1-20 OF 545 RESULTS FOR

PLUM

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 28 July 2022
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (5): 2668–2688.
...Jessie K. Saunders; Sarah E. Minson; Annemarie S. Baltay; Julian J. Bunn; Elizabeth S. Cochran; Deborah L. Kilb; Colin T. O’Rourke; Mitsuyuki Hoshiba; Yuki Kodera ABSTRACT We examine the real‐time earthquake detection and alerting behavior of the Propagation of Local Undamped Motion (PLUM...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 11 January 2022
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2022) 112 (2): 803–819.
...Elizabeth S. Cochran; Jessie K. Saunders; Sarah E. Minson; Julian Bunn; Annemarie Baltay; Debi Kilb; Colin O’Rourke; Mitsuyuki Hoshiba; Yuki Kodera ABSTRACT We determine an optimal alerting configuration for the propagation of local undamped motion (PLUM) earthquake early warning (EEW) algorithm...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 16 June 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (4): 1887–1903.
... earthquakes. In 2018, we began retrospective and internal real‐time testing of the propagation of local undamped motion (PLUM) method for earthquake warning in California, Oregon, and Washington, with the potential that PLUM might one day be included in the ShakeAlert EEW system. A real‐time version of PLUM...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 18 June 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (4): 1524–1541.
...Elizabeth S. Cochran; Julian Bunn; Sarah E. Minson; Annemarie S. Baltay; Deborah L. Kilb; Yuki Kodera; Mitsuyuki Hoshiba Abstract We test the Japanese ground‐motion‐based earthquake early warning (EEW) algorithm, propagation of local undamped motion (PLUM), in southern California with application...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2018
Environmental Geosciences (2018) 25 (3): 101–119.
...Matthew L. Rhoads; David H. Malone ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to deconstruct the relationship between the Leaf River anticline and the preglacial bedrock paleotopography at the eastern terminus of the Plum River Fault Zone in Ogle County, Illinois, using a geostatistical approach...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 23 January 2018
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (2): 983–1003.
... faults, (2) missing earthquakes during intense seismic activities, and (3) overprediction of the strong motion of multiple simultaneous earthquakes. We propose the propagation of local undamped motion (PLUM) method to address these technical challenges. The PLUM method is a simple wavefield‐estimation...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 1995
Journal of Paleontology (1995) 69 (6): 1123–1139.
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1979
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1979) 49 (1): 323–333.
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1977
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1977) 47 (4): 1475–1483.
...J. R. Jones; B. Cameron Abstract The origin and development of barrier islands systems has received much attention during the last decade as marine scientists have become more concerned with coastal environments. Plum Island, part of a barrier island system located off the northeastern coast...
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 1971
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1971) 8 (11): 1423–1431.
...Nils-Axel Mörner Abstract Plum Point Interstadial deposits in Scarborough Bluffs, Toronto, include a layer of unvarved sandy sediments, which indicates relative low lake level, with the ice margin some distance away, probably north of the Ontario basin proper. Radiocarbon dates above and below...
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1945
Journal of Paleontology (1945) 19 (2): 87–95.
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1942
Journal of Paleontology (1942) 16 (5): 549–563.
Image
Flowchart of the NZ‐PLUM and NZ‐PLUM‐P algorithms’ operational architecture for a single observation station during a three‐second time window. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 May 2025
Figure 3. Flowchart of the NZ‐PLUM and NZ‐PLUM‐P algorithms’ operational architecture for a single observation station during a three‐second time window. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1991
European Journal of Mineralogy (1991) 3 (6): 933–941.
...Gerburg Larsen; Karl H. Plum; Hansgeorg Foerster GeoRef, Copyright 2008, American Geological Institute. Reference includes data from Geoline, Bundesanstalt fur Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hanover, Germany 1991 ...
Journal Article
Published: 08 May 2025
Seismological Research Letters (2025)
...Figure 3. Flowchart of the NZ‐PLUM and NZ‐PLUM‐P algorithms’ operational architecture for a single observation station during a three‐second time window. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition. ...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Stations first triggered (shown as red triangles) during the 23 May 2024 M 3.9 earthquake: (a) using the NZ‐PLUM algorithm and (b) using the NZ‐PLUM‐P algorithm. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 May 2025
Figure 6. Stations first triggered (shown as red triangles) during the 23 May 2024 M  3.9 earthquake: (a) using the NZ‐PLUM algorithm and (b) using the NZ‐PLUM‐P algorithm. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
Stations first triggered (shown as red triangles) during the 3 June 2024 M 4.1 earthquake: (a) using the NZ‐PLUM algorithm and (b) using the NZ‐PLUM-P algorithm. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 May 2025
Figure 7. Stations first triggered (shown as red triangles) during the 3 June 2024 M  4.1 earthquake: (a) using the NZ‐PLUM algorithm and (b) using the NZ‐PLUM-P algorithm. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
Stations first triggered (shown as red triangles) during the 6 July 2024 M 4.0 earthquake: (a) using the NZ‐PLUM algorithm and (b) using the NZ‐PLUM-P algorithm. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 May 2025
Figure 8. Stations first triggered (shown as red triangles) during the 6 July 2024 M  4.0 earthquake: (a) using the NZ‐PLUM algorithm and (b) using the NZ‐PLUM-P algorithm. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
Overview of the propagation of local undamped motion (PLUM): the illustration of the PLUM algorithm’s operation demonstrating intensity prediction equation for a prediction point based on observations from peripheral stations (adapted from Kodera, 2018). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 08 May 2025
Figure 2. Overview of the propagation of local undamped motion (PLUM): the illustration of the PLUM algorithm’s operation demonstrating intensity prediction equation for a prediction point based on observations from peripheral stations (adapted from Kodera, 2018 ). The color version
Image
Real‐time MMI time series for two M 4.1 earthquakes during the Calipatria earthquake swarm event near the Salton Sea in southern California that demonstrate different PLUM alerting behavior. PLUM calculates the maximum observed MMI every second from real‐time velocity and acceleration data streams. (a) MMI time series for the 5 June 2021 M 4.1 earthquake that PLUM detected and generated an alert for MMI 4.0+ shaking. (b) MMI time series for the 7 June 2021 M 4.1 earthquake that PLUM detected but did not generate an alert for MMI 4.0+ shaking. In both the plots, the vertical solid line indicates the time relative to earthquake origin when MMI 4.0+ shaking is first observed. The vertical dashed line indicates the time when MMI 3.0+ shaking is observed at a neighboring station, which is when the PLUM event detection is confirmed and when alert regions start to be determined from the PLUM MMI prediction grid.
Published: 28 July 2022
Figure 3. Real‐time MMI time series for two M  4.1 earthquakes during the Calipatria earthquake swarm event near the Salton Sea in southern California that demonstrate different PLUM alerting behavior. PLUM calculates the maximum observed MMI every second from real‐time velocity and acceleration