1-20 OF 1088 RESULTS FOR

Mission Canyon Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1993
GSA Bulletin (1993) 105 (11): 1389–1399.
...TAD M. SMITH; STEVEN L. DOROBEK Abstract Dolomite in the Mississippian Mission Canyon Formation (Osagean to middle Meramecian) of central and southwestern Montana precipitated during multiple episodes of dolomitization and/or recrystallization. The earliest generation of dolomite most likely...
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 1993
DOI: 10.1306/M57579C13
EISBN: 9781629810980
... Abstract The Lower Mississippian Mission Canyon Formation and stratigraphic equivalents in Montana and Idaho were deposited on a progradational carbonate ramp that developed on the foreland side of the Antler foredeep. Shallow subtidal and peritidal lithofacies were deposited in ramp-interior...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (5): 854.
...Robert F. Lindsay ABSTRACT The Mission Canyon Formation is a regressive, shoaling-upward carbonate to anhydrite sequence deposited in a slowly shrinking epeiric sea. From its base upsection, the formation is mostly subtidal in origin and emergent at its top, and consists of (1) deeper water...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (2): 297.
...James C. Pol; Paul K. Mescher ABSTRACT The Mission Canyon evaporite wedge, the Frobisher-Alida interval, has commonly been interpreted as typical nodular or “chicken-wire” anhydrite from a sabkha depositional setting. Upon examination of over 190 cores from North Dakota and Montana, we identified...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1983
AAPG Bulletin (1983) 67 (8): 1332.
.... The Mississippian Mission Canyon formation of the Williston basin provides an excellent example of the need to understand the lithofacies/diagenesis relation. During the Mississippian the Williston basin was the site of subtidal to supratidal carbonate deposition. In general, depositional environments became more...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (5): 594–595.
...Robert F. Lindsay The Mission Canyon is interpreted to be a regressive shoaling-upward, carbonate to anhydrite sequence deposited by a shallow epeiric sea. Upsection most of the formation is of subtidal origin, deposited as: (1) basinal “deeper water” carbonates, below wave base; (2) open shallow...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (5): 559.
.... The Mission Canyon Formation (Mississippian) of the Williston basin provides an excellent example of the need to understand the lithofacies/diagenesis relation. During the Mississippian, the Williston basin was the site of subtidal to supratidal carbonate deposition. In general, depositional environments...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (5): 547.
...David K. Beach; Ann L. Schumacher Stanley field provides a new model for exploration in the Mission Canyon Formation of the Williston basin. Moreover, it establishes for the first time the economic significance of early mechanical compaction of limestone with implications for both trapping...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (5): 560.
...David B. Crass Thirty-five oil fields have been developed in the Mission Canyon Formation in northern Bottineau and Renville Counties, North Dakota. Six cyclic sedimentary units have been defined in the Mission Canyon in that area. They are, in ascending intervals: Landa, Wayne, Glenburn, Mohall...
Series: SEPM Core Workshop Notes
Published: 01 January 1980
DOI: 10.2110/cor.80.01.0079
EISBN: 9781565762565
... Abstract The Little Knife Field, 12 by 2.5 to 4 miles (19.2 × 4 to 6.4 Km.), lies beneath a broad northward plunging anticline with less than 100 feet (30 m) of structural relief. Production is from early diagenetic porosity in the Mission Canyon Formation. The discovery well flowed 480 BOPD...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (5): 870.
...Douglas L. Waters; William J. Sando ABSTRACT Study of the distribution of corals and rock types in the Mission Canyon Limestone and the lower part of the Charles Formation (Tilston, Frobisher-Alida, and Ratcliffe intervals) in 29 cores from wells in the Williston basin of western North Dakota...
Image
Stratigraphy of the Madison Group and Mission Canyon Formation (modified from Martiniuk et al., 2000).
Published: 01 June 2002
Fig. 4. Stratigraphy of the Madison Group and Mission Canyon Formation (modified from Martiniuk et al., 2000 ).
Image
—Well log correlation section of the upper Mission Canyon formation across the Billings Nose area showing the “step-down” of major producing zones in the Frobisher—Alida interval and the thickening of the Nesson Anhydrite toward the southeast. Interval names are from Petty (1988); locations of fields shown in Figure 3. Datum is the gamma marker at the base of the Lower Sherwood interval. No horizontal scale. Well logs are gamma ray (GR), density porosity (ØD), and neutron porosity (ØN).
Published: 01 April 1994
Figure 4 —Well log correlation section of the upper Mission Canyon formation across the Billings Nose area showing the “step-down” of major producing zones in the Frobisher—Alida interval and the thickening of the Nesson Anhydrite toward the southeast. Interval names are from Petty (1988
Image
—Freshwater potentiometric surface in the Mission Canyon formation, Billings Nose area. The potentiometric gradient is toward the east and implies a generally eastward flow of formation waters. Contour interval is 100 ft. Circles denote control wells for the map. Ground elevations in the area range from 716 to 850 m (2350 to 2800 ft).
Published: 01 April 1994
Figure 7 —Freshwater potentiometric surface in the Mission Canyon formation, Billings Nose area. The potentiometric gradient is toward the east and implies a generally eastward flow of formation waters. Contour interval is 100 ft. Circles denote control wells for the map. Ground elevations
Image
Top of Mississippian Mission Canyon formation in Redwing Creek field area, North Dakota.
Published: 01 June 1985
Figure 18 Top of Mississippian Mission Canyon formation in Redwing Creek field area, North Dakota.
Image
—Dolomitic limestone core of Mission Canyon Formation from 9,841 ft (2,999.5 m) in Tachenko 1-15-4A. The thin, vertical, relatively unmineralized fracture is characteristic of Mission Canyon Formation in Little Knife field.
Published: 01 September 1984
Figure 4 —Dolomitic limestone core of Mission Canyon Formation from 9,841 ft (2,999.5 m) in Tachenko 1-15-4A. The thin, vertical, relatively unmineralized fracture is characteristic of Mission Canyon Formation in Little Knife field.
Image
—Azimuth of fractures in oriented core from Mission Canyon Formation in Little Knife area. Structure is top of Mission Canyon Formation (subsea). Rose diagrams based on statistical method of Kamb (1959) and a scaling factor whereby each concentric circle equals the expected value. T = Tachenko 1-15-4A, 30 fractures, 21° counting window, 3.5 expected value. H = Hurinenko 2-1-3A, 80 fractures, 10° window, 3.8 expected value. I = Zabolotny Injection 1, 46 fractures, 14° window, 3.7 expected value. Z1 = Zabolotny Observation 1, 123 fractures, 10° window, 3.8 expected value. Z2 = Zabolotny Observation 2, 75 fractures, 10° window, 3.8 expected value. Z3 = Zabolotny Observation 3, 19 fractures, 31° window, 3.3 expected value.
Published: 01 September 1984
Figure 7 —Azimuth of fractures in oriented core from Mission Canyon Formation in Little Knife area. Structure is top of Mission Canyon Formation (subsea). Rose diagrams based on statistical method of Kamb (1959) and a scaling factor whereby each concentric circle equals the expected value. T
Image
—Type log of Mission Canyon Formation in central portion of Little Knife field. Depositional environment and diagenetic modifications from a composite section of several cores (from Lindsay and Kendall, 1981).
Published: 01 September 1984
Figure 3 —Type log of Mission Canyon Formation in central portion of Little Knife field. Depositional environment and diagenetic modifications from a composite section of several cores (from Lindsay and Kendall, 1981 ).
Image
—Structure contour map of top of Mission Canyon Formation, Little Knife field. Black dots represent well locations (after Nettle et al, 1981).
Published: 01 September 1984
Figure 2 —Structure contour map of top of Mission Canyon Formation, Little Knife field. Black dots represent well locations (after Nettle et al, 1981 ).
Image
—Sandstone pebbles in solution breccia, Mission Canyon Formation, Open Door Mountain.
Published: 01 March 1973
Fig. 4. —Sandstone pebbles in solution breccia, Mission Canyon Formation, Open Door Mountain.