1-20 OF 35 RESULTS FOR

Manas earthquake 1906

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 06 December 2017
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (1): 13–21.
... between the Qigu and Tugulu anticlines during the Late Cenozoic. Based on regional study of the fault plane, fault F3 is capable of producing earthquakes of M w ≥ 8.0 . This study suggests that fault F3 was the seismogenic fault responsible for the 2016 M 6.2 Hutubi earthquake and the 1906 M 7.7 Manas...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2014
Seismological Research Letters (2014) 85 (4): 801–808.
...Joseph M. Stockmeyer; John H. Shaw; Shuwei Guan © 2014 by the Seismological Society of America The most recent rupture along the SJT thrust sheet was the 1906 M w  7.4–8.2 Manas earthquake, which has been interpreted to have ruptured most, if not all, of the SJT ( Avouac et al...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Image
Seismotectonic model of the 2016 M 6.2 Hutubi earthquake and the 1906 M 7.7 Manas earthquake. White circles represent aftershocks of the M 6.2 Hutubi earthquake. The yellow star indicates the hypocenter of the M 7.7 Manas earthquake. Solid red lines represent active faults, and black lines represent previous existing faults.
Published: 06 December 2017
Figure 6. Seismotectonic model of the 2016 M  6.2 Hutubi earthquake and the 1906 M  7.7 Manas earthquake. White circles represent aftershocks of the M  6.2 Hutubi earthquake. The yellow star indicates the hypocenter of the M  7.7 Manas earthquake. Solid red lines represent active faults
Image
Tectonic setting of the northern Tian Shan, northwestern China. White lines represent major faults in the northern Tian Shan area. Blue circles indicate historic earthquakes (magnitude≥5.0), and red circles indicate earthquakes (magnitude≥6.0) recorded since 1970. The red dashed line shows the surface rupture of the 1906 Manas earthquake. The blue line A–A′ corresponds to a combined industrial seismic reflection profile. 1, Dushanzi–Anjihai anticline belt; 2, Huoerguosi–Manas–Tugulu anticline belt; 3, Qigu anticline belt; F1, Yamate fault; F2, Junggar southern margin fault; F3, Huoerguosi–Manas–Tugulu fault.
Published: 06 December 2017
. The red dashed line shows the surface rupture of the 1906 Manas earthquake. The blue line A–A′ corresponds to a combined industrial seismic reflection profile. 1, Dushanzi–Anjihai anticline belt; 2, Huoerguosi–Manas–Tugulu anticline belt; 3, Qigu anticline belt; F1, Yamate fault; F2, Junggar southern
Image
Geologic cross section of the trace of P–P′, which is modified from the study by Lu et al. (2018). Brown solid lines indicate the inferred seismogenic fault of the 2016 Hutubi earthquake. The yellow star is the hypocenter of the 1906 Manas earthquake. White circles are the relocated aftershocks, and red circles indicate the aftershocks after adjusted the location based on the coordinate difference between the mainshocks solved by Lu et al. (2018) and USGS.
Published: 29 January 2019
Figure 7. Geologic cross section of the trace of P–P′, which is modified from the study by Lu et al. (2018) . Brown solid lines indicate the inferred seismogenic fault of the 2016 Hutubi earthquake. The yellow star is the hypocenter of the 1906 Manas earthquake. White circles are the relocated
Image
Map of the study region. Faults (red lines), historical earthquakes (red circles), and aftershocks (cyan circles) are mapped on shaded relief of Shuttle Radar Topography Mission 4 digital elevation model. Violet and black solid polygons indicate the footprint of Sentinel‐1A ascending and Sentinel‐1B descending tracks, respectively. The blue solid line indicates the surface trace of the seismic reflection section. Blue and yellow stars indicate the epicenters of the 2016 Hutubi earthquake and 1906 Manas earthquake, respectively.
Published: 29 January 2019
and Sentinel‐1B descending tracks, respectively. The blue solid line indicates the surface trace of the seismic reflection section. Blue and yellow stars indicate the epicenters of the 2016 Hutubi earthquake and 1906 Manas earthquake, respectively.
Journal Article
Published: 29 January 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (2): 770–779.
...Figure 7. Geologic cross section of the trace of P–P′, which is modified from the study by Lu et al. (2018) . Brown solid lines indicate the inferred seismogenic fault of the 2016 Hutubi earthquake. The yellow star is the hypocenter of the 1906 Manas earthquake. White circles are the relocated...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 18 April 2018
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (4): 1467–1477.
... reveals that the present‐day tectonic activity throughout the Hutubi area is still relatively strong and that earthquakes often occur ( Bai, 1990 ; Avouac et al. , 1993 ; Cao, 2013 ). The largest recorded earthquake in this region is the 1906 M  7.7 Manas earthquake, which occurred at depth along...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 26 September 2022
Seismological Research Letters (2023) 94 (1): 87–99.
.... , 2020 ; Ren et al. , 2021 ). However, seven historical and instrumental major‐great earthquakes (>M 7.0) have occurred at the Tian Shan piedmont or adjacent mountains, for example, the 1906 M 7.7 Manas occurred at the northern piedmont, 1911 M w  8.0 Chon Kemin, 1889 M 8.0 Chilik earthquake...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 2016
AAPG Bulletin (2016) 100 (9): 1443–1468.
... stage of deformation is related to the activity and development of the SJT ( Figure 10D ). This fault offsets and folds Holocene terraces across the Tugulu–Manas–Huoerguosi fold trend and is considered the source of the 1906 M 7.4–8.2 Manas earthquake ( Avouac et al., 1993 ; Molnar et al., 1994...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 22 May 2017
GSA Bulletin (2017) 129 (9-10): 1337–1356.
... surface segmentation, the Southern Junggar Thrust is capable of sourcing M w >8 earthquakes, consistent with the magnitude estimates of the most recent rupture, the 1906 M w 7.4–8.2 Manas, China, earthquake ( Avouac et al., 1993 ; Deng et al., 1996 ). The Tugulu-Manas-Huoerguosi folds...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 17 May 2022
Lithosphere (2022) 2022 (1): 7872549.
... Shan, China AAPG Bulletin 2016 100 9 1443 1468 10.1306/04041615023 2-s2.0-85020919519 Stockmeyer J. M. Shaw J. H. Guan S. Seismic hazards of multisegment thrust-fault ruptures: insights from the 1906 mw 7.4-8.2 Manas, China, earthquake Seismological Research Letters...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 21 March 2025
Lithosphere (2024) 2024 (Special 15): lithosphere_2024_130.
.... The surface projection of the epicenter of a strong earthquake is generally located on the fore-mountain fault, whereas the coseismic surface rupture is located at the fore-edge fault of the nappe body. For example, the 1906 Ms7.7 Manas earthquake in front of the northern Tianshan Mountains can be explained...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Published: 30 September 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (6): 3143–3157.
... significant practical implications. Table 2 Historical Earthquakes in the Research Regions No. Time Magnitude Location Fault I 1902 M w  8.25 Atushi Totgongbazi–Alparek fault II 1906 M w  7.7 Manas Qingshuihezi fault III 1914 M w  7.5 Barkol...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Image
Published: 01 April 2010
1 08-05-1847 Zenkoji, Japan RE 7.4 1.5–2.7 – 43 7.0 7.0–7.1 Imamura (1930) 2 05-07-1895 Tashikuergan RR 7.5 3.9 3.6 30 6.8 7.1–7.2 Liu (1993) 3 23-12-1906 Manas, China RE 8 0.58 – 146 7.6 7.1 Avouac et al. (1993) 4 23-01-1909 Silakhur, Iran RE 7.0
Image
Published: 01 April 2010
1 08-05-1847 Zenkoji, Japan RE 7.4 1.5–2.7 – 43 7.0 7.0–7.1 Imamura (1930) 2 05-07-1895 Tashikuergan RR 7.5 3.9 3.6 30 6.8 7.1–7.2 Liu (1993) 3 23-12-1906 Manas, China RE 8 0.58 – 146 7.6 7.1 Avouac et al. (1993) 4 23-01-1909 Silakhur, Iran RE 7.0
Journal Article
Published: 17 January 2025
Seismological Research Letters (2025) 96 (3): 1937–1952.
... or rupture zones on the ground surface. The well‐known folding earthquakes reported in the literature include the 1980 El Asnam earthquake that occurred in Algeria ( Gui et al. , 1984 ), the 1983 Coalinga earthquake that occurred in the United States of America ( Rose and Fu, 1986 ), and the 1906 Manas...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 03 March 2021
Seismological Research Letters (2021) 92 (4): 2134–2144.
...) earthquakes with M ≥ 7.0 and more than 60 earthquakes with M ≥ 6.0 occurred during the past 200 yr. These earthquakes, however, dominantly occurred before 1950, for example, the 1812 M  8.0 Nileke, the 1889 M  8.0 Chilik, the 1902 M w  7.7 Atushi, the 1906 M  7.7 Manas, the 1911...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 17 April 2019
Geosphere (2019) 15 (3): 935–945.
... , Q.D. , Xu , X.W. , Feng , X.Y. , Peng , S.Z. , and Yang , X.P. , 1994 , Blind thrust, folding earthquake, and the 1906 Manas earthquake, Xinjiang [in Chinese with English abstract] : Seismology and Geology , v. 16 , no. 3 , p. 193 – 204 . Zheng , H.B. , Powell , C.M...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 30 March 2016
Seismological Research Letters (2016) 87 (3): 601–608.
.... Yeats R. ( 1989 ). Hidden earthquakes , Sci. Am. 260 , 48–57 . Stockmeyer J. Shaw J. Guan S. ( 2014 ). Seismic hazards of multisegment thrust‐fault ruptures: Insights from the 1906 M w  7.4–8.2 Manas, China, earthquake , Seismol. Res. Lett. 85 , 801–808 , doi...
FIGURES | View All (5)