1-20 OF 121 RESULTS FOR

Nikanassin Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
A) Sandy Facies C1 lying directly on the Jurassic Nikanassin Formation; the sinuous white line is the sub-Cretaceous unconformity. Compare with the more typical conglomeratic deposits of Facies Association A (Figs. 4, 5). This section also shows a thickly developed weathering profile (lighter upper part) immediately beneath the loessite (Facies D1) that caps the Cadomin Formation. This weathered interval includes deformed sandstone at the top with vertically oriented bedding (inside white box). B) Sandstone and matrix-supported conglomerate of Facies C1 grading upward into interbedded and interlaminated sandstone and siltstone of Facies C2, which is overlain erosionally in turn by more Facies C1.
Published: 27 August 2019
Fig. 10.— A) Sandy Facies C1 lying directly on the Jurassic Nikanassin Formation; the sinuous white line is the sub-Cretaceous unconformity. Compare with the more typical conglomeratic deposits of Facies Association A ( Figs. 4 , 5 ). This section also shows a thickly developed weathering
Image
(A) Location map and sites of Nikanassin Formation samples (Alberta Foothills, Canada; after Fermor, 1999). (B) A–A’ cross section near the town of Grande Cache (McMechan, 1996).
Published: 01 April 2016
Figure 3. (A) Location map and sites of Nikanassin Formation samples (Alberta Foothills, Canada; after Fermor, 1999 ). (B) A–A’ cross section near the town of Grande Cache ( McMechan, 1996 ).
Image
(A) Location map and sites of Nikanassin Formation samples (Alberta Foothills, Canada; after Fermor, 1999). (B) A–A’ cross section near the town of Grande Cache (McMechan, 1996).
Published: 01 April 2016
Figure 3. (A) Location map and sites of Nikanassin Formation samples (Alberta Foothills, Canada; after Fermor, 1999 ). (B) A–A’ cross section near the town of Grande Cache ( McMechan, 1996 ).
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1990
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1990) 38A (1): 159–175.
... formation Nikanassin et le groupe Minnes, est un dépôt orogénique clastique qui se termine en biseau en direction est et remplit l’avant-fosse à l’ouest, et qui se retrouve en minces dépôts de schiste argileux et de grès équivalents déposés sur une plate-forme à l’est. L’absence ou la quasi-absence de...
Image
WELL SECTIONS OF THE FERNIE AND KOOTENAY (NIKANASSIN) FORMATIONS IN ALBERTA
Published: 01 April 1949
FIG. 3. WELL SECTIONS OF THE FERNIE AND KOOTENAY (NIKANASSIN) FORMATIONS IN ALBERTA
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1985
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1985) 33 (1): 1–11.
...C. Willem Langenberg; Margaret E. McMechan RÉSUMÉ Le Groupe Luscar (revisé) forme la séquence carbonifère du Crétacé Inférieur qui recouvre disconformément les strates marines et non-marines de la Formation Nikanassin du Groupe Minnes et qui est disconformément sous-jacent aux argiles marines...
Book Chapter

Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 1992
DOI: 10.1306/M55563C8
EISBN: 9781629811093
... traps produce gas in the northern Alberta and northeastern British Columbia Deep Basin and Foothills (Nikanassin Formation). In the Mannville Assemblage (Lower Cretaceous fluviodeltaiclittoral deposits), the main plays occur within continental basal sandstones deposited transgressively on the sub...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1980
AAPG Bulletin (1980) 64 (5): 669.
.... Hydrocarbons have been found in 20 rock units ranging in age from Permian to Late Cretaceous. The majority of the reserves are contained within the Lower Cretaceous Spirit River Group and the Jurassic Nikanassin formation. Spirit River sediments were deposited in a series of transgressive and regressive cycles...
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 01 April 2016
Geosphere (2016) 12 (2): 400–438.
...Figure 3. (A) Location map and sites of Nikanassin Formation samples (Alberta Foothills, Canada; after Fermor, 1999 ). (B) A–A’ cross section near the town of Grande Cache ( McMechan, 1996 ). ...
FIGURES | View All (28)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1979
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1979) 27 (2): 183–208.
..., the Elk is possibly conformably overlain by the Pocaterra Creek Member of the Cadomin Formation (Blairmore Group). The Kootenay Group grades laterally into strata of the Nikanassin Formation in the vicinity of the North Saskatchewan River. 1 Geological Survey of Canada, Institute of Sedimentary...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 May 2013
GSA Bulletin (2013) 125 (5-6): 741–755.
.... Accordingly, sandstones of the Jurassic foreland, associated with the Minnes Group and equivalent Kootenay and Nikanassin formations, are divided into two informal groups, type 1 and type 2. Type 1 sandstones are mature quartz arenites, present along the entire north-south length of the Alberta Basin...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Series: AAPG Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1958
DOI: 10.1306/SV17349C2
EISBN: 9781629812441
... Abstract The Jurassic of the Canadian Rocky Mountains and foothills comprising the Fernie group and the lower part of the Kootenay and Nikanassin formations is subdivided on a paleontological basis into a number of units which correspond to zones and stages of the Northwest European standard...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1956
AAPG Bulletin (1956) 40 (2): 413.
...Hans Frebold ABSTRACT The Jurassic of the Canadian Rocky Mountains and Foothills comprising the Fernie group and the lower part of the Kootenay and Nikanassin formations is subdivided on a palaeontological basis into a number of units which correspond to zones and stages of the Northwest European...
Image
Examples of studied fractures in hand sample. All fractures are at a high angle to bedding. (A) Nikanassin Formation sample NK-1 in the steep limb of an anticline (box shows location of B). (B) Sample NK-1. X-y axes indicate the orientation of the cut thin section with respect to the reference frame shown in Figure 6. (C) Travis Peak Formation sample TP-1 in core. This fracture (F) is nearly vertical. (D) Travis Peak Formation sample TP-2 showing several vertical, partially filled fractures.
Published: 01 April 2016
Figure 2. Examples of studied fractures in hand sample. All fractures are at a high angle to bedding. (A) Nikanassin Formation sample NK-1 in the steep limb of an anticline (box shows location of B). (B) Sample NK-1. X-y axes indicate the orientation of the cut thin section with respect
Image
Type geophysical well log used for this study, well 02-33-66-07W6: GR, Gamma ray; ND, neutron; DP, density; DT, sonic. The Jurassic Nikanassin Formation consists of mudstones and sandstones and is unconformably overlain by the Cadomin Formation, a clean, siliciclastic body on the gamma-ray log. The Gething Formation, which overlies the Cadomin Formation, contains many coal beds and paleosols that make good local stratigraphic markers, but regionally traceable markers are absent. The top of the sandy Bluesky Formation is an extensive flooding surface that is the only regionally correlative marker in the study area; it forms the datum for this study. Depths are in meters.
Published: 27 August 2019
Fig. 3.— Type geophysical well log used for this study, well 02-33-66-07W6: GR, Gamma ray; ND, neutron; DP, density; DT, sonic. The Jurassic Nikanassin Formation consists of mudstones and sandstones and is unconformably overlain by the Cadomin Formation, a clean, siliciclastic body on the gamma
Image
Fig. 13.—East–west cross section over the Wapiti natural gas field. See Figure 2 for the location. All wells are vertical. The Bluesky Formation top is the datum. Additional local markers in the Gething Formation (e.g., coals, clusters of paleosols) are also shown. Channel bodies in the Gething Formation are shown schematically. The wells are nearly in a straight line and are relatively evenly spaced. Note the slight angular unconformity between the Cadomin Formation and the underlying Jurassic Nikanassin Formation, the terraced nature of the top and bottom of the Cadomin Formation, and the presence of deeper erosion (as indicated by the truncation of deeper markers) at locations where the Cadomin Formation is lower. The location of the Wapiti Gas Field (see Fig. 2) is indicated.
Published: 27 August 2019
Formation are shown schematically. The wells are nearly in a straight line and are relatively evenly spaced. Note the slight angular unconformity between the Cadomin Formation and the underlying Jurassic Nikanassin Formation, the terraced nature of the top and bottom of the Cadomin Formation
Series: Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series
Published: 01 January 2010
DOI: 10.1144/0071099
EISBN: 9781862394131
... are interpreted to reflect a progressive increase in accommodation space that led to successively less amalgamation of the channel deposits. Fig. 7. Cross-section of upper Nikanassin Formation showing distribution of sandstones across the central BCG region. Fig. 6. Well log characteristics...
FIGURES | View All (29)
Image
Regional strike oriented gamma radiation log cross-section (A–A′) featuring the stratigraphic correlation scheme adapted in this study indicated by solid lines, as well as previous stratigraphic picks from Stott (1998) and Legun (1988), indicated by bars adjacent to gamma radiation curves. Complex stratigraphic architecture led to incorrect application of the Monach, Beattie Peaks and Monteith formation nomenclature, developed in northeastern British Columbia, to strata in Alberta by Stott (1998). Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous strata in the Alberta subsurface are lithostratigraphically equivalent to the Monteith Formation in northeastern British Columbia. The Nikanassin Formation is correlative with the Monteith C. Extent of the Alberta study area is shown in grey. Cross-section location shown in Figure 2A.
Published: 01 March 2012
are lithostratigraphically equivalent to the Monteith Formation in northeastern British Columbia. The Nikanassin Formation is correlative with the Monteith C. Extent of the Alberta study area is shown in grey. Cross-section location shown in Figure 2A .
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1949
AAPG Bulletin (1949) 33 (4): 533–546.
...FIG. 3. WELL SECTIONS OF THE FERNIE AND KOOTENAY (NIKANASSIN) FORMATIONS IN ALBERTA ...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Image
Tubular tidalites from intertidal and subtidal successions worldwide. A) Tidal couplets preserved within Thalassinoides, Cretaceous, Nice Formation, Møre Basin. Scale bar = 1cm. B) Transverse view and C) longitudinal view. Subtidal channel, Jurassic, upper Monteith Member, Nikanassin Formation, British Columbia, Canada. Scale bar = 1 cm. D)Thalassinoides (?), Jurassic, Schandelah Basin, Germany. In this example, three sets of evenly spaced, bifurcating couplets are indicated (white arrows). E) Rhythmic lamination within Ophiomorpha shaft. Shallow subtidal, Miocene Pebas Formation. Scale bar = 1cm. F)Arenicolites from shallow subtidal succession, Miocene Pebas Formation, Peru. Scale bar = 1 cm. G–I) Obliquely-oriented Psilonichnus, intertidal flat, Pleistocene, Willapa Bay Washington. Bars of scales = 1 cm. J)Thalassinoides, intertidal flat, Pleistocene, Willapa Bay Washington. Field of view is approximately 12 cm. K, L) X-radiograph of tidal couplets in Psilonichnus, modern inner intertidal flat, Willapa Bay, Washington.
Published: 01 July 2015
, Nikanassin Formation, British Columbia, Canada. Scale bar = 1 cm. D) Thalassinoides (?), Jurassic, Schandelah Basin, Germany. In this example, three sets of evenly spaced, bifurcating couplets are indicated (white arrows). E) Rhythmic lamination within Ophiomorpha shaft. Shallow subtidal, Miocene