1-20 OF 1049 RESULTS FOR

Pittsburgh Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Generalized hydrostratigraphy of the Pittsburgh Formation, Upper Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group (after Edmunds et al., 1999). Scale is approximate.
Published: 01 May 2015
Figure 4.  Generalized hydrostratigraphy of the Pittsburgh Formation, Upper Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group (after Edmunds et al., 1999 ). Scale is approximate.
Published: 01 January 2006
DOI: 10.1130/2006.2399(10)
... The Pittsburgh, Redstone, and Sewickley coal beds all occur in the Late Pennsylvanian Pittsburgh Formation of the Monongahela Group in the northern Appalachian Basin. The goal of this study is to compare and contrast the palynology, petrography, and geochemistry of the three coals, specifically...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Series: SEPM Core Workshop Notes
Published: 01 January 1994
DOI: 10.2110/cor.94.01.0297
EISBN: 9781565762718
... Abstract The Redstone limestone of Platt and Platt (1877) is one of five nonmarine limestone beds in the Upper Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group. The Redstone limestone lies within the lower member (Berryhill and Swanson, 1962) of the Pittsburgh Formation between the thick, economically...
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2019
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2019) 25 (1): 27–101.
..., the Allegheny, Monongahela, and Ohio. The formation of Pittsburgh’s three rivers and drainages has a long history dating back to before the Pleistocene Epoch, linked closely to the advance and retreat of continental glaciation. Western Pennsylvania is associated with the westernmost formation of the Appalachian...
FIGURES | View All (58)
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1946
American Mineralogist (1946) 31 (7-8): 357–364.
...Wilder D. Foster; Florence L. Feicht Abstract Four concretions were found in the Pittsburgh coal bed at Pursglove, Monongalia County, West Virginia, and were collected for study to obtain a better understanding of acid formation in the mine. Three of the concretions were mainly pyrite...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1947
AAPG Bulletin (1947) 31 (3): 429–446.
... direct compression by the formation of the Pittsburgh-Huntington basin. Deformation through central Kentucky and southern Illinois is explained as the result of a westward expression of orogenic stress through greater thickness of sedimentary rock. An experiment is described by which the general pattern...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 31 December 1934
GSA Bulletin (1934) 45 (6): 1017–1034.
... of sandstone with siliceous and ferruginous cement, and, because of their vertical attitude and concentric banded structure, have been known locally as “trees” or “tree trunks” (PL 123). Various suggestions have been offered to account for their formation. These seem to be based on brief field studies...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1891
GSA Bulletin (1891) 2 (1): 457–464.
..., consisting of grooves, striæ and potholes, were discovered by the writers in the course of a survey of the Pleistocene formations of the valley of the Beaver river. The description of the particular phenomena in which we are interested is here prefaced by a short account of some of the features...
Journal Article
Published: 13 March 2025
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2025)
... development of prehistoric and other landslides results from the presence of thick, weak, slide-prone soil and rock units. In addition to the clay shales of the Northern Plains, these include thick, weak claystones, e.g., the Pittsburgh red beds of the Appalachian Plateau (Hamel and Flint, 1972), the thick...
Image
High-angle faulting within the Casselman Formation shales and claystones north of Pittsburgh (Shultz and Harper, 1996).
Published: 01 February 2019
Figure 31. High-angle faulting within the Casselman Formation shales and claystones north of Pittsburgh ( Shultz and Harper, 1996 ).
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2015
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2015) 21 (2): 147–164.
...Figure 4.  Generalized hydrostratigraphy of the Pittsburgh Formation, Upper Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group (after Edmunds et al., 1999 ). Scale is approximate. ...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 04 June 2021
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2021) 27 (3): 269–285.
..., and un-named limestone below the Pittsburgh red beds ( Figures 4 and 5 ). On the day of the slide, ice formations existed on the slope face at the levels of the Duquesne coal and Ames Limestone. It originally appeared that ice plugged essentially all of these outlets and that water pressure...
Image
—Cross section of Pottsville and Allegheny Formations from vicinity of Bluefield, West Virginia, to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, showing general arrangement of coal beds and depositional environments in which they formed (after Ferm and Cavaroc, 1969).
Published: 01 December 1978
Fig. 16 —Cross section of Pottsville and Allegheny Formations from vicinity of Bluefield, West Virginia, to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, showing general arrangement of coal beds and depositional environments in which they formed (after Ferm and Cavaroc, 1969 ).
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2010
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2010) 16 (3): 229–243.
...BRIAN H GREENE; JENNIFER CROCK; LARRY MOSKOVITZ; JOSEPH W PREMOZIC Abstract East Branch Dam is a Pittsburgh District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) dam that nearly failed in 1957, several years after construction. The dam is a zoned embankment that is 56 m (184 ft) high and 526 m (1,725 ft...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2006
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2006) 12 (3): 273–282.
... recharge calculations for postmining flooding. This study presents upper-limit estimates for hydraulic conductivity (K) of intact barriers in two closed mines at moderate depth (75–300 m, or 250–980 ft) in the Pittsburgh coal basin. The estimates are based on pumping rates from these mines for the years...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1943
AAPG Bulletin (1943) 27 (4): 529–537.
... the hole. Several wells near Hundred, Wetzel County, are producing considerable volumes of gas (as much as 380 MCF. per day) from Pittsburgh coal at an approximate depth of 750 feet. Samples 1–6 ( Table I ) were collected in this area from the Pittsburgh coal. Well No. 3 was completed a few weeks...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 1941
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1941) 31 (3): 239–243.
... the output of an electromagnetic vertical seismometer which is de- signed for short periods. It is this principle which has formed the basis of the unit designed at the University of Pittsburgh Seismological Observatory. The Pittsburgh system uses a standard Benioff vertical seismometer, a pre- amplifier...
Image
Maps showing cross-structural discontinuities and (A) the location of the Oriskany no-sand area, Kane gravity high, and the area of the basin absent in the Union Springs Member of the Marcellus Formation; (B) the area of the basin absent in the Cherry Valley Member of the Marcellus Formation; (C) the region of the basin over which the Oatka Creek Member of the Marcellus Formation thins; (D) the distribution of the Stafford Member of the Skaneateles Formation; (E) the distribution of the Levanna Member of the Skaneateles Formation illustrating 0 ft, 5 ft (1.5 m), and 20 ft (6.1 m) isochores. Crossstructural discontinuities: L-A = Lawrenceville-Attica; B-B = Blairsville-Broadtop; H-G = Home-Gallitzin; T-MU = Tyrone-Mount Union; P-W = Pittsburgh-Washington (modified from Parrish and Lavin, 1982).
Published: 01 January 2011
Figure 24 Maps showing cross-structural discontinuities and (A) the location of the Oriskany no-sand area, Kane gravity high, and the area of the basin absent in the Union Springs Member of the Marcellus Formation; (B) the area of the basin absent in the Cherry Valley Member of the Marcellus
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2001
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (2001) 1 (1): 61–70.
... , BENCH , B. M. & DUEL , M. 1975 . Selected Geologic Factors Affecting Mining of the Pittsburgh Coalbed. In : Report of Investigations 8093 . US Bureau of Mines . NORDSTROM , D. K. 1982 . Aqueous Pyrite Oxidation and the Consequent Formation of Secondary Iron Minerals...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Series: GSA Field Guide
Published: 01 January 2017
DOI: 10.1130/2017.0046(01)
EISBN: 9780813756462
... Tunnel and Duquesne Incline (from Neelan et al., 2003 , p. 7). The rocks in this sequence belong to the Glenshaw and Casselman Formations of the Conemaugh Group (the Ames Limestone comprises the topmost unit of the Glenshaw) and the Monongahela Group (the Pittsburgh coal is the basal unit of the group...
FIGURES | View All (24)