1-10 OF 10 RESULTS FOR

Paronychomys

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2022
Journal of Paleontology (2022) 96 (3): 692–705.
... , Galushamys , Miotomodon , Repomys , Nelsonia ). The extinct Miocene Lindsaymys was proposed as a possible early neotominan, but not formally included in the Neotomini. In other studies, two extinct genera, Basirepomys and Paronychomys , occasionally have been treated as related to neotominans...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Image
Published: 01 May 2022
Table 1. List of significant character differences between Paronychomys and Onychomys that indicate they are not closely related. Abbreviations: ap = greatest anteroposterior length; ht = height. Character Onychomys Paronychomys cranial posterior termination
Image
Paronychomys antiquus, holotype left dentary with m1–3 (UCMP 12571): (1) occlusal view; (2) labial view; (3) lingual view. Scale bars for (1) and (2, 3) 1 mm. Photos by P. Holroyd, UCMP.
Published: 01 May 2022
Figure 5. Paronychomys antiquus , holotype left dentary with m1–3 (UCMP 12571): ( 1 ) occlusal view; ( 2 ) labial view; ( 3 ) lingual view. Scale bars for ( 1 ) and ( 2, 3 ) 1 mm. Photos by P. Holroyd, UCMP.
Image
Published: 01 May 2022
† Basirepomys romensis Korth, 2011 † Galushamys redingtonensis Jacobs, 1977 —type species   Hodomys alleni (Merriam, 1892) (Merriam, 1892b )—type species † Lindsaymys takeuchii Kelly and Whistler, 2014 —type species † Paronychomys lemredfieldi Jacobs, 1977 —type species † Paronychomys
Image
Ventral views of posterior palates showing synapomorphic character state of anterior position of anteriormost choanae borders of posterior nares (thick black lines) relative to posterior margins of M3s (thick gray lines) in representatives of extant Neotomini versus pleisomorphic state seen in Paronychomys, Copemys russelli, and primitive Oligocene cricetids where anteriormost choanae borders are even with posterior borders of M3s. (1) Paronychomys jacobsi1, LACM 156274 (holotype, choanae anterior borders outlined by thin black lines because posterior nares filled with rock matrix; thick black line overlaps thick gray line with both equal in position); (2) Neotoma cinerea occidentaltis2 (MVZ 11152); (3) Neotoma lepida lepida3 (MVZ 10438); (4) Hodomys alleni elatturus4 Osgood, 1938 (IBUNAM:CNMA 8912); (5) Xenomys nelsoni5, (IBUNAM:CNMA 5829); (6, 7) Nelsonia goldmani6 (USNM 91965 and USNM 90893, respectively). 1Photo by T. Kelly; 2 photo by J. Blois; 3with the permission of The Museum of Vertebrate Zoology Archives, University of California, Berkeley; 4, 5from Silva and Cuenca (2020a, 2020b); 6photos by C. Ronez. Not to scale, all adjusted to equal M1–3 lengths.
Published: 01 May 2022
seen in Paronychomys , Copemys russelli , and primitive Oligocene cricetids where anteriormost choanae borders are even with posterior borders of M3s. ( 1 ) Paronychomys jacobsi 1 , LACM 156274 (holotype, choanae anterior borders outlined by thin black lines because posterior nares filled with rock
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2022
Journal of Paleontology (2022) 96 (3): f1–f2.
.... Almonte Milan, and Jonathan I. Bloch The oldest known record of a ground sloth (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Folivora) from Hispaniola: evolutionary and paleobiogeographical implications 692 Thomas S. Kelly and Robert A. Martin Phylogenetic positions of Paronychomys Jacobs and Basirepomys Korth and De Blieux...
Image
Single most parsimonious tree of 84 steps, CI = 0.917, RI = 0.972, using implicit enumeration. Values below branches are bootstrap support when >50%. The cladogram is supported by the following list of hypothesized ancestral synapomorphies (number to left of period denotes character number and number to right of period denotes character state). Node 1—1.2, 11.1, 17.1, 22.1, 26.2, 30.1, 33.1. Node 2—2.1, 18.4. Node 3—3.4, 4.1, 11.4. Node 4—5.1, 26.1. Node 5—34.1. Node 6—16.1, 36.1. Node 7—13.2. Node 8—26.3. Node 9—28.1, 37.1. Node 10—22.2, 23.2, 24.1, 26.5, 30.3, 34.3. Node 11—9.1, 29.1, 32.3, 35.1, 39.1. Node 12—8.1, 10.1, 13.2, 15.3, 25.1, 27.1, 30.2. Node 13—11.2, 18.3, 26.4. Node 14—3.2. Node 15—13.1, 14.1, 15.2, 16.2. Node 16—12.2. Node 17—38.3, 39.1, 40.1. Apomorphies for terminal taxa are: Basirepomys romensis 6.1, 21.1; Basirepomys robertsi 21.3; Basirepomys pliocenicus 21.2; Paronychomys lemredfieldi 21.1; Protorepomys bartlettensis 1.1, 3.1, 18.1, 23.1; Miotomodon mayi 26.3; Galushamys redingtonensis 3.3, 7.1, 11.3; Nelsonia goldmani 13.2; Neotoma lepida 7.2, 26.6; Neotoma cinerea 20.1.
Published: 01 May 2022
pliocenicus 21.2; Paronychomys lemredfieldi 21.1; Protorepomys bartlettensis 1.1, 3.1, 18.1, 23.1; Miotomodon mayi 26.3; Galushamys redingtonensis 3.3, 7.1, 11.3; Nelsonia goldmani 13.2; Neotoma lepida 7.2, 26.6; Neotoma cinerea 20.1.
Image
M1 (upper left in each quadruplet), M3 (lower left), m1 (upper right), and m3 (lower right) of species in cladistic analyses. Question mark indicates tooth position unknown. All occlusal views. (1) Copemys loxodon, LM1 (UCMP 317394, reversed), LM3 (UCMP 317400, reversed), Lm1 (UCMP 317625, reversed), Rm3 (UCMP 317546, reversed), photos by C. Ronez; (2) Basirepomys pliocenicus1, RM1 (LACM [CIT] 1968), Rm1 (LACM [CIT] 1966, holotype), from Wilson (1937); (3) Basirepomys romensis, LM1 (USNM 23564, reversed), Rm1, (USNM 23567, reversed), Lm3 (UMNH 23566), photos of E. Lindsay casts; (4) Basirepomys robertsi2, LM1 (UMNH VP 18749, reversed), Rm1 (UMNH VP 18751, holotype, reversed), Rm3 (UMNH VP 18752), from Korth and De Blieux (2010); (5) Paronychomys lemredfieldi, RM1 and RM3 (AMNH FAM 3249), Rm1 and Rm3 (AMNH FAM 3430, reversed), photos of E. Lindsay casts; (6) Paronychomys jacobsi, RM1 (LACM 156279), LM3 (LACM 156277, reversed), Lm1 (LACM 156289), Lm3 (LACM 156287), photos by T. Kelly; (7) Protorepomys bartlettensis, LM1 (UO 24957, reversed), LM3 (UO 25078, reversed), Lm1 (UO 25591); photos by K. Tate-Jones, Lm3 (UO 21720), from Shotwell (1967); (8) Protorepomys mckayensis, RM1 (UO 26942), Lm1 (UO 24603), Rm3 (UO 21720), photos by K. Tate-Jones; (9) Miotomodon mayi2, LM1 (UCMP 82669, reversed), LM3 (UCMP 83672, reversed), Lm1 (UCMP 82671), from Korth (2011); (10) Tsaphanomys shotwelli, LM1 (UO 21716, reversed), photo by K. Tate-Jones; Lm1 (UO 21719), Lm3 (UO 21270), from Korth2 (2011); (11) Lindsaymys takeuchii Kelly and Whistler, 2014, RM1 (LACM 126050, holotype), RM3 (LACM 156397), Rm1 (LACM 156394, reversed), Lm3 (LACM 156521), photos by T. Kelly; (12) Neotoma (Paraneotoma) quadriplicata Hibbard, 1941, LM1 (UMMP 41198, reversed); photo by A. Rountrey; LM3 (UMMP 41196, reversed), Rm1 (FHSM 14330, reversed), Rm3 (UMMP 41196), photos by R. Zakrzewski; (13) Neotoma cinerea occidentalis Baird, 1855, RM1 and RM3 (MVZ 69441), Lm1 and Lm3 (MVZ 69441), photos by Jessica Blois, UC Merced; (14) Neotoma lepida lepida3, LM1 and LM3 (MVZ 10438, reversed), Rm1 and Rm3 (MVZ 10438, reversed), photos by C. Conroy; (15) Hodomys alleni, LM1 and LM3 (IBUNAM:CNMA 8912, reversed), from Silva and Cuenca (2020a), Rm1 and Rm3 (IBUNAM:CNMA 46970, reversed), from Cervantes et al. (2016a); (16) Xenomys nelsoni Merriam, 1898 (Merriam, 1898a), LM1 and LM3 (IBUNAM:CNMA 5829, reversed), from Silva and Cuenca (2020b); Rm1 and Rm3 (IBUNAM:CNMA 42968, reversed), from Cervantes et al. (2016b); (17) Galushamys redingtonensis, RM1 (UALP 6013), RM3 (UALP 6020), Rm1 (UALP 6013, reversed), photos by T. Kelly; (18) Repomys gustelyi2 May, 1981, LM1 (UCR 20147= UCMP 320147, reversed), RM3 (UCR 20156 = UCMP 320156), Lm1 (UCR 20158 = UCMP 320158), Rm3 (UCR 20178 =UCMP 320178, reversed), from May (1981); (19) Nelsonia goldmani Merriam, 1903, RM1 (USNM 125816), LM3 (USNM 90893, reversed), Lm1 (USNM 125816), Lm3 (USNM 125602), photos by C. Ronez. 1With permission of the Carnegie Institution for Science; 2with permission from Taylor & Francis; 3with permission of the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology Archives, University of California, Berkeley. Not to scale, all specimens adjusted to equal size for comparison.
Published: 01 May 2022
. Lindsay casts; ( 4 ) Basirepomys robertsi 2 , LM1 (UMNH VP 18749, reversed), Rm1 (UMNH VP 18751, holotype, reversed), Rm3 (UMNH VP 18752), from Korth and De Blieux ( 2010 ); ( 5 ) Paronychomys lemredfieldi , RM1 and RM3 (AMNH FAM 3249), Rm1 and Rm3 (AMNH FAM 3430, reversed), photos of E. Lindsay casts
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2023
Journal of Paleontology (2023) 97 (3): 735–753.
..., are now considered “microtoid-like” cricetids of uncertain ancestry by Fejfar et al. ( 2011 ). Paronychomys and Basirepomys recently have been shown to be ancient sister groups to the Neotomini, unrelated to either Onychomys or Repomys (Kelly and Martin, 2022 ), and Onychomys and its extinct...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Series: GSA Memoirs
Published: 27 September 2021
DOI: 10.1130/2021.1217(15)
EISBN: 9780813782171
... Clarendonian and therefore between 10 and 9 Ma. It could be earliest Hemphillian, if Lander’s interpretation of the oreodont is correct, but the fauna overall looks late Clarendonian. Lander (2008) stated that the Kendall-Mallory assemblage included the Hemphillian cricetid mouse Paronychomys . However...
FIGURES | View All (40)