1-20 OF 129 RESULTS FOR

Pir Panjal Range

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 1984
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1984) 25 (11): 706–719.
...K. L. Kaila; K. M. Tripathi; M. M. Dixit Abstract Deep Seismic Soundings along Wular lake-Gulmarg-Naoshera profile across Pir Panjal range of the Himalaya have delineated the Srinagar and Jammu synclines, each having a maximum sedimentary thickness of about 18 km. In the Srinagar syncline...
Image
Updated age-elevation plot from the Dhauladhar Range and Pir Panjal Range modified after Deeken et al. (2011). Green dots show new ZHe (zircon (U-Th)/He) ages. Note the difference of the age elevation trends. (A) Apatite fission track (AFT) and ZHe data from the Dhauladhar Range, where AFT data yield approximately the same age, despite large elevation difference, while the ZHe data show a clear elevation dependence. MBT—Main Boundary thrust. (B) Age-elevation trends of Pir Panjal Range are approximately parallel, indicating moderate and constant exhumation rates.
Published: 14 July 2017
Figure 3. Updated age-elevation plot from the Dhauladhar Range and Pir Panjal Range modified after Deeken et al. (2011) . Green dots show new ZHe (zircon (U-Th)/He) ages. Note the difference of the age elevation trends. (A) Apatite fission track (AFT) and ZHe data from the Dhauladhar Range
Image
The location of the Kashmir valley fronted by the Pir Panjal range of the Great Himalaya adjoining the Hazara syntaxial bend. Lines across the range mark the various broadband seismic profiles from the western Himalaya to the eastern. A, current study; B, Rai et al. (2006); C, Gilligan et al. (2015); D, Nabelek et al. (2009); E, Schulte‐Pelkum et al. (2005); F, Acton et al. (2011); and G, Hazarika (2007). Numbers (depths in kilometers) indicate both eastward and westward thickening of the crust beneath the 3500‐m‐high contour that approximately follows the northern edge of the locked Main Himalayan thrust (MHT; Avouac, 2003, 2015).The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 25 September 2017
Figure 10. The location of the Kashmir valley fronted by the Pir Panjal range of the Great Himalaya adjoining the Hazara syntaxial bend. Lines across the range mark the various broadband seismic profiles from the western Himalaya to the eastern. A, current study; B, Rai et al. (2006) ; C
Image
(a) Map view of the Kashmir valley bounded to the SW by the Pir Panjal range and to the NE by the Zanskar range. The four sections across the valley highlight the form of RFs and, in particular, the crustal thinning underneath the valley. The PPs are marked by an initial letter of their respective station name; stations having same initial letter are differentiated by a degree symbol (see legend). (b)–(e) RFs calculated for various sets of PPs along four profiles crossing the valley from SW to NE, marked in (a). All four profiles are measured from the valley axis (vertical line). The BF is the geologically‐inferred Balapora fault (Ahmad et al., 2014) paralleling the valley axis to its southeast (SE).The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 25 September 2017
Figure 9. (a) Map view of the Kashmir valley bounded to the SW by the Pir Panjal range and to the NE by the Zanskar range. The four sections across the valley highlight the form of RFs and, in particular, the crustal thinning underneath the valley. The PPs are marked by an initial letter
Journal Article
Published: 25 September 2017
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (5): 2443–2458.
...Figure 10. The location of the Kashmir valley fronted by the Pir Panjal range of the Great Himalaya adjoining the Hazara syntaxial bend. Lines across the range mark the various broadband seismic profiles from the western Himalaya to the eastern. A, current study; B, Rai et al. (2006) ; C...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Crustal Structure beneath the Kashmir Basin Adjoin...
Second thumbnail for: Crustal Structure beneath the Kashmir Basin Adjoin...
Third thumbnail for: Crustal Structure beneath the Kashmir Basin Adjoin...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 07 May 2021
GSA Bulletin (2022) 134 (1-2): 275–292.
... which separates the Tethyan Himalaya in the south from the Karakoram zone to the north. Due to the barriers created by the Pir-Panjal ranges and the High Himalaya, Ladakh is located in a rain shadow zone of the Indian summer monsoon (ISM) making it a high-altitude desert. Occasional catastrophic...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Late Pleistocene–Holocene flood history, flood-sed...
Second thumbnail for: Late Pleistocene–Holocene flood history, flood-sed...
Third thumbnail for: Late Pleistocene–Holocene flood history, flood-sed...
... of the Kashmir valley during major earthquakes around A.D. 1505 and/or 1886. Such movement likely caused historical drainage reversals, impoundments, and SE tilting, which were previously attributed to some unknown structures under the Pir Panjal Ranges. ...
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1986
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1986) 28 (4): 289–297.
...R. K. Pant; K. Dilli Abstract The spatial and temporal variation of Kashmir loess deposits has been explained as the function of palaeotopographical configuration consequent to the Pir Panjal Range uplift datable at 0.4 m.y. At least three palaeosurfaces were available for loess deposition...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2022
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2022) 98 (9): 1329.
... depression of about 140 km long and up to 60 km wide with an average elevation of 1800masl. It is located between latitudes 34°17'N and 37°6'N and longitudes 73°6'E to 80°30'E. The valley basin was developed in northwestern India during the late Cenozoic era by tectonic uplift of the Pir Panjal Range, which...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1974
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1974) 15 (3): 299–305.
... south western arm is known as the Pir-Panjal Range and the north-eastern arm as the Main Himalayan Range. At the northern limit of the Valley is the Qazi Nag Range. These mountainous ranges comprise metamorphosed Palaeozoic and Mesozoic marine sediments and effusive rocks. In between the complexly...
Image
Differences of ksn values between catchments in the hanging and footwall along strike of the three major fault zones with a shaded area indicating a 50-km running average. See Figure 2A for location. Crosses show Δ river steepness indices between hanging and footwall averaged over 10-km segments (note different y-scales). Areas of an increased difference in steepness indices are interpreted to show fault segments with Quaternary tectonic activity. (A) The contribution of the PT2-structure to higher steepness indices in its hanging wall is pronounced at the northern boundary of the Kashmir Basin (50–150 km), at the Dhauladhar Range (340–410 km) and in the Garhwal-Sutlej Himalaya (600−800 km). (B) The MBT profile shows three parabola-like increases at the Pir Panjal Range (50−150 km), at the Dhauladhar Range (300−400 km), and in the northern boundary of the Dehra Dun (540–640 km). (C) The MFT profile shows a large positive Δ ksn between Chamba and Sutlej regions (460–540 km), around the Chenab outlet (280–320 km), and in the Kashmir Himalaya (60–220 km). See the Data Repository Item (text footnote 1) for additional along strike ksn plots showing changes in the hanging wall (10 and 30 km) of the major fault systems (Data Repository Figs. S9−S11).
Published: 02 July 2018
of the Kashmir Basin (50–150 km), at the Dhauladhar Range (340–410 km) and in the Garhwal-Sutlej Himalaya (600−800 km). (B) The MBT profile shows three parabola-like increases at the Pir Panjal Range (50−150 km), at the Dhauladhar Range (300−400 km), and in the northern boundary of the Dehra Dun (540–640 km). (C
Image
Cross section of the Kashmir valley beneath L2–L2′ (Fig. 1). Arrows on the surface denote the surface expressions of major faults (Fig. 1). Inverted triangles in the subsurface are depths to a prominent low‐velocity horizon required by the inversions of RFs, whereas stars and diamonds, respectively, denote the Moho depths from Kaila et al. (1984) and from the current study (CS). Pentagons represent a reflector mapped by Kaila et al. (1984), located in conjunction with our LVZ. Error bounds on the Moho were obtained from forward modeling. All depths are below sea level after correcting for the elevation of stations. The vertical line marks the valley axis (Fig. 1) and serves as a reference for reckoning distances on either side. The ISC‐ and CS‐denoted circles respectively mark the hypocenters of earthquakes from ISC and those recorded by our network and are scaled by size (see legend). Triangles mark the station locations positioned according to their elevation along L2. Note that the Moho has a steep descent from ∼44  km beneath the MBT to ∼58  km beneath the Pir Panjal range within ∼35  km, becoming gentler further NE across the valley, with a slight upwarp in the valley, suggesting thinning of the crust. Squares with error bounds are the selected Moho depths from H‐κ stacking algorithm.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 25 September 2017
by size (see legend). Triangles mark the station locations positioned according to their elevation along L2. Note that the Moho has a steep descent from ∼ 44    km beneath the MBT to ∼ 58    km beneath the Pir Panjal range within ∼ 35    km , becoming gentler further NE across
Image
The jointly inverted and forward‐modeled shear‐wave velocity structure beneath selected clusters of PPs corresponding to tightly binned source locations. In each case, inversion was initiated with the fixed shear‐wave velocity (4.48  km/s) model shown by the dashed thin line (denoted by IM [initial model]). Jointly inverted (JI) results are shown by the solid thin line, forward models (FM) by solid thick lines, and uncertainty bounds on the Moho by the dashed thick line. Arrows denote the depth of the low‐velocity zone (LVZ) and the Moho (see legend). (a) Two pairs of inversions: the first for BAR and GUL in respect of RFs from BAZ ∼114° and ∼36°, respectively, and the other for AHR and ANG in respect to RF stacks from BAZ ∼37° and ∼285°, respectively. Despite wide differences in source locations, each pair corresponds to close PP and yield similar Moho depths. (b) Two rows of inversions for sites from the southern side of the valley to the northern side, and three columns of inversions from the western flank of the valley through its middle to the eastern flank. The Moho depths yielded by them vary from ∼58  km under the Pir Panjal range on the SW to ∼62  km under the eastern margin with a Moho upwarp in the valley at ∼54  km.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 25 September 2017
the Pir Panjal range on the SW to ∼ 62    km under the eastern margin with a Moho upwarp in the valley at ∼ 54    km .The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
(A) Topographic map and swath profile locations. Colored lines show location of traces of along-strike swath profiles. Lines in the hanging and footwall are 10 km off the respective structure. Swath profiles (20 km wide) have been calculated along these lines. Black lines show the location of topographic swath profiles (profiles are numbered 1−10 from NW to SE). The locations of the MFT and the MBT were derived from geologic maps by Steck et al. (2003). Abbreviations: DDR—Dehra Dun reentrant; DR—Dhauladhar Range; JWT—Jawalamukhi Thrust; KB—Kashmir Basin; KR—Kangra reentrant; KRW—Kullu-Rampur Window; KW—Kishtwar Window; MBT—Main Boundary Thrust; MCT—Main Central Thrust; MFT—Main Frontal Thrust; MWT—Medicott-Wadia Thrust; NS—Nahan Salient; PPR—Pir Panjal Range; RT—Riasi Thrust; ZR—Zanskar Range. (B) Topographic relief calculated over a 5 × 5 km window. PT2 is defined by the abrupt increase in topographic relief (relief > 1000 m). Thermochronologic data and erosion rates are obtained from Thiede et al. (2009, 2017), Deeken et al. (2011), and Thiede and Ehlers (2013). (C) Spatial pattern of catchment-averaged river steepness analysis for the western Himalaya with θref = -0.45. The three segments, Kashmir Himalaya, Chamba Himalaya, and Garhwal-Sutlej Himalaya are areas of internally similar morphologic, geologic, and topographic characteristics. (D) Distribution of moment magnitudes (Mw) of seismic events since 1960 (data source: U.S. Geological Survey, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search).
Published: 02 July 2018
—Kullu-Rampur Window; KW—Kishtwar Window; MBT—Main Boundary Thrust; MCT—Main Central Thrust; MFT—Main Frontal Thrust; MWT—Medicott-Wadia Thrust; NS—Nahan Salient; PPR—Pir Panjal Range; RT—Riasi Thrust; ZR—Zanskar Range. (B) Topographic relief calculated over a 5 × 5 km window. PT2 is defined
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2024
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2024) 100 (7): 1068.
... for several years on importance of loess deposits and paleosols in Kashmir Himalaya. For the first time he was able to understand the spatial and temporal variations in the loess deposits as the function of palaeotopographical configuration consequent to the Pir Panjal Range uplift at 0.4m.y. ...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Rajendra Kumar Pant (1934-2024)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 1994
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1994) 44 (5): 563–574.
... on the soil micromorphology (Bronger between the Himalaya to the northeast rising to and Pant, 1985; Bwnger et nl. 1987) povided about 6000rn and the Pir Panjal range to the first evidence for lute Pleistocene climatic southwest rising to about 4000m.The basin is change in the valley. Ther~noluminescence...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2025
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2025) 101 (6): 821–826.
...) reflecting the mafic nature of subsurface rocks (Supplementary Fig. S8). The high ratio (> 0.30) reflects the presence of subsurface partial melt (Christensen, 1996), as appears for the TDAR stations. Mir et al. (2017) observed that the Moho descends steeply below the Pir-Panjal ranges from a depth...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Crustal Thickness Variation across the Jammu and K...
Second thumbnail for: Crustal Thickness Variation across the Jammu and K...
Third thumbnail for: Crustal Thickness Variation across the Jammu and K...
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 14 July 2017
Lithosphere (2017) 9 (5): 715–725.
...Figure 3. Updated age-elevation plot from the Dhauladhar Range and Pir Panjal Range modified after Deeken et al. (2011) . Green dots show new ZHe (zircon (U-Th)/He) ages. Note the difference of the age elevation trends. (A) Apatite fission track (AFT) and ZHe data from the Dhauladhar Range...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Sustained out-of-sequence shortening along a tecto...
Second thumbnail for: Sustained out-of-sequence shortening along a tecto...
Third thumbnail for: Sustained out-of-sequence shortening along a tecto...
Book Chapter

Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2018
DOI: 10.1144/SP463.4
EISBN: 9781786203441
...-grained groundmass ( Fig. 5a , b ). Rocks from other regions (Pir Panjal Range and Pahalgam) of the Traps have experienced greenschist-facies metamorphism and the primary mineralogy was largely replaced ( Nakazawa & Kapoor 1973 ; Vannay & Spring 1993 ; Chauvet et al. 2008 ). Consequently...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2016
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2016) 87 (4): 439–452.
... with recurrent seismic activities during differential upliftment of Pir Panjal and Zanaskar ranges which resulted in various deformation structures during their evolution and development. In the present study, an attempt has been made to relate the palaeo-seismicity events in Karewa formations with the deformed...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Earthquake Triggered Soft Sediment Deformational S...
Second thumbnail for: Earthquake Triggered Soft Sediment Deformational S...
Third thumbnail for: Earthquake Triggered Soft Sediment Deformational S...