1-20 OF 348 RESULTS FOR

Pentland Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 31 July 2014
Journal of the Geological Society (2014) 171 (5): 635–647.
...Mark Wilkinson; R. Stuart Haszeldine; Andrew Morton; Anthony E. Fallick Abstract The Pentland Formation of the UK Central North Sea is a quartzite in a sequence of more arkosic sandstones. Provenance-sensitive heavy mineral indices are interpreted to indicate that it was probably derived by erosion...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 27 January 2017
Scottish Journal of Geology (2017) 53 (1): 35–39.
...Y. Candela; W. R. B. Crighton Abstract Additional machaeridian specimens from the Wether Law Linn Formation (Telychian) have increased our knowledge of this poorly recorded but abundant group in the Pentland Hills, located a few kilometres SE of Edinburgh. A new type of anterior outer shell plate...
FIGURES
Image
Proportion of Pentland Formation facies in drilled sequences across the Rattray Volcanic Province, calculated from wireline data. It should be noted that intrusive rocks are not included as a separate proportion as they are very minor; intrusions in 21/03b-3 are included in the tabular lava component that they intrude.
Published: 14 April 2020
Fig. 5. Proportion of Pentland Formation facies in drilled sequences across the Rattray Volcanic Province, calculated from wireline data. It should be noted that intrusive rocks are not included as a separate proportion as they are very minor; intrusions in 21/03b-3 are included in the tabular
Image
Depth to present day top Pentland Formation (s TWT) across the PGS 3D Central North Sea MegaSurveyPlus and 3D North Sea MegaSurvey seismic surveys. Well penetration depths to the Rattray Volcanics Member are highlighted. The Pentland Formation is shallowest on structural highs such as the Piper Shelf, Renee Ridge and Buchan–Glenn Horst (2.3–2.8 km depth) and deepest in the Witch Ground Graben and Fisher Bank Basin (>5 km depth). BGH, Buchan–Glenn Horst; FBB, Fisher Bank Basin; FGS, Fladen Ground Spur; FMH, Forties–Montrose High; HH, Halibut Horst; JH, Jaeren High; NBG, North Buchan Graben; PS, Piper Shelf; RR, Renee Ridge; SBG, South Buchan Graben; SVG, South Viking Graben; WGG, Witch Ground Graben.
Published: 10 January 2019
Fig. 5. Depth to present day top Pentland Formation (s TWT) across the PGS 3D Central North Sea MegaSurveyPlus and 3D North Sea MegaSurvey seismic surveys. Well penetration depths to the Rattray Volcanics Member are highlighted. The Pentland Formation is shallowest on structural highs
Image
Pentland Formation GRV range distribution, based on 4000 realizations. The GRV axis on this figure does not start at zero, and absolute values are withheld. The distribution shows good upside potential with the P10 GRV 27% higher than the P50 GRV and the P90 only 15% lower.
Published: 24 November 2014
Figure 8. Pentland Formation GRV range distribution, based on 4000 realizations. The GRV axis on this figure does not start at zero, and absolute values are withheld. The distribution shows good upside potential with the P10 GRV 27% higher than the P50 GRV and the P90 only 15% lower.
Image
Location map showing study wells with core of the Pentland Formation in relation to hydrocarbon fields in the Skagerrak, Pentland and Fulmar formations. Large numerals are the UK quadrants.
Published: 31 July 2014
Fig. 1. Location map showing study wells with core of the Pentland Formation in relation to hydrocarbon fields in the Skagerrak, Pentland and Fulmar formations. Large numerals are the UK quadrants.
Image
Petrography of the Pentland Formation v. burial depth (TVD); crosses (+) are measured using point counting on SEM images; circles by conventional light petrography. The data for the Skagerrak Formation were also assembled as part of this study, from various unpublished sources. CoPL, absolute porosity loss due to compaction; CePL, absolute porosity loss due to cementation.
Published: 31 July 2014
Fig. 5. Petrography of the Pentland Formation v. burial depth (TVD); crosses (+) are measured using point counting on SEM images; circles by conventional light petrography. The data for the Skagerrak Formation were also assembled as part of this study, from various unpublished sources. CoPL
Image
Conventional core porosity for the Pentland Formation lies close to the world average for sandstone reservoirs (continuous line; Ehrenberg & Nadeau 2005). The Pentland Formation is significantly less porous than the Fulmar Formation (data from Wilkinson & Haszeldine 2011).
Published: 31 July 2014
Fig. 6. Conventional core porosity for the Pentland Formation lies close to the world average for sandstone reservoirs (continuous line; Ehrenberg & Nadeau 2005 ). The Pentland Formation is significantly less porous than the Fulmar Formation (data from Wilkinson & Haszeldine 2011 ).
Image
The Pentland Formation lacks apatite (expressed as the ATi index) compared with the Fulmar Formation and with the likely source, the Skagerrak Formation, owing to apatite dissolution by acidic fluids in the floodplain environment. The lower ATi values of the Fulmar Formation (50–80) are interpreted to result from either reworking of sediment from the Pentland floodplain or weathering of the Skagerrak source sediment prior to transport.
Published: 31 July 2014
Fig. 8. The Pentland Formation lacks apatite (expressed as the ATi index) compared with the Fulmar Formation and with the likely source, the Skagerrak Formation, owing to apatite dissolution by acidic fluids in the floodplain environment. The lower ATi values of the Fulmar Formation (50–80
Image
The Pentland Formation has significantly less K-feldspar than the likely source, the Skagerrak Formation, and less than the Fulmar Formation, which was also plausibly sourced from the Skagerrak Formation but in which extensive K-feldspar dissolution has been documented. Horizontal bars are 2 standard error; numbers show data quantity for each point.
Published: 31 July 2014
Fig. 9. The Pentland Formation has significantly less K-feldspar than the likely source, the Skagerrak Formation, and less than the Fulmar Formation, which was also plausibly sourced from the Skagerrak Formation but in which extensive K-feldspar dissolution has been documented. Horizontal bars
Image
The ankerite in the Pentland Formation (open squares) has similar stable isotope ratios to the ankerite in the immediately overlying Fulmar Formation, consistent with a similar origin. The lower carbon isotope ratios probably reflect the influence of the high concentrations of organic carbon within the Pentland floodplain.
Published: 31 July 2014
Fig. 11. The ankerite in the Pentland Formation (open squares) has similar stable isotope ratios to the ankerite in the immediately overlying Fulmar Formation, consistent with a similar origin. The lower carbon isotope ratios probably reflect the influence of the high concentrations of organic
Image
Photomicrograph of kaolin from the Pentland formation.
Published: 01 March 2006
F ig . 15. Photomicrograph of kaolin from the Pentland formation.
Book Chapter

Author(s)
I. Robertson
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 30 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/M52-2018-72
EISBN: 9781786205070
... production is approximately 5000 bwpd and is all produced from the Pentland Formation. Estimates of hydrocarbons initially in place Tables 1 and 2 show the hydrocarbon in place estimates both at field sanction and the current view. The sanction case estimates were prepared using a combination...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Series: SEPM Special Publication
Published: 01 January 2009
DOI: 10.2110/sepmsp.093.009
EISBN: 9781565762978
... such data sets often include samples that are transitional between two or more “pure” faunal or floral assemblages. As an evaluation of FCM we used it to resolve Jurassic miospore and pollen biofacies from the Pentland, Fulmar, and Heather formations from two closely spaced wells in the Hawkins Field...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 30 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/M52-2019-28
EISBN: 9781786205070
... has been achieved from intra-Heather Formation sandstones, as well as from the Middle Jurassic Pentland Formation. Following first gas in 2000, a series of well failures occurred such that by 2008 production from the main field Fulmar reservoir had ceased. This resulted in a shut-in period...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 30 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/M52-2019-26
EISBN: 9781786205070
... Mudstone Member, while the Jonathan Mudstone Member overlays the Joanne Sandstone Member ( Fig. 4 ). The overlying coal-bearing heterolithic Pentland Formation is regionally placed in a humid upper delta to alluvial plain setting ( Richards et al. 1993 ). The Pentland Formation unconformably overlies...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Book Chapter

Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 30 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/M52-2019-6
EISBN: 9781786205070
... are trapped in a truncated rotated fault block, striking NW–SE. The reservoir sequence is sealed by Kimmeridge Clay Formation and Heather Formation claystones. Geochemical analysis suggests that Middle Jurassic Pentland Formation and Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay Formation mudstones have been the source...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 30 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/M52-2019-23
EISBN: 9781786205070
... Field are 11.2 MMbbl, with 1.1 MMbbl produced to date through depletion drive by a subsea development well 22/13a-8. This represents recovery rates of 35% for Howe and 10% for Bardolino to date. In place volumes for the undeveloped Pentland Formation at Howe are 5 MMbbl. In place estimates...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 05 September 2017
Petroleum Geoscience (2018) 24 (2): 197–207.
.../25a-11. The primary reservoir is the Triassic Skagerrak Formation, with a secondary reservoir in the Middle Jurassic Pentland Formation. Total recoverable reserves are estimated to be 250 – 300 MMBOE. One principal challenge concerning the Skagerrak reservoir in Culzean is the stratigraphy...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Series: Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.1144/0060675
EISBN: 9781862394124
... a possible direct hydrocarbon indicator was recognized on an inverted seismic volume. The well discovered hydrocarbons in the primary target, the Fulmar Formation and also in the Pentland Formation and was immediately side-tracked to a previously planned updip Fulmar development location...
FIGURES | View All (12)