1-20 OF 115 RESULTS FOR

Monongahela Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1907
GSA Bulletin (1907) 18 (1): 29–178.
...JOHN J. STEVENSON Abstract The Monongahela Formation CORRELATION The practically continuous area of Monongahela is confined to the southwest four counties of Pennsylvania, a narrow strip in eastern Ohio, and central West Virginia. Small outlying patches remain east from the Alleghenies...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (9): 1436.
... on the means can separate stratigraphic units into three categories: (1) Kanawha Formation, which has a mean of 5.04 ppm; (2) New River, Pocahontas, and Monongahela Formations, which have means of 10.1, 10.9, and 12.4 ppm, respectively; and (3) Allegheny Formation, which has a mean of 18.1 ppm. Data from 40...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1946
American Mineralogist (1946) 31 (7-8): 357–364.
... and the fourth was mainly dolomite. Associated with one or more of these concretions were these minerals: analcite, brammallite, calcite, dolomite, kaolinite, melanterite, pyrite, and an unknown mineral. The Pittsburgh coal bed is of Pennsylvanian age, and the base of the Monongahela formation. Analcite has been...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1955
AAPG Bulletin (1955) 39 (10): 2087–2090.
... Sewickley coal and 230-250 feet above the Big Vein or Pittsburgh coal. Clark and Martin (1902, pp. 226, 229-230) considered the Koontz to be equivalent to the Waynesburg coal, which is the upper member of the Monongahela formation in southwestern Pennsylvania and the adjacent parts of Ohio and West...
FIGURES
Image
Generalized hydrostratigraphy of the Pittsburgh Formation, Upper Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group (after Edmunds et al., 1999). Scale is approximate.
Published: 01 May 2015
Figure 4.  Generalized hydrostratigraphy of the Pittsburgh Formation, Upper Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group (after Edmunds et al., 1999 ). Scale is approximate.
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2024
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2024) 94 (5): 617–640.
... in soils through time requires detailed analysis. Strata of the Late Pennsylvanian to early Permian in Ohio and West Virginia include the Conemaugh, Monongahela, and Dunkard groups ( Fig. 1A ). These groups are variably divided into different formations based primarily on correlative limestone...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Series: GSA Field Guide
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1130/2011.0020(03)
EISBN: 9780813756202
... of time of approximately twenty million years, from 318 to 299 million years ago ( Gradstein et al., 2004 ). In ascending order, Pennsylvanian strata of western Pennsylvania consist of the Pottsville and Allegheny formations, and the Conemaugh and Monongahela groups ( Edmunds et al., 1999 ). Current...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Series: GSA Field Guide
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1130/2011.0020(03)
EISBN: 9780813756202
... of time of approximately twenty million years, from 318 to 299 million years ago ( Gradstein et al., 2004 ). In ascending order, Pennsylvanian strata of western Pennsylvania consist of the Pottsville and Allegheny formations, and the Conemaugh and Monongahela groups ( Edmunds et al., 1999 ). Current...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 23 November 2022
PALAIOS (2022) 37 (11): 671–690.
... the Appalachian, Ouachita, Marathon, and Variscan orogenies from northern Mexico to southeastern Europe ( Blakey 2008 ; Tabor and Poulsen 2008 ). The Monongahela Group (Gzhelian) is 80–125 m thick and is regionally divided into the Pittsburgh and Uniontown formations ( Fig. 1 A) ( Martin 1998 ). It consists...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2019
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2019) 25 (1): 27–101.
..., the Allegheny, Monongahela, and Ohio. The formation of Pittsburgh’s three rivers and drainages has a long history dating back to before the Pleistocene Epoch, linked closely to the advance and retreat of continental glaciation. Western Pennsylvania is associated with the westernmost formation of the Appalachian...
FIGURES | View All (58)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1974
AAPG Bulletin (1974) 58 (9): 1891–1892.
...; Mississippian Maccrady-Stroubles Formation in Virginia and West Virginia; and Pennsylvanian Allegheny, Conemaugh, and Monongahela Groups from Pennsylvania to Kentucky. A few uranium shows have been reported from pegmatites and other igneous rocks in the Blue Ridge, but far below commercial concentrations. None...
Book Chapter

Series: AAPG Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1962
DOI: 10.1306/SV23356C2
EISBN: 9781629812373
..., and meta-anthracite. In the northwest part of the basin similar clastic rocks are red. All are of continental origin. The lowermost Pennsylvanian formations are the Pondville and the Bellingham comglomerates. Above the Pondville, or lying directly upon basement, is the Rhode Island formation, which...
Published: 01 January 2006
DOI: 10.1130/2006.2399(10)
... The Pittsburgh, Redstone, and Sewickley coal beds all occur in the Late Pennsylvanian Pittsburgh Formation of the Monongahela Group in the northern Appalachian Basin. The goal of this study is to compare and contrast the palynology, petrography, and geochemistry of the three coals, specifically...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1906
GSA Bulletin (1906) 17 (1): 65–228.
... the formations, the Pottsville being XII and the Coal Measures above being XIII; but in the fourth report he divided Formation XIII into the Allegheny and Monongahela series, drawing the line between them at the lowest rock bed seen at Pittsburg, or nearly at the place of the Ames limestone. In the next year he...
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 01 May 2017
PALAIOS (2017) 32 (5): 295–320.
... ). Regionally, the Monongahela Group is divided into the Pittsburgh and Uniontown formations and the Dunkard Group into the Waynesburg, Washington, and Greene formations. The boundary between the Uniontown and Waynesburg formations is traditionally placed at the bottom of the Waynesburg Coal ( Fedorko and Skema...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1994
Journal of the Geological Society (1994) 151 (4): 669–680.
... and length to A. protracta above the Benwood Limestone, middle Monongahela Group, of Pennsylvania, and to A. protracta 2700 km further west in central Arizona, with which the Pennsylvania band has been correlated. The ranges of variation within the Oslo, Pennsylvania and Arizona assemblages are closely...
Series: SEPM Core Workshop Notes
Published: 01 January 1994
DOI: 10.2110/cor.94.01.0297
EISBN: 9781565762718
... Abstract The Redstone limestone of Platt and Platt (1877) is one of five nonmarine limestone beds in the Upper Pennsylvanian Monongahela Group. The Redstone limestone lies within the lower member (Berryhill and Swanson, 1962) of the Pittsburgh Formation between the thick, economically...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1934
AAPG Bulletin (1934) 18 (5): 567–602.
... Pennsylvanian beds, indicating the age of the uplift as early Pennsylvanian. In the Arbuckle anticline, pre-Pontotoc (pre-Monongahela) rocks are essentially conformable with all the lower Paleozoic formations, thus indicating the late Pennsylvanian age of that fold. Evidence is also presented to show...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1909
GSA Bulletin (1909) 20 (1): 333–340.
...I. C. WHITE Abstract The barren Area It was formerly supposed that the several coal formations of the Appalachian region would hold coal of commercial value over the entire area of that great field. Your speaker pointed out, many years ago, that this was a grave mistake, so far as the Monongahela...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1904
GSA Bulletin (1904) 15 (1): 37–210.
...JOHN J. STEVENSON Abstract Introduction In a former memoir * the writer described the Lower Carboniferous or Mississippian of the Appalachian basin. In this the effort will be to describe the lowest formation of the Coal Measures or Pennsylvanian of the same basin. The Coal Measures were studied...