1-20 OF 156 RESULTS FOR

Pabdeh Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Lithostratigraphy of the Paleocene–Oligocene Pabdeh Formation of southwestern Iran (Salehi, 1989).
Published: 01 April 2013
Figure 14: Lithostratigraphy of the Paleocene–Oligocene Pabdeh Formation of southwestern Iran ( Salehi, 1989 ).
Image
Different deformation styles of the incompetent unit (the Pabdeh Formation, lower part) and the competent unit (the Asmari Formation, upper part) in the NE plunge of the Saiwah anticline. (See Fig. 1c for location.)
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 7. Different deformation styles of the incompetent unit (the Pabdeh Formation, lower part) and the competent unit (the Asmari Formation, upper part) in the NE plunge of the Saiwah anticline. (See Fig. 1 c for location.)
Image
—Pabdeh Formation; typical plankton assemblage with Hantkenina sp. Coastal Fars. Middle Eocene. ×35.
Published: 01 December 1965
Fig. 70. —Pabdeh Formation; typical plankton assemblage with Hantkenina sp. Coastal Fars. Middle Eocene. ×35.
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2010
DOI: 10.1144/SP329.10
EISBN: 9781862395770
... Abstract A regional sequence stratigraphic model is proposed for the Oligo-Miocene Asmari and Pabdeh Formations in the Dezful Embayment of SW Iran. The model is based on both new detailed sedimentological observations in outcrops, core and well logs, and an improved high-resolution...
FIGURES | View All (23)
Image
Stratigraphy and bedding surfaces in the scar. Stratigraphic positions of photographs are showed in Figure 10. (a) In situ bedding surface of thin-bedded limestone (Pabdeh Formation) below thin talus cover (note backpack (arrowed) in left middle ground for scale). (b) Matrix-supported debris composed of unbedded shale matrix and gravel- to boulder-sized limestone clasts (large clast in upper right is c. 1 m × 1.5 m), resting on sliding surface 2 in the Pabdeh Formation. (c) Bedding of interbedded shale and limestone (Pabdeh Formation) exposed in a downslope-oriented gully. (Note approximate scale.) (d) Mass of interbedded shale and limestone resting on sliding surface 4 in the Pabdeh Formation. (e) Limestone bedding surface (sliding surface 4, Pabdeh Formation) with striations (note compass for scale). (f) Small pile of matrix-supported debris on sliding surface 2 in the Pabdeh Formation (c. 10 m upslope of the proximal limit of the main debris mass) composed of shale matrix and gravel- to cobble-sized limestone clasts. (g) Shale of the Pabdeh Formation. (h) Upper contact of the Emam Hassan Member (Gurpi Formation) exposed in the central head scarp and the lowest stratigraphical unit exposed in the scar.
Published: 20 June 2013
Fig. 9. Stratigraphy and bedding surfaces in the scar. Stratigraphic positions of photographs are showed in Figure 10 . ( a ) In situ bedding surface of thin-bedded limestone (Pabdeh Formation) below thin talus cover (note backpack (arrowed) in left middle ground for scale). ( b ) Matrix
Image
Type section of the Gurpi and Pabdeh Formations.
Published: 01 December 1965
Fig. 48. Type section of the Gurpi and Pabdeh Formations.
Image
Core images from borehole Bz-15. (a) Evidence of fracture that crosses profile t1at an angle of 15° at depth of about 187–192 m; (b) accumulation of bitumen in Pabdeh Formation at depth of about 417–422 m. The fractures in the Pabdeh Formation should be noted.
Published: 21 February 2022
Fig. 13. Core images from borehole Bz-15. ( a ) Evidence of fracture that crosses profile t1at an angle of 15° at depth of about 187–192 m; ( b ) accumulation of bitumen in Pabdeh Formation at depth of about 417–422 m. The fractures in the Pabdeh Formation should be noted.
Image
Correlation of the limestone portions of the Jahrum Formation across the study area (see Figure 15 for location) and into the basinal Pabdeh Formation.
Published: 01 October 2013
Figure 16: Correlation of the limestone portions of the Jahrum Formation across the study area (see Figure 15 for location) and into the basinal Pabdeh Formation.
Image
‘Fish-tail' structure in the competent limestone unit within the Pabdeh Formation in the Saiwah anticline (north of Ilam city). (See Fig. 1c for location.)
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 8. ‘Fish-tail' structure in the competent limestone unit within the Pabdeh Formation in the Saiwah anticline (north of Ilam city). (See Fig. 1 c for location.)
Image
(a) Formation boundaries are projected onto the resistivity model to compare the results from AMT investigation with the geology. The anomalous conductive zone in the centre of profile t1 should be noted. To provide more information about this zone, 500 m of core boring is proposed at the location of BZ-15 (between stations t1-26 and t1-27). (b) Water inflow and H2S seepage into the tunnel during the drilling programme. It should be noted that the highest amount of H2S seepage into the tunnel is related to the anomalous conductive zone, whereas the highest amount of water inflow into the tunnel is located in the fractured part of the Pabdeh Formation (in the vicinity of faults F2 and F1) and at the conjunction of the Pabdeh and Asmari formations.
Published: 21 February 2022
into the tunnel is located in the fractured part of the Pabdeh Formation (in the vicinity of faults F2 and F1) and at the conjunction of the Pabdeh and Asmari formations.
Image
Cross-plot of formation resistivity and groundwater salinity for different clay per cent. It should be noted that the bulk resistivity of Pabdeh Formation based on the different clay per cent and measured water salinity from borehole is higher than the resistivity of the anomalous conductive zone (by about an order of magnitude).
Published: 21 February 2022
Fig. 12. Cross-plot of formation resistivity and groundwater salinity for different clay per cent. It should be noted that the bulk resistivity of Pabdeh Formation based on the different clay per cent and measured water salinity from borehole is higher than the resistivity of the anomalous
Image
Overview of the scar of the Seymareh rock avalanche on the NE flank of the Kabir Kuh anticline. (a) Panoramic view of debris and distant view of scar from the debris limit along the plunging nose of Kuh Dufarush (c. 14 km from the upslope limit of the sliding surface). The lateral limits of the scar are visible on the skyline, marked by vertical arrows. The distance between the lateral limits is 15.5 km. Utility poles on the debris in the foreground are c. 12 m high. (b) The NW lateral scarp, consisting of Asmari Limestone, is visible on the skyline. Various basal sliding surfaces are visible in the middle to near foreground and coincide with bedding surfaces of limestone beds (mean dip c. 22°) in the Pabdeh Formation. The most dominant sliding surfaces represented are sliding surface 1 (foreground, lower slope), sliding surfaces 3 and 4 (middle ground, upper slope) and sliding surface 2 (background, upper slope). Debris at right consists of disaggregated mudrocks of the Pabdeh Formation. Parts of the scar have been deeply eroded by stream action since the landslide occurred (see incised gully at left).
Published: 20 June 2013
surfaces are visible in the middle to near foreground and coincide with bedding surfaces of limestone beds (mean dip c . 22°) in the Pabdeh Formation. The most dominant sliding surfaces represented are sliding surface 1 (foreground, lower slope), sliding surfaces 3 and 4 (middle ground, upper slope
Image
Danan anticline. Simplified geological map and linedrawing on satellite imagery (from GoogleEarth, Image © 2016 DigitalGlobe) of stratigraphic horizons within the Agha Jari Formation. Black dotted line represents the Danan axial trace. Al = alluvial deposits; As = Asmari Formation; Fm. = Formation; Gu = Gurpi Formation; Il = Ilam Formation; Mbr. = Member; Pd = Pabdeh Formation; Sv = Sarvak Formation.
Published: 01 March 2018
. = Formation; Gu = Gurpi Formation; Il = Ilam Formation; Mbr. = Member; Pd = Pabdeh Formation; Sv = Sarvak Formation.
Image
Fracture network in the outcrop from Cretaceous carbonate layers in SW Iran. (a) The main fracture sets (modified from Casini 2011). (b) Photograph of the bedding surface, Ilam Formation, southern limb of Siah Kuh Anticline. (c) Photograph of the bedding surface, Pabdeh Formation, southern limb of Siah Kuh anticline. (d) Distribution of Cv for the fracture populations from the Bangestan Group in the Lurestan and Asmari formations in the Khaviz Anticline, SW Iran.
Published: 04 January 2016
Fig. 10. Fracture network in the outcrop from Cretaceous carbonate layers in SW Iran. ( a ) The main fracture sets (modified from Casini 2011 ). ( b ) Photograph of the bedding surface, Ilam Formation, southern limb of Siah Kuh Anticline. ( c ) Photograph of the bedding surface, Pabdeh Formation
Image
:Paleofacies of the Middle to Late Eocene spanning deposition of the Jaddala, Dammam, and Pabdeh formations, and their regional equivalents [GSS intra-Pg30]. The sediments were deposited in a structural setting comparable to those of the underlying succession. With information from: Andrews (1992b); Filbrandt et al. (1990); Gilmour and Mäkel (1996); Goff et al. (1995); Guiraud et al. (2001); Hertig et al. (1995); Koop and Stoneley (1982); Kraig and Kozlu (1990); Le Métour et al. (1995); Nolan et al. (1990); Ponikarov et al. (1966); Roger et al. (1989); and unpublished Saudi Aramco Miscellaneous Report 913 (W.J. Koop, 1982).
Published: 01 July 2001
Figure 18 :Paleofacies of the Middle to Late Eocene spanning deposition of the Jaddala, Dammam, and Pabdeh formations, and their regional equivalents [GSS intra-Pg30]. The sediments were deposited in a structural setting comparable to those of the underlying succession. With information from
Image
:Paleofacies of the Late Paleocene to Early Eocene spanning deposition of the Rus, Umm er Radhuma, and Pabdeh formations, and their regional equivalents [MFS Pg10 to intra-Pg20]. Sediments were deposited within a ‘remnant’ foredeep setting during rapid erosion, lowering, and subsidence of the emergent ophiolite and sedimentary structures along the eastern margin of the Plate. With information from: Andrews (1992b); Filbrandt et al. (1990); Gilmour and Mäkel (1996); Goff et al. (1995); James and Wynd (1965); Koop and Stonely (1982); (Kraig and Kozlu (1990); Le Métour et al. (1995); Nolan et al. (1990); Murris (1980); Ponikarov (1966); Roger et al. (1989); and unpublished Saudi Aramco Miscellaneous Report 913 (W.J. Koop, 1982).
Published: 01 July 2001
Figure 17 :Paleofacies of the Late Paleocene to Early Eocene spanning deposition of the Rus, Umm er Radhuma, and Pabdeh formations, and their regional equivalents [MFS Pg10 to intra-Pg20]. Sediments were deposited within a ‘remnant’ foredeep setting during rapid erosion, lowering, and subsidence
Journal Article
Published: 21 February 2022
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2022) 55 (3): qjegh2021-132.
...Fig. 13. Core images from borehole Bz-15. ( a ) Evidence of fracture that crosses profile t1at an angle of 15° at depth of about 187–192 m; ( b ) accumulation of bitumen in Pabdeh Formation at depth of about 417–422 m. The fractures in the Pabdeh Formation should be noted. ...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 23 December 2015
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2016) 49 (1): 105–115.
... mm. The alluvial sediments have a thickness of 35 m at the location of the dam axis, but this increases to 70 m in the upstream part of the dam axis ( Mahab Ghods Consulting Engineers 2009 ). The Asmari and Pabdeh formations dominate at the dam site. Outcrops of the Pabdeh formation are visible...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1965
AAPG Bulletin (1965) 49 (12): 2182–2245.
...Fig. 70. —Pabdeh Formation; typical plankton assemblage with Hantkenina sp. Coastal Fars. Middle Eocene. ×35. ...
FIGURES | View All (98)
Image
—Kuh-e Pabdeh; Type section of Pabdeh-Gurpi Formations. Kuh-e Pabdeh, Khuzestan.
Published: 01 December 1965
Fig. 69. —Kuh-e Pabdeh; Type section of Pabdeh-Gurpi Formations. Kuh-e Pabdeh, Khuzestan.