1-14 OF 14 RESULTS FOR

Marsham Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Representative section through the <span class="search-highlight">Marsham</span> <span class="search-highlight">Formation</span> at section B, paleocur...
Published: 01 October 2008
Figure 10: Representative section through the Marsham Formation at section B, paleocurrent directions measured from ripple-cross lamination (black) and the orientations of wave-ripple crests (gray) in unit M1 (measured at different localities).
Journal Article
Journal: GeoArabia
Publisher: Gulf Petrolink
Published: 01 October 2008
GeoArabia (2008) 13 (4): 45–72.
...Figure 10: Representative section through the Marsham Formation at section B, paleocurrent directions measured from ripple-cross lamination (black) and the orientations of wave-ripple crests (gray) in unit M1 (measured at different localities). ...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2007
Journal of the Geological Society (2007) 164 (5): 997–1009.
... placed within the Cryogenian ( c . 850–635 Ma) part of the Huqf Supergroup. The c . 1 km thick marine deposits of the Arkahawl and Marsham Formations of the Mirbat Group are thought to represent a stratigraphic interval between older Cryogenian and younger Cryogenian glaciations that is not preserved...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
Proposed composite section of  Cryogenian Model  (from  Rieu and Allen, 200...
Published: 01 April 2010
Cap Carbonate, and the Masirah Bay to the Arkahawl and Marsham formations. The Middle Carboniferous Unconformity (Sub-Khlata) is interpreted below the Shareef Formation.
Image
Field photographs of representative lithofacies of the upper Arkahawl Forma...
Published: 01 October 2008
Figure 9: Field photographs of representative lithofacies of the upper Arkahawl Formation (unit A3), the Marsham Formation (units M1 and M2) and the Shareef Formation (unit S1). (a) green distal-marine siltstone and mudstone (LF A3-1) in section C (looking NE at ~550 m), showing disconformable
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1144/M36.19
EISBN: 9781862394117
... ; Wright et al. 1990 ), the former containing glaciomarine deposits in the Jabal Akhdar region of northern Oman. Rieu et al. (2006 , 2007 a ) and Allen (2007) recommended the use of the term Mirbat Group, to include the Ayn, Arkahawl, Marsham and Shareef Formations, in Dhofar. The Mirbat Group...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Series: GeoArabia Special Publication
Publisher: Gulf PetroLink
Published: 01 January 2010
EISBN: 9781733475747
... (Mirbat), Rieu and Allen (2008) illustrate a comparable range of environments but with fluvial and fluvio-deltaic elements also present (within the Marsham Formation and the Ayn Formation, respectively). Subdivision: The Abu Mahara Group, as defined in the subsurface, comprises only the Ghadir...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: GeoArabia
Publisher: Gulf Petrolink
Published: 01 April 2010
GeoArabia (2010) 15 (2): 209–244.
... Cap Carbonate, and the Masirah Bay to the Arkahawl and Marsham formations. The Middle Carboniferous Unconformity (Sub-Khlata) is interpreted below the Shareef Formation. ...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1989
Journal of the Geological Society (1989) 146 (4): 675–684.
... oxide Analytical Chemistry 1975 47 1179 1181 Sasaki, A. 1969. Sulphur isotope study of the Muskox intrusion, District of Mackenzie. Geological Survey of Canada. Paper 68. Seccombe P. K. Groves D. I Marsham R. J. Barre-It F. M. Sulphide paragenesis and sulphur mobility...
Journal Article
Published: 22 November 2019
Journal of the Geological Society (2020) 177 (2): 357–378.
..., the Arkahawl and the Marsham formations. The Mirbat Group is eroded at the top by a sub-Cretaceous unconformity. The Ayn Formation, at the base of the Mirbat Group, is made up of 400 m thick glacially influenced basin-margin deposits ( Rieu et al. 2006 ). It consists of intervals of glacimarine rainout...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: GeoArabia
Publisher: Gulf Petrolink
Published: 01 April 2005
GeoArabia (2005) 10 (2): 17–34.
..., 2003 ) intruded into older-than 800 Ma gneissic basement. The Mirbat Sandstone Formation comprises three members; from base up: (1) glaciogenic Ayn ( Kellerhals and Matter, 2003 ); (2) deep-marine Arkahawl; and (3) shallow- to deep-marine Marsham. Correlation of the glaciogenic rocks of the Mirbat...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 21 February 2022
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2022) 55 (3): qjegh2021-060.
... commonly rise to elevations of 2000–3800 m above sea level (asl) and up to almost 2000 m above the adjacent Rift Valley floors. The formation of the EARS has been both asynchronous and diachronous: developing first in the Turkana Depression of southern Ethiopia and northern Kenya at c. 20–25 Ma (e.g...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: GeoArabia
Publisher: Gulf Petrolink
Published: 01 October 2004
GeoArabia (2004) 9 (4): 11–36.
... comprises five formations. The Buah is the youngest of these formations, and represents the most promising exploration target. Accordingly, an integrated outcrop and subsurface study was initiated to better understand the distribution of the Buah depositional facies. High-resolution chemostratigraphy...
FIGURES | View All (22)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 2024
AAPG Bulletin (2024) 108 (9): 1727–1766.
... Group (e.g., Loosveld et al., 1996 ; Kellerhals and Matter, 2003 ) and the Arkahawl and Marsham Formations to be time equivalent to the Masirah Bay Formation (e.g., Bowring et al., 2007 ). 21 01 2023 06 06 2023 27 10 2023 09 02 2024 Integration of the results...
FIGURES | View All (25)