by the growth northward of extensive alluvial deposits interspersed with several large-scale landslides, the largest and most recent of which is the Blackhawk landslide. Both the geological evidence and, in the case of the Elm and Frank landslides, the eyewitness reports suggest that the Blackhawk landslide and its congeners started as huge rockfalls, which were launched into the air and then traversed the gently inclined, relatively smooth slopes below as nearly nondeforming sheets of breccia sliding at high speed on a relatively thin, easily sheared lubricating layer. These facts suggest the hypothesis that landslides of this type acquire such high speed in their descent that at a sudden steepening of slope they leave the ground, overriding and compressing a cushion of trapped air upon which they traverse the gentler slopes below with little friction, much as the slipper in a thrust bearing slides on a cushion of oil with no metal-to-metal contact. This air-layer lubrication readily accounts for the low friction, high speed, and nonflowing motion of these large landslides and explains many otherwise puzzling details of their form and structure, such as the striking three-dimensional jigsaw puzzle effect seen in the pervasively fractured larger blocks, the transverse corrugations, soil schlieren, and certain of the peculiar debris cones on the landslide surface, the moraine-like ridges along the sides, and the low rim, steep scarp, and transported debris at the distal end. Thus, it appears that under the right circumstances massive avalanches like the Blackhawk can slide for miles on nothing more substantial than an ephemeral layer of compressed air.

Abstract The Neogene stratigraphic section in the Split Mountain area exposes megabreccia deposits up to 12 km long with volumes up to 3 × 10 8 m 3 . Shattered-rock domains still portray the bedrock distribution of lithologies. Jigsaw-puzzle fabric occurs on a variety of scales from microscopic to outcrop. Broken and stretched pegmatites tend to rise upward as step-ups in the inferred down-flow directions. Upper Miocene subaerial megabreccias about 65 m thick disturbed the underlying strata to depths less than a meter during their emplacement. This includes producing grooved and decapitated stones both in the substrate and below shear surfaces especially within the basal few meters of the megabreccia deposits. The lower portions of a megabreccia are rich in step-ups, ramps, and crushed-rock streamers that rise upward in the down-flow direction. After flooding of the basin by the ancestral Gulf of California, a lower Pliocene megabreccia moved across the sea floor deforming underlying sedimentary layers by injections and sunken megabreccia lobes that locally caused tightly folded bottom-sediment packages >35 m thick to rise as diapirs. Near the leading edge, on the southwest corner of the deposit, there is a small volume of more traditional sandy conglomerate deposited as the mass rapidly slowed and stopped. Both subaerial and subaqueous megabreccias contain lithologic domains that preserve the distribution of bedrock lithologies, jigsaw-puzzle fabric, step-ups and crushed-rock streamers; these features all require non-turbulent flow. These huge volumes of shattered bedrock moved 10–12 km distance in late Miocene as dry subaerial masses, and again across the floor of an early Pliocene inland sea. All the observed features strongly indicate flow as sturzstroms.

The eastern Lake Mead region, to the north of the belt of metamorphic core complexes that define the Colorado River extensional corridor, underwent large-magnitude extension in the middle to late Miocene. We present two speculative new models for extension in this area that resolve several puzzling and paradoxical relations. These models are based on new field mapping and structural, geochronologic, and thermochronologic data from the northern White Hills, Lost Basin Range, and south Wheeler Ridge. The Meadview fault, a previously underappreciated structure, is an east-side-down normal fault that separates the northern Lost Basin Range to the west from south Wheeler Ridge to the east. Proterozoic crystalline rocks of the northern Lost Basin Range yielded an apatite fission-track (AFT) age of 15 Ma, whereas 2 km to the east, across the Meadview fault, crystalline rocks of south Wheeler Ridge yielded a 127 Ma AFT age. Similarly, at the south end of the Lost Basin Range, crystalline rocks with ca. 15 Ma AFT ages lie within 5 km of crystalline rocks of Garnet Mountain that yielded a 68 Ma AFT age across the Grand Wash fault. Neither of these relations can be explained by existing tilted crustal section or tilt-block models. In our “classic” metamorphic core complex model, the Grand Wash fault (breakaway), the Meadview fault, and the South Virgin–White Hills detachment represent different structural levels of a single, regional detachment that was active between ca. 16 and 11 Ma. The hanging wall of the detachment consists of rocks at south Wheeler Ridge, the Paleozoic ridges, and possibly part of the crystalline basement of the Gold Butte block, sedimentary and volcanic rocks in the hanging walls of the Salt Spring and Cyclopic Mine faults, and possibly stranded tilt blocks beneath the Grand Wash Trough supradetachment basin. The footwall, exhumed by subvertical simple shear and characterized by middle Miocene AFT ages, includes the central and western Gold Butte block, Hiller Mountains, and crystalline rocks of the White Hills and the Lost Basin Range. The east-dipping Meadview fault bounds the crystalline core on the east; the west-dipping South Virgin–White Hills detachment bounds the core on the west. Therefore, the Grand Wash fault represents the structurally highest part of the detachment, and the South Virgin–White Hills detachment represents the structurally deepest exposed part of the detachment. In the modified core complex model, the Grand Wash, Meadview, and South Virgin–White Hills detachment faults are separate structures, and the Grand Wash Trough is a “trailing-edge” basin bound on the east by the Grand Wash fault and on the west by the Meadview fault. The South Virgin–White Hills detachment is the main detachment along which extension was accommodated, and the Meadview fault is a major antithetic normal fault that facilitated exhumation of the core at the trailing edge of the detachment system.

Abstract The Palaeozoic to recent evolution of the Tethys system gave way to the largest mountain chain of the world extending from the Atlantic to Pacific oceans – the Alpine–Himalayan Mountain chain, which is still developing as a result of collision and northwards convergence of continental blocks including Apulia in the west, the Afro-Arabian Plate in the middle and the Indian Plate in the east. This Special Publication addresses the main problems of the middle part of this system incorporating the Balkans, Black Sea and Greater Caucasus in the north and the Afro-Arabian Plate in the south. Since the Early Mesozoic a number of small to large scale oceanic basins opened and closed as the intervening continental fragments drifted northwards and diachronously collided with and accreted to the southern margin of the Eurasian Plate. Despite the remarkable consequences of this, in terms of subduction, obduction and orogenic processes, little is known about the timing and palaeogeographic evolution of the region. This includes the amounts of shortening and interplay between synconvergent extension and compression, development of magmatic arc and arc-related basins and the timing and mechanism of their deformation. The chapters presented in this Special Publication present new information that help to fill some of the gaps of the puzzle.

Shatsky Rise is an oceanic plateau that formed at the Pacific-Farallon-Izanagi triple junction during the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous. Its origin is unclear, but volcanism from a mantle plume or plume head is accepted as an explanation because many observations from the plateau are consistent with the plume head model. Initial eruptions were massive and rapid, with emplacement rates estimated at 1.2–4.6 km 3 /yr, similar to continental flood basalts. The plateau exhibits an age progression, with igneous output waning over time, possibly representing the transition from plume head to plume tail. Shallow water fossils imply that the rise top was subaerial and that thermal and dynamic uplift was significant. Furthermore, the age progression and trends of Shatsky and Hess rises are mimicked by the Mid-Pacific Mountains, to be expected if these features formed by the drift of the plate over mantle plumes. In contrast, several observations do not fit the plume head model. The initial eruption was coincident with a reorientation of the Pacific-Izanagi ridge and an 800-km jump of the triple junction, a low probability occurrence if plume heads behave independently of plate motions. Moreover, this same type of event may have occurred repeatedly, as other western Pacific plateaus occur near the trace of this triple junction (Hess Rise) and the Pacific-Farallon-Phoenix triple junction (Magellan Rise, Manihiki Plateau, Mid-Pacific Mountains). If these other plateaus formed from plumes, either there were many plumes or the plumes defining the triple junction paths exhibited large relative motion. Moreover, rocks recovered from the main Shatsky Rise edifices have mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) geochemistry and isotopic signatures, whereas most plume head models imply that lower mantle material, with a different signature, will be carried to the surface. A simpler hypothesis is that Shatsky Rise and other near-triple-junction plateaus were formed as a result of ridge tectonics. One possibility is that decompression melting occurred near the triple junctions during the Mesozoic because the northwest Pacific was located over a region of anomalous asthenosphere that was susceptible to melting given only small perturbations in lithospheric stress. A pitfall for this argument is that changes in the thin, fast-spreading Pacific lithosphere must result in massive volcanism. Although both plume and ridge tectonics hypotheses explain some observations from Shatsky Rise, uncertainties make it premature to conclude which, if either, is correct. Resolution awaits future investigations, which must reveal missing pieces to this puzzle.

New data from an Upper Triassic to Lower Cretaceous deep marine succession—the herein reinstated and restricted Gemuk Group—provide a vital piece of the puzzle for unraveling southwestern Alaska's tectonic history. First defined by Cady et al. in 1955 , the Gemuk Group soon became a regional catchall unit that ended up as part of at least four different terranes. In this paper we provide the first new data in nearly half a century from the Gemuk Group in the original type area in Taylor Mountains quadrangle and from contiguous rocks to the north in Sleetmute quadrangle. Discontinuous exposure, hints of complex structure, the reconnaissance level of our mapping, and spotty age constraints together permit definition of only a rough stratigraphy. The restricted Gemuk Group is at least 2250 m thick, and could easily be at least twice as thick. The age range of the restricted Gemuk Group is tightened on the basis of ten radiolarian ages, two new bivalve ages, one conodont age, two U-Pb zircon ages on tuff, and U-Pb ages of 110 detrital zircons from two sandstones. The Triassic part of the restricted Gemuk Group, which consists of intermediate pillow lavas interbedded with siltstone, chert, and rare limestone, produced radiolarians, bivalves, and conodonts of Carnian and Norian ages. The Jurassic part appears to be mostly siltstone and chert, and yielded radiolarians of Hettangian-Sinemurian, Pliensbachian-Toarcian, and Oxfordian ages. Two tuffs near the Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary record nearby arc volcanism: one at 146 Ma is interbedded with red and green siltstone, and a second at ca. 137 Ma is interbedded with graywacke turbidites. Graywacke appears to be the dominant rock type in the Lower Cretaceous part of the restricted Gemuk Group. Detrital zircon analyses were performed on two sandstone samples using SHRIMP. One sandstone yielded a dominant age cluster of 133–180 Ma; the oldest grain is only 316 Ma. The second sample is dominated by zircons of 130–154 Ma; the oldest grain is 292 Ma. The youngest zircons are probably not much older than the sandstone itself. Point counts of restricted Gemuk Group sandstones yield average ratios of 24/29/47 for Q/F/L, 15/83/2 for Ls/Lv/Lm, and 41/48/11 for Qm/P/K. In the field, sandstones of the restricted Gemuk Group are not easily distinguished from sandstones of the overlying Upper Cretaceous turbidite-dominated Kuskokwim Group. Petrographically, however, the restricted Gemuk Group has modal K-feldspar, whereas the Kuskokwim Group generally does not (average Qm/P/K of 64/36/0). Some K-feldspar-bearing graywacke that was previously mapped as Kuskokwim Group ( Cady et al., 1955 ) is here reassigned to the restricted Gemuk Group. Major- and trace-element geochemistry of shales from the restricted Gemuk Group and the Kuskokwim Group show distinct differences. The chemical index of alteration (CIA) is distinctly higherforshales of the Kuskokwim Group than forthose of the restricted Gemuk Group, suggesting more intense weathering during deposition of the Kuskokwim Group. The restricted Gemuk Group represents an estimated 90–100 m.y. of deep-water sedimentation, first accompanied by submarine volcanism and later by nearby explosive arc activity. Two hypotheses are presented for the tectonic setting. One model that needs additional testing is that the restricted Gemuk Group consists of imbricated oceanic plate stratigraphy. Based on available information, our preferred model is that it was deposited in a back-arc, intra-arc, or forearc basin that was subsequently deformed. The terrane affinity of the restricted Gemuk Group is uncertain. The rocks of this area were formerly assigned to the Hagemeister subterrane of the Togiak terrane—a Late Triassic to Early Cretaceous arc—but our data show this to be a poor match. None of the other possibilities (e.g., Nukluk and Tikchik subterranes of the Goodnews terrane) is viable; hence, the terrane subdivision and distribution in southwestern Alaska may need to be revisited. The geologic history revealed by our study of the restricted Gemuk Group gives us a solid toehold in unraveling the Mesozoic paleogeography of this part of the northern Cordillera.

INTRODUCTION Canyons of the sea floor have constituted for many years one of the most puzzling features on the face of the earth. Many of these valleys have been cut back into the continental shelf and extend virtually to the coast. Where best known they have the characteristics of river-cut canyons such as are found in mountain ranges or on the escarpments at the margins of plateaus. Thus most of them have rocky walls and are narrow and roughly V-shaped; their floors slope outward almost continuously toward the ocean basin, and they have many tributaries entering from the sides in the common stream pattern. Despite these stream-valley characteristics, geologists do not agree as to whether they were cut by streams or whether they are the product of present-day processes acting on the sea floor. The cause of these canyons will not be considered here, although references at the end of the chapter include some of the more recent articles and books on the subject. ( See Ericson el al., 1951; Kuenen, 1950; 1952; Shepard, 1948 Shepard, 1952; Woodford, 1951.) DESCRIPTION OF LA JOLLA CANYON Before discussing the type of life which has been found within the canyons and especially on their walls, some description is needed of the characteristics of some of the best-known canyons. Those at La Jolla, California, have been explored more than any others. Their general setting is indicated in Plate 1, which shows the head of La Jolla Canyon and Scripps Canyon, out to the point where they...