1-20 OF 2105 RESULTS FOR

Paradox Valley

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 January 2023
AAPG Bulletin (2023) 107 (1): 169–189.
... into paleofluid flow. This study examines bleaching and Cu mineralization in the Jurassic Wingate Sandstone on the southwestern flank of the Paradox Valley salt anticline near the Cashin mine. Bleaching within the Wingate Sandstone extends for more than 12 km along the southwestern flank of the Paradox anticline...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 18 August 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (5): 2308–2327.
...Roger P. Denlinger; Daniel R. H. O’Connell ABSTRACT High‐pressure fluid injection into a subhorizontal confined aquifer at 4.3–4.6 km depth induced > 7000 earthquakes between 1991 and 2012 within once seismically quiescent Paradox Valley in Colorado, with magnitudes up to M w 3.9. Earthquake...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 07 July 2016
Geophysics (2016) 81 (5): B119–B134.
...Vanessa M. King; Lisa V. Block; Christopher K. Wood ABSTRACT The Bureau of Reclamation operates a deep injection well near Paradox Valley, Colorado. Intermittent injection testing began in 1991, followed by near-continuous injection since 1996. Daily average injection flow rates and surface...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 16 February 2016
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2016) 106 (2): 812.
...Arantza Ugalde; Beatriz Gaite; Antonio Villaseñor 12 January 2016 In our recent article ( Ugalde et al. , 2014 ), we applied the passive image interferometry technique of Sens‐Schönfelder and Wegler (2006) to monitor seismic velocity changes in Paradox Valley (southwestern...
Journal Article
Published: 06 May 2014
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2014) 104 (3): 1088–1099.
...Arantza Ugalde; Beatriz Gaite; Antonio Villaseñor Abstract Passive image interferometry is applied to monitor seismic velocity changes in Paradox Valley (southwestern Colorado). For this purpose, we analyzed short‐period vertical‐component continuous recordings of seismic ambient noise from...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2005
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2005) 95 (2): 664–683.
...Jon Ake; Kenneth Mahrer; Daniel O’Connell; Lisa Block Abstract The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s Paradox Valley Unit ( pvu ) extracts aquifer brine from nine shallow wells along the Dolores River, Paradox Valley, in southwestern Colorado and, after treating, high pressure injects the brine 4.3–4.8...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Series: DNAG, Centennial Field Guides
Published: 01 January 1987
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-5402-X.339
EISBN: 9780813754086
... Abstract Paradox Valley is located in west-central Colorado, in western Montrose County (Fig. 1). The valley is approximately 23 mi (37 km) long and averages 3 mi (5 km) in width. It occupies a large part of T.46N., R.17W.;T.47N., R.18 and 19W.; and T.48N., R. 19W. Colorado 90 traverses...
Series: Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook Series
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.5382/GB.37.ch2
EISBN: 9781934969908
... phisiography of Sinbad Valley, an oval box canyon valley approximately 3 × 6 miles in size surrounded by shear cliffs, is due to its origin as a collapsed apophysis on the crest of the northeasternmost salt wall in the Paradox basin. This wall stretches about 40 miles to the northwest with other collapsed...
Image
<span class="search-highlight">Paradox</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span> Unit location map. Inset map shows <span class="search-highlight">Paradox</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span>. Injection...
Published: 01 April 2005
Figure 1. Paradox Valley Unit location map. Inset map shows Paradox Valley. Injection well (black circle), local municipalities (yellow squares), Dolores River across Paradox Valley (blue line), and Paradox Valley Seismic Network (green triangles; vertical-only stations, green lettering; 3
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 October 2006
Geology (2006) 34 (10): 885–888.
...Timothy F. Lawton; Brenda J. Buck Abstract Gypsum-bearing growth strata and sedimentary facies of the Moenkopi Formation on the crest and NE flank of the Castle Valley salt wall in the Paradox Basin record salt rise, evaporite exposure, and salt-withdrawal subsidence during the Early Triassic...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 21 November 2019
Geosphere (2020) 16 (1): 297–328.
... and stratigraphic history within a basin. Using new geologic mapping, measured stratigraphic sections, and subsurface interpretations of seismic and well logs, we describe circum-diapir stratal geometries and deformation at the Sinbad Valley salt wall in the proximal, northeastern Paradox Basin, southwest Colorado...
FIGURES | View All (19)
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 01 October 2015
Geosphere (2015) 11 (5): 1475–1506.
... are locations of stratigraphic columns of Figure 2 . This paper describes the structural and depositional settings of continental deposits of the Permian Cutler Group in and near Castle Valley, Utah, located in the proximal part of the Paradox Basin, and compares the petrography and detrital-zircon...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Series: Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook Series
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.5382/GB.37
EISBN: 9781934969908
Image
—Mode of formation of Sinbad <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span> anticline of <span class="search-highlight">Paradox</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span> anticline f...
Published: 01 August 1959
Fig. 8. —Mode of formation of Sinbad Valley anticline of Paradox Valley anticline formed first.
Image
Schematic southwest-northeast cross section through the <span class="search-highlight">Paradox</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span> salt...
Published: 01 January 2023
Figure 10. Schematic southwest-northeast cross section through the Paradox Valley salt wall depicting the pooling of reduced hydrocarbon fluids in stacked eolian sandstone reservoirs during bleaching. Hydrocarbon filled reservoirs (modern bleached zones) are shaded. Bleaching on the northeastern
Image
(a) Plot of focal planes of all well‐located earthquakes in <span class="search-highlight">Paradox</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span>....
Published: 18 August 2020
Figure 5. (a) Plot of focal planes of all well‐located earthquakes in Paradox Valley. The regional principal stress direction is shown, as are the three largest earthquakes and their dextral strikes in Paradox valley. The fault numbers are the same as in Figure  5b,c , and the focal planes
Image
Focal plane evolution for small induced earthquakes in <span class="search-highlight">Paradox</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span>. Faul...
Published: 18 August 2020
Figure 10. Focal plane evolution for small induced earthquakes in Paradox Valley. Faulting varies with the orientation of the weak fault zones that are concentrating shear strain. For faults west of the well, such as fault zones 7 and 1 here, the strikes of the weak fault zones average to N260E
Image
Location of the deep injection well at Reclamation’s <span class="search-highlight">Paradox</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span> Unit in...
Published: 07 July 2016
Figure 1. Location of the deep injection well at Reclamation’s Paradox Valley Unit in the western Colorado. The white star represents the injection well and the small black dots represent shallow (depth < 8.5    km relative to the ground surface elevation at the wellhead
Image
<span class="search-highlight">Paradox</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span>: semilogarithmic plot of the relation between the fluid inje...
Published: 14 October 2014
Figure 4. Paradox Valley: semilogarithmic plot of the relation between the fluid injection rate at saturation and the maximum expected magnitude within 332 days. The curves are consistent with the relation in equation  (16) .
Image
<span class="search-highlight">Paradox</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span>: Bayesian posterior probability for the maximum expected mag...
Published: 14 October 2014
Figure 3. Paradox Valley: Bayesian posterior probability for the maximum expected magnitude within 332 days of continuous fluid injection according to equation  (13) , 1100 days after the start of the injection. The (1− α ) confidence intervals are color coded.