1-20 OF 456 RESULTS FOR

Prague Oklahoma

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Save search
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article

Relocated Hypocenters and Structural Analysis from Waveform Modeling of Aftershocks from the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, Earthquake Sequence Available to Purchase

Marius P. Isken, Walter D. Mooney
Published: 21 February 2017
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (2): 553–562.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160150
...Marius P. Isken; Walter D. Mooney Abstract We present an analysis of aftershocks with M L > 3 from the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake sequence, an intraplate sequence of moderate‐size earthquakes within the North American craton. We apply waveform analysis to seismograms from temporary local...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Relocated Hypocenters and Structural Analysis from...
Second thumbnail for: Relocated Hypocenters and Structural Analysis from...
Third thumbnail for: Relocated Hypocenters and Structural Analysis from...
View PDF for article title, Relocated Hypocenters and Structural Analysis from Waveform Modeling of Aftershocks from the 2011 <span class="search-highlight">Prague</span>, <span class="search-highlight">Oklahoma</span>, Earthquake Sequence
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Relocated Hypocenters and Structural Analysis from Waveform Modeling of Aftershocks from the 2011 <span class="search-highlight">Prague</span>, <span class="search-highlight">Oklahoma</span>, Earthquake Sequence
Includes: Supplemental Content
Journal Article

Site Response in the Oklahoma Region from Seismic Recordings of the 2011 M w 5.7 Prague Earthquake Available to Purchase

Carlos Mendoza, Stephen Hartzell
Published: 21 August 2019
Seismological Research Letters (2019) 90 (5): 2015–2027.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180388
...Carlos Mendoza; Stephen Hartzell ABSTRACT We invert the shear‐wave displacement spectra obtained from 30 three‐component, broadband waveforms recorded within 300 km of the 6 November 2011 M w 5.7 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake to recover the site‐response contribution using an inversion method...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Site Response in the <span class="search-highlight...
Second thumbnail for: Site Response in the <span class="search-highlight...
Third thumbnail for: Site Response in the <span class="search-highlight...
View PDF for article title, Site Response in the <span class="search-highlight">Oklahoma</span> Region from Seismic Recordings of the 2011 M w 5.7 <span class="search-highlight">Prague</span> Earthquake
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Site Response in the <span class="search-highlight">Oklahoma</span> Region from Seismic Recordings of the 2011 M w 5.7 <span class="search-highlight">Prague</span> Earthquake
Image
Broadband stations (triangles) operating the day of the Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake (6 November 2011) and located within 3° of the epicenter (the star).

Broadband stations (triangles) operating the day of the Prague, Oklahoma, e... Available to Purchase

Published: 21 August 2019
Figure 1. Broadband stations (triangles) operating the day of the Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake (6 November 2011) and located within 3° of the epicenter (the star).
Image
Spectral ratio plots for four events from the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake sequence. Event 55 is the M 5.7 mainshock. Dashed curves correspond to the original moment tensor moments with a corner frequency corresponding to a stress drop of 3.5 MPa. Dotted lines are the fit. Solid lines show the mean spectral ratio and one standard deviation of the simulated residuals. Vertical lines are the corner frequencies.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.

Spectral ratio plots for four events from the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, earthq... Available to Purchase

Published: 21 February 2017
Figure 4. Spectral ratio plots for four events from the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake sequence. Event 55 is the M  5.7 mainshock. Dashed curves correspond to the original moment tensor moments with a corner frequency corresponding to a stress drop of 3.5 MPa. Dotted lines are the fit. Solid
Image
Epicenters of study events of M&gt;1.5 from the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, sequence, between November 2011 and December 2011, as determined by Sumy et al. (2014). Inset map shows location. Triangles are recording stations and lines show fault systems in the region (from Holland, 2015).The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.

Epicenters of study events of M >1.5 from the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, se... Available to Purchase

Published: 13 December 2016
Figure 1. Epicenters of study events of M >1.5 from the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, sequence, between November 2011 and December 2011, as determined by Sumy et al. (2014) . Inset map shows location. Triangles are recording stations and lines show fault systems in the region (from Holland, 2015
Journal Article

Ground Motions for Induced Earthquakes in Oklahoma Available to Purchase

Emrah Yenier, Gail M. Atkinson, Danielle F. Sumy
Published: 13 December 2016
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (1): 198–215.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160114
...Figure 1. Epicenters of study events of M >1.5 from the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, sequence, between November 2011 and December 2011, as determined by Sumy et al. (2014) . Inset map shows location. Triangles are recording stations and lines show fault systems in the region (from Holland, 2015...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Ground Motions for Induced Earthquakes in <span cl...
Second thumbnail for: Ground Motions for Induced Earthquakes in <span cl...
Third thumbnail for: Ground Motions for Induced Earthquakes in <span cl...
View PDF for article title, Ground Motions for Induced Earthquakes in <span class="search-highlight">Oklahoma</span>
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Ground Motions for Induced Earthquakes in <span class="search-highlight">Oklahoma</span>
Journal Article

Shallow Shear‐Wave Velocity Structure in Oklahoma Based on the Joint Inversion of Ambient Noise Dispersion and Teleseismic P ‐Wave Receiver Functions Available to Purchase

Jiayan Tan, Charles A. Langston, Sidao Ni
Published: 08 December 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (2): 654–670.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200246
...‐velocity zones in the model correlate with the large sedimentary basins of Oklahoma. The velocity model significantly improves the agreement of synthetic and observed seismograms from the 6 November 2011 M w 5.7 Prague, Oklahoma earthquake suggesting that it can be used to improve earthquake location...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Shallow Shear‐Wave Velocity Structure in <span cla...
Second thumbnail for: Shallow Shear‐Wave Velocity Structure in <span cla...
Third thumbnail for: Shallow Shear‐Wave Velocity Structure in <span cla...
View PDF for article title, Shallow Shear‐Wave Velocity Structure in <span class="search-highlight">Oklahoma</span> Based on the Joint Inversion of Ambient Noise Dispersion and Teleseismic P ‐Wave Receiver Functions
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Shallow Shear‐Wave Velocity Structure in <span class="search-highlight">Oklahoma</span> Based on the Joint Inversion of Ambient Noise Dispersion and Teleseismic P ‐Wave Receiver Functions
Journal Article

Shape Dynamic Time Warping for Seismic Waveform Inversion Available to Purchase

Jiayan Tan, Charles A. Langston
Published: 01 September 2022
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (6): 2915–2932.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120220051
... broadband seismographic stations of the Tanzania Broadband Seismic Experiment are used to demonstrate the method. We also test the inversion through solving for 1D crustal velocity structure of the Cherokee Platform in Oklahoma using seismograms of the 2011 M w 5.7 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake recorded...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Shape Dynamic Time Warping for Seismic Waveform In...
Second thumbnail for: Shape Dynamic Time Warping for Seismic Waveform In...
Third thumbnail for: Shape Dynamic Time Warping for Seismic Waveform In...
View PDF for article title, Shape Dynamic Time Warping for Seismic Waveform Inversion
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Shape Dynamic Time Warping for Seismic Waveform Inversion
Journal Article

Quake‐DFN: A Software for Simulating Sequences of Induced Earthquakes in a Discrete Fault Network Available to Purchase

Kyungjae Im, Jean‐Philippe Avouac
Published: 31 May 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (5): 2341–2358.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230299
... fault with a wide range of initial stresses, (2) a branching fault system with varying fault angles and principal stress orientations, and (3) a fault network similar to the one that was activated during the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake sequence. The simulations produce realistic earthquake...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Quake‐DFN: A Software for Simulating Sequences of ...
Second thumbnail for: Quake‐DFN: A Software for Simulating Sequences of ...
Third thumbnail for: Quake‐DFN: A Software for Simulating Sequences of ...
View PDF for article title, Quake‐DFN: A Software for Simulating Sequences of Induced Earthquakes in a Discrete Fault Network
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Quake‐DFN: A Software for Simulating Sequences of Induced Earthquakes in a Discrete Fault Network
Includes: Supplemental Content
Image
Epicenters of earthquakes (blue dots) included in the Mw 3–4 ground‐motion catalog associated with the Oklahoma/Kansas study area. Red dots indicate epicenters of the 2011 Mw 5.6 event near Prague, Oklahoma, and the 2016 Mw 5.8 event near Pawnee, Oklahoma.

Epicenters of earthquakes (blue dots) included in the M w  3–4 grou... Available to Purchase

Published: 25 September 2017
Figure 1. Epicenters of earthquakes (blue dots) included in the M w  3–4 ground‐motion catalog associated with the Oklahoma/Kansas study area. Red dots indicate epicenters of the 2011 M w  5.6 event near Prague, Oklahoma, and the 2016 M w  5.8 event near Pawnee, Oklahoma.
Image
Epicenters of earthquakes (dots) included in the Mw&gt;4 ground‐motion catalog associated with the Oklahoma/Kansas target area. Epicenters of the 2011 Mw 5.6 event near Prague, Oklahoma, and the 2016 Mw 5.8 event near Pawnee, Oklahoma, are specifically identified.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.

Epicenters of earthquakes (dots) included in the M w > 4 grou... Available to Purchase

Published: 26 February 2019
Figure 1. Epicenters of earthquakes (dots) included in the M w > 4 ground‐motion catalog associated with the Oklahoma/Kansas target area. Epicenters of the 2011 M w  5.6 event near Prague, Oklahoma, and the 2016 M w  5.8 event near Pawnee, Oklahoma, are specifically
Image
Amplitude versus distance plot of the vertical‐component data from the M 5.7 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake. The open red circles are observations to the north and northeast, the asterisk in red circles are observations to the south and southeast, and the open blue circles are observations to the west. SA, spectral acceleration.

Amplitude versus distance plot of the vertical‐component data from the M... Available to Purchase

Published: 19 December 2017
Figure 1. Amplitude versus distance plot of the vertical‐component data from the M  5.7 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake. The open red circles are observations to the north and northeast, the asterisk in red circles are observations to the south and southeast, and the open blue circles
Image
Comparisons of the tangential component of synthetic waveforms based on the 1D central United States (CUS) (Herrmann, 1979) velocity model (red) and observed waveforms (blue) for the 2011 Mw 5.7 Prague, Oklahoma earthquake. Waveforms are band‐pass‐filtered between 0.03 and 0.25 Hz. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.

Comparisons of the tangential component of synthetic waveforms based on the... Available to Purchase

Published: 08 December 2020
Figure 2. Comparisons of the tangential component of synthetic waveforms based on the 1D central United States (CUS) ( Herrmann, 1979 ) velocity model (red) and observed waveforms (blue) for the 2011 M w  5.7 Prague, Oklahoma earthquake. Waveforms are band‐pass‐filtered between 0.03
Image
Map showing the locations of the three main events (yellow stars) with moment tensor solution from McNamara, Benz, et al. (2015) and 13 aftershocks ML&gt;3 (red stars) that followed the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake sequence between 11 November and 31 December 2011. Seismograph locations of the Rapid Array Mobilization Program (RAMP) and large aperture (LA) array are marked by green and blue triangles, respectively. Locations of known mapped faults from the Oklahoma Geological Survey fault database are shown in dark red (Marsh and Holland, 2016).

Map showing the locations of the three main events (yellow stars) with mome... Available to Purchase

Published: 21 February 2017
Figure 1. Map showing the locations of the three main events (yellow stars) with moment tensor solution from McNamara, Benz, et al. (2015) and 13 aftershocks M L > 3 (red stars) that followed the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake sequence between 11 November and 31 December 2011
Journal Article

Stress‐Drop Variations of Induced Earthquakes in Oklahoma Available to Purchase

Qimin Wu, Martin Chapman, Xiaowei Chen
Published: 01 May 2018
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (3A): 1107–1123.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170335
... and Zoback, 2015 ). There have been several notable earthquake sequences in Oklahoma. For example, the November 2011 M w  5.6 Prague earthquake, one of the largest historical earthquakes in Oklahoma, resulted in structural damage and was attributed to nearby wastewater disposal ( Keranen et al...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Stress‐Drop Variations of Induced Earthquakes in <...
Second thumbnail for: Stress‐Drop Variations of Induced Earthquakes in <...
Third thumbnail for: Stress‐Drop Variations of Induced Earthquakes in <...
View PDF for article title, Stress‐Drop Variations of Induced Earthquakes in <span class="search-highlight">Oklahoma</span>
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Stress‐Drop Variations of Induced Earthquakes in <span class="search-highlight">Oklahoma</span>
Includes: Supplemental Content
Image
Geologic cross section through the Anadarko basin and Cherokee platform in the North American platform, illustrating the stratigraphy of the basin. The yellow star marks the projected hypocenter at 5‐km depth of the main 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake (Mw 5.6; 6 November 2011) in the Precambrian granitic basement. The projected location of the LA array is shown by the black line. Adapted from Johnson (2008).

Geologic cross section through the Anadarko basin and Cherokee platform in ... Available to Purchase

Published: 21 February 2017
Figure 2. Geologic cross section through the Anadarko basin and Cherokee platform in the North American platform, illustrating the stratigraphy of the basin. The yellow star marks the projected hypocenter at 5‐km depth of the main 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake ( M w  5.6; 6 November
Image
Observed peak ground acceleration (PGA) ground motions from three databases used in this study. (a) Magnitude versus distance for the observed instrumental ground‐motion dataset. (b) Mw 5.7 Prague, Oklahoma, PGA from all three ground‐motion databases for comparison. Atkinson and Boore (2006, hereafter, AB06) ground‐motion model (GMM) shown for comparison to ground‐motion observations.

Observed peak ground acceleration (PGA) ground motions from three databases... Available to Purchase

Published: 20 November 2018
Figure 1. Observed peak ground acceleration (PGA) ground motions from three databases used in this study. (a) Magnitude versus distance for the observed instrumental ground‐motion dataset. (b)  M w  5.7 Prague, Oklahoma, PGA from all three ground‐motion databases for comparison. Atkinson
Image
Illustration of the corner frequency selection and minimum signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) criteria for the BH instrument at station TA.437A for the 2011 M 5.7 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake. For the SNR‐based corner frequency selection option, relevant config parameters are the minimum frequency (fmin) and the maximum frequency (fmax) that define the bandwidth over which the minimum required SNR (SNRmin) must be exceeded. fHP and fLP are the selected high‐pass and low‐pass corner frequencies, respectively. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.

Illustration of the corner frequency selection and minimum signal‐to‐noise ... Available to Purchase

Published: 16 August 2024
Figure 2. Illustration of the corner frequency selection and minimum signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) criteria for the BH instrument at station TA.437A for the 2011  M 5.7 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake. For the SNR‐based corner frequency selection option, relevant config parameters are the minimum
Image
Residuals (difference between natural logarithms of observed Fourier acceleration amplitude spectra and the target spectra) for the 28 February 2011 Mw 4.65 central Arkansas earthquake (filled circles) and the 6 November 2011 Mw 5.59 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake (open circles). The left column shows residuals for a target incorporating all terms in equation (21). The right column shows residuals for a target computed with the site term in equation (21) omitted.

Residuals (difference between natural logarithms of observed Fourier accele... Available to Purchase

Published: 15 March 2016
Figure 15. Residuals (difference between natural logarithms of observed Fourier acceleration amplitude spectra and the target spectra) for the 28 February 2011 M w  4.65 central Arkansas earthquake (filled circles) and the 6 November 2011 M w  5.59 Prague, Oklahoma, earthquake (open circles
Image
(a) Locations of 10 tectonic events listed in Table 2 (gray triangles). Also shown are “Did You Feel It?” (DYFI) intensity values for the 18 April 2008 Mt. Carmel, Illinois, earthquake. Intensity values are plotted using the color scale shown. (b) Locations of 11 induced earthquakes listed in Table 1 (black stars). Some stars represent multiple events. DYFI intensity values are shown for the largest earthquake in the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, sequence.

(a) Locations of 10 tectonic events listed in Table  2 (gray triangles). A... Available to Purchase

Published: 19 August 2014
listed in Table  1 (black stars). Some stars represent multiple events. DYFI intensity values are shown for the largest earthquake in the 2011 Prague, Oklahoma, sequence.