1-20 OF 2510 RESULTS FOR

Mill Creek Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
... Well-lithified Tertiary sedimentary rocks crop out within the San Andreas fault zone south of the San Bernardino Mountains. At the east end of the outcrop is the pre-Pliocene Mill Creek Formation. The diverse compositional facies of the Mill Creek Formation can be explained in terms of a strike...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1995
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1995) 43 (3): 320–342.
...Dale A. Leckie; Lee F. Krystinik ABSTRACT Several Albian–aged igneous pebble to cobble conglomerate channels are incised into finer– grained sediment of the Mill Creek and Beaver Mines formations (Blairmore Group) in the Rocky Mountain Foothills and Front Ranges in southwest Alberta...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1995
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1995) 32 (8): 1079–1092.
...Dale A. Leckie; David Craw Abstract Albian-aged (Early Cretaceous) igneous pebble to cobble conglomerates fill multiple, northeast–southwest-oriented, subparallel channels in the upper Blairmore Group (upper Beaver Mines and Mill Creek formations) of the Rocky Mountain foreland basin, southwestern...
Image
Shaded-relief topographic map of the San Bernardino strand within the San Gorgonio Pass region (SGPr), showing selected geologic units. Bedrock units include the Miocene Mill Creek Formation of Gibson (1964, 1971), Triassic Monzogranite of Manzanita Springs (described by Morton et al., 1980; Matti et al., 2003), and the Orthogneiss of Alger Creek, possibly Proterozoic in age (described by Matti et al., 1992b, 2003, 2015). Faults are displayed as red lines and labeled on Figure 1. The Vincent thrust fault is indicated by the thicker, bright red line. Major drainages are shown as blue lines; the depositional area of Santa Ana River and Mill Creek are shown in light-blue shading. The headwaters of the Falls Creek drainage system are shown by a dashed white line. The heavy blue line highlights Wood Canyon and the beheaded Hathaway Creek. Area of Figure 3 is shown by white box.
Published: 18 February 2022
Figure 2. Shaded-relief topographic map of the San Bernardino strand within the San Gorgonio Pass region (SGPr), showing selected geologic units. Bedrock units include the Miocene Mill Creek Formation of Gibson ( 1964 , 1971 ), Triassic Monzogranite of Manzanita Springs (described by Morton et
Image
Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for foreland strata in southwestern Alberta. Modified from Stockmal et al. (2001) with local modifications of the Kootenay Group (Gibson, 1985), Blairmore Group (D. Leckie, 2001, personal commun.), and Milk River and Belly River groups (Stockmal, 1995). LCM and BCM are Lynx Creek and Bruin Creek members, respectively, of the Mill Creek Formation. Pulse 3 includes coarse clastic strata above the Belly River Group. The Alberta Group, which is dominated by shales and mudstones, is considered part of pulse 3. Crk.—Creek; Fm.—Formation; Mbr.—Member; Gp.—Group.
Published: 01 May 2005
and BCM are Lynx Creek and Bruin Creek members, respectively, of the Mill Creek Formation. Pulse 3 includes coarse clastic strata above the Belly River Group. The Alberta Group, which is dominated by shales and mudstones, is considered part of pulse 3. Crk.—Creek; Fm.—Formation; Mbr.—Member; Gp.—Group.
Image
Figure 7. (A) Outcrop at Highwood River showing the resistant ridge of the Barons Sandstone and the recessive shales of the overlying Sunkay Member. (B) Example of coarse-grained ripples within the Barons Sandstone at Highwood River. (C) Outcrop at Sheep River showing the marine shales of the Sunkay Member (middle Cenomanian) overlying the nonmarine Mill Creek Formation (middle Albian to upper Albian). Field of view is about 40 cm wide.
Published: 01 August 2000
of the Sunkay Member (middle Cenomanian) overlying the nonmarine Mill Creek Formation (middle Albian to upper Albian). Field of view is about 40 cm wide.
Image
Figure 5. (A) Rar-earth element (REE) abundance patterns for a selection of samples typical of those with more negative ϵNd values. No significant variations are seen in the REE of all samples with ϵNd < −4, except for dilution of REE concentrations by quartz in sandy samples. La enrichments range up to 150 times the Orgueil C1 carbonaceous chondrite reference (Anders and Grevesse, 1989), and all samples have Eu anomalies where Eu/expected Eu = ∼0.65. The samples plotted are Mist Mountain sandstone (01-JG-14), Mill Creek sandstone and shale (00-JG-10B and 00-JG-11A, respectively), Lundbreck shale (00-JG-5A), Willow Creek shale (00-JG-20A), and Paskapoo shale (01-JG-36A). (B) REE abundance patterns for seven samples with ϵNd > −4. The reference is Orgueil C1 meteorite (Anders and Grevesse, 1989). All samples are light REE enriched, similar to those with more negative ϵNd values, but La enrichments range up to only 75 compared with 150 for samples with more negative ϵNd. Two of the samples (open symbols) have a weakly developed Eu anomaly (Beaver Mines shale and the matrix of the Crowsnest Channel conglomerate in the Mill Creek Formation). Five other samples (solid symbols) have no Eu anomaly. With respect to Sm concentration, from top to bottom, the samples are Beaver Mines shale (01-JG-24A), Mill Creek sandstone (01-JG-18), Gladstone sandstone (93-NB-28B), Beaver Mines sandstones (01-JG-24B and 00-JG-8B), Drywood Creek sandstone (00-JG-4B), and Belly River sandstone (93-NB-31).
Published: 01 May 2005
values, but La enrichments range up to only 75 compared with 150 for samples with more negative ϵ Nd . Two of the samples (open symbols) have a weakly developed Eu anomaly (Beaver Mines shale and the matrix of the Crowsnest Channel conglomerate in the Mill Creek Formation). Five other samples (solid
Image
Figure 4. Nd isotopic changes through the Blairmore Group (pulse 2) of late Aptian to Albian age (115–103 Ma). Nd isotopic values for underlying pulse 1 strata of the Ferni-Kootenay succession and the base of the Alberta Group (pulse 3) are shown for reference. Signals for ϵNd around zero are seen in Gladstone and Beaver Mines Formations. In the overlying Mill Creek Formation, ϵNd is lower, except for channels represented by conglomerate with igneous cobbles. It is uncertain whether the Bruin and Crowsnest channels are at the same stratigraphic level; their relative stratigraphic position in this figure is schematic. Note that Crowsnest Volcanics [sic] cannot be a source of the juvenile signature (field from Peterson et al., 1997). Arrows to the left of the stratigraphic column are generalized paleocurrents trends (from D. Leckie, 2001, personal commun.). Fm.—Formation; cgl.—conglomerate; Gp.—Group.
Published: 01 May 2005
are seen in Gladstone and Beaver Mines Formations. In the overlying Mill Creek Formation, ϵ Nd is lower, except for channels represented by conglomerate with igneous cobbles. It is uncertain whether the Bruin and Crowsnest channels are at the same stratigraphic level; their relative stratigraphic position
Series: DNAG, Centennial Field Guides
Published: 01 January 1988
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-5404-6.165
EISBN: 9780813754109
... Abstract The basal sandstone of the Oil Creek Formation is well exposed in a quarry located 5 mi (8 km) north northwest of the small town of Mill Creek in Johnston County, Oklahoma (Sec.14, T.1S., R4E.) (Figs. 1 and 2). The quarry is owned by the Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation and is about...
Image
(a) The type locality of the Wiscoy Formation at Wiscoy Falls. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Lines indicate locations of different beds with respect to the waterfalls. The inset boxes identify the locations of Figures 6b and 6c. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 5f. (b) Cross sectional view of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; arrows point to Skolithos burrows. (c) Bedding surface of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; black arrows point to Teichichnus traces, white arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos. (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets of the Mills-Mills formation. (e) Thick sandstone near the base of the Caneadea formation that is an approximation for the field contact with the Hume formation. Sandstone displays internal festoon ripples and large, straight-crested ripple on top-bedding surface. (f) Type locality of the Caneadea formation at Caneadea Creek. Arrows point to the tops of coarsening-/ shallowing-upward cycles. (g) Tempestite bed in the Caneadea formation showing lenses of brachiopod coquinite in the sandstone bed. (h) Calcareous sandstones in the Caneadea formation. The white arrow points to Zoophycos trace; the black arrows point to the crestline of asymmetric ripples. (i) The lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation along White Creek. The attached stratigraphic column details sedimentology and ichnology. The white arrows indicate the top of each shoreface sequence in the lower sandstone packet. (j) Transgressive lag at the top of the lower sandstone packet of Rushford formation. Note the erosive contact with the underlying finer grained sandstone indicated by the arrow. (k) Rhizocorallium (indicated by arrows) on bedding surface below transgressive lag at White Creek. (l) Arenicolites (indicated by arrows) in the cross sectional view of the sandstones in the lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (m) Teichichnus traces (indicated by arrows) on the bedding surface of sandstones in the interbedded section of the Rushford formation. (n) Swaley cross-stratification displayed in the upper sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (o) Trough cross-stratification and swaley trough cross-stratification in sandstone packet in the Machias Formation.
Published: 01 February 2001
arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos . (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets
Image
(a) The type locality of the Wiscoy Formation at Wiscoy Falls. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Lines indicate locations of different beds with respect to the waterfalls. The inset boxes identify the locations of Figures 6b and 6c. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 5f. (b) Cross sectional view of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; arrows point to Skolithos burrows. (c) Bedding surface of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; black arrows point to Teichichnus traces, white arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos. (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets of the Mills-Mills formation. (e) Thick sandstone near the base of the Caneadea formation that is an approximation for the field contact with the Hume formation. Sandstone displays internal festoon ripples and large, straight-crested ripple on top-bedding surface. (f) Type locality of the Caneadea formation at Caneadea Creek. Arrows point to the tops of coarsening-/ shallowing-upward cycles. (g) Tempestite bed in the Caneadea formation showing lenses of brachiopod coquinite in the sandstone bed. (h) Calcareous sandstones in the Caneadea formation. The white arrow points to Zoophycos trace; the black arrows point to the crestline of asymmetric ripples. (i) The lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation along White Creek. The attached stratigraphic column details sedimentology and ichnology. The white arrows indicate the top of each shoreface sequence in the lower sandstone packet. (j) Transgressive lag at the top of the lower sandstone packet of Rushford formation. Note the erosive contact with the underlying finer grained sandstone indicated by the arrow. (k) Rhizocorallium (indicated by arrows) on bedding surface below transgressive lag at White Creek. (l) Arenicolites (indicated by arrows) in the cross sectional view of the sandstones in the lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (m) Teichichnus traces (indicated by arrows) on the bedding surface of sandstones in the interbedded section of the Rushford formation. (n) Swaley cross-stratification displayed in the upper sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (o) Trough cross-stratification and swaley trough cross-stratification in sandstone packet in the Machias Formation.
Published: 01 February 2001
arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos . (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets
Image
(a) The type locality of the Wiscoy Formation at Wiscoy Falls. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Lines indicate locations of different beds with respect to the waterfalls. The inset boxes identify the locations of Figures 6b and 6c. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 5f. (b) Cross sectional view of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; arrows point to Skolithos burrows. (c) Bedding surface of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; black arrows point to Teichichnus traces, white arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos. (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets of the Mills-Mills formation. (e) Thick sandstone near the base of the Caneadea formation that is an approximation for the field contact with the Hume formation. Sandstone displays internal festoon ripples and large, straight-crested ripple on top-bedding surface. (f) Type locality of the Caneadea formation at Caneadea Creek. Arrows point to the tops of coarsening-/ shallowing-upward cycles. (g) Tempestite bed in the Caneadea formation showing lenses of brachiopod coquinite in the sandstone bed. (h) Calcareous sandstones in the Caneadea formation. The white arrow points to Zoophycos trace; the black arrows point to the crestline of asymmetric ripples. (i) The lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation along White Creek. The attached stratigraphic column details sedimentology and ichnology. The white arrows indicate the top of each shoreface sequence in the lower sandstone packet. (j) Transgressive lag at the top of the lower sandstone packet of Rushford formation. Note the erosive contact with the underlying finer grained sandstone indicated by the arrow. (k) Rhizocorallium (indicated by arrows) on bedding surface below transgressive lag at White Creek. (l) Arenicolites (indicated by arrows) in the cross sectional view of the sandstones in the lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (m) Teichichnus traces (indicated by arrows) on the bedding surface of sandstones in the interbedded section of the Rushford formation. (n) Swaley cross-stratification displayed in the upper sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (o) Trough cross-stratification and swaley trough cross-stratification in sandstone packet in the Machias Formation.
Published: 01 February 2001
arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos . (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets
Image
(a) The type locality of the Wiscoy Formation at Wiscoy Falls. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Lines indicate locations of different beds with respect to the waterfalls. The inset boxes identify the locations of Figures 6b and 6c. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 5f. (b) Cross sectional view of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; arrows point to Skolithos burrows. (c) Bedding surface of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; black arrows point to Teichichnus traces, white arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos. (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets of the Mills-Mills formation. (e) Thick sandstone near the base of the Caneadea formation that is an approximation for the field contact with the Hume formation. Sandstone displays internal festoon ripples and large, straight-crested ripple on top-bedding surface. (f) Type locality of the Caneadea formation at Caneadea Creek. Arrows point to the tops of coarsening-/ shallowing-upward cycles. (g) Tempestite bed in the Caneadea formation showing lenses of brachiopod coquinite in the sandstone bed. (h) Calcareous sandstones in the Caneadea formation. The white arrow points to Zoophycos trace; the black arrows point to the crestline of asymmetric ripples. (i) The lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation along White Creek. The attached stratigraphic column details sedimentology and ichnology. The white arrows indicate the top of each shoreface sequence in the lower sandstone packet. (j) Transgressive lag at the top of the lower sandstone packet of Rushford formation. Note the erosive contact with the underlying finer grained sandstone indicated by the arrow. (k) Rhizocorallium (indicated by arrows) on bedding surface below transgressive lag at White Creek. (l) Arenicolites (indicated by arrows) in the cross sectional view of the sandstones in the lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (m) Teichichnus traces (indicated by arrows) on the bedding surface of sandstones in the interbedded section of the Rushford formation. (n) Swaley cross-stratification displayed in the upper sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (o) Trough cross-stratification and swaley trough cross-stratification in sandstone packet in the Machias Formation.
Published: 01 February 2001
arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos . (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets
Image
(a) The type locality of the Wiscoy Formation at Wiscoy Falls. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Lines indicate locations of different beds with respect to the waterfalls. The inset boxes identify the locations of Figures 6b and 6c. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 5f. (b) Cross sectional view of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; arrows point to Skolithos burrows. (c) Bedding surface of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; black arrows point to Teichichnus traces, white arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos. (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets of the Mills-Mills formation. (e) Thick sandstone near the base of the Caneadea formation that is an approximation for the field contact with the Hume formation. Sandstone displays internal festoon ripples and large, straight-crested ripple on top-bedding surface. (f) Type locality of the Caneadea formation at Caneadea Creek. Arrows point to the tops of coarsening-/ shallowing-upward cycles. (g) Tempestite bed in the Caneadea formation showing lenses of brachiopod coquinite in the sandstone bed. (h) Calcareous sandstones in the Caneadea formation. The white arrow points to Zoophycos trace; the black arrows point to the crestline of asymmetric ripples. (i) The lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation along White Creek. The attached stratigraphic column details sedimentology and ichnology. The white arrows indicate the top of each shoreface sequence in the lower sandstone packet. (j) Transgressive lag at the top of the lower sandstone packet of Rushford formation. Note the erosive contact with the underlying finer grained sandstone indicated by the arrow. (k) Rhizocorallium (indicated by arrows) on bedding surface below transgressive lag at White Creek. (l) Arenicolites (indicated by arrows) in the cross sectional view of the sandstones in the lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (m) Teichichnus traces (indicated by arrows) on the bedding surface of sandstones in the interbedded section of the Rushford formation. (n) Swaley cross-stratification displayed in the upper sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (o) Trough cross-stratification and swaley trough cross-stratification in sandstone packet in the Machias Formation.
Published: 01 February 2001
arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos . (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets
Image
(a) The type locality of the Wiscoy Formation at Wiscoy Falls. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Lines indicate locations of different beds with respect to the waterfalls. The inset boxes identify the locations of Figures 6b and 6c. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 5f. (b) Cross sectional view of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; arrows point to Skolithos burrows. (c) Bedding surface of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; black arrows point to Teichichnus traces, white arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos. (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets of the Mills-Mills formation. (e) Thick sandstone near the base of the Caneadea formation that is an approximation for the field contact with the Hume formation. Sandstone displays internal festoon ripples and large, straight-crested ripple on top-bedding surface. (f) Type locality of the Caneadea formation at Caneadea Creek. Arrows point to the tops of coarsening-/ shallowing-upward cycles. (g) Tempestite bed in the Caneadea formation showing lenses of brachiopod coquinite in the sandstone bed. (h) Calcareous sandstones in the Caneadea formation. The white arrow points to Zoophycos trace; the black arrows point to the crestline of asymmetric ripples. (i) The lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation along White Creek. The attached stratigraphic column details sedimentology and ichnology. The white arrows indicate the top of each shoreface sequence in the lower sandstone packet. (j) Transgressive lag at the top of the lower sandstone packet of Rushford formation. Note the erosive contact with the underlying finer grained sandstone indicated by the arrow. (k) Rhizocorallium (indicated by arrows) on bedding surface below transgressive lag at White Creek. (l) Arenicolites (indicated by arrows) in the cross sectional view of the sandstones in the lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (m) Teichichnus traces (indicated by arrows) on the bedding surface of sandstones in the interbedded section of the Rushford formation. (n) Swaley cross-stratification displayed in the upper sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (o) Trough cross-stratification and swaley trough cross-stratification in sandstone packet in the Machias Formation.
Published: 01 February 2001
arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos . (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets
Image
(a) The type locality of the Wiscoy Formation at Wiscoy Falls. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Lines indicate locations of different beds with respect to the waterfalls. The inset boxes identify the locations of Figures 6b and 6c. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 5f. (b) Cross sectional view of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; arrows point to Skolithos burrows. (c) Bedding surface of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; black arrows point to Teichichnus traces, white arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos. (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets of the Mills-Mills formation. (e) Thick sandstone near the base of the Caneadea formation that is an approximation for the field contact with the Hume formation. Sandstone displays internal festoon ripples and large, straight-crested ripple on top-bedding surface. (f) Type locality of the Caneadea formation at Caneadea Creek. Arrows point to the tops of coarsening-/ shallowing-upward cycles. (g) Tempestite bed in the Caneadea formation showing lenses of brachiopod coquinite in the sandstone bed. (h) Calcareous sandstones in the Caneadea formation. The white arrow points to Zoophycos trace; the black arrows point to the crestline of asymmetric ripples. (i) The lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation along White Creek. The attached stratigraphic column details sedimentology and ichnology. The white arrows indicate the top of each shoreface sequence in the lower sandstone packet. (j) Transgressive lag at the top of the lower sandstone packet of Rushford formation. Note the erosive contact with the underlying finer grained sandstone indicated by the arrow. (k) Rhizocorallium (indicated by arrows) on bedding surface below transgressive lag at White Creek. (l) Arenicolites (indicated by arrows) in the cross sectional view of the sandstones in the lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (m) Teichichnus traces (indicated by arrows) on the bedding surface of sandstones in the interbedded section of the Rushford formation. (n) Swaley cross-stratification displayed in the upper sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (o) Trough cross-stratification and swaley trough cross-stratification in sandstone packet in the Machias Formation.
Published: 01 February 2001
arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos . (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets
Image
(a) The type locality of the Wiscoy Formation at Wiscoy Falls. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Lines indicate locations of different beds with respect to the waterfalls. The inset boxes identify the locations of Figures 6b and 6c. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 5f. (b) Cross sectional view of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; arrows point to Skolithos burrows. (c) Bedding surface of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; black arrows point to Teichichnus traces, white arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos. (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets of the Mills-Mills formation. (e) Thick sandstone near the base of the Caneadea formation that is an approximation for the field contact with the Hume formation. Sandstone displays internal festoon ripples and large, straight-crested ripple on top-bedding surface. (f) Type locality of the Caneadea formation at Caneadea Creek. Arrows point to the tops of coarsening-/ shallowing-upward cycles. (g) Tempestite bed in the Caneadea formation showing lenses of brachiopod coquinite in the sandstone bed. (h) Calcareous sandstones in the Caneadea formation. The white arrow points to Zoophycos trace; the black arrows point to the crestline of asymmetric ripples. (i) The lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation along White Creek. The attached stratigraphic column details sedimentology and ichnology. The white arrows indicate the top of each shoreface sequence in the lower sandstone packet. (j) Transgressive lag at the top of the lower sandstone packet of Rushford formation. Note the erosive contact with the underlying finer grained sandstone indicated by the arrow. (k) Rhizocorallium (indicated by arrows) on bedding surface below transgressive lag at White Creek. (l) Arenicolites (indicated by arrows) in the cross sectional view of the sandstones in the lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (m) Teichichnus traces (indicated by arrows) on the bedding surface of sandstones in the interbedded section of the Rushford formation. (n) Swaley cross-stratification displayed in the upper sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (o) Trough cross-stratification and swaley trough cross-stratification in sandstone packet in the Machias Formation.
Published: 01 February 2001
arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos . (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets
Image
(a) The type locality of the Wiscoy Formation at Wiscoy Falls. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Lines indicate locations of different beds with respect to the waterfalls. The inset boxes identify the locations of Figures 6b and 6c. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 5f. (b) Cross sectional view of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; arrows point to Skolithos burrows. (c) Bedding surface of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; black arrows point to Teichichnus traces, white arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos. (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets of the Mills-Mills formation. (e) Thick sandstone near the base of the Caneadea formation that is an approximation for the field contact with the Hume formation. Sandstone displays internal festoon ripples and large, straight-crested ripple on top-bedding surface. (f) Type locality of the Caneadea formation at Caneadea Creek. Arrows point to the tops of coarsening-/ shallowing-upward cycles. (g) Tempestite bed in the Caneadea formation showing lenses of brachiopod coquinite in the sandstone bed. (h) Calcareous sandstones in the Caneadea formation. The white arrow points to Zoophycos trace; the black arrows point to the crestline of asymmetric ripples. (i) The lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation along White Creek. The attached stratigraphic column details sedimentology and ichnology. The white arrows indicate the top of each shoreface sequence in the lower sandstone packet. (j) Transgressive lag at the top of the lower sandstone packet of Rushford formation. Note the erosive contact with the underlying finer grained sandstone indicated by the arrow. (k) Rhizocorallium (indicated by arrows) on bedding surface below transgressive lag at White Creek. (l) Arenicolites (indicated by arrows) in the cross sectional view of the sandstones in the lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (m) Teichichnus traces (indicated by arrows) on the bedding surface of sandstones in the interbedded section of the Rushford formation. (n) Swaley cross-stratification displayed in the upper sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (o) Trough cross-stratification and swaley trough cross-stratification in sandstone packet in the Machias Formation.
Published: 01 February 2001
arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos . (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets
Image
(a) The type locality of the Wiscoy Formation at Wiscoy Falls. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Lines indicate locations of different beds with respect to the waterfalls. The inset boxes identify the locations of Figures 6b and 6c. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 5f. (b) Cross sectional view of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; arrows point to Skolithos burrows. (c) Bedding surface of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; black arrows point to Teichichnus traces, white arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos. (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets of the Mills-Mills formation. (e) Thick sandstone near the base of the Caneadea formation that is an approximation for the field contact with the Hume formation. Sandstone displays internal festoon ripples and large, straight-crested ripple on top-bedding surface. (f) Type locality of the Caneadea formation at Caneadea Creek. Arrows point to the tops of coarsening-/ shallowing-upward cycles. (g) Tempestite bed in the Caneadea formation showing lenses of brachiopod coquinite in the sandstone bed. (h) Calcareous sandstones in the Caneadea formation. The white arrow points to Zoophycos trace; the black arrows point to the crestline of asymmetric ripples. (i) The lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation along White Creek. The attached stratigraphic column details sedimentology and ichnology. The white arrows indicate the top of each shoreface sequence in the lower sandstone packet. (j) Transgressive lag at the top of the lower sandstone packet of Rushford formation. Note the erosive contact with the underlying finer grained sandstone indicated by the arrow. (k) Rhizocorallium (indicated by arrows) on bedding surface below transgressive lag at White Creek. (l) Arenicolites (indicated by arrows) in the cross sectional view of the sandstones in the lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (m) Teichichnus traces (indicated by arrows) on the bedding surface of sandstones in the interbedded section of the Rushford formation. (n) Swaley cross-stratification displayed in the upper sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (o) Trough cross-stratification and swaley trough cross-stratification in sandstone packet in the Machias Formation.
Published: 01 February 2001
arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos . (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets
Image
(a) The type locality of the Wiscoy Formation at Wiscoy Falls. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Lines indicate locations of different beds with respect to the waterfalls. The inset boxes identify the locations of Figures 6b and 6c. Abbreviations are defined in Figure 5f. (b) Cross sectional view of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; arrows point to Skolithos burrows. (c) Bedding surface of a dolomitic sandstone in the Wiscoy Formation; black arrows point to Teichichnus traces, white arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos. (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets of the Mills-Mills formation. (e) Thick sandstone near the base of the Caneadea formation that is an approximation for the field contact with the Hume formation. Sandstone displays internal festoon ripples and large, straight-crested ripple on top-bedding surface. (f) Type locality of the Caneadea formation at Caneadea Creek. Arrows point to the tops of coarsening-/ shallowing-upward cycles. (g) Tempestite bed in the Caneadea formation showing lenses of brachiopod coquinite in the sandstone bed. (h) Calcareous sandstones in the Caneadea formation. The white arrow points to Zoophycos trace; the black arrows point to the crestline of asymmetric ripples. (i) The lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation along White Creek. The attached stratigraphic column details sedimentology and ichnology. The white arrows indicate the top of each shoreface sequence in the lower sandstone packet. (j) Transgressive lag at the top of the lower sandstone packet of Rushford formation. Note the erosive contact with the underlying finer grained sandstone indicated by the arrow. (k) Rhizocorallium (indicated by arrows) on bedding surface below transgressive lag at White Creek. (l) Arenicolites (indicated by arrows) in the cross sectional view of the sandstones in the lower sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (m) Teichichnus traces (indicated by arrows) on the bedding surface of sandstones in the interbedded section of the Rushford formation. (n) Swaley cross-stratification displayed in the upper sandstone packet of the Rushford formation. (o) Trough cross-stratification and swaley trough cross-stratification in sandstone packet in the Machias Formation.
Published: 01 February 2001
arrows point to spreiten from Zoophycos . (d) Outcrop showing the South Wales, Mills-Mills, and Hume formations at Wiscoy Creek. The attached stratigraphic section details the sedimentology and ichnology; the scale of the column is in meters. Arrows point to the contacts of the sandstone packets