1-20 OF 1158 RESULTS FOR

Moreno Valley

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1941
GSA Bulletin (1941) 52 (2): 177–210.
...LOUIS L. RAY; J. FRED SMITH, JR. Abstract The Moreno Valley, located along the complex eastern boundary between the Sangre de Cristo Mountains and the Great Plains, is structurally a broad, northward-plunging syncline, disrupted by smaller folds and faults. This major synclinal structure...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1943
GSA Bulletin (1943) 54 (7): 891–924.
...-Cambrian crystalline rocks. Faulting along the eastern and western margins of the anticline separates the mountains from the Great Plains and the Moreno Valley. North of Cimarron Canyon the anticline plunges beneath the Tertiary sediments of the Raton Coal Basin. To the south the structure is obscured...
Image
Hillshade image of a 30 m digital elevation model with the northern San Jacinto fault zone, San Bernardino section of the San Andreas fault zone, and the San Gorgonio Pass fault zone shown in black. Selected slip rate and paleoseismic sites are also shown. The cities of San Bernardino, Riverside, Moreno Valley, and Hemet are shown for reference.
Published: 01 June 2015
, Riverside, Moreno Valley, and Hemet are shown for reference.
Image
A) Geological setting of the Great Valley Group. B) Outcrop of the Moreno and Panoche formations with the sampling area, Moreno Gulch marked. C) Lithostratigraphy of the Panoche Giant Injection Complex (PGIC) and the host strata from the Panoche and Moreno formations in the Moreno Gulch area (Vigorito et al. 2008). Upper and Lower Dike Zones and Sill Zone are as defined in Vigorito and Hurst (2010). LES is the lithostatic equilibrium surface (Vigorito and Hurst 2010).
Published: 01 April 2017
Fig. 1.— A) Geological setting of the Great Valley Group. B) Outcrop of the Moreno and Panoche formations with the sampling area, Moreno Gulch marked. C) Lithostratigraphy of the Panoche Giant Injection Complex (PGIC) and the host strata from the Panoche and Moreno formations in the Moreno
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Glendale 207,157 160 243 San Bernardino 205,010 5 81 Fremont 200,468 36 Huntington Beach 194,457 27 Irvine 186,852 4 Oxnard 183,628 20 Fontana 181,640 14 Moreno Valley 178,367 4 Santa Clarita 177,158 12 Ontario 172,701 22 Rancho Cucamonga 172,331
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 2018
AAPG Bulletin (2018) 102 (2): 195–243.
... subbasin ( Bartow, 1991 ). Many oil fields occur in the valley, some of which are annotated in Figure 2A . The Monterey, Kreyenhagen, and Moreno Formations are the three major source rocks in the San Joaquin basin ( Figure 2B ). An additional source rock, the Tumey Formation, is younger than...
FIGURES | View All (22)
Image
Moraines at the Perito Moreno outlet area. From west to east, i.e., from the youngest to the oldest, it includes (Ackert et al. 2003; Kaplan et al. 2004; Singer et al. 2004; Douglass et al. 2006) the Menucos and Fenix I–V moraines (17.3 ± 0.6 to 25.7 ± 0.9 ka), the Moreno I and II moraines (∼109–244 ka), and the Moreno III-Deseado-Telken moraines (∼244–1016 ka). Note that the Rio Fenix Grande branches the Rio Fenix Chico at Perito Moreno (392 m, elevation at the divide between Pacific and Atlantic) to feed the General Carrera–Buenos Aires (GCBA) Lake. At present, no connection exists between the Rio Fenix Grande and the Rio Deseado. Bold numbers indicate location of samples 4, 15, 17, 23, and 69; thin barbed line indicates main strandlines; thick hashed line indicates dry valley network. Location of figure 9 is shown; map location (west of 71°W) on figure 2.
Published: 01 January 2016
Figure 8. Moraines at the Perito Moreno outlet area. From west to east, i.e., from the youngest to the oldest, it includes (Ackert et al. 2003 ; Kaplan et al. 2004 ; Singer et al. 2004 ; Douglass et al. 2006 ) the Menucos and Fenix I–V moraines (17.3 ± 0.6 to 25.7 ± 0.9 ka), the Moreno I
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2017
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2017) 87 (4): 388–405.
...Fig. 1.— A) Geological setting of the Great Valley Group. B) Outcrop of the Moreno and Panoche formations with the sampling area, Moreno Gulch marked. C) Lithostratigraphy of the Panoche Giant Injection Complex (PGIC) and the host strata from the Panoche and Moreno formations in the Moreno...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1970
GSA Bulletin (1970) 81 (7): 2123–2128.
...LOREN A RAYMOND Abstract Stratigraphic and structural details in the juxtaposed Franciscan and Great Valley Sequences of the northeastern Diablo Range, California, allow restriction of the age of regional thrusting or gravity sliding. The Cretaceous section in the area consists of three sandstone...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1940
AAPG Bulletin (1940) 24 (10): 1722–1751.
...Robert T. White ABSTRACT In 1937 the writer defined the Lodo formation exposed along the west side of the San Joaquin Valley, California, as a shale unit with an included sandstone member (Cantua sandstone). The formation is stratigraphically above the Moreno shale (Upper Cretaceous) and below...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Image
 Figure1—Location of the San Joaquin Valley in central California and surficial exposures of the Maastrichtian-Paleocene Moreno Formation in the Tumey and Panoche hills (modified from Lindgren et al., 2008, fig. 1). Note that the scale bar refers to the left-hand, close-up map
Published: 01 May 2009
Figure 1 —Location of the San Joaquin Valley in central California and surficial exposures of the Maastrichtian-Paleocene Moreno Formation in the Tumey and Panoche hills (modified from Lindgren et al., 2008 , fig. 1). Note that the scale bar refers to the left-hand, close-up map
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2009
Journal of Paleontology (2009) 83 (3): 448–456.
...Figure 1 —Location of the San Joaquin Valley in central California and surficial exposures of the Maastrichtian-Paleocene Moreno Formation in the Tumey and Panoche hills (modified from Lindgren et al., 2008 , fig. 1). Note that the scale bar refers to the left-hand, close-up map ...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 2007
DOI: 10.1306/1209862M873264
EISBN: 9781629810072
... basin. The oldest units exposed are the Panoche Formation and the Moreno Formation, the latter being the uppermost local unit of the so-called Great Valley sequence ( Ingersoll, 1979 ). The Moreno Formation, deposited from the middle Maastrichtian to late Danian, contains the paleoseep features...
FIGURES | View All (19)
Image
 (a) Photograph and sketch interpretation of a hillside in the Panoche Hills, western margin of the Great Valley, northern California. Cliff is c. 80 m high. Both sills and dykes can be seen intruding the Moreno Shale Formation. The source bed is below the base of the cliff within the Dosados Member. (b) An example of a sill-dominated intrusion formed at shallow burial depths, Rosroe Peninsula, western Ireland.
Published: 01 September 2002
Fig. 7.  ( a ) Photograph and sketch interpretation of a hillside in the Panoche Hills, western margin of the Great Valley, northern California. Cliff is c . 80 m high. Both sills and dykes can be seen intruding the Moreno Shale Formation. The source bed is below the base of the cliff within
Image
(a) Geological map of the Panoche and Tumey Hills. Location of the three sectors and main type-sections is shown: MG, Moreno Gulch; MC, Marca Canyon; CC, Capita Canyon; RC, Rosetta Canyon; EC, Escarpado Canyon; RA, Right Angle Canyon; WT, West Tumey; TG, Tumey Gulch. (b) Simplified geological map of most of northern and central California (modified from Ingersoll 1979). Location of the Panoche Giant Injection Complex (PGIC) is shown. (c) Mesozoic–Tertiary evolution of the Great Valley forearc basin. The Panoche Giant Injection Complex formed during the early Danian (Vigorito et al. 2008) on the western border of the Great Valley Forearc Basin.
Published: 01 September 2010
Fig. 3. ( a ) Geological map of the Panoche and Tumey Hills. Location of the three sectors and main type-sections is shown: MG, Moreno Gulch; MC, Marca Canyon; CC, Capita Canyon; RC, Rosetta Canyon; EC, Escarpado Canyon; RA, Right Angle Canyon; WT, West Tumey; TG, Tumey Gulch. ( b ) Simplified
Image
Zircon saturation temperatures for 103 Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO) samples (Moreno, 2016; Pack, 2017; this study) including the 49 reported herein. SiO2 content versus Zr colored for (A) “M value” (Watson and Harrison, 1983; Boehnke et al., 2013) and (B) zircon saturation temperature (°C). (C) Distribution of zircon saturation temperatures. The calculated δ18O equilibrium temperature (Valley, 2003) and the calculated liquidus temperatures (Gualda and Ghiorso, 2014) for four different water contents at 125 MPa are shown for reference. (D) Zircon saturation temperatures for dated SMO samples (colored by age), non-dated SMO samples (gray; Pack, 2017), and the compilation of SMO tuffs (n = 12) from Siégel et al. (2018).
Published: 25 February 2022
Figure 9. Zircon saturation temperatures for 103 Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO) samples ( Moreno, 2016 ; Pack, 2017 ; this study) including the 49 reported herein. SiO 2 content versus Zr colored for (A) “M value” ( Watson and Harrison, 1983 ; Boehnke et al., 2013 ) and (B) zircon saturation
Image
Figure 3. Selected climate records from Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Vertical gray bars represent globally expansive periods of rapid climate change (Mayewski et al., 2004). From top to bottom: Gaussian-smoothed (200 yr) K and Na concentrations from GISP2 ice core (Mayewski et al., 2004), paleovegetation index (positive values are warmer and drier) from Chilean Lake District (Moreno, 2004), lake-level record from Lago Cardiel (Stine and Stine, 1990; Markgraf et al., 2003), global glacial advances (Mayewski et al., 2004, and references therein), early Holocene glacial advances in southern South America at Fachinal, Ventisquero “Jose” (Röthlisberger, 1986), and Rio Guanaco valley (Wenzens, 1999)
Published: 01 March 2005
), paleovegetation index (positive values are warmer and drier) from Chilean Lake District ( Moreno, 2004 ), lake-level record from Lago Cardiel ( Stine and Stine, 1990 ; Markgraf et al., 2003 ), global glacial advances ( Mayewski et al., 2004 , and references therein), early Holocene glacial advances in southern
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2017
DOI: 10.1144/SP442.13
EISBN: 9781786202925
... decrease in size and origin of Darwin’s ‘gravel formation’. Among other contributions, Moreno also described the Patagonian salars, the different types of rock units found in the routes he travelled, the structural layout of sedimentary strata in the upper valley of the Shehuen river and the eruptive...
Image
Regional petrotectonic provinces, lithostratigraphy, and architecture of the Panoche giant injectite complex (PGIC; Vigorito et al., 2008). (A) Petrotectonic provinces and major faults cropping out in central California (modified from Ingersoll, 1979; Nilsen and Dibblee, 1981). The PGIC crops out on the eastern flank of a monocline of the Great Valley sequence along the western margin of the Central Valley of California. Faults: H = Hayward; SA = San Andreas. (B) Lithostratigraphy and architecture of the northern PGIC (modified from Vigorito and Hurst, 2010). (C) Geologic map of the Panoche Hills (modified from Bartow, 1996). Study sites are located with boxes. Locations of logged sections (in Figure 3) are marked. See Appendices 1 to 10 for text, maps, and stratigraphic sections of the study areas. MG = Moreno Gulch; NoC = No Name Canyon; Mc = Marca Canyon; Ca = Capita Canyon; Ro = Rosseta Canyon; Do = Dosados Canyon; Es = Escapardo Canyon; RA = Right Angle Canyon; WT = West Tumey; Fm = Formation; Mbr = Member; Cima Sst. L. = Cima Sandstone lentil; En. = environment; Res. = reservoir unit.
Published: 01 February 2013
). The PGIC crops out on the eastern flank of a monocline of the Great Valley sequence along the western margin of the Central Valley of California. Faults: H = Hayward; SA = San Andreas. (B) Lithostratigraphy and architecture of the northern PGIC (modified from Vigorito and Hurst, 2010 ). (C) Geologic map
Image
(A) Sites of referenced paleoclimate records (black dots) and physiographic provinces of southwestern North America. TL—Tulelake (Adam et al., 1989); LH—Lake Lahontan (Reheis, 1999; Reheis et al., 2002); OL—Owens Lake (Smith and Bischoff, 1997; Woolfenden, 2003); SL—Searles Lake (Smith, 1984); DV—Death Valley (Lowenstein, 2002; Knott et al., 2008); LM—Lake Manix (Reheis et al., 2012); DH—Devil's Hole (Wendt et al., 2018); GBD—Great Basin Dripstone (Lachniet et al., 2014, 2017); BV—Lake Bonneville; GSL—Great Salt Lake (Oviatt, 1997; Davis, 1998; Davis and Moutoux, 1998; Kowalewska and Cohen, 1998; Oviatt et al., 1999; Balch et al., 2005; Nishizawa et al., 2012); BL—Bear Lake (Jiménez-Moreno et al., 2007); B&FL—Bear and Fracas Lakes (Weng and Jackson, 1999); WL—Walker Lake (Hevly, 1985); STL—Stoneman Lake (Hasbargen, 1994; this study); MW—Montezuma Well (Davis and Shafer, 1992); PL—Potato Lake (Anderson, 1993; Anderson et al., 2000); VC—Valles Caldera (Fawcett et al., 2011); SB—Stewart Bog (Jiménez-Moreno et al., 2008); EB—Estancia Basin (Allen and Anderson, 2000; Menking and Anderson, 2003); CC—Carlsbad Caverns (Railsback et al., 2015a); LP—Lake Palomas (Castiglia and Fawcett, 2006). (B) Aerial imagery of Stoneman Lake from spring 2018 shows little standing water. Overlaid topographic contours (3 m interval) reveal a small, bowl-shaped catchment (∼3.5 km2, outlined in light blue). The piñon-juniper–ponderosa pine forest ecotone crosses the lower left of the image. Labeled white dots are the drilling locations of STL14-1A and 1B cores.
Published: 02 July 2021
Lake ( Smith, 1984 ); DV—Death Valley ( Lowenstein, 2002 ; Knott et al., 2008 ); LM—Lake Manix ( Reheis et al., 2012 ); DH—Devil's Hole ( Wendt et al., 2018 ); GBD—Great Basin Dripstone ( Lachniet et al., 2014 , 2017 ); BV—Lake Bonneville; GSL—Great Salt Lake ( Oviatt, 1997 ; Davis, 1998 ; Davis