1-20 OF 853 RESULTS FOR

Pratt Anticline

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Book Chapter

Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 1968
DOI: 10.1306/M9363C103
EISBN: 9781629812311
.... Cumulative gas production reported from the major structural features of the state is Hugoton embayment, 76 per cent; Cherokee basin, 8 per cent; Sedgwick basin, 8 per cent; Central Kansas uplift, less than 3 per cent; Pratt anticline, less than 2 per cent; and the Forest City basin, Nemaha anticline...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1965
AAPG Bulletin (1965) 49 (9): 1561.
...J. E. Brewer Abstract The Sedgwick basin is a moderate-size basinal structure, approximately 10–12,000 sq. mi. located in south-central Kansas. The basin is bounded on the east by the Nemaha anticline and on the west by the Pratt anticline. It is actually an embayment connected to a major Oklahoma...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1998
AAPG Bulletin (1998) 82 (2): 187–205.
...," these reservoirs occur beneath, and are partly associated with, a major regional unconformity separating Mississippian and Pennsylvanian deposits. Chat fields occur in an arcuate fairway extending approximately 160 km along the flanks of the southward-plunging Pratt anticline, a southern extension of the Central...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1998
AAPG Bulletin (1998) 82 (1): 187–205.
...,” these reservoirs occur beneath, and are partly associated with, a major regional unconformity separating Mississippian and Pennsylvanian deposits. Chat fields occur in an arcuate fairway extending approximately 160 km along the flanks of the southward-plunging Pratt anticline, a southern extension of the Central...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Book Chapter

Series: DNAG, Geology of North America
Published: 01 January 1991
DOI: 10.1130/DNAG-GNA-P2.325
EISBN: 9780813754697
... the northwest end of the Arbuckle Mountains with the east end of the Wichita Mountains. Figure 1 illustrates several subsidiary elements of the greater Anadarko basin: the Hugoton Embayment, the Pratt anticline, the Sedgwick basin, the Keyes dome, and the Dalhart basin, all of which are important...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (8): 1318.
... in southern Barber County, Kansas, near the axis of Pratt anticline. Previous studies using structure, isopach, netpay, and combinations of porosity and water saturation maps have had limited success in defining hydrocarbon migration paths or increasing reserves through drilling. Recent studies indicate...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1967
AAPG Bulletin (1967) 51 (8): 1689.
...Charles R. King ABSTRACT The Sedgwick embayment occupies approximately 8,000 sq mi in south-central Kansas. The area is bounded on the west and northwest by the Pratt anticline and the Central Kansas uplift. The Nemaha ridge limits the embayment on the east. Late Mississippian and Early...
Image
—Regional northwest-southeast log cross section, western flank of the Pratt anticline, showing stratigraphic relations within a major portion of the chat fairway, south-central Kansas.
Published: 01 January 1998
Figure 4. —Regional northwest-southeast log cross section, western flank of the Pratt anticline, showing stratigraphic relations within a major portion of the chat fairway, south-central Kansas.
Image
—(A) Regional structure, top of Mississippian Osagean series, south-central Kansas, (B) isopach data, Osagean strata, and (C) diagrammatic cross section showing basic stratigraphic relations along the Pratt anticline. Modified from Goebel (1966).
Published: 01 January 1998
Figure 2. —(A) Regional structure, top of Mississippian Osagean series, south-central Kansas, (B) isopach data, Osagean strata, and (C) diagrammatic cross section showing basic stratigraphic relations along the Pratt anticline. Modified from Goebel (1966) .
Image
(A) Isopach map of the Upper Devonian and Lower Mississippian clastics. Contour interval is 7.6 m (25 ft). Lineament A delimits the southwestern edge of the clastic-filled sag basin. (B) Isopach map of the Mississippian carbonates. Contour interval is 15 m (50 ft). Lineament A delimits the northeastern edge of thicker carbonates in the Sedgwick basin. Lineament B borders the rapid thickening of Mississippian strata toward the Hugoton embayment. (C) Isopach map of the Cowley Formation. Contour interval is 30 m (100 ft). Lineaments A and B are shown delimiting northern edges of the formation. (D) Isopach map of the chat. Contour interval is 3 m (10 ft). Lineaments A and B are shown delimiting southern edges of thick chat in the vicinity of the Pratt anticline.
Published: 01 January 2001
of the formation. (D) Isopach map of the chat. Contour interval is 3 m (10 ft). Lineaments A and B are shown delimiting southern edges of thick chat in the vicinity of the Pratt anticline.
Image
Northwest-southeast stratigraphic cross section depicting shale fraction in the Upper Devonian shale and Mississippian strata extending from the southeastern edge of the Central Kansas uplift along the southeast flank of the Pratt anticline. Datum is the top of the Mississippian. Colors depict shale fraction obtained from normalized gamma-ray logs. Warm colors (light yellow) are low shale content and represent carbonate, chert, and chat lithofacies. Shale is represented by black and blue identified by middle correlation line. Lower correlation line is top of Viola Limestone. Scale bar on left side of illustration is 15 m (50 ft). Length of cross section is 150 km (93 mi). Index for cross section is shown in inset map. Well 8a is in Spivey-Grabs field. Lineament A is immediately north of Spivey-Grabs field.
Published: 01 January 2001
Figure 6 Northwest-southeast stratigraphic cross section depicting shale fraction in the Upper Devonian shale and Mississippian strata extending from the southeastern edge of the Central Kansas uplift along the southeast flank of the Pratt anticline. Datum is the top of the Mississippian. Colors
Image
Generalized cross sections showing the relation of the aquifer and confining units to stratigraphic units in Kansas. (A) Paleozoic strata in southeastern Kansas dipping west of the Ozark dome on the east into the Cherokee basin. The Ozark plateau aquifer system/Western Interior Plains aquifer system with the overlying Western Interior Plains confining system is shown in relation to stratigraphy and structure. Warmer waters migrate updip from the Cherokee basin extension of the Arkoma basin farther south in Oklahoma until they intersect the cooler waters infiltrating from outcrops in the Ozark uplift (see Figures 8, 12). The cross section is adapted from Lee and Merriam (1954). (B) Northeast–southwest profile in south-central Kansas showing units dipping south into the Sedgwick basin extension of the Anadarko basin in Oklahoma. The Ozark plateau aquifer system/Western Interior Plains aquifer system is overlain by the Western Interior Plains confining system. Migration of fluids is updip out of the deeper parts of the basin (see Figure 12) until encountering waters migrating southward out of the Salina basin. The location of the Ellsworth anticline in the southern Salina basin is shown. The cross section is adapted from Lee (1949). Key to abbreviations: CA = Cambridge arch; HE = Hugoton embayment; CKU = Central Kansas uplift; SB = Salina basin; PA = Pratt anticline; NA = Nemaha anticline; SgB = Sedgwick basin; FCB = Forest City basin; CB = Cherokee basin. Dashed lines show the approximate location of boundaries between basins.
Published: 01 December 2005
basin is shown. The cross section is adapted from Lee (1949) . Key to abbreviations: CA = Cambridge arch; HE = Hugoton embayment; CKU = Central Kansas uplift; SB = Salina basin; PA = Pratt anticline; NA = Nemaha anticline; SgB = Sedgwick basin; FCB = Forest City basin; CB = Cherokee basin. Dashed lines
Image
Generalized cross sections showing the relation of the aquifer and confining units to stratigraphic units in Kansas. (A) Paleozoic strata in southeastern Kansas dipping west of the Ozark dome on the east into the Cherokee basin. The Ozark plateau aquifer system/Western Interior Plains aquifer system with the overlying Western Interior Plains confining system is shown in relation to stratigraphy and structure. Warmer waters migrate updip from the Cherokee basin extension of the Arkoma basin farther south in Oklahoma until they intersect the cooler waters infiltrating from outcrops in the Ozark uplift (see Figures 8, 12). The cross section is adapted from Lee and Merriam (1954). (B) Northeast–southwest profile in south-central Kansas showing units dipping south into the Sedgwick basin extension of the Anadarko basin in Oklahoma. The Ozark plateau aquifer system/Western Interior Plains aquifer system is overlain by the Western Interior Plains confining system. Migration of fluids is updip out of the deeper parts of the basin (see Figure 12) until encountering waters migrating southward out of the Salina basin. The location of the Ellsworth anticline in the southern Salina basin is shown. The cross section is adapted from Lee (1949). Key to abbreviations: CA = Cambridge arch; HE = Hugoton embayment; CKU = Central Kansas uplift; SB = Salina basin; PA = Pratt anticline; NA = Nemaha anticline; SgB = Sedgwick basin; FCB = Forest City basin; CB = Cherokee basin. Dashed lines show the approximate location of boundaries between basins.
Published: 01 December 2005
basin is shown. The cross section is adapted from Lee (1949) . Key to abbreviations: CA = Cambridge arch; HE = Hugoton embayment; CKU = Central Kansas uplift; SB = Salina basin; PA = Pratt anticline; NA = Nemaha anticline; SgB = Sedgwick basin; FCB = Forest City basin; CB = Cherokee basin. Dashed lines
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1978
AAPG Bulletin (1978) 62 (8): 1477–1486.
... producing wells along the Nemaha anticline. Niobrara gas is the target for leasing and drilling in northwestern Kansas, adjacent areas in Colorado, and northward across Nebraska. Sharon Springs is the first oil field in Wallace County. Cowley County, with 251 holes, had the most tests. Cunningham field...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1983
AAPG Bulletin (1983) 67 (4): 609–623.
... is a fourcounty region of south-central Kansas which straddles the Pratt anticline, a southern extension of the Central Kansas uplift ( Fig. 1 ). The Viola Limestone is a cherty, dolomitic limestone of Middle and Late Ordovician age which subcrops immediately north of the study area, against the flanks...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Image
(a) Lidar shaded relief map of Mercer Island showing locations of profiles 78th, 84th M, 84th N, 84th S, 86th, and 90th seismic profiles. Roadways shown by yellow lines. (b) Interpreted seismic profiles showing projections of Frontal, Seward Point, and Orchard Point faults. Approximate projection of Newcastle Hills anticline and fault is shown (e.g., Liberty and Pratt, 2008). DF is the projected location of the deformation front synclinal axis north of Mercer Island. Quaternary and Tertiary strata defined by Q and T, respectively. Uninterpreted versions of the seismic profiles are provided by Lindberg and Stephenson (2024).
Published: 08 August 2024
projection of Newcastle Hills anticline and fault is shown (e.g., Liberty and Pratt, 2008 ). DF is the projected location of the deformation front synclinal axis north of Mercer Island. Quaternary and Tertiary strata defined by Q and T , respectively. Uninterpreted versions of the seismic profiles
Image
Map of the Seattle fault zone (SFZ) crossing the Seattle urban area, modified from Blakely et al. (2002) and Pratt et al. (2015). Line locations of seismic profiles described in this study are shown by the magenta lines. The black boxes contain land‐based seismic‐reflection profiles grouped as the areas of West Seattle (WS), central Seattle (CS), and Mercer Island (MI). The black dashed lines show northern and southern boundaries of the SFZ, based on magnetic anomalies (Blakely et al., 2002). The red lines (solid where interpreted and dashed where inferred) are projected locations of south‐dipping thrust faults and blue thin lines are inferred north‐dipping back thrusts observed on Puget Sound marine seismic‐reflection profiles (Pratt et al., 2015). The heavy green dashed lines are fault locations implemented in 2023 National Seismic Hazard Model (e.g., Hatem et al., 2022). The red–orange areas are mapped as near‐surface Tertiary bedrock. The cyan lines show the interpreted locations of anticlinal folds within the SFZ, simplified from Yount and Gower (1991) and Troost and Booth (2008). AP, Alki Point; BH, Beacon Hill borehole; BHF, Blakely Harbor fault; BI, Blake Island; BR, Bremerton; DH, Duwamish Head; FF, Frontal fault; IW, Island Wood fault; OPF, Orchard Point fault; PG, Point Glover scarp; RP, Restoration Point; SPF, Seward Park fault; TJH, Toe Jam Hill fault; VI, Vashon Island; VPF, Vasa Park fault; WP, Waterman Point scarp. The inset figure indicates regional map showing study area in relation to the Cascadia region.
Published: 08 August 2024
Figure 1. Map of the Seattle fault zone (SFZ) crossing the Seattle urban area, modified from Blakely et al. (2002) and Pratt et al. (2015) . Line locations of seismic profiles described in this study are shown by the magenta lines. The black boxes contain land‐based seismic‐reflection
Image
Detailed stratigraphy of the Bridge Creek Limestone Member in the U.S.G.S. #1 Portland core with plots of weight percent calcium carbonate and total organic carbon (% CaCO3, % TOC: smooth lines are 20-point moving averages), optical densitometry (average pixel values from core photographs), oxygen-related ichnocoenosis (ORI) ranks from Savrda (1998), and δ13Corg values (Pratt 1985). Correlation of the #1 Portland core to the Rock Canyon Anticline reference section is indicated by the numbered marker limestone beds of Cobban and Scott (1972) and the lettered marker bentonites of Elder (1985). The biozonation is from Kennedy and Cobban (1991), and the biozone boundary ages represent an interpolated time scale (Kauffman et al. 1993) based on radiometric dating of bentonites by Obradovich (1993).
Published: 01 July 2001
photographs), oxygen-related ichnocoenosis (ORI) ranks from Savrda (1998) , and δ 13 C org values ( Pratt 1985 ). Correlation of the #1 Portland core to the Rock Canyon Anticline reference section is indicated by the numbered marker limestone beds of Cobban and Scott (1972) and the lettered marker
Image
Upper Devonian paleogeography of the Three Forks Formation, modified from Patchett et al. (1999) (left). Facies belts of the Palliser Platform (inset, Canadian side) are modified from Halbertsma (1994), Root (2001), and Peterhänsel and Pratt (2008). U.S.-side facies belts are interpreted from outcrop data in Nekhorosheva (2011) and Schietinger (2013) and regional studies that incorporate biostratigraphic data from Sandberg and Klapper (1967) and Sandberg et al. (1988a). The Potlach evaporite basin (Sandberg et al. 1988a) is inferred to be a southward extension of the microbial-mud belt. Frasnian structures include the Peace River Arch (PR) and theWestern Alberta Ridge (WA). Major stuctures active during Three Forks time include the Sweetgrass Arch (SG), the Swift Current Platform (SC), and the Cedar Creek Anticline (CC). The Transcontinental Arch (TA) was emergent southwest of the greater continental interior.
Published: 08 May 2018
Fig. 2.— Upper Devonian paleogeography of the Three Forks Formation, modified from Patchett et al. (1999) (left). Facies belts of the Palliser Platform (inset, Canadian side) are modified from Halbertsma (1994) , Root (2001) , and Peterhänsel and Pratt (2008) . U.S.-side facies belts
Image
(a) A legacy profile which shows characteristic deformation features interpreted in the SFZ including (1) the DF of the Seattle fault zone as denoted by an inflection in apparent dip of Tertiary sediments from north‐dipping in the hanging wall to flat lying in the foot wall, (2) the Blake Island anticline in the marine basaltic Tc in the hanging wall, which shows a fold truncated by the southernmost primary strand of the fault zone (Pratt et al., 2015), and (3) short wavelength anticlines within the Seattle uplift, indicating shortening along the extent of the SFZ hanging wall; approximate depth conversions represent a minimum depth estimate, with a constant time to depth conversion of 1500 m/s. (b) Automatically detected coherent reflectors from the profile shown in panel (a); reflectors are colored by apparent dip, which is at the minimum depth estimate and calculated using a constant time to depth conversion of 1500 m/s. Characteristic apparent dip curve was calculated using a moving 3‐CDP window of all detected reflectors at each offset; averages calculated using <10 apparent dip values (N horizons <10) are discarded. (c) Map of the characteristic apparent dip curve calculated for all north–south oriented profiles from the 1970 and 1997 Legacy seismic datasets; red is north‐dipping, blue is south‐dipping, and white is relatively flat; labels 1–3 show what the characteristic deformation features previously interpreted in Legacy seismic data look like in map view; blue‐to‐red transitions provide a map‐view visualization of previously interpreted anticlines (Booth et al., 2004; Brocher et al., 2004; Johnson et al., 2004), which are labeled as BIA, Blake Island anticline; PB, Point Beals; SP, Seahurst Park; TTP, Three Tree Point; and WiP, Winghaven Park. The profile in panel (a) can be found on the National Archive of Marine Seismic Surveys (NAMSS; Triezenberg et al., 2016) in survey W‐2‐70‐PS, line PG71‐027. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 19 August 2022
) the Blake Island anticline in the marine basaltic Tc in the hanging wall, which shows a fold truncated by the southernmost primary strand of the fault zone ( Pratt et al. , 2015 ), and (3) short wavelength anticlines within the Seattle uplift, indicating shortening along the extent of the SFZ hanging wall