1-20 OF 212 RESULTS FOR

Ohio earthquake 2019

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 14 April 2021
Seismological Research Letters (2021) 92 (4): 2531–2539.
...Dongdong Yao; Yihe Huang; Jeffrey L. Fox Abstract We present a detailed analysis of the 10 June 2019 M L 4.0 Ohio earthquake sequence, which is the largest earthquake that struck Lake County, northeastern Ohio, since 1986. This sequence is well recorded by local seismic networks, which provides...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 09 May 2022
Seismological Research Letters (2022) 93 (4): 2268–2280.
... and water level variations before the 2019 Ohio sequence, suggesting that water level fluctuations do not modulate long‐term seismicity. However, we cannot fully rule out the impact of increasing water level on reactivating the fault that hosted the 2019 Ohio earthquake sequence because of the uncertainty...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 18 March 2020
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (3): 1831–1845.
.... * Corresponding author: [email protected] 18 January 2019 © Seismological Society of America The central and eastern United States has experienced a significant increase in earthquakes induced by hydrocarbon‐related hydraulic fracturing or wastewater injection during the past decade...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Main cluster around the <span class="search-highlight">2019</span> <span class="search-highlight">Ohio</span> mainshock. (a) Magnitude versus time for ...
Published: 09 May 2022
Figure 5. Main cluster around the 2019 Ohio mainshock. (a) Magnitude versus time for events within this cluster. Symbols are similar to those in Figure  3 . The cumulative number of earthquakes is shown with the solid black curve. (b) Earthquake rate (black line, averaged every 10 days) versus
Image
Map showing the study region. Seismic stations used for determining the mai...
Published: 14 April 2021
accessed May 2020). Open circles are events before 2013, whereas those after 2013 are shown with gray‐filled circles. Two focal mechanism plots are the 2019 M  4.0 (19M4) and 1986 M  5.0 Ohio (86M5) earthquakes. Nearby earthquakes with magnitudes above 3.0 are marked with gray stars, including the 2013
Journal Article
Published: 19 February 2020
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (2A): 1086–1093.
... © Seismological Society of America The 91st Annual Meeting of the Eastern Section of the Seismological Society of America (ES‐SSA) was held in Columbus, Ohio, on 3–5 November 2019. Fifty‐one scientists participated in multiple sessions covering topics such as seismicity, earthquake...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 15 February 2021
AAPG Bulletin (2021) 105 (2): 265–273.
... . Ohio Administrative Code , 2017 , Ohio State regulation 1501:9-3-06, accessed December 29, 2019, http://codes.ohio.gov/oac/1501%3A9-3-06 . Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Oil and Gas Resource Management , 2014 , Recent earthquake epicenters in Ohio : Ohio Department...
FIGURES
Image
Different types of events detected through template matching. (a,b) The 201...
Published: 09 May 2022
Figure 2. Different types of events detected through template matching. (a,b) The 2019 M L  4.0 Ohio mainshock. (c,d) An M  2.6 aftershock. (e,f) The M  3.4 Detroit earthquake. (g,h) Matched surficial quarry blast. (i,j) Matched mining blasts. The color version of this figure
Journal Article
Published: 28 April 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (5): 2411–2422.
... al. , 2014 ), British Columbia ( Babaie Mahani et al. , 2017 ), Alberta ( Schultz, Stern, et al. , 2015 ; Schultz, Mei, et al. , 2015 ), Ohio ( Skoumal et al. , 2015 ), Oklahoma ( Skoumal, Ries, et al. , 2018 ), Arkansas ( Yoon et al. , 2017 ), Texas, and China ( Lei et al. , 2019 ). Some...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
Magnitude–time distribution for all detected events around the <span class="search-highlight">2019</span> <span class="search-highlight">Ohio</span> ea...
Published: 14 April 2021
Figure 4. Magnitude–time distribution for all detected events around the 2019 Ohio earthquake. Color‐coded circles are events with verified phase arrivals, and the color bar indicates average cross‐correlation value (CCV). Squares are events without verified phase arrivals. Cumulative number
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2020
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (5): 2960–2975.
..., and Ohio (Fig.  1 ). Seismic data were collected starting in October 2013 and ending in October 2016. We deployed 28 broadband seismic sensors, with continuous data recording, and relied on natural (passive) earthquake sources. MT data were collected between October 2015 and May 2016, with each of the 25...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2022
Earthquake Spectra (2022) 38 (4): 2754–2787.
... Department of Homeland Security (IDHS), 2019 ). This study extends the results of that project and estimates the risk for the state of Indiana and major Indiana cities associated with various seismic sources in and around the state, and the potential for earthquake secondary effects of liquefaction...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2020
Earthquake Spectra (2020) 36 (4): 1995–2018.
... of informing mitigation efforts and post-earthquake inspection procedures. Abbie B Liel, Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. Email: [email protected] 30 9 2019 23 3 2020 © The Author(s) 2020...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Journal Article
Published: 12 April 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (4): 2028–2053.
... seismicity models. Earthquake catalogs were updated through 2022 using the methodology of Mueller (2019) , which merges preexisting input catalogs, removes duplicates, explosions, and mining‐related seismicity, and calculates a uniform moment magnitude. Some of the methodological catalog development changes...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Journal Article
Published: 17 November 2021
Seismological Research Letters (2022) 93 (2A): 727–738.
... ( AGS, 2019 ). (d) Timeline of the earthquakes (pink circles) overlaying monthly injection volumes (colored bars). (e) The temporal relation between injection activities and earthquakes by the ReshuffleCorr analysis. CC, Correlation Coefficients. The color version of this figure is available only...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 11 March 2020
Interpretation (2020) 8 (2): T323–T347.
... for pore-pressure variation needed to induce reactivation ( Zoback, 2012 ; Ellsworth, 2013 ; Huang et al., 2017 ; Hennings et al., 2019 ). In Youngstown, Ohio, a series of low-magnitude (Mw 0.0–3.9) earthquakes have been determined to be triggered by increased pore pressure along preexisting...
FIGURES | View All (21)
Journal Article
Published: 22 November 2024
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2024) 30 (4): 229–243.
... of Jackson (population 68,114) ( Figure 1 ) may be affected by both earthquake ground shaking and liquefaction in the event of future large New Madrid earthquakes ( Chiu et al., 1992 ; Cox et al., 2001 , 2006 , 2013 ; Tuttle et al., 2002 , 2019 ; Cramer, 2006 ; Csontos and Van Arsdale, 2008 ; Cramer...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 21 June 2024
Seismological Research Letters (2024) 95 (6): 3633–3651.
... the feasibility of using fiber‐optic cable to monitor activities and events such as passing traffic or earthquakes ( Ajo‐Franklin et al. , 2019 ; Lindsey et al. , 2020 ; Shen and Zhu, 2021b ). Most of these studies use a technique called distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), which can be deployed on existing...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 21 July 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (5): 2272–2282.
... of earthquakes induced by HF are smaller than those induced by WD, the largest magnitude events correlated with HF activities has increased recently to include an M w  4.6 in Canada ( Atkinson et al. , 2016 ) and an M L  5.7 in China ( Lei et al. , 2019 ). The potential for these larger...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 21 June 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (5): 2325–2340.
...) with an average spacing, Δ d , of 30 m has been deployed in Belmont County, Ohio, for one month since 23 August 2013 (Fig.  6 ). The passive data records include local high‐frequency quarry blasts and global earthquakes. Figure 6. Image from Google Earth showing the location and configuration (inset...
FIGURES | View All (11)