1-20 OF 64 RESULTS FOR

Maynes Creek Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Save search
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article

A Bootstrap Analysis for Comparative Taphonomy Applied to Early Mississippian (Kinderhookian) Crinoids from the Wassonville Cycle of Iowa Available to Purchase

FOREST J. GAHN, TOMASZ K. BAUMILLER
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 01 February 2004
PALAIOS (2004) 19 (1): 17–38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1669/0883-1351(2004)019<0017:ABAFCT>2.0.CO;2
... in six crinoid morphotypes (diplobathrids, monobathrids, dichocrinids, platycrinitids, cladids, and flexibles) from three stratigraphic units (the Maynes Creek Formation and the Starrs Cave and “Ollie” Members of the Wassonville Formation) representing distinct depositional environments along an onshore...
FIGURES | View All (11)
View PDF for article title, A Bootstrap Analysis for Comparative Taphonomy Applied to Early Mississippian (Kinderhookian) Crinoids from the Wassonville Cycle of Iowa
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for A Bootstrap Analysis for Comparative Taphonomy Applied to Early Mississippian (Kinderhookian) Crinoids from the Wassonville Cycle of Iowa
Journal Article

Arm regeneration in Mississippian crinoids: evidence of intense predation pressure in the Paleozoic? Available to Purchase

Forest J. Gahn, Tomasz K. Baumiller
Journal: Paleobiology
Published: 01 January 2005
Paleobiology (2005) 31 (1): 151–164.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031<0151:ARIMCE>2.0.CO;2
... in crinoids from the lower Mississippian (Kinderhookian) Maynes Creek Formation near Le Grand, Iowa, a locality renowned for the preservation of thousands of crinoids in tangled masses of crowns, stalks, and holdfasts. Nine percent of the specimens that we examined contained at least one regenerating arm...
FIGURES | View All (8)
View PDF for article title, Arm regeneration in Mississippian crinoids: evidence of intense predation pressure in the Paleozoic?
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Arm regeneration in Mississippian crinoids: evidence of intense predation pressure in the Paleozoic?
Image
Conodonts recovered from the Peterson #1 core and the I-172, Fall Creek, and Hannibal type sections. All images are from a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and the scale bar is 100 μm for each specimen. (A) Polygnathus communis communis Branson and Mehl, 1934; dextral P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Dolbee Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 0.5–0.6 m. Note: the morphology of this element is atypical. (B) Polygnathus communis communis Branson and Mehl, 1934; sinistral P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Dolbee Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 1.0–1.15 m. Note: the morphology of this element is atypical. (C) Polygnathus communis carinus Hass, 1959; sinistral P1 element, oral view, Fall Creek section, “unit 1” of Baxter, Burlington Formation, 1.0–1.1 m. (D) Polygnathus communis carinus Hass, 1959; sinistral P1 element, oral view, Fall Creek section, “unit 1” of Baxter, Burlington Formation, 1.0–1.1 m. (E) Siphonodella sulcata (Huddle, 1934); sinistral P1 element, E1 oral view, E2 aboral view, Hannibal type section, Hannibal Formation, 17.65–17.75 m. (F) Siphonodella sulcata (Huddle, 1934); dextral P1 element, F1 oral view, F2 aboral view, Hannibal type section, Hannibal Formation, 17.65–17.75 m. (G) Siphonodella sulcata (Huddle, 1934); sinistral P1 element, G1 oral view, G2 aboral view, Hannibal type section, Hannibal-Burlington contact, 23.9–24.1 m. (H) Siphonodella obsoleta Hass, 1959; sinistral P1 element, oral view, Peterson #1 core, Lower Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 259′4″–260′1″. (I) Siphonodella cooperi Hass, 1959; sinistral P1 element, oral view, Peterson #1 core, Lower Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 259′4″–260′1″. (J) Siphonodella isosticha (Cooper, 1939); sinistral P1 element, oral view, Peterson #1 core, Lower Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 243′9″–245′0″. (K) Siphonodella isosticha (Cooper, 1939); dextral P1 element, oral view, Peterson #1 core, Lower Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 243′9″–245′0″. (L) Siphonodella sp.; sinistral P1 element, oral view, Peterson #1 core, Lower Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 226′9″–228′0″. (M) Siphonodella sp.; dextral P1 element, oral view, Peterson #1 core, Lower Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 259′4″–260′1″. (N) Siphonodella isosticha (Cooper, 1939); dextral P1 element, oral view, Peterson #1 core, Lower Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 226′9″–228′0″. (O) Siphonodella isosticha? (Cooper, 1939); sinistral P1 element, oral view, Peterson #1 core, Upper Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 176′7″–177′6″. (P) Pseudopolygnathus multistriatus Mehl and Thomas 1947; see synonymy of Thompson (1967); sinistral? P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Dolbee Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 2.9–3.1 m. (Q) Pseudopolygnathus multistriatus Mehl and Thomas 1947; see synonymy of Thompson (1967); dextral? P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Dolbee Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 2.9–3.1 m. (R) Pseudopolygnathus multistriatus Mehl and Thomas 1947; see synonymy of Thompson (1967); dextral P1 element, oral view, Hannibal type section, “unit 1” of Baxter, Burlington Formation, 25.5–25.8 m. (S) Pseudopolygnathus multistriatus Mehl and Thomas 1947; see synonymy of Thompson (1967); sinistral P1 element, oral view, Hannibal type section, “unit 1” of Baxter, Burlington Formation, 25.5–25.8 m. (T) Bactrognathus hamatus Branson and Mehl, 1941; dextral P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Dolbee Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 3.4–3.6 m. (U) Bactrognathus excavatus Branson and Mehl, 1941; sinistral P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Haight Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 5.4–5.55 m. (V) Bactrognathus excavatus Branson and Mehl, 1941; dextral P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Haight Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 5.4–5.55 m. (W) Bactrognathus distortus lanei Chauffe, 1981; dextral? P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Haight Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 5.4–5.55 m. (X) Bactrognathus distortus lanei Chauffe, 1981; sinistral? P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Haight Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 5.4–5.55 m. (Y) Doliognathus latus Branson and Mehl, 1941; sinistral P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Haight Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 7.0–7.3 m. (Z) Eotaphrus burlingtonensis Collinson and Norby, 1973, as reported by Pierce and Langenheim (1974); sinistral P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Haight Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 12.0–12.3 m. (AA) Eotaphrus burlingtonensis Collinson and Norby, 1973, as reported by Pierce and Langenheim (1974); dextral P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Haight Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 15.9–16.1 m. (BB) Eotaphrus burlingtonensis Collinson and Norby, 1973, as reported by Pierce and Langenheim (1974); dextral P1 element, oral view, I-172 section, Haight Creek Member, Burlington Formation, 19.0–19.2 m. For reference: 250 ft = 76.2 m.

Conodonts recovered from the Peterson #1 core and the I-172, Fall Creek, an... Available to Purchase

Published: 20 September 2023
view, Peterson #1 core, Lower Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 259′4″–260′1″. (I) Siphonodella cooperi Hass, 1959 ; sinistral P 1 element, oral view, Peterson #1 core, Lower Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 259′4″–260′1″. (J) Siphonodella isosticha ( Cooper, 1939 ); sinistral P 1 element, oral
Image
FIGURE 9—Generalized results for the taphonomic analysis of compression and orientation data in crinoids from the Maynes Creek Formation. Data are arranged as in Figure 8, but taller bars indicate relatively greater resistance to compaction and a higher grade of arm orientation (see Figure 6 and Table 1)

FIGURE 9 —Generalized results for the taphonomic analysis of compression an... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 February 2004
FIGURE 9 —Generalized results for the taphonomic analysis of compression and orientation data in crinoids from the Maynes Creek Formation. Data are arranged as in Figure 8 , but taller bars indicate relatively greater resistance to compaction and a higher grade of arm orientation (see Figure 6
Image

Similarity matrix of shared cladid genera (number of shared genera divided ... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 May 2012
). The Maynes Creek Formation of Iowa equals Hampton Formation of older literature. The Lodgepole Formation is in Montana; the Henderson Canyon Formation is in Utah andWyoming (Webster, 1997); and the Gilmore City Formation is in Iowa.
Image

TABLE 4 —Results of pairwise taphonomic comparisons of crinoid groups from ... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 February 2004
TABLE 4 —Results of pairwise taphonomic comparisons of crinoid groups from the Maynes Creek Formation. Values indicate the number of simulations in which crinoid group 1 (G 1 ) demonstrates greater quality of preservation than crinoid group 2 (G 2 ). Significant differences (α < 0.05
Image

TABLE 3 —Mean additive taphonomic values for disarticulation in crinoids fr... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 February 2004
TABLE 3 —Mean additive taphonomic values for disarticulation in crinoids from the Maynes Creek Formation. Values represent means generated from normalized stalk, calyx, and arm disarticulation scores for all specimens. Values for the crown (calyx and arms) and complete specimens (all components
Image
FIGURE 7—Additive disarticulation gradient for crinoid crowns and complete specimens from the Maynes Creek Formation. The additive taphonomic values represent the sum of normalized means for crowns (black symbols) and complete specimens (gray symbols) with perfect preservation for each component equaling 1, and non-preservation equaling 0 (see Table 3). Squares represent mean values, and the overlying and underlying bars represent the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals, respectively

FIGURE 7 —Additive disarticulation gradient for crinoid crowns and complete... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 February 2004
FIGURE 7 —Additive disarticulation gradient for crinoid crowns and complete specimens from the Maynes Creek Formation. The additive taphonomic values represent the sum of normalized means for crowns (black symbols) and complete specimens (gray symbols) with perfect preservation for each component
Image
FIGURE 8—Generalized results for the taphonomic analysis of disarticulation in crinoids from the Maynes Creek Formation. Bar height indicates relative preservation: the higher the bar, the greater the relative disarticulation resistance. Disarticulation resistance decreases from left to right. Gaps between bars indicate significant differences in disarticulation, with the exception of flexible arm disarticulation, which is not significantly poorer than that that of the monobathrids (see Table 4). Directly adjacent bars (without separating gaps) lack significantly different disarticulation patterns. D, diplobathrids; M, monobathrids; P, platycrinitids; H, dichocrinids; C, cladids; F, flexibles

FIGURE 8 —Generalized results for the taphonomic analysis of disarticulatio... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 February 2004
FIGURE 8 —Generalized results for the taphonomic analysis of disarticulation in crinoids from the Maynes Creek Formation. Bar height indicates relative preservation: the higher the bar, the greater the relative disarticulation resistance. Disarticulation resistance decreases from left to right
Image
FIGURE 1—Generalized cross-section of the study area (not to scale). Crinoid symbols represent the relative location of each crinoid association with respect to its position along an onshore–offshore transect in the Wassonville Cycle of southeast Iowa: MC, crinoid association from the Maynes Creek Formation; SC, crinoid association from the Starrs Cave Member of the Wassonville Formation; OL, crinoid association from the “Ollie member” of the Wassonville Formation. Numbers refer to distinct environments and facies: 1, terrestrial and lacustrine; 2, intertidal; 3, inner to proximal middle shelf laminated mudstones; 4, central middle shelf oolites; 5, central middle shelf skeletal packstone–grainstones; 6, distal middle shelf laminated wackestones; 7, distal middle shelf laminated mudstones; 8, outer shelf. FWWB, fair-weather wave base; SWB, storm wave base

FIGURE 1 —Generalized cross-section of the study area (not to scale). Crino... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 February 2004
FIGURE 1 —Generalized cross-section of the study area (not to scale). Crinoid symbols represent the relative location of each crinoid association with respect to its position along an onshore–offshore transect in the Wassonville Cycle of southeast Iowa: MC, crinoid association from the Maynes Creek
Journal Article

Resolving complex stratigraphic architecture across the Burlington shelf and identifying the Devonian-Carboniferous (Hangenberg) and Kinderhookian-Osagean (Tournaisian) boundary biogeochemical events in the type area of the Mississippian subsystem Available to Purchase

Matthew G. Braun, Alyssa M. Bancroft, Nicholas J. Hogancamp, Brittany M. Stolfus, Megan N. Heath, Ryan J. Clark, Stephanie Tassier-Surine, James E. Day, Bradley D. Cramer
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 20 September 2023
GSA Bulletin (2024) 136 (5-6): 2157–2177.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/B36974.1
... view, Peterson #1 core, Lower Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 259′4″–260′1″. (I) Siphonodella cooperi Hass, 1959 ; sinistral P 1 element, oral view, Peterson #1 core, Lower Member, Maynes Creek Formation, 259′4″–260′1″. (J) Siphonodella isosticha ( Cooper, 1939 ); sinistral P 1 element, oral...
FIGURES | View All (13)
View PDF for article title, Resolving complex stratigraphic architecture across the Burlington shelf and identifying the Devonian-Carboniferous (Hangenberg) and Kinderhookian-Osagean (Tournaisian) boundary biogeochemical events in the type area of the Mississippian subsystem
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Resolving complex stratigraphic architecture across the Burlington shelf and identifying the Devonian-Carboniferous (Hangenberg) and Kinderhookian-Osagean (Tournaisian) boundary biogeochemical events in the type area of the Mississippian subsystem
Journal Article

Isolation and characterization of the earliest taxon-specific organic molecules (Mississippian, Crinoidea): REPLY Open Access

Christina E. O’Malley, William I. Ausich, Yu-Ping Chin
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 March 2014
Geology (2014) 42 (3): e322.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/G35388Y.1
.... Illustrations of the crinoids from the Maynes Creek Formation from Iowa were presented (again clearly labeled) and used because these Iowa crinoids are one of the most striking examples of fossil crinoid species preserved with vivid colors. Analysis of material other than that from the Maynes Creek Formation...
View PDF for article title, Isolation and characterization of the earliest taxon-specific organic molecules (Mississippian, Crinoidea): REPLY
Add to Citation Manager for Isolation and characterization of the earliest taxon-specific organic molecules (Mississippian, Crinoidea): REPLY
Image
(A) Stratigraphic plots of geochemical data arranged by increasing water depth. Lithology and δ13C for Briggs Woods are from Braun et al. (2023); Strawberry Creek values are from Saltzman (2003); Funeral Mountains data are published here for first time. Sr/Ca scale bar applies to fill color on δ44/40Ca data points. Note that for Briggs Woods, study interval of Braun et al. (2023) begins below base of our section (see Table S1 [text footnote 1]) and includes entire Maynes Creek (MaC)–Gilmore City Formation. VPDB—Vienna Peedee belemnite; SW—seawater. (B) Schematic cross section and location of sections. (C) Thin section photomicrograph (50× magnification, 2.6 mm field of view) highlighting radial structure of ooids from Gilmore City Formation, Briggs Woods section at ~73 m. (D) Core scan of calcite-filled subvertical fracture (arrow) at ~52 m in Briggs Woods section. MsC—Mission Canyon Formation.

(A) Stratigraphic plots of geochemical data arranged by increasing water de... Available to Purchase

Published: 23 May 2024
to fill color on δ 44/40 Ca data points. Note that for Briggs Woods, study interval of Braun et al. (2023) begins below base of our section (see Table S1 [text footnote 1 ]) and includes entire Maynes Creek (MaC)–Gilmore City Formation. VPDB—Vienna Peedee belemnite; SW—seawater. (B) Schematic cross
Journal Article

Cladid Crinoids from the Late Kinderhookian Meadville Shale, Cuyahoga Formation of Ohio Available to Purchase

Thomas W. Kammer, Edgar W. Roeser
Published: 01 May 2012
Journal of Paleontology (2012) 86 (3): 470–487.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1666/11-101.1
... ). The Maynes Creek Formation of Iowa equals Hampton Formation of older literature. The Lodgepole Formation is in Montana; the Henderson Canyon Formation is in Utah andWyoming (Webster, 1997); and the Gilmore City Formation is in Iowa. ...
FIGURES | View All (6)
View PDF for article title, Cladid Crinoids from the Late Kinderhookian Meadville Shale, Cuyahoga <span class="search-highlight">Formation</span> of Ohio
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Cladid Crinoids from the Late Kinderhookian Meadville Shale, Cuyahoga <span class="search-highlight">Formation</span> of Ohio
Journal Article

Isolation and characterization of the earliest taxon-specific organic molecules (Mississippian, Crinoidea): COMMENT Open Access

Klaus Wolkenstein
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 March 2014
Geology (2014) 42 (3): e320.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/G34583C.1
... the impression that the crinoids shown in their figure 1 are from the Mississippian of Indiana. However, figure 1 actually shows a crinoid plate from the Mississippian Maynes Creek Formation at Le Grand, Iowa ( Gahn and Baumiller, 2004 ). Although the figure shows an example of color differences among different...
View PDF for article title, Isolation and characterization of the earliest taxon-specific organic molecules (Mississippian, Crinoidea): COMMENT
Add to Citation Manager for Isolation and characterization of the earliest taxon-specific organic molecules (Mississippian, Crinoidea): COMMENT
Journal Article

A HISTORY OF RESEARCH ON HUNTER FAULT SYSTEM OR “LINEAMENT” Available to Purchase

J.M. Dickins
Published: 01 October 1987
Earth Sciences History (1987) 6 (2): 205–213.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17704/eshi.6.2.a686377183m24773
... in the work of Browne, Carey, Osborne, Raggatt, and Voisey. These workers established that the Carboniferous was affected by tectonic movement prior to the Permian and that the main (“orogenic”) folding of the Permian/Triassic began with deposition of the Muree Formation and continued during the Upper Permian...
FIGURES | View All (10)
View PDF for article title, A HISTORY OF RESEARCH ON HUNTER FAULT SYSTEM OR “LINEAMENT”
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for A HISTORY OF RESEARCH ON HUNTER FAULT SYSTEM OR “LINEAMENT”
Journal Article

Geochemical evolution of groundwater on Saturna Island, British Columbia Available to Purchase

D.M. Allen, M. Suchy
Published: 13 July 2001
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2001) 38 (7): 1059–1080.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/e01-007
... (overlooking Plumper Sound) and the second unnamed ridge running the length of the north side of the island (Fig.  3 ). Strata dip angles range from almost horizontal atop the anticline to 49° on the north side of the island (Fig.  3 ). Outcrop patterns for the different formations, in combination with strata...
FIGURES | View All (12)
View PDF for article title, Geochemical evolution of groundwater on Saturna Island, British Columbia
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Geochemical evolution of groundwater on Saturna Island, British Columbia
Journal Article

A HISTORY OF GEOLOGICAL EXPLORATION IN THE CANNING BASIN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA Available to Purchase

V.L. Passmore, R.R. Towner
Published: 01 October 1987
Earth Sciences History (1987) 6 (2): 159–177.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17704/eshi.6.2.jm774585j6382583
... restructured forms. Between 1922 and 1923, the Freney Co. drilled four wells in the Prices Creek area using a portable percussion rig with a capacity of 307 m. Prices Creek Nos.1, 2, 3 were sited within 1.5 km of the original bore in the same unit as the discovery bore (the Emanuel Formation, an Ordovician...
FIGURES | View All (9)
View PDF for article title, A HISTORY OF GEOLOGICAL EXPLORATION IN THE CANNING BASIN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for A HISTORY OF GEOLOGICAL EXPLORATION IN THE CANNING BASIN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Journal Article

Early Mississippian global δ 13 C excursion is not a diagenetic artifact Available to Purchase

Matthew G. Braun, Noah T. Anderson, Kristin D. Bergmann, Elizabeth M. Griffith, Matthew R. Saltzman
Journal: Geology
Published: 23 May 2024
Geology (2024) 52 (9): 641–645.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/G52109.1
... to fill color on δ 44/40 Ca data points. Note that for Briggs Woods, study interval of Braun et al. (2023) begins below base of our section (see Table S1 [text footnote 1 ]) and includes entire Maynes Creek (MaC)–Gilmore City Formation. VPDB—Vienna Peedee belemnite; SW—seawater. (B) Schematic cross...
FIGURES | View All (4)
View PDF for article title, Early Mississippian global δ 13 C excursion is not a diagenetic artifact
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Early Mississippian global δ 13 C excursion is not a diagenetic artifact
Journal Article

Development of a 3D Geologic Model Used in the Seismic Hazard and Liquefaction Hazard Analysis of Madison County, Tennessee Available to Purchase

Valarie Joyner Harrison, Hamed Tohidi, Roy Van Arsdale, Chris Cramer, David Arellano
Published: 22 November 2024
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2024) 30 (4): 229–243.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21663/EEG-D-23-00075
... North Geologic Quadrangle map ( Figure 2B ) ( Jewel, 2006 ). The basal portion of the Paleocene Clayton Formation is difficult to differentiate from the top of the underlying Cretaceous sediment (the Owl Creek Formation) in some published quadrangles (e.g., Figure 2B ) as they are both described...
FIGURES | View All (9)
View PDF for article title, Development of a 3D Geologic Model Used in the Seismic Hazard and Liquefaction Hazard Analysis of Madison County, Tennessee
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Development of a 3D Geologic Model Used in the Seismic Hazard and Liquefaction Hazard Analysis of Madison County, Tennessee