1-9 OF 9 RESULTS FOR

Muzkol Nappe

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Save search
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article

NAPPE DISLOCATIONS OF COLLISIONAL OROGEN ( by the example of geological complexes on the southern slope of the Muzkol Range, Central Pamirs ) Available to Purchase

V. I. Budanov, B. R. Pashkov
Published: 01 November 2000
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2000) 41 (11): 1454–1470.
... 1999 © 2002 by Allerton Press, Inc. 2002 Allerton Press, Inc. The largest structure of the Kukurt-Dzhilga nappe in the Muzkol Range is the Kukurt-Dzhilga brachysyncline [ 10 ]. The axis of the fold gently dips westward. The beds of the northern limb adjacent to the zone of the Muzkol...
FIGURES | View All (10)
View PDF for article title, <span class="search-highlight">NAPPE</span> DISLOCATIONS OF COLLISIONAL OROGEN ( by the example of geological complexes on the southern slope of the <span class="search-highlight">Muzkol</span> Range, Central Pamirs )
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for <span class="search-highlight">NAPPE</span> DISLOCATIONS OF COLLISIONAL OROGEN ( by the example of geological complexes on the southern slope of the <span class="search-highlight">Muzkol</span> Range, Central Pamirs )
Image
Nappes in the Molo-Kara-Dzhilga – Aksai interfluve (for location see Fig. 1). Symbols follow Fig. 4. Most stratigraphic indices on the map coincide with those given in Fig. 2. Encircled digits are nappe-limiting faults (see Fig. 5). C? – Carboniferous(?) deposits of the Saly-Mula unit [26] contributing to the structure of the Muzkol nappe; T3 – sandstones and schists of the Kara-Istyk series making up the tectonic outliers of the South Pshart nappe (see Figs. 1, 2, and 5).

Nappes in the Molo-Kara-Dzhilga – Aksai interfluve (for location see Fig. ... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 November 2000
unit [ 26 ] contributing to the structure of the Muzkol nappe; T 3 – sandstones and schists of the Kara-Istyk series making up the tectonic outliers of the South Pshart nappe (see Figs. 1 , 2 , and 5 ).
Image
Schematic location of tectonic nappes on the southern slope of the Muzkol Ridge. M – Muzkol Crystalline Massif. Nappes: Kk – Kukurt-Dzhilga, Ss – Sauksai, Mk – Muzkol, NP – North Pamirs, K – Kalaktash, N – North Pshart, S – South Pshart. SEP – nappe-folded structures of the Southeastern Pamirs. Main thrusts (encircled digits): 1 – Muzkol, 2 – Aksai, 3 – Maldzhuran, 4 – Pshart. Dashed outlines – sites shown in Figs. 3–6. For readability, the lettered nappes are additionally hatched.

Schematic location of tectonic nappes on the southern slope of the Muzkol R... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 November 2000
Fig. 1. Schematic location of tectonic nappes on the southern slope of the Muzkol Ridge. M – Muzkol Crystalline Massif. Nappes: Kk – Kukurt-Dzhilga, Ss – Sauksai, Mk – Muzkol, NP – North Pamirs, K – Kalaktash, N – North Pshart, S – South Pshart. SEP – nappe-folded structures of the Southeastern
Image
Dynamics of the Alpine nappe formation on the southern slope of the Muzkol Range (principal scheme), 1–5 – geological complexes (1 – Proterozoic, 2 – Paleozoic, 3 – Mesozoic, 4 – Paleocene–Eocene, 5 – Oligocene–Miocene); 6 – main decollements; 7 – direction of mass transport on tangential compression; 8 – direction of transfer of c1astics; 9 – contact-metasomatic processes; 10 – syncollisional granitoids. A – Muzkol–Kalaktash trough, B – Muzkol uplift, C – Sauksai – Kukurt–Dzhilga trough. I–IV – paleotectonic profiles (I – Paleocene–Early Eocene, II – Late Eocene–Early Oligocene, III – Late Oligocene–Early Miocene, IV – Late Pliocene–Early Pleistocene). Kk, Cc – parautochthone, gravitational decollement nappes (Kukurt-Dzhilga, Sauksai). M, K + NP, N, S – allochthone, tectonically layered imbricated nappes (Muzkol, Kalaktash + North Pamirs, North Pshart, and South Pshart, respectively).

Dynamics of the Alpine nappe formation on the southern slope of the Muzkol ... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 November 2000
Fig. 10. Dynamics of the Alpine nappe formation on the southern slope of the Muzkol Range (principal scheme), 1 – 5 – geological complexes ( 1 – Proterozoic, 2 – Paleozoic, 3 – Mesozoic, 4 – Paleocene–Eocene, 5 – Oligocene–Miocene); 6 – main decollements; 7 – direction of mass
Image
Imbricated and nappe structures in the Aksai – Saly-Mula interfluve (for location see Fig. 1). Indexation of units follows Fig. 2. Encircled digits indicate the faults (2 – Aksai, 3 – Maldzhuran) limiting the nappes: Sauksai, Muzkol, and North Pshart ones (see Fig. 1). Symbols follow Fig. 4.

Imbricated and nappe structures in the Aksai – Saly-Mula interfluve (for lo... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 November 2000
Fig. 5. Imbricated and nappe structures in the Aksai – Saly-Mula interfluve (for location see Fig. 1 ). Indexation of units follows Fig. 2 . Encircled digits indicate the faults (2 – Aksai, 3 – Maldzhuran) limiting the nappes: Sauksai, Muzkol, and North Pshart ones (see Fig. 1 ). Symbols
Image
Lying folds in the Cretaceous deposits of the North Pshart nappe in the Muzkol watershed at the headwaters of the right constituent of the Aksai River. 1 – red sandstones; 2 – rudist limestones; 3 – shales; 4 – dolomites.

Lying folds in the Cretaceous deposits of the North Pshart nappe in the Muz... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 November 2000
Fig. 9. Lying folds in the Cretaceous deposits of the North Pshart nappe in the Muzkol watershed at the headwaters of the right constituent of the Aksai River. 1 – red sandstones; 2 – rudist limestones; 3 – shales; 4 – dolomites.
Image
Comparative scheme of the sections of Paleozoic and Meso-Cenozoic nappe deposits on the southern slope of the Muzkol Range. 1 – limestones, lumpy and conglomerate-like limestones, marbleized limestones, and marbles; 2 – dolomitized limestones and dolomites, marls, and dolomite marls; 3 – shales and phyllites; 4 – schists and gneisses; 5 – sandstones and silts tones; 6 – quartzites; 7 – tuff sandstones and tuff conglomerates; 8 – conglomerates and gravelstones; 9 – conglomerate breccias; 10 – slates; 11 – lavas, lava breccias, and tuffs of basalts; 12 – lavas, lava breccias, and tuffs of andesite basalts; 13 – lavas and tuffs of dacites and rhyolites; 14 – trachytes; 15 – amphibolites; 16 – eroded surfaces; 17 – discordant surfaces. Encircled digits left of the columns – series, formations, or suites: 1 – Chottukoi, 2 – Belaga, 3 – Dzhar, 4 – Kara-Istyk, 5 – Bekzhol’, 6 – Kyzyl-Kyr, 7 – Zorabat, 8 – Kozyndyi, 9 – Buran, 10 – Tau, 11 – Sary-Kyr, 12 – Atkamar, 13 – Dzhaambai-Kukurt, 14 – Saly-Mula, 15 – Zor-Buguchi, 16 – Kalaktash, 17 – Kichik-Kainda, 18 – Mukur-Kainda, 19 – Zor-Kainda, 20 – Dzhan-Kainda, 21 – Dzhaambai-Chechikta, 22 – Vamar, 23 – Murkala, 24 – Shisharb, 25 – Molo-Kara-Dzhilga, 26 – Kukurt-Dzhilga, 27 – Tanymas- Kudara, 28 – Sarez. Their thickness in meters is given. Right of the columns, there are age indices of stratigraphic subdivisions. Roman digits above the columns stand for the nappes: I – South Pshart, II – North Pshart, III – Kalaktash, IV – North Pamir, V – Muzkol, VI and VII – Sauksai, VIII and IX – Kukurt-Dzhilga. I – West Pshart zone, II–V – South Muzkol zone, VI–IX – North Muzkol zone.

Comparative scheme of the sections of Paleozoic and Meso-Cenozoic nappe dep... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 November 2000
Fig. 2. Comparative scheme of the sections of Paleozoic and Meso-Cenozoic nappe deposits on the southern slope of the Muzkol Range. 1 – limestones, lumpy and conglomerate-like limestones, marbleized limestones, and marbles; 2 – dolomitized limestones and dolomites, marls, and dolomite marls
Image
Direct and overturned folds in deposits of the Muzkol (T2, T3, P3), North Pshart (K1–2, K2, P1?), and South Pshart (γT3, C?-P1; P3-N1) nappes on the Vostochnyi Pshart headwaters near the Aktash pass. In the north, there is a fragment of brachysyncline represented by Oligocene-Miocene deposits, characterizing the Sauksai decollement nappe. 1 – schists; 2 – siltstones; 3 – sandstones; 4 – conglomerates; 5 – dolomites; 6 – granites; 7 – thrusts, 8 – overturned eroded and discordant surfaces. Encircled digits: 1 – Apak syncline, 2 – Maldzhuran syncline, 3 – Maldzhuran boundary thrust, 4 – Aksai fault.

Direct and overturned folds in deposits of the Muzkol (T 2 , T 3 , P 3 ), N... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 November 2000
Fig. 7. Direct and overturned folds in deposits of the Muzkol (T 2 , T 3 , P 3 ), North Pshart (K 1–2 , K 2 , P 1 ?), and South Pshart ( γ T 3 , C?-P 1 ; P 3 -N 1 ) nappes on the Vostochnyi Pshart headwaters near the Aktash pass. In the north, there is a fragment of brachysyncline represented
Journal Article

Directions of lithosphere interactions in the Pamir – Hindu Kush junction inferred from anisotropic tomography Available to Purchase

Jamshed Aminov, Ivan Koulakov, Andrey Jakovlev, Junmeng Zhao, Sami El-Khrepy, Jovid Aminov, Nassir Al Arifi, Javhar Aminov, Yunus Mamadjanov
Published: 20 December 2019
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2020) 57 (5): 601–616.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2019-0081
... and Triassic, respectively; Rutte et al. 2017 b ; Schmidt et al. 2011 ). This outcome may explain the absence of the low-velocity zones coinciding with the domes in the Central Pamir. Instead, the location of the Central and Northern Pamir gneiss domes (Muzkol, Sarez, and Kurgovad) coincide with elongated...
FIGURES | View All (10)
View PDF for article title, Directions of lithosphere interactions in the Pamir – Hindu Kush junction inferred from anisotropic tomography
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Directions of lithosphere interactions in the Pamir – Hindu Kush junction inferred from anisotropic tomography