The first broad Russian experiment aimed at the study of the deep structure of Earth's crust and upper mantle by the common midpoint (CMP) method along the 1-EU geotraverse and cross-traverse 4B was realized in 1995–2008 in the territory of the East European Platform under the Russian Federal Program on Development of the State Geotraverse Network and Deep and Superdeep Boreholes. At the same time, the EGGI profile, geotraverses TATSEIS, ESRU 2003–2005, and DOBRE in Ukraine, as well as the system of profiles under the FIRE project in the adjacent territory of Finland were acquired. Integration of the existing geological maps and available geological (in the widest sense: structural, geochemical, geochronological, and so forth) data with results of geological interpretation of seismic images of the crust and upper mantle have led to a three-dimensional (3D) model of the deep crustal structure of the East European craton and a significant revision of previous ideas on the deep structure and Early Precambrian evolution of the region. In the geological interpretation of seismic data, we attached particular significance to the direct tracing of geological boundaries and fault zones recognized on the seismic-reflection pattern and the section of effective acoustic impedance toward the present-day surface and to their correlation with mapped geological and tectonic units. Comparison of the seismic image geometry with the geology of the eastern Fennoscandian Shield at the present-day erosion level shows that the reflection pattern matches the general trends of compositional layering, gneissic banding, and schistosity. The roughly homogeneous structural domains of the crust correspond to relatively large tectonic sheets, 3–5 km thick. Their inner structure commonly is not discernible in reflection patterns. The 3D model of deep structure in the Kola-Lapland region is based on correlation of tectonostratigraphic complexes depicted in the geological-tectonic map with structural subdivisions recognized as a result of interpretation of seismic crust images and their tracing to depth. In addition to the geological section along the 1-EU geotraverse, the model includes the section along the FIRE-4–4a profile that crosses the western part of the region studied in Finland. The 3D model shows the Paleoproterozoic tectonic structures (Lapland granulite-gneiss belt and its structural and evolutionary relationships with lower-crustal granulites, the structure and tectonic position of the Tana belt) and Archean tectonic structural units (the Central Kola granulite-gneiss belt, the Inari-Kola granite-greenstone domain, and the boundary zone between the Kola craton and the Belomorian orogen). The detailed 3D model of the crust and uppermost mantle in the Karelian-Belomorian region is also based on correlation between the exposed geological structure and geological interpretation of seismic images along the 1-EU geotraverse and cross-traverse 4B. The geological interpretation of the seismic crust image along the FIRE-1 profile serves as the additional basis for the Svecofennian accretionary orogen and its boundary with the Kola-Karelia continent. The model of the crust in the Karelian-Belomorian region contains the Paleoproterozoic tectonic structures (East Karelian imbricate thrust belt, Svecofennian accretionary orogen, and Onega Depression) and also Archean tectonic structures (Kuhmo-Segozero and Kovdozero microcontinents, and Chupa granulite-gneiss belt). The deep structure of the platform basement beneath the Moscow syneclise is an immediate extension of the Fennoscandian Shield. The basement structure in this area was controlled by Paleoproterozoic processes resulting in formation of the Lapland–Mid-Russia–South Baltia intracontinental orogen. The 3D model shows the marginal Totma and Aprelevka volcanic-sedimentary belts, and a synformal structure for the upper crust in the central domain of the orogen. The rock complexes of the Zubtsov-Diakonovo granulite-gneiss belt in the northwest and the Dmitrov-Galich belt in the southeast make up a distinctly outlined stage in the synform section. These complexes are underlain by gneiss-migmatite-amphibolite associations of the Bologoevo and Ivanovo-Sharya belts and are overlain by similar rocks of the Tver and Bukalovo belts. Lastly, the Kashin synformal granulite-gneiss belt is localized in the upper part of the section. The alternation of rocks of differing metamorphic grade clearly indicates the tectonic or tectonized stratigraphic character of the section in the Nelidovo synform. The crust sandwiched between the southward-plunging Totma and Aprelevka belts is characterized by rough layering. The reflections and boundaries of crustal sheets outlined in agreement with this pattern plunge southward beneath the Archean Sarmatia and Volgo-Uralia continental blocks. The deep crustal structure of the Voronezh Crystalline Massif is determined by a succession of geodynamic settings and Archean and Paleoproterozoic tectonic events that resulted in the formation of the Archean crust in the Kursk granite-greenstone domain and probably in the Khopior microcontinent, the Middle Paleoproterozoic East Voronezh orogen, and the Late Paleoproterozoic North Voronezh orogen. The 3D model applies particularly well to the Middle Paleoproterozoic East Voronezh orogen. The orogen is localized in the area of collision of the Kursk and Khopior microcontinents, which differ markedly in crustal structure and composition. The crocodile-type tectonic structure of the East Voronezh orogen is clear evidence for collisional compression. The countermotion of microcontinents resulted in the wedge-shaped structure of the Kursk microcontinent extending for 150 km, delamination of crust in the Khopior microcontinent, and counterdisplacement of tectonic sheets coherently thrust over and under the Kursk microcontinent. The tectonic structure of the central and western Volgo-Uralia continent to a depth of 15–20 km is characterized by sections of 3D models of effective density and magnetization. The second block of information on the Volgo-Uralia continent deep structure comes from results of seismic profiling along the TATSEIS, ESRU 2003–2005, and URSEIS geotraverses. The TATSEIS geotraverse crosses a significant part of the Volgo-Uralia continent from southeast to northwest. The seismic crust images along this geotraverse not only create the basis for interpretation of regional deep structure, but also robustly link the crustal models of the western and southeastern parts of the Volgo-Uralia continent. The data along the ESRU 2003–2005 geotraverse played an important role in ascertaining the deep structure of the Krasnoufimsk ovoid, which is overlapped by sedimentary fill of the Ural foredeep. Additional evidence was provided by the URSEIS geotraverse. The Archean crust, slightly modified in the Paleoproterozoic, which forms the East European Platform basement in the Volgo-Uralia continent, is made up of mafic granulites, khondalite, mafic-ultramafic intrusions, and granitoid plutons. The 3D model of the crust based on the TATSEIS geotraverse demonstrates the deep structure of the Vetluga synform in the Tokmov ovoid and of the interovoid domain. Ovoids play a crucial role in the Volgo-Uralia continent structure and occupy no less than 60% of the crust. In 3D representation, they are bowl-shaped blocks, round or oval in outline, and 300–600 km in diameter at the basement surface, and with a base at the level of the crust-mantle interface, i.e., at a depth of 60 km. The thickness of crust of the interovoid domain does not commonly exceed 50 km. Two types of elongated oval synforms are distinguished: the interovoid ovals (Verkhnevyatka, North Tatar, Almetevsk), up to 200–300 m long, with aspect ratio of 2:1–3:1, and the interovoid belts (Usovo, Vyatka, Kilmez, Elabuga-Bondyuga, Tuma-Penza, as well as Zhiguli-Pugachev homocline), 300–400 km in extent, with aspect ratio of 4:1–5:1. The bottom of the largest interovoid oval crossed by the TATSEIS profile reaches 25 km in depth. In crustal section, the structural elements of the interovoid domain are underlain or partly crosscut by acoustically transparent layers composed of the Bakaly-type granitoids. The lower crust of the interovoid domain is ~35 km in thickness and is composed of tectonic sheets plunging toward the northwestern end of the geotraverse and penetrating into the mantle.

Abstract Decades of oil and gas exploration across the North Sea have led to a detailed understanding of its Cenozoic–Mesozoic structure. However, the deeper basin architecture of Paleozoic petroleum systems has been less well defined by seismic data. This regional structural overview of the Devono-Carboniferous petroleum systems incorporates interpretations from more than 85 000 line-kilometres of 2D seismic data and 50 3D seismic volumes, plus a gravity, density and magnetic study, from the Central Silverpit Basin to the East Orkney Basin. A complex picture of previously unmapped or poorly known basins emerges on an inherited basement fabric, with numerous granite-cored blocks. These basins are controlled by Devono-Carboniferous normal, strike-slip and reverse faults. The main basins across Quadrants 29–44 trend NW–SE, influenced by the Tornquist trend inherited from the Caledonian basement. North of Quadrants 27 and 28, and the presumed Iapetus suture, the major depocentres are NE–SW (e.g. the Forth Approaches and Inner Moray Firth basins) to east–west (e.g. the Caithness Graben), and WNW–ESE trending (e.g. the East Orkney Basin), reflecting the basement structural inheritance. From seismic interpretation, there are indications of an older north–south fault trend in the Inner Moray Firth that is difficult to image, since it has been dissected by subsequent Permo-Carboniferous and Mesozoic faulting and rifting.

Abstract Spatially and temporally variable Tournaisian to Namurian Carboniferous fluvial, fluvio-deltaic, platform carbonate and shale-dominated basin sedimentary successions up to 3.5 km thick are preserved in a complex series of basins from the Outer Moray Firth (Quadrant 14) to the Silverpit Basin (Quadrant 44). Differences in stratigraphic nomenclature in the areas surrounding the Mid North Sea High and onshore, combined with sparse biostratigraphic data, have hindered the systematic regional understanding of the timing and controls on stacked source and reservoir rock intervals. Over 125 well reinterpretations, tied to seismic interpretations, provide evidence of the inception and extent of a delta system. Regional time slices highlight a long-lived laterally equivalent basinal, mud-rich succession across Quadrants 41–44. They also show that the area from the Outer Moray Firth to the Silverpit Basin was part of the same sedimentary system up to at least Namurian times. All of this is placed within a simplified stratigraphic framework. Supplementary material: Appendix A in the Supplementary Material contains the stratigraphic intervals interpreted on each well and highlights which intervals have biostratigraphic control. Supplemental Figures 1 and 2 are larger scale versions of Figures 6 – 8 . The Supplementary Material is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4087046