1-20 OF 210 RESULTS FOR

Manitou Falls Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Paragenetic sequence for the Manitou Falls Formation in the alteration footprint of the McArthur River deposit indicating diagenesis, early- and late pre-mineralization alteration, mineralization-stage alteration, and post-mineralization alteration. Line thickness indicates the relative abundance of each mineral and dashed lines represent uncertainty in the timing of mineral formation. Modified after Ng et al. (2013), Fayek & Kyser (1997), and Kotzer & Kyser (1995).
Published: 07 October 2021
Fig. 3. Paragenetic sequence for the Manitou Falls Formation in the alteration footprint of the McArthur River deposit indicating diagenesis, early- and late pre-mineralization alteration, mineralization-stage alteration, and post-mineralization alteration. Line thickness indicates the relative
Image
Paragenetic sequence for the Manitou Falls Formation and ore zone at McArthur River Zone 4 indicating early- and late pre-ore alteration, ore, and post-ore alteration stages. Line thickness indicates relative abundance of each mineral and dashed line represents uncertainty in the timing of mineral formation. The formation temperature of K1 kaolin is constrained by homogenization temperatures of fluid inclusions in compaction-related quartz overgrowth and euhedral quartz (Q2 and Q3 in this study), determined by Kotzer and Kyser (1995). Basement paragenesis and remaining temperatures are discussed in text.
Published: 01 November 2013
Fig. 3 Paragenetic sequence for the Manitou Falls Formation and ore zone at McArthur River Zone 4 indicating early- and late pre-ore alteration, ore, and post-ore alteration stages. Line thickness indicates relative abundance of each mineral and dashed line represents uncertainty in the timing
Image
General mineral paragenesis for Manitou Falls Formation in the Wheeler River area. Three main stages of alteration are identified: diagenesis, hydrothermal alteration, which is subdivided into an early, a mid, and a late substage, and post-hydrothermal alteration. The thickness of the lines indicates the relative abundance. Dashed lines indicate uncertainty in the position.
Published: 01 March 2010
F ig . 4. General mineral paragenesis for Manitou Falls Formation in the Wheeler River area. Three main stages of alteration are identified: diagenesis, hydrothermal alteration, which is subdivided into an early, a mid, and a late substage, and post-hydrothermal alteration. The thickness
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 March 2010
Economic Geology (2010) 105 (2): 303–324.
...F ig . 4. General mineral paragenesis for Manitou Falls Formation in the Wheeler River area. Three main stages of alteration are identified: diagenesis, hydrothermal alteration, which is subdivided into an early, a mid, and a late substage, and post-hydrothermal alteration. The thickness...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Image
Spatial distribution of alteration minerals within the Manitou Falls Formation and Wollaston Group basement at McArthur River Zone 4. Clay distribution based on XRD analyses of the <2-μm size fraction from each drill core sample. Major alteration minerals occur in abundance greater than 5 wt %. Boundaries between alteration assemblages assigned based on changes in mineralogy and modal abundance. Basin: C1 = Mg sudoite, C2 = Mg-Fe sudoite, C3 = Fe-Mg sudoite, Dkt (K1) = dickite, ICML = illite-chlorite mixed-layer clay, I1 = illite, Kln (K1, K2) = kaolinite, T1 = magnesiofoitite. Basement: C1bsmt = clinochlore, C2bsmt = Mg sudoite, I1bsmt = illite.
Published: 01 November 2013
Fig. 6 Spatial distribution of alteration minerals within the Manitou Falls Formation and Wollaston Group basement at McArthur River Zone 4. Clay distribution based on XRD analyses of the <2- μ m size fraction from each drill core sample. Major alteration minerals occur in abundance greater
Image
Photomicrographs of typical mineral assemblages in the Manitou Falls Formation related to diagenesis, hydrothermal alteration, and post-hydrothermal alteration events. A. Diagenetic H1 hematite coats a detrital Q0 quartz grain in H2 hematite matrix. B. Remnants of H2 hematite matrix showing embayments filled with diagenetic K1 dickite and early hydrothermal alteration substage Ms1 muscovite. C. Early hydrothermal alteration substage Ms1 muscovite filling interstices in a K1 diagenetic dickite aggregate. D. Mid-hydrothermal alteration substage C1 chlorite filling corroded zones in mid-hydrothermal alteration substage T1 dravite aggregates. E. Late hydrothermal alteration substage C2 chlorite vein crosscutting mid-hydrothermal alteration substage C1 chlorite-rich matrix. F. Post-hydrothermal alteration stage K2 kaolinite pseudomorphous after late hydrothermal alteration substage C2 chlorite. XP = cross-polar light.
Published: 01 March 2010
F ig . 5. Photomicrographs of typical mineral assemblages in the Manitou Falls Formation related to diagenesis, hydrothermal alteration, and post-hydrothermal alteration events. A. Diagenetic H1 hematite coats a detrital Q0 quartz grain in H2 hematite matrix. B. Remnants of H2 hematite matrix
Journal Article
Published: 07 October 2021
The Canadian Mineralogist (2021) 59 (5): 913–945.
... to the ore body or alteration zone can be detected at the surface more than 500 m above the deposit. Organic-rich Ah-horizon soils, Fe-rich B-horizon soils, C-horizon soils, tree cores of Jack pine ( Pinus banksiana ), and glacially dispersed boulders of Manitou Falls Formation sandstone that host the U...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 November 2013
Economic Geology (2013) 108 (7): 1657–1689.
...Fig. 3 Paragenetic sequence for the Manitou Falls Formation and ore zone at McArthur River Zone 4 indicating early- and late pre-ore alteration, ore, and post-ore alteration stages. Line thickness indicates relative abundance of each mineral and dashed line represents uncertainty in the timing...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1993
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1993) 30 (4): 653–673.
..., the detrital units correspond to the Manitou Falls Formations where most of the uranium deposits are located. The Lower Pelitic unit of the Wollaston Group, which lies directly on the Archean basement, is considered to be the most favourable horizon for uranium mineralization. During the Hudsonian orogeny...
Image
(a) A simplified sketch of Canada showing the locations of the Athabasca and Thelon Basins, and map (b). (b) A regional map (modified from Jefferson et al. 2007) showing the stratigraphic units of the eastern Athabasca Basin overlying the Rae and Hearne Provinces. The location of the Wollaston Supergroup, the McArthur River deposit, P2 fault, and map (c) is also shown. Stratigraphic units: RD = Read Formation; MFb = Bird Member, Manitou Falls Formation; MFc = Collins Member, Manitou Falls Formation; MFd = Dunlop Member, Manitou Falls Formation. (c) A plan view map [modified from Adlakha et al. (2017) and updated according to Bray et al. (2018)] of the unconformity showing the P2 fault, mineralized zones of the McArthur River deposit (from southwest to northeast: McA South 1, Zones 4-1, McA North 1, Zone A, McA North 2, Zone B, McA North 3, and McA North 4), low-grade (P2 Main) and unmineralized areas. Surface drillhole collar locations are indicated by a circle, and next to each drillhole collar is a list of samples that were collect from that location (see Table 1). Samples collected from drillholes collared in the underground mine are indicated with an arrow pointing to its general location (i.e., mineralized zone). (Color online.)
Published: 01 December 2020
of the Wollaston Supergroup, the McArthur River deposit, P2 fault, and map ( c ) is also shown. Stratigraphic units: RD = Read Formation; MFb = Bird Member, Manitou Falls Formation; MFc = Collins Member, Manitou Falls Formation; MFd = Dunlop Member, Manitou Falls Formation. ( c ) A plan view map [modified from
Image
Cross section through the Centennial deposit along L10+00N looking north. The lighter shading for each rock type represents sudoite-clinochore, and illite-sudoite alteration assemblages, which overprint the original rock. Question marks indicate extrapolation of rock types and alteration not constrained by drill holes. The location of the cross section is shown in Figure 3. MFb = Manitou Falls Formation (Bird member), MFw = Manitou Falls Formation (Warnes member), the boundary between the MFb and MFw is located at the top of the “Conglomeratic Layer.” ASL = above sea level. Note that the unconformity is approximately 800 to 830 m below the surface.
Published: 01 May 2014
not constrained by drill holes. The location of the cross section is shown in Figure 3 . MFb = Manitou Falls Formation (Bird member), MFw = Manitou Falls Formation (Warnes member), the boundary between the MFb and MFw is located at the top of the “Conglomeratic Layer.” ASL = above sea level. Note
Image
Location and regional geologic framework of the Athabasca Basin (after Card et al., 2007a, b; Jefferson et al., 2007; Ramaekers et al., 2007). Abbreviations: AB = Athabasca Basin, C = Carswell…, D = Douglas, FP = Fair Point, LL = Locker Lake, LZ = Lazenby Lake, MF = Manitou Falls, O = Otherside, RD = Read, S = Smart, S/M = undivided Smart or Manitou Falls formations, W = Wolverine Point. Red stars represent major uranium deposits.
Published: 01 March 2017
, O = Otherside, RD = Read, S = Smart, S/M = undivided Smart or Manitou Falls formations, W = Wolverine Point. Red stars represent major uranium deposits.
Image
Conserved element scatterplot of TiO2 plotted against Zr for 4604 Read and Manitou Falls Formation samples from above the Phoenix unconformity U deposit, Saskatchewan. Colours correlate with the density of samples across the graph.
Published: 22 November 2019
Fig. 30. Conserved element scatterplot of TiO 2 plotted against Zr for 4604 Read and Manitou Falls Formation samples from above the Phoenix unconformity U deposit, Saskatchewan. Colours correlate with the density of samples across the graph.
Image
GER diagram plotting (Na + K)/Al against Mg/Al for 4604 Read and Manitou Falls Formation samples from above the Phoenix unconformity U deposit, Saskatchewan. Colours correlate with the density of samples across the graph.
Published: 22 November 2019
Fig. 32. GER diagram plotting (Na + K)/Al against Mg/Al for 4604 Read and Manitou Falls Formation samples from above the Phoenix unconformity U deposit, Saskatchewan. Colours correlate with the density of samples across the graph.
Image
GER diagram plotting (Na + K)/Al against Fe/Al for 4604 Read and Manitou Falls Formation samples from above the Phoenix unconformity U deposit, Saskatchewan. Colours correlate with the density of samples across the graph.
Published: 22 November 2019
Fig. 33. GER diagram plotting (Na + K)/Al against Fe/Al for 4604 Read and Manitou Falls Formation samples from above the Phoenix unconformity U deposit, Saskatchewan. Colours correlate with the density of samples across the graph.
Image
GER diagram plotting (Na + K)/Al against Na/Al for 4604 Read and Manitou Falls Formation samples from above the Phoenix unconformity U deposit, Saskatchewan. Colours correlate with the density of samples across the graph.
Published: 22 November 2019
Fig. 34. GER diagram plotting (Na + K)/Al against Na/Al for 4604 Read and Manitou Falls Formation samples from above the Phoenix unconformity U deposit, Saskatchewan. Colours correlate with the density of samples across the graph.
Image
GER diagram plotting (Na + K)/Al against K/Al for 4604 Read and Manitou Falls Formation samples from above the Phoenix unconformity U deposit, Saskatchewan. Colours correlate with the density of samples across the graph.
Published: 22 November 2019
Fig. 35. GER diagram plotting (Na + K)/Al against K/Al for 4604 Read and Manitou Falls Formation samples from above the Phoenix unconformity U deposit, Saskatchewan. Colours correlate with the density of samples across the graph.
Image
Schematic cross section of geology through the Millennium deposit displaying the main lithological units discussed in the paper, including; the Mother Fault (a), the graphitic Marker Fault (b) and the main B1 Fault (c). MF refers to Manitou Falls Formation.
Published: 07 September 2012
Figure 2. Schematic cross section of geology through the Millennium deposit displaying the main lithological units discussed in the paper, including; the Mother Fault (a), the graphitic Marker Fault (b) and the main B 1 Fault (c). MF refers to Manitou Falls Formation.
Image
Molar Al-Fe-Mg ternary plot of tourmaline group minerals from the Manitou Falls Formation at McArthur River Zone 4 and composition of end-member schorl, dravite, foitite (Deer et al., 1966), and magnesiofoitite (Rosenberg and Foit, 2006).
Published: 01 November 2013
Fig. 8 Molar Al-Fe-Mg ternary plot of tourmaline group minerals from the Manitou Falls Formation at McArthur River Zone 4 and composition of end-member schorl, dravite, foitite ( Deer et al., 1966 ), and magnesiofoitite ( Rosenberg and Foit, 2006 ).
Image
C1 Chondrite-normalized spider diagrams (McDonough &amp; Sun 1995). (A) Median REE concentrations in APS minerals, apatite, APS-altered monazite, and detrital zircon from LA-ICP-MS. (B) Median REE concentrations in Manitou Falls Formation sandstones from total digestion.
Published: 07 October 2021
Fig. 17. C1 Chondrite-normalized spider diagrams (McDonough & Sun 1995). (A) Median REE concentrations in APS minerals, apatite, APS-altered monazite, and detrital zircon from LA-ICP-MS. (B) Median REE concentrations in Manitou Falls Formation sandstones from total digestion.