1-20 OF 1807 RESULTS FOR

Piper Sandstone

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
—Piper field structure map. Contours are on top of Piper sandstone. Sandstone subcrops beneath Upper Cretaceous unconformity are dotted. Well locations and lines of cross sections in Figures 9 and 10 are shown.
Published: 01 September 1975
Fig. 2. —Piper field structure map. Contours are on top of Piper sandstone. Sandstone subcrops beneath Upper Cretaceous unconformity are dotted. Well locations and lines of cross sections in Figures 9 and 10 are shown.
Image
—Isopach map of gross Piper sandstone, showing well locations and lines of cross sections in Figures 9 and 10. Areas of sand subcrop are dotted.
Published: 01 September 1975
Fig. 11. —Isopach map of gross Piper sandstone, showing well locations and lines of cross sections in Figures 9 and 10 . Areas of sand subcrop are dotted.
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2003
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.MEM.2003.020.01.38
EISBN: 9781862393950
... space was technically controlled during this period, with subsidence occurring more rapidly in the western areas of the field. The Scott Field reservoir consists of two major sand packages, the Scott Sandstone Member and the Piper Sandstone Member, bounded above and below by marine flooding surfaces...
Book Chapter

Author(s)
C. E. Maher
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 1980
DOI: 10.1306/M30410C8
EISBN: 9781629811840
... platform with 36 well slots and space for two drilling rigs was centrally located over the field in 474 ft (144 m) of water in June, 1975, and made ready for production drilling by October 1976. Production is from the Upper Jurassic Piper Sandstone, a high energy, marginal marine and shallow marine, shelf...
Image
—Middle Jurassic erosional surface prior to Late Jurassic marine transgression and Piper sandstone deposition.
Published: 01 September 1975
Fig. 5. —Middle Jurassic erosional surface prior to Late Jurassic marine transgression and Piper sandstone deposition.
Image
—Late Jurassic paleogeologic surface, illustrating disconformity surface developed on Kimmeridgian highly organic shale and siltstone prior to deposition of Lower Cretaceous marl and shale. Isopachs are of thickness of gross Piper sandstone, which underlies Kimmeridgian shale and siltstone. Surface-fault traces are dashed, as movement preceded Kimmeridgian deposition.
Published: 01 September 1975
Fig. 6. —Late Jurassic paleogeologic surface, illustrating disconformity surface developed on Kimmeridgian highly organic shale and siltstone prior to deposition of Lower Cretaceous marl and shale. Isopachs are of thickness of gross Piper sandstone, which underlies Kimmeridgian shale
Journal Article
Journal: Clay Minerals
Published: 01 October 1986
Clay Minerals (1986) 21 (4): 649–694.
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1975
AAPG Bulletin (1975) 59 (9): 1585–1601.
...Fig. 2. —Piper field structure map. Contours are on top of Piper sandstone. Sandstone subcrops beneath Upper Cretaceous unconformity are dotted. Well locations and lines of cross sections in Figures 9 and 10 are shown. ...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: <span class="search-highlight">Piper</span> Oil Fi...
Second thumbnail for: <span class="search-highlight">Piper</span> Oil Fi...
Third thumbnail for: <span class="search-highlight">Piper</span> Oil Fi...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 11 October 1993
AAPG Bulletin (1993) 77 (10): 1693–1709.
...S.D. Harker; K.A. Mantel; D.J. Morton; L.A. Riley ABSTRACT Oil-bearing Upper Jurassic Oxfordian-Kimmeridgian sandstones of the Sgiath and Piper formations are of major economic importance in the Witch Ground Graben, United Kingdom North Sea. They form the reservoirs in 14 fields that originally...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: The Stratigraphy of Oxfordian-Kimmeridgian (Late J...
Second thumbnail for: The Stratigraphy of Oxfordian-Kimmeridgian (Late J...
Third thumbnail for: The Stratigraphy of Oxfordian-Kimmeridgian (Late J...
Image
Increase in K content with depth in illite prepared for K-Ar age measurement from the Brent Group (Glasmann et al, 1989a; Hamilton et al, 1992; Hogg et al, 1993; Mathews et al, 1994; Girard et al, 2002), the Piper sandstone (Burley &amp; Flisch, 1989), and the Fulmar formation (Darby et al, 1994 and Table 1). All samples were illite separated for K-Ar age analysis. The best-fit line (for the depth interval 2500–4700 m) has a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.65, which for 105 points is significant for 99% confidence. The increase in K presumably reflects decreasing smectite content due either to new growth of pure illite and/or recrystallization of earlier, more smectitic illite. The data suggest that there is no significant alteration in illite composition below ~4700 m. The ‘whole illite’ data are in situ electron microprobe measurements of Mathews et al.(1994) and Girard et al.(2002), obtained from polished thin sections. The difference between the ‘whole illite’ electron microprobe data and the K-Ar separates may be due to contamination of the K-Ar separates, or to a genuine difference between the ‘whole-illite’ and the very finest size fraction separated for K-Ar analysis. The Fulmar TEM data (Table 2) were obtained from the same illite separates as the Fulmar K-Ar data. Also shown are data from mudstones from the Piper field (Burley &amp; Flisch, 1989) which also fall on the same general trend.
Published: 01 March 2006
F ig . 12. Increase in K content with depth in illite prepared for K-Ar age measurement from the Brent Group ( Glasmann et al, 1989a ; Hamilton et al, 1992 ; Hogg et al, 1993 ; Mathews et al, 1994; Girard et al, 2002 ), the Piper sandstone ( Burley & Flisch, 1989
Book Chapter

Author(s)
Graham Tegerdine
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 30 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/M52-2017-27
EISBN: 9781786205070
... Licensing in March 1972. The 15/27-1 discovery well was drilled in 1976, testing oil at rates of 8025 bopd from stacked Piper/Upper Scott sandstone reservoirs. The field was appraised in mid-1997 and an Annex B submitted to the Department of Trade and Industry in late 1997 for a joint Renee and Rubie Field...
Published: 01 May 2012
DOI: 10.1130/2012.2487(10)
... Upper Jurassic sandstones deposited in a shallow-marine deltaic setting in the Piper Field of the Outer Moray Firth area, North Sea, show high-frequency fluctuations in apatite:tourmaline ratios that appear to be related to sea-level change. Because apatite and tourmaline are both stable during...
Image
Piper diagram for the Nugget Sandstone showing chemical variation for water quality data from Nugget Sandstone groundwater. Black symbols represent samples with &gt;10,000 mg/L TDS; gray symbols represent samples with &lt;10,000 mg/L TDS.
Published: 01 January 2010
Figure 4. Piper diagram for the Nugget Sandstone showing chemical variation for water quality data from Nugget Sandstone groundwater. Black symbols represent samples with >10,000 mg/L TDS; gray symbols represent samples with <10,000 mg/L TDS.
Image
Piper diagram for the Tensleep Sandstone showing chemical variation for water quality data from Tensleep Sandstone groundwater. Black symbols represent samples with &gt;10,000 mg/L TDS; gray symbols represent samples with &lt;10,000 mg/L TDS.
Published: 01 January 2010
Figure 5. Piper diagram for the Tensleep Sandstone showing chemical variation for water quality data from Tensleep Sandstone groundwater. Black symbols represent samples with >10,000 mg/L TDS; gray symbols represent samples with <10,000 mg/L TDS.
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 30 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/M52-2019-32
EISBN: 9781786205070
... the Paleocene Lower Balmoral Sandstone unit and Upper Jurassic Piper Formation reservoir intervals. Fig. 2. Semi-regional geological cross-section. The Donan Field has been redeveloped as the ‘Dumbarton Project’. This continued the convention of naming fields in this area after Scottish...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1957
AAPG Bulletin (1957) 41 (3): 367–398.
... limestone unit serves to indicate the upper boundary of the formation. The Piper, Rierdon, and Swift formations can be traced only over the western half of the area. The Piper can be divided into three members. The lower member is a heterogeneous unit consisting of limestone, sandstone, and shale in which...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Jurassic Stratigraphy of Williston Basin Area
Second thumbnail for: Jurassic Stratigraphy of Williston Basin Area
Third thumbnail for: Jurassic Stratigraphy of Williston Basin Area
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1998
Petroleum Geoscience (1998) 4 (3): 271–286.
... Jurassic paralic to shallow marine sandstones (Sgiath and Piper formations). Production commenced in 1976 and until the Piper Alpha disaster of 1988, the field had produced 834X10 6 bbl oil out of the then estimated recoverable reserves of 952X10 6 bbl. Redevelopment started by pre-drilling 1 injection...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1954
AAPG Bulletin (1954) 38 (4): 454–462.
... sandstones and Piper limestones have suitable porosity and may be found to be productive on structure elsewhere in the basin. The Jurassic system in the Williston Basin consists of the marine Middle Jurassic Piper formation, the marine Upper Jurassic Sundance formation, and the non-marine Morrison...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Jurassic System in Williston Basin
Second thumbnail for: Jurassic System in Williston Basin
Third thumbnail for: Jurassic System in Williston Basin
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1953
AAPG Bulletin (1953) 37 (11): 2617.
... sandstones and Piper limestones have suitable porosity and may be found to be productive on structure elsewhere in the basin. © 1953 American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved 1953 American Association of Petroleum Geologists ...
Image
Variation in ilmenite abundance with grain-size in sandstones and mudstones from boreholes in the Chaswood Formation at Shubenacadie (based on data in Pe-Piper et al. 2004).
Published: 01 October 2005
Figure 3. Variation in ilmenite abundance with grain-size in sandstones and mudstones from boreholes in the Chaswood Formation at Shubenacadie (based on data in Pe-Piper et al. 2004 ).