Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![Simplified map of the Pazarcık earthquake surface rupture and segmentations. 1a, Hassa rupture segment of the Karasu segment; 1b, Nurdağı rupture segment of the Karasu segment; 2a, Tevekkelli rupture segment of the Pazarcık segment; 2b, Gölbaşı rupture segment of the Pazarcık segment; 3, Erkenek segment; 4, Narlı Fault. K, Kahramanmaraş; Kı, Kırıkhan; H, Hassa; İ, İslahiye; Nu, Nurdağ; T, Türkoğlu; G, Gölbaşı; E, Erkenek; Ç, Çelikhan; P, Pazarcık; N, Narlı. Symbols are as in Figure 1.]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![Rupture geometry of the Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş) earthquake along the Pazarcık segment of the EAFZ and slip distribution locations. (a) Tevekkelli rupture segment; (b) Gölbaşı rupture segment. Base maps were generated using AsterG-DEM V3 digital data.]()
![Aftershock distribution and moment tensor solutions along the Narlı fault and Pazarcık segment. (a) The aftershocks are represented by black circles and scaled by their magnitudes. The green circles indicate the seismic activity during the interseismic period. The blue solid lines represent the active faults in the study region (Emre et al., 2013). The colored squares indicate the surface offset of the 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş earthquake (Karabulut et al., 2023). The earthquakes are projected onto the profiles indicated by the corresponding black solid lines. The red focal mechanism plots represent the moment tensor inversions of the earthquakes with Mw 3.5+. ID number of each solution is near the focal mechanism plot, and the source parameters are presented in Table S1. The source mechanisms of the 9 September 2012 Mw 5.1 earthquake is demonstrated by green focal mechanism plot (Karabulut et al., 2023). The green and yellow stars show the epicenters of the 2023 and 2012 earthquakes, respectively. The highlighted pink curves indicate the surface offsets obtained at the field (MTA, 2023). The reference point of each profile is on the main branch and shown by yellow‐filled circles on the profiles. GB, Gavur basin; NFS, Nurdağ fault segment; PS, Pazarcık segment; TRB, Türkoğlu releasing bend. Inset show the Pazarcık segment. (b) A zoomed‐in view of the region within the black box in panel (a). Aftershock activities on distinct faults are represented by circles in different colors. RB, releasing bend. (c) Depth sections ±15 km around DD′, EE′, FF′, and GG′ in panel (a). Earthquakes, shown by different colors, represent distinct seismic activities. The red and blue circles indicate aftershock activity on the Pazarcık segment and the side fault along the northern margin of the Sağlık basin, respectively. The pink circles show a distinct side fault located at the northern margin of the Sağlık basin. Southern side faults in the Narlı basin are represented by yellow and black circles. EAF and NF show the locations of the main branch and the Narlı fault on the profiles. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.]()
![Histograms of (a,b) normalized total and (c,d) intra‐event residuals for the Lavrentiadis and Abrahamson (2023) model. (a,c) The 2023 Pazarcık event, and (b,d) the 2023 Elbistan event observed on‐fault displacement data. The black continuous line represents the standard normal distribution. The red dashed lines represent the normalized total residuals for the Pazarcık segment of East Anatolian fault zone (EAFZ) and Çardak fault at the largest observed on‐fault permanent displacement points along the rupture length. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.]()
![Histograms of (a) normalized total and (b) intra‐event residuals for the Petersen et al. (2011) model. The left column represents the 2023 Pazarcık, and the right column represents the 2023 Elbistan event observed on‐fault displacement data. The black continuous line represents the standard normal distribution. The red dashed lines represent the normalized total residuals for the Pazarcık segment of EAFZ and Çardak fault at the largest observed on‐fault permanent displacement points along the rupture length. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.]()
![(a) Earthquakes occurrence between 9 October 2021 and 22 December 2022 (w. no. 28–32) for grid 06 is shown here. (b) The spatial variation of Dc for the same period is depicted, with brown and green regions indicating low and high Dc. (c) Spatial variation of Dc after the occurrence of the Mw 7.7 Nurdağı‐Pazarcık earthquake. (d) Dc distribution post‐Mw 7.6, Ekinözü. The purple lines represent major faults in the study region (Pazarcik segment, Amanos segment, and Cardak fault). The purple star indicates mainshocks, and the black dots demonstrate earthquakes with M ≥ 3.5. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.]()
![Overview of the study region. (a) Aftershock seismicity according to the AFAD catalog (6 February 2023 01:17 UTC–11 February 2023 00:00 UTC) with 2677 events color coded according to origin time and size scaled with magnitude depicted as circles. The black lines show active faults according to Emre et al. (2018), light green lines represent the surface ruptures of the earthquake doublet according to Reitmann et al. (2023). Inverted triangles represent the stations used in this study with station codes indicated, and the cyan stars mark the epicenters of the two mainshocks on 6 February 2023. The white segments indicate faults and fault segments (according to Duman and Emre, 2013) activated during the two mainshocks (Gabriel et al., 2023) and an adjacent segment toward the northeast with corresponding segment names: AS, Amanos segment; CF, Çardak fault; ES, Erkenek segment; GBS, Göksun bend segment; GS, Göksun splay; MF, Malatya fault; NF, Narlı fault; PS, Pazarcık segment, PtS, Pütürge segment. (b) Tectonic context of the study region with EAFZ in red and gray box indicating the region shown in panel (a). Arrows indicate plate motion relative to stable Eurasia according to Reilinger et al. (2006). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.]()
![Map of the study area. (a) Tectonic setting and location of historical and recent Mw>6.7 epicenters. Tectonic plate boundaries and long‐term plate‐motion directions (Jolivet et al., 2013) are depicted by black lines and black thick arrows, respectively. Active faults (Styron and Pagani, 2020) are shown by the red lines. Sentinel‐1 footprints are shown by black thin polygons, and Advanced Land Observation Satellite (ALOS)‐2 footprints are shown by black thick polygons. The yellow stars show the 2023 Mw 7.8 and 7.6 earthquakes, and red stars show the historic earthquakes (Duman and Emre, 2013). (b) The 2023 Mw 7.8 coseismic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) offsets and the aftershocks of the Mw 7.8 and 7.6 mainshocks. (c) The 2023 Mw 7.6 coseismic GNSS offsets and aftershocks of the Mw 7.8 earthquake occurring before the Mw 7.6 earthquake. The aftershock locations are from Lomax (2023). Abbreviations: AS, Amanos segment; CA, Cyprus Arc; DSF, Dead Sea fault; EAFZ, East Anatolian fault zone; ES, Erkenek segment; and NAFZ, North Anatolian fault zone; PS, Pazarcik segment. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.]()
![(a) Fault map with surface ruptures of the 2023 Turkey earthquake sequence. Focal mechanisms are from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS; Goldberg et al., 2023). Shaded areas show the inferred extent of historic surface ruptures labeled by year and magnitude (Duman and Emre, 2013). Red and blue numbers correspond to fault segments modeled in this study named following Duman and Emre (2013). The first earthquake is modeled using six segments of the EAF: 1 and 2, Amanos segment; 3, Pazarcık segment; 4, Nurdağı‐Pazarcık fault (NPF); 5, unnamed Erkenek splay; 6, Erkenek segment. The second earthquake ruptures four segments of the SCSF: 7, Çardak fault; 8, Göksun bend segment; 9, Malatya fault; and 10, unnamed Göksun splay. The Sürgü fault (segment 11) is shown in Figure 5. Inset shows regional tectonic map modified from Barbot and Weiss (2021). Yellow circles show earthquakes of Mw>3.0 before 2021 (European‐Mediterranean Seismological Centre [EMSC] catalog). DSTF, Dead Sea Transform fault; EAF, East Anatolian fault; NAF, North Anatolian fault; and SCSF, Sürgü–Cardak–Savrun fault. (b) Top: Geodetically inferred second invariant of principal strain rate prior to the 6 February earthquakes from Weiss et al. (2020). The black rectangle outlines the area shown in the bottom panel. (b) Bottom: zoomed view of East Anatolian fault zone principal strain rate directions in purple (first component) and pink (second component) from Weiss et al. (2020). In dark and light gray, we show the seismologically inferred maximum and minimum principal horizontal stress components from Güvercin et al. (2022), as well as in dark and light blue, the maximum and minimum principal horizontal stress orientations used in this study. (c) Initial conditions for 3D dynamic rupture modeling of both large earthquakes. SHmax[°] is the orientation of the maximum horizontal compressive stress from a new stress inversion we perform (based on Güvercin et al., 2022, Fig. S5), Dc is the critical slip‐weakening distance in the linear slip‐weakening friction law, R0 is the maximum relative prestress ratio, and R<R0 is the fault‐local relative prestress ratio modulated by varying fault geometry and orientation. Although the assumed SHmax is the same in distinction to the dynamic rupture models in Jia et al. (2023), no additional smaller scale initial prestress or fault strength heterogeneity is prescribed.]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![(a,b) The variation of the normalized intra‐event residuals with distance along the fault (in kilometer) when observed on‐fault permanent displacement data of 2023 Pazarcık (blue circles) and Elbistan (pink circles) earthquakes is compared with the Lavrentiadis and Abrahamson (2023) model. The hypocenters of the 2023 Pazarcık and Elbistan events are marked with the red star symbols. The ruptured segment names are provided for the 2023 Pazarcık and the 2023 Elbistan events. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
1-20 OF 86 RESULTS FOR
Pazarcik segment
Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Journal Article
Surface rupture history and 18 kyr long slip rate along the Pazarcık segment of the East Anatolian Fault Available to Purchase
Journal: Journal of the Geological Society
Publisher: Geological Society of London
Published: 13 December 2023
Journal of the Geological Society (2024) 181 (1): jgs2023-056.
...Önder Yönlü; Volkan Karabacak Abstract We investigate the palaeo earthquakes and slip rate on the Pazarcık segment of the East Anatolian Fault, which was involved in the surface rupture of the 6 February 2023 Pazarcık–Kahramanmaraş earthquake (M w 7.7) and provided insights into the long-term...
FIGURES
| View All (8)
Journal Article
The 2023 Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye) earthquake (M w 7.7): implications for surface rupture dynamics along the East Anatolian Fault Zone Available to Purchase
Journal: Journal of the Geological Society
Publisher: Geological Society of London
Published: 27 April 2023
Journal of the Geological Society (2023) 180 (3): jgs2023-020.
... on the Karasu, Pazarcık and Erkenek segments of the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Left-lateral strike-slip faulting developed with a maximum horizontal displacement ( D max ) of 7.30 m and an average displacement ( D avg ) of 3.00 m. Although the surface rupture generally exhibits a narrow deformation zone width...
FIGURES
| View All (13)
Image
Simplified map of the Pazarcık earthquake surface rupture and segmentations... Available to Purchase
in The 2023 Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye) earthquake (M w 7.7): implications for surface rupture dynamics along the East Anatolian Fault Zone
> Journal of the Geological Society
Published: 27 April 2023
Fig. 2. Simplified map of the Pazarcık earthquake surface rupture and segmentations. 1a, Hassa rupture segment of the Karasu segment; 1b, Nurdağı rupture segment of the Karasu segment; 2a, Tevekkelli rupture segment of the Pazarcık segment; 2b, Gölbaşı rupture segment of the Pazarcık segment; 3
Journal Article
Assessment of urban seismic resilience of a town in Eastern Turkiye: Turkoglu, Kahramanmaras before and after 6 February 2023 M 7.8 Kahramanmaras earthquake Open Access
Journal: Earthquake Spectra
Publisher: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Published: 01 February 2025
Earthquake Spectra (2025) 41 (1): 146–175.
... segments of the East Anatolian Fault zone. The proposed framework encompasses the assessment of active faults in the region, construction of regional velocity models, ground motion simulations of potential earthquakes, structural vulnerability, and study of seismic resilience indicators. The Pazarcik...
FIGURES
| View All (21)
Journal Article
Tectonic Duets: Self‐Similar Approach to Investigate Eastern Anatolian Fault’s Recent Seismicity, with Special Emphasis on the 6 February 2023 Earthquake Doublet Available to Purchase
Journal: Seismological Research Letters
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 19 January 2024
Seismological Research Letters (2024) 95 (2A): 626–642.
... November 2018. Prior to the 2023 events, low‐moderate Dc regions predominated on the Pazarcık segment and Cardak fault. The Pürtürge segment that ruptured with an M w 6.7 event was within a low Dc area. We identified a consistent relationship between stress levels and Dc for the 2023 twin events and the M...
FIGURES
| View All (10)
Includes: Supplemental Content
Journal Article
Dense Seismic Recordings of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Sequence in Southeastern Türkiye Available to Purchase
Journal: Seismological Research Letters
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 24 February 2025
Seismological Research Letters (2025)
.... The main Eastern Anatolian Seismic Temporary (EAST) array includes 125 nodal, 10 broadband, and 6 strong‐motion seismic stations distributed around the rupture zone. An additional linear array of 73 nodal stations was also installed across the Pazarcık segment of the EAFZ and the Sakçagöz segment near...
FIGURES
| View All (10)
Early Publication
Includes: Supplemental Content
Journal Article
The 2023 M w 7.8 and 7.6 Earthquake Doublet in Southeast Türkiye: Coseismic and Early Postseismic Deformation, Faulting Model, and Potential Seismic Hazard Available to Purchase
Journal: Seismological Research Letters
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 23 August 2023
Seismological Research Letters (2024) 95 (2A): 562–573.
...‐lateral strike‐slip motion, with the maximum slip of ∼9.1 m. Early postseismic deformation within two months exhibits displacement discontinuities in the Amanos and Pazarcık segments and the Çardak fault, suggesting that the afterslip partially compensated the coseismic slip deficit at the shallow depths...
FIGURES
| View All (5)
Includes: Supplemental Content
Image
Rupture geometry of the Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş) earthquake along the Pazar... Available to Purchase
in The 2023 Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye) earthquake (M w 7.7): implications for surface rupture dynamics along the East Anatolian Fault Zone
> Journal of the Geological Society
Published: 27 April 2023
Fig. 6. Rupture geometry of the Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş) earthquake along the Pazarcık segment of the EAFZ and slip distribution locations. ( a ) Tevekkelli rupture segment; ( b ) Gölbaşı rupture segment. Base maps were generated using AsterG-DEM V3 digital data.
Image
Aftershock distribution and moment tensor solutions along the Narlı fault a... Available to Purchase
in 2023 Earthquake Doublet in Türkiye Reveals the Complexities of the East Anatolian Fault Zone: Insights from Aftershock Patterns and Moment Tensor Solutions
> Seismological Research Letters
Published: 22 January 2024
Figure 4. Aftershock distribution and moment tensor solutions along the Narlı fault and Pazarcık segment. (a) The aftershocks are represented by black circles and scaled by their magnitudes. The green circles indicate the seismic activity during the interseismic period. The blue solid lines
Image
Histograms of (a,b) normalized total and (c,d) intra‐event residuals for th... Available to Purchase
in Comparison of Probabilistic Fault Displacement Hazard Assessment Results with Observed Permanent Ground Displacements in the Aftermath of the 6 February 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 04 March 2025
distribution. The red dashed lines represent the normalized total residuals for the Pazarcık segment of East Anatolian fault zone (EAFZ) and Çardak fault at the largest observed on‐fault permanent displacement points along the rupture length. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic
Image
Histograms of (a) normalized total and (b) intra‐event residuals for the P... Available to Purchase
in Comparison of Probabilistic Fault Displacement Hazard Assessment Results with Observed Permanent Ground Displacements in the Aftermath of the 6 February 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 04 March 2025
the standard normal distribution. The red dashed lines represent the normalized total residuals for the Pazarcık segment of EAFZ and Çardak fault at the largest observed on‐fault permanent displacement points along the rupture length. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
(a) Earthquakes occurrence between 9 October 2021 and 22 December 2022 (w. ... Available to Purchase
in Tectonic Duets: Self‐Similar Approach to Investigate Eastern Anatolian Fault’s Recent Seismicity, with Special Emphasis on the 6 February 2023 Earthquake Doublet
> Seismological Research Letters
Published: 19 January 2024
of the M w 7.7 Nurdağı‐Pazarcık earthquake. (d) Dc distribution post‐ M w 7.6, Ekinözü. The purple lines represent major faults in the study region (Pazarcik segment, Amanos segment, and Cardak fault). The purple star indicates mainshocks, and the black dots demonstrate earthquakes with M
Image
Overview of the study region. (a) Aftershock seismicity according to the AF... Available to Purchase
in Performance of AI‐Based Phase Picking and Event Association Methods after the Large 2023 M w 7.8 and 7.6 Türkiye Doublet
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 29 May 2024
segment; GBS, Göksun bend segment; GS, Göksun splay; MF, Malatya fault; NF, Narlı fault; PS, Pazarcık segment, PtS, Pütürge segment. (b) Tectonic context of the study region with EAFZ in red and gray box indicating the region shown in panel (a). Arrows indicate plate motion relative to stable Eurasia
Image
Map of the study area. (a) Tectonic setting and location of historical and ... Available to Purchase
in Fault Coalescence, Slip Distribution, and Stress Drop of the February 2023 Southeast Türkiye Earthquakes from Joint Inversion of SAR, GNSS, and Burst Overlap Interferometry
> Seismological Research Letters
Published: 22 January 2024
occurring before the M w 7.6 earthquake. The aftershock locations are from Lomax (2023) . Abbreviations: AS, Amanos segment; CA, Cyprus Arc; DSF, Dead Sea fault; EAFZ, East Anatolian fault zone; ES, Erkenek segment; and NAFZ, North Anatolian fault zone; PS, Pazarcik segment. The color version
Image
![(a) Fault map with surface ruptures of the 2023 Turkey earthquake sequence. Focal mechanisms are from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS; Goldberg et al., 2023). Shaded areas show the inferred extent of historic surface ruptures labeled by year and magnitude (Duman and Emre, 2013). Red and blue numbers correspond to fault segments modeled in this study named following Duman and Emre (2013). The first earthquake is modeled using six segments of the EAF: 1 and 2, Amanos segment; 3, Pazarcık segment; 4, Nurdağı‐Pazarcık fault (NPF); 5, unnamed Erkenek splay; 6, Erkenek segment. The second earthquake ruptures four segments of the SCSF: 7, Çardak fault; 8, Göksun bend segment; 9, Malatya fault; and 10, unnamed Göksun splay. The Sürgü fault (segment 11) is shown in Figure 5. Inset shows regional tectonic map modified from Barbot and Weiss (2021). Yellow circles show earthquakes of Mw>3.0 before 2021 (European‐Mediterranean Seismological Centre [EMSC] catalog). DSTF, Dead Sea Transform fault; EAF, East Anatolian fault; NAF, North Anatolian fault; and SCSF, Sürgü–Cardak–Savrun fault. (b) Top: Geodetically inferred second invariant of principal strain rate prior to the 6 February earthquakes from Weiss et al. (2020). The black rectangle outlines the area shown in the bottom panel. (b) Bottom: zoomed view of East Anatolian fault zone principal strain rate directions in purple (first component) and pink (second component) from Weiss et al. (2020). In dark and light gray, we show the seismologically inferred maximum and minimum principal horizontal stress components from Güvercin et al. (2022), as well as in dark and light blue, the maximum and minimum principal horizontal stress orientations used in this study. (c) Initial conditions for 3D dynamic rupture modeling of both large earthquakes. SHmax[°] is the orientation of the maximum horizontal compressive stress from a new stress inversion we perform (based on Güvercin et al., 2022, Fig. S5), Dc is the critical slip‐weakening distance in the linear slip‐weakening friction law, R0 is the maximum relative prestress ratio, and R<R0 is the fault‐local relative prestress ratio modulated by varying fault geometry and orientation. Although the assumed SHmax is the same in distinction to the dynamic rupture models in Jia et al. (2023), no additional smaller scale initial prestress or fault strength heterogeneity is prescribed.](https://gsw.silverchair-cdn.com/gsw/Content_public/Journal/tsr/3/4/10.1785_0320230028/2/s_0320230028fig1.png?Expires=2147483647&Signature=0QbDEYuGstFdBqH0qIJI7LRc7GiMDfk-0YxhC9EUgoAhX3xVCr9ujwtV3v2LOsvKnsX7RTNt9nBlQuWwVrAYKxt7ajGl8JuSeD0fLWuAH5jGLbVZ12IteP5nZJG9HNx6FnrwIkiqthjBYFMIofP5U7SqY1YDk4u5OY0sj~c3V0vCkNiwbYVt~fAAMhuwnF22lGhSS2pWcFVJdhhmeKwNYkXPM7j-cVO5nZ9jXl3bY9naHdThbt-QfT0zd05gZ9zbr7ECGcJep00bsmh-pT98ctIHM6EGwFw-G4k7jmYA-bD4O~VIThw5KXIRqyTkBlnd5CP2mW8XMEUYlE1AEQGwAw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)
(a) Fault map with surface ruptures of the 2023 Turkey earthquake sequence.... Open Access
in 3D Dynamic Rupture Modeling of the 6 February 2023, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey M w 7.8 and 7.7 Earthquake Doublet Using Early Observations
> The Seismic Record
Published: 01 December 2023
). Red and blue numbers correspond to fault segments modeled in this study named following Duman and Emre (2013) . The first earthquake is modeled using six segments of the EAF: 1 and 2, Amanos segment; 3, Pazarcık segment; 4, Nurdağı‐Pazarcık fault (NPF); 5, unnamed Erkenek splay; 6, Erkenek segment
Journal Article
An M w 7.8 Earthquake on 6 February 2023 on the East Anatolian Fault, Turkey Available to Purchase
Publisher: Geological Society of India
Published: 01 April 2023
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2023) 99 (4): 449–453.
... it is inferred that the fault rupture was bidirectional and broke a ~300 km fault length of EAF in three segments of Amanos, Pazarcik and Erkenek. This earthquake triggered an event of M w 7.5 on the E-W Surgu Fault, ~100 km north of the mainshock. Eleven cities suffered the worst damage where several...
FIGURES
Book Chapter
The East Anatolian Fault: geometry, segmentation and jog characteristics Available to Purchase
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Publisher: Geological Society of London
Published: 01 January 2013
DOI: 10.1144/SP372.14
EISBN: 9781862396357
... of the time elapsed from the latest events on the East Anatolian Fault, we suggest that the Pazarcık and Amanos segments have the potential to produce destructive earthquakes in the near future. Supplementary material: The data and interpretations given here are supported by five additional annotated field...
FIGURES
| View All (24)
Journal Article
Comparison of Probabilistic Fault Displacement Hazard Assessment Results with Observed Permanent Ground Displacements in the Aftermath of the 6 February 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes Available to Purchase
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 04 March 2025
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2025)
... distribution. The red dashed lines represent the normalized total residuals for the Pazarcık segment of East Anatolian fault zone (EAFZ) and Çardak fault at the largest observed on‐fault permanent displacement points along the rupture length. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic...
FIGURES
| View All (12)
Early Publication
Image
(a,b) The variation of the normalized intra‐event residuals with distance a... Available to Purchase
in Comparison of Probabilistic Fault Displacement Hazard Assessment Results with Observed Permanent Ground Displacements in the Aftermath of the 6 February 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes
> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published: 04 March 2025
) model. The hypocenters of the 2023 Pazarcık and Elbistan events are marked with the red star symbols. The ruptured segment names are provided for the 2023 Pazarcık and the 2023 Elbistan events. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Journal Article
2023 Earthquake Doublet in Türkiye Reveals the Complexities of the East Anatolian Fault Zone: Insights from Aftershock Patterns and Moment Tensor Solutions Available to Purchase
Journal: Seismological Research Letters
Publisher: Seismological Society of America
Published: 22 January 2024
Seismological Research Letters (2024) 95 (2A): 664–679.
...Figure 4. Aftershock distribution and moment tensor solutions along the Narlı fault and Pazarcık segment. (a) The aftershocks are represented by black circles and scaled by their magnitudes. The green circles indicate the seismic activity during the interseismic period. The blue solid lines...
FIGURES
| View All (7)
Includes: Supplemental Content
1
