1-20 OF 40 RESULTS FOR

Mount Keith MKD5 Deposit

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 December 2023
Economic Geology (2023) 118 (8): 1813–1834.
... the proxy of silicate/sulfide mass ratio, or R factor, on the resulting MIF-S signatures of pentlandite-rich ore from the Mount Keith MKD5 nickel sulfide deposit, Agnew-Wiluna greenstone belt, Western Australia. We carried out in situ multiple S isotope and platinum group element (PGE) analyses...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Series: Special Publications of the Society of Economic Geologists
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.5382/SP.12.16
EISBN: 9781629490366
... in the southern portion ( Fig. 1 ). Regional metamorphism in the Mount Keith area attained midgreenschist facies ( Barrett et al., 1977 ). The giant MKD5 orebody is a type IIb (low-grade, disseminated, magmatic nickel sulfide) deposit...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Image
Plan view of the Mount Keith MKD5 deposit at 400 m RL, showing the main stratigraphic elements and principal structures. UCL = Cliffs ultramafic unit, UMK = Mount Keith ultramafic unit, UMU = Monument ultramafic unit. The positions of the cross sections presented in Figure 8 are shown as dotted lines.
Published: 01 November 2015
Fig. 7 Plan view of the Mount Keith MKD5 deposit at 400 m RL, showing the main stratigraphic elements and principal structures. UCL = Cliffs ultramafic unit, UMK = Mount Keith ultramafic unit, UMU = Monument ultramafic unit. The positions of the cross sections presented in Figure 8 are shown
Image
Long section through the Mount Keith MKD5 deposit highlighting the apparent control exerted by accretionary structures and Jon’s fault on the igneous architecture. A. Looking east at the base of the olivine adcumulate (oAC) core of the Mount Keith ultramafic unit, colored for thickness variations of the core. Inset: 0.2% Al2O3 isosurface in purple with >250-m deep drill strings in white, both projected against the base of the olivine adcumulate core with thickness contours converted to gray scale (interpolation carried out in Leapfrog, using spheroidal interpolant, trend of 75° toward 260° with pitch of 90° to match stratigraphic layering, ellipsoid axes proportioned according to the ratios 2:2:1, sill set to equal variance of 5.12, range of 300 m). The “X” marks the approximate position of the thickest development of upper and lower marginal orthocumulate zones and the thickest development of the upper fractionated sequence. B. Looking east at the base of Zone 104 disseminated Ni sulfide mineralization, also colored by thickness. Inset: 0.5% (pale translucent orange) and 0.8% (red) Ni isosurfaces projected against the base of the olivine adcumulate core with thickness contours converted to gray scale (interpolation carried out in Leapfrog using spheroidal interpolant, trend of 75° toward 260° with pitch of 90° to match stratigraphic layering, ellipse axes proportioned according to the ratios 2:2:1, sill set to equal variance of 0.0472, range of 300 m).
Published: 01 November 2015
Fig. 9 Long section through the Mount Keith MKD5 deposit highlighting the apparent control exerted by accretionary structures and Jon’s fault on the igneous architecture. A. Looking east at the base of the olivine adcumulate (oAC) core of the Mount Keith ultramafic unit, colored for thickness
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 August 2016
Economic Geology (2016) 111 (5): 1159–1185.
... Mount Keith MKD5 deposit (>2.6 Mt contained Ni) to the north, but the morphology and internal stratigraphy of the host unit differs significantly. Three-dimensional modeling of the Yakabindie region reveals that each dunite lens is located at the intersection between steeply dipping NNW- and NNE...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 November 2015
Economic Geology (2015) 110 (7): 1669–1695.
...Fig. 7 Plan view of the Mount Keith MKD5 deposit at 400 m RL, showing the main stratigraphic elements and principal structures. UCL = Cliffs ultramafic unit, UMK = Mount Keith ultramafic unit, UMU = Monument ultramafic unit. The positions of the cross sections presented in Figure 8 are shown...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Series: Special Publications of the Society of Economic Geologists
Published: 01 January 2006
DOI: 10.5382/SP.13.04
EISBN: 9781629490373
... Abstract The Mount Keith and Yakabindie deposits are type examples of large-tonnage, low-grade type 2 nickel sulfide systems. Discovered in 1969, the MKD5 deposit at Mount Keith has been in production since 1994 and is Australia’s largest Ni producer. The Yakabindie deposits (Six Mile Well...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 January 2005
Economic Geology (2005) 100 (1): 149–156.
...N. M. Rosengren; S. W. Beresford; B. A. Grguric; R.A.F. Cas Abstract The MKD5 nickel deposit at Mount Keith is hosted within the Mount Keith Ultramafic Complex, a thick komatiitic dunite body previously interpreted as either a large volume lava flow or as a dikelike intrusion. The upper contact...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Image
Geology plan of the Mount Keith region, showing the three main komatiite horizons. The Mount Keith and Cliffs ultramafic units are structurally juxtaposed south of the MKD5 deposit. Coordinates are in UTM for datum MGA, Zone 51. Figure adapted from Hill et al. (1995).
Published: 01 November 2013
Fig. 1 Geology plan of the Mount Keith region, showing the three main komatiite horizons. The Mount Keith and Cliffs ultramafic units are structurally juxtaposed south of the MKD5 deposit. Coordinates are in UTM for datum MGA, Zone 51. Figure adapted from Hill et al. (1995) .
Image
Fig. 1. Local geology and stratigraphy of the Mount Keith region, outlining the three ultramafic belts and intercalated mafic and/or felsic volcanic rocks. The MKD5 nickel deposit is hosted within the Mount Keith Ultramafic Complex (modified from Dowling and Hill, 1990 unpub. report for CSIRO).
Published: 01 January 2005
F ig . 1. Local geology and stratigraphy of the Mount Keith region, outlining the three ultramafic belts and intercalated mafic and/or felsic volcanic rocks. The MKD5 nickel deposit is hosted within the Mount Keith Ultramafic Complex (modified from Dowling and Hill, 1990 unpub. report for CSIRO).
Image
Fig. 2. A. Schematic architecture and geology of the MKD5 deposit, showing drill hole locations. Boxed area indicates northwest corner, highlighting large-scale ultramafic apophyses in overlying dacite. Dashed lines indicate tectonized contacts around the thickened Mount Keith Ultramafic Complex. B. and C. Photographs of pit exposures of ultramafic apophysis in the dacite hanging wall. Note the lobate contacts and partial enclosure of a dacite xenolith. D. Ultramafic apophyses in dacite footwall to the MKD5 deposit. Their location is indicated by the rectangle on the lower contact of the MKD5 deposit in A.
Published: 01 January 2005
F ig . 2. A. Schematic architecture and geology of the MKD5 deposit, showing drill hole locations. Boxed area indicates northwest corner, highlighting large-scale ultramafic apophyses in overlying dacite. Dashed lines indicate tectonized contacts around the thickened Mount Keith Ultramafic Complex
Image
Geologic map of the Mount Keith ultramafic unit in the area of the MKD5 Ni sulfide deposit, showing rock types and structures at a depth of around 100 m below surface. Units 101 to 102 and 104 to 107 are stratigraphic units proposed by Rosengren et al. (2007). Unit 103 occurs as thin dike-like bodies (not shown). Figure modified from Haywood (2004).
Published: 01 November 2013
Fig. 2 Geologic map of the Mount Keith ultramafic unit in the area of the MKD5 Ni sulfide deposit, showing rock types and structures at a depth of around 100 m below surface. Units 101 to 102 and 104 to 107 are stratigraphic units proposed by Rosengren et al. (2007) . Unit 103 occurs as thin
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2002
Mineralogical Magazine (2002) 66 (2): 313–326.
... of sulphides in the MKD5 orebody at Mount Keith, Western Australia was undertaken in order to define the variation in sulphide mineral chemistry and assemblages deposit-wide. This paper documents violarite-pentlandite±pyrite and violarite-millerite±pentlandite assemblages noted during the course of this study...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 November 2013
Economic Geology (2013) 108 (7): 1731–1752.
...Fig. 1 Geology plan of the Mount Keith region, showing the three main komatiite horizons. The Mount Keith and Cliffs ultramafic units are structurally juxtaposed south of the MKD5 deposit. Coordinates are in UTM for datum MGA, Zone 51. Figure adapted from Hill et al. (1995) . ...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2001
Mineralogical Magazine (2001) 65 (3): 427–435.
...B. A. Grguric; I. C. Madsen; A. Pring Abstract Woodallite is a new Cr-rich member of the hydrotalcite group from the large, low-grade Mount Keith nickel deposit, in the northeastern Goldfields district of Western Australia. Woodallite occurs as whorls and clusters of minute platelets up to 6 mm...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2001
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (2001) 1 (4): 391–407.
.... & BUTT , C. R. M. 1995 . The Mount Keith MKD5 nickel sulphide deposit . In : Butt , C.R.M , Anand , R.R , Smith , & R.E. (eds). Regolith Geology and Exploration Geochemistry in The Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia . 17th International Geochemical Exploration Symposium...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Series: Reviews in Economic Geology
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.5382/Rev.17.02
EISBN: 9781629490243
... to 100% sulfide) compared with bulk deposit data from a variety of different deposits based on data compilation of Barnes ( 2006a ), with additional data from Flying Fox (Collins et al., 2011 ) and Betheno (Barnes et al., 2011b ). Mount Keith data points are for zones A, C, D, and F of the MKD5 deposit...
FIGURES | View All (28)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 March 2008
Economic Geology (2008) 103 (2): 431–437.
... . Fiorentini , M.L. , Rosengren , N. , Beresford , S.W. , Grguric , B. , and Barley , M.E. , 2007 b, Controls on the emplacement and genesis of the MKD5 and Sarah’s Find Ni-Cu-PGE deposits, Mount Keith, Agnew-Wiluna greenstone belt, Western Australia : Mineralium Deposita , v. 42 , p...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 August 2012
Economic Geology (2012) 107 (5): 781–796.
... Australia, MERIWA Final Report no. 255, Project M356 , 39 p. Fiorentini M.L. Rosengren N. Beresford S.W. Grguric B. Barley M.E. , 2007a , Controls on the emplacement and genesis of the MKD5 and Sarah’s Find Ni-Cu-PGE deposits, Mount Keith, Agnew-Wiluna Greenstone Belt, Western...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2011
American Mineralogist (2011) 96 (1): 179–187.
...-layer polytypes (3 R 1 , 3 R 2 , 3 H 1 –3 H 7 ,) and a large number of 6-layer polytypes (6 R and 6 H ) ( Bookin and Drits 1993 ). Our interest in stichtite derives from studies of the MKD5 orebody at the Mount Keith Nickel Mine, Western Australia (27°10′S, 120°33′E), where stichtite occurs...
FIGURES | View All (5)