Abstract More than 6 ½ billion barrels of oil have been discovered in the San Joaquin Valley. Approximately 4 ¼ billion barrels have been produced and there is a reserve of 2 ¼ . billion barrels. San Joaquin Valley oil fields account for 42 per cent of the annual production, and contain 45 per cent of the reserves of the state. Ninety per cent of the oil produced to date has come from rocks which are Miocene or younger in age. Nonmarine sediments, largely of Miocene or later age, have accounted for 1 ½ billion barrels of oil, or 35 per cent of the total production of the valley. Oligocene and Eocene reservoirs are assuming importance as deeper drilling is done and new areas are explored. The pre-Tertiary sediments have accounted for less than one per cent of the oil produced. However, Cretaceous rocks are now being actively prospected. The San Joaquin Valley is a synclinorium some 250 miles long and 50–60 miles wide, lying between the Sierra Nevada Mountains to the east and the Coast Ranges to the west. The maximum depth to the basement is estimated to be in excess of 30,000 feet with the thickest sedimentary section being on the western side of the valley. Oil production is confined mainly to the southern portion which contains a thick section of organic Tertiary sediments. The San Joaquin Valley does not lend itself well to the basin analysis suggested by authors. The geosynclinal trough is present, as is the Sierra Nevada foreland to the east. Numerous faults of minor displacement along the east side of the valley might be termed a "hingebelt" but they interrupt the regional dip in only a minor way. The San Andreas and other faults of large lateral displacement have probably altered or removed the "geanticlinal welt," if it ever existed, on the west side of the valley. Furthermore, the western boundary of the valley has been transgressed many times by Tertiary seas making it difficult to determine the exact outline of the San Joaquin "basin." In the San Joaquin Valley, oil is found in almost every type of trap. Anticlinal structures with complications either by faulting or stratigraphic changes have accounted for the major volume of production. Examples of this type of accumulation are fields on the Coalinga-Kettleman Hills anticline, the Elk Hills-Coles Levee anticline, the Rio Bravo-Greeley trend, the Wheeler Ridge-Tejon Ranch anticline and the Belridge anticline. Oil occurs in faulted homoclines on the east side of the valley at Round Mountain, Kern Front, Fruitvale, Mount Poso, and Mountain View. Sands open to outcrop but with low fluid level produce at East Coalinga. The Lakeview area of the Midway-Sunset field appears to be synclinal. Although sand is the reservoir rock for 95 per cent or more of the fields, significant accumulations also occur in fractured shales at Elk Hills and Buena Vista Hills and in fractured schist basement at Edison. Inclined water tables have been noted in the Coalinga Nose, North Dome of Kettleman Hills, Paloma, Coles Levee, Elk Hills, and other fields. Advocates of the hydrodynamic theory are opposed by those who consider such inclined water surfaces due to differences in permeability. In some cases water encroachment is opposed to direction of inclination. In the future, stratigraphic and fault traps should account for a larger percentage of oil discovered in the San Joaquin Valley than in the past. Obscure structural highs revealed by subsurface geology, detailed geophysics, or other methods will undoubtedly contribute future discoveries. Recently, extensions and deeper drilling of known structures have accounted for substantial amounts of new oil and should continue to do so in the future.

ABSTRACT The structure and stratigraphy of the southeastern San Joaquin basin were reviewed for evidence that would document the impact on the basin of Miocene rotation of the adjacent Tehachapi and San Emigdio Mountains. Outcrops of basement rocks and volcanic intervals at the southeast margin of the basin contain paleomagnetic data indicating up to 59 degrees of clockwise rotation. The study used cross sections and maps of oil fields published by the California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources. Information extracted included fault age and orientation, and stratigraphic data including gross unit thickness and net sand thickness. The geologic studies of the oil fields contain an abundance of evidence indicating Miocene extension. South of the Kern River, several fields contain numerous faults of early to middle Miocene age that generally fall on NW-SE or NE-SW trends. Fault offsets indicate a large amount of extension and correspond to the down-dropping of the floor of the Tejon embayment and break-up and collapse of the Edison high. Faults of similar age, present in fields north of the Kern River, have a slightly different NNW-SSE strike. Offsets on this latter set of faults are relatively minor and contributed in forming a wide shelf region. Sediments deposited during the middle and late Miocene reflect different styles of structural extension. South of the Kern River, the depositional gradient was very steep, and sand bodies representing deltaic, shallow-marine and deep marine environments are very localized in extent. North of the Kern River, sands deposited on the wide shelf are laterally extensive and represent deltaic and shallow-marine environments deposited at the terminus of a river system. The structural and depositional styles are similar between the Edison high and Tejon embayment area, indicating that the same structural events were responsible. The structural evidence is consistent with the rotation model of Goodman and Malin (1992) . However, if the Edison high block has rotated, then additional faults may be necessary to accommodate slippage against the adjacent Maricopa sub-basin block. The faulting style north of the Kern River is not consistent with rotation; thus rotation is likely limited to south of the Bakersfield arch.