1-20 OF 23 RESULTS FOR

Namaki Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1980
AAPG Bulletin (1980) 64 (12): 2095–2107.
... Formation); (3) gypsum-anhydrite facies (Namaki Formation); and (4) massive salty facies (Qeshm Formation). The names Namaki and Qeshm are assigned to two distinct units with different lithologies within the southeastern extension of the lower Fars Group. Surface and subsurface reference sections...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 November 2007
Geology (2007) 35 (11): 963–966.
... in namakiers (salt glaciers). Using seismic sections and variance attribute maps derived from high-resolution three-dimensional seismic data, we show that when a syndepositional fault cuts a near-emergent diapir crest, the caprock carapace was breached, opening a pathway for salt extrusion. The fault...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 01 December 2014
Geosphere (2014) 10 (6): 1219–1234.
... and satellite image analysis confirm surface outcrops of active salt structures, including the salt thrust sheets, salt walls, and salt namakiers (“glaciers” of salt; see Talbot and Pohjola, 2009 ). Here we provide initial geometric and kinematic characterization of these structures and their relationships...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 08 June 2021
Journal of the Geological Society (2021) 178 (6): jgs2020-136.
... types, which partially represent their evolution from birth (early extrusion) to death (wasting) ( Jahani et al. 2007 ). Types A to F of this classification are buried diapirs, high relief active diapirs, namakiers with salt fountains, eroded namakiers without fountains, dead diapirs (and empty...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
Figure 2. Surface geology (left) and Landsat image (right) of Kuk-e-Namak (Dashti), Iran, 28°16′N, 51°42′E. Faults intersecting the anticlinal dome facilitated salt breakout and formation of surface salt glacier, or namakier. Black arrows indicate bedding dip and azimuth in anticlinal beds (geology after Kent, 1958; Landsat image courtesy of National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
Published: 01 November 2007
Figure 2. Surface geology (left) and Landsat image (right) of Kuk-e-Namak (Dashti), Iran, 28°16′N, 51°42′E. Faults intersecting the anticlinal dome facilitated salt breakout and formation of surface salt glacier, or namakier. Black arrows indicate bedding dip and azimuth in anticlinal beds (geology
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1987
AAPG Bulletin (1987) 71 (9): 1068–1093.
... communication), in which R is the universal gas constant and T the absolute temperature (K). Figure adapted from Carter and Hansen (1983) . Strain rates for shallow diapirs and namakiers ( Jackson and Talbot, 1986 ) show that laboratory-derived data for power law creep of dry salt account for low strain rates...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Image
—Microstructure of pure rock salt. (A) and (B) are undeformed salts from Permian Palo Duro basin, northwest Texas; (C) and (D) are naturally deformed salts. (A) Thin section of unrecrystallized halite showing morphological preferred orientation of elongate grains normal to bedding. Chevron structures defined by bands of fluid inclusions; from Stone and Webster No. 1 Mansfield well, depth 487.0 m, lower San Andres Formation, Oldham County. (B) Thick section of coarse-grained, possibly recrystallized, structurally isotropic halite; from Stone and Webster No. 1 Zeeck well, depth 580.5 m, lower Seven Rivers Formation, Swisher County. (C) Thick section of gneissose halite from LETCO TOG 1 well, depth 387.5 m, Oakwood Dome, east Texas. (D) Ground and etched surface of mylonitic halite from northern namakier of the extrusive dome, Kuh-e-Namak (Dashti), Iran (modified from Talbot, 1981, his Figure 3b).
Published: 01 September 1987
m, lower Seven Rivers Formation, Swisher County. (C) Thick section of gneissose halite from LETCO TOG 1 well, depth 387.5 m, Oakwood Dome, east Texas. (D) Ground and etched surface of mylonitic halite from northern namakier of the extrusive dome, Kuh-e-Namak (Dashti), Iran (modified from Talbot
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2004
Journal of the Geological Society (2004) 161 (2): 321–334.
.... The river cliff truncates the eastern end of this bedrock collar. The apron of allochthonous salt is up to c. 500 m thick and about 0.75 km long to the west of the summit, and c. 2 km to the south, in what will be referred to as the southern namakier (salt glacier) (Figs 5 & 6). Fig. 2...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 13 June 2023
Geophysics (2023) 88 (4): G135–G144.
...Rukuan Xie; Shengqing Xiong; Shuling Duan; Yao Luo; Ping Wang ABSTRACT The remanent magnetization vector records the earth’s magnetic field at the time of the formation process of magnetized geologic units. Recovering the magnetization vector from magnetic data can provide extra information...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 1999
Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France (1999) 170 (3): 413–420.
.... Mesloula est singulièrement maigre et donc peu conforme à celle attendue dans l'hypothèse diapirique «classique». La partie centrale du profil A est réinterprétée figure 3. Par rapport à la figure originale au format A3, par souci de I isibilité, seules les légendes ont été agrandies. séparent le matériel...
Journal Article
Published: 02 December 2020
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2021) 54 (3): qjegh2020-101.
... , V s , E and ν . The Gachsaran Formation (Early Miocene) is an evaporitic sequence in the Zagros Basin of western Iran. The formation takes its name from the Gachsaran oilfield, where it has significant outcrop. The outcropping rocks of the Gachsaran Formation in the study area include...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 2018
AAPG Bulletin (2018) 102 (3): 369–399.
...., 2008 ); (13) Kuh-e Namaki, linkage ( Ramsey et al., 2008 ; Fernandez and Kaus, 2014 ; Collignon et al., 2015 ); (14) Herang, linkage ( Faghih et al., 2015 ); (15) Kuh-e Par-e Lavar, linkage ( Collignon et al., 2015 ); (16) Shab, secondary ( Leturmy et al., 2010 ); (17) Kuh-e Muran, secondary...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 11 January 2019
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2019) 89 (1): 28–45.
.... This is accomplished through detailed geological mapping and the measurement of eight stratigraphic sections from the diapir contact into the minibasin interior. Subsidence of sedimentary strata due to the mobilization of underlying evaporites often results in the formation of small basins at a scale of tens...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 24 July 2018
PALAIOS (2018) 33 (7): 296–311.
... Publication , p . 381 – 435 . Rasmussen, D.L., 2014 , Namakiers in Triassic and Permian formations in the Paradox Basin (USA) with comparisons to modern examples in the Zagros Fold Belt, Iran , in MacLean...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 21 November 2019
Geosphere (2020) 16 (1): 297–328.
... in the Paradox Basin, USA : Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs , v. 45 , no. 7 , p. 888 . Rasmussen , D.L. , 2014 , Namakiers in Triassic and Permian formations in the Paradox Basin (USA) with comparisons to modern examples in the Zagros Fold Belt, Iran , in MacLean , J.S...
FIGURES | View All (19)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1965
AAPG Bulletin (1965) 49 (12): 2182–2245.
... designated as formations by L. E. T. Parker (1959, company report). Their type section ( Fig. 83 ) is Tang-e Chehel, in the central part of the southern flank of Kuh-e Gachestan, also called Kuh-e Namaki, about 40 miles northeast of the Fars port of Lengeh, and 2 miles north of the village of Rustami...
FIGURES | View All (98)
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 01 October 2015
Geosphere (2015) 11 (5): 1475–1506.
... of Geologists, Special Paper (CD-ROM) , p. 691 – 778 . Rasmussen D.L. , 2014 , Namakiers in Triassic and Permian formations in the Paradox Basin (USA) with comparisons to modern examples in the Zagros Fold Belt, Iran , in MacLean J.S. Biek R.F. Huntoon J.E. , eds., Geology of Utah’s...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Series: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Publications
Published: 01 December 1989
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.89.10.0039
EISBN: 978-1-944966-32-4
... range to allow for the formation of a Lower Miocene escarpment. It is generally accepted that salt sheets forming the Sigsbee Escarpment resulted from loading of the Pleistocene depocenter ( Wilhelm and Ewing, 1972 ). Ray (1988) has suggested that many salt ridges on the continental slope resulted...
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 14 April 2020
DOI: 10.1144/SP490-2018-147
EISBN: 9781786205155
.... Example of a geological interpretation ( b ) produced from a Sentinel-2 12,8,3 band composition image ( a ) around Kuh-e Shu in Eastern Fars. Copernicus Sentinel data 2017. Below the Gascharan Formation are the grey-brownish coloured Asmari limestones, and farther underneath, the Pabdeh–Gurpi...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Book Chapter

Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 2019
DOI: 10.1306/13662199M1223819
EISBN: 9781629812830
... ). The system is interpreted to have subsequently collapsed, reactivating its constituent thrust faults as normal faults during formation of the Hanna Trough. Syntectonic deposits of the Endicott Group were deposited directly upon the dismembered structures as they collapsed. The fold-and-thrust system...
FIGURES | View All (5)