1-20 OF 825 RESULTS FOR

Madison Bay

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Map of south-central Louisiana showing the location of Madison Bay (MB), the Cocodrie tide gauge, and the distribution of wetland losses relative to producing oil and gas fields. Wetland loss (1930–1990) from Britsch and Dunbar (1996). General geographic position of the yellow X is lat. N29°21′50″, long. W90°34′45″.
Published: 01 June 2003
Figure 1 Map of south-central Louisiana showing the location of Madison Bay (MB), the Cocodrie tide gauge, and the distribution of wetland losses relative to producing oil and gas fields. Wetland loss (1930–1990) from Britsch and Dunbar (1996) . General geographic position of the yellow X is lat
Image
Water depths and elevations at Madison Bay along a bathymetric profile surveyed May 1, 2002 between core 10 and the staff tide gauge. Location shown in Figure 2.
Published: 01 June 2003
Figure 3 Water depths and elevations at Madison Bay along a bathymetric profile surveyed May 1, 2002 between core 10 and the staff tide gauge. Location shown in Figure 2 .
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2003
Environmental Geosciences (2003) 10 (2): 71–80.
...Figure 1 Map of south-central Louisiana showing the location of Madison Bay (MB), the Cocodrie tide gauge, and the distribution of wetland losses relative to producing oil and gas fields. Wetland loss (1930–1990) from Britsch and Dunbar (1996) . General geographic position of the yellow X is lat...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2023
American Mineralogist (2023) 108 (3): 572–583.
... at the University of Wisconsin-Madison using a Linkam LMS600 heating-freezing stage mounted on an Olympus BX50 microscope with a 100× objective lens. The fluid-inclusion populations in our garnet sample are predominantly monophase liquid inclusions with small numbers of two-phase inclusions, as shown in Figure 3...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Image
Locations of sediment cores and sediment-surface profile from the Madison Bay area superimposed on an aerial photograph taken in 2000. General location shown as MB in Figure 1. Geographic position of MB04 is lat. N29°21′54.03″, long. W90°34′56.59″.
Published: 01 June 2003
Figure 2 Locations of sediment cores and sediment-surface profile from the Madison Bay area superimposed on an aerial photograph taken in 2000. General location shown as MB in Figure 1 . Geographic position of MB04 is lat. N29°21′54.03″, long. W90°34′56.59″.
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2022
American Mineralogist (2022) 107 (7): 1353–1360.
... ) 4 ] at pH ~3 and ~9 ( Zheng et al. 2019 ). Laboratory XRD data were collected with a 2D image-plate detector and a 0.3 mm collimator using a Rigaku Rapid II instrument (Mo K α radiation) in the Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Two-dimensional diffraction images were...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
Stratigraphic correlations for marsh and open-water core pairs illustrate the magnitude of subsidence and wetland erosion (in centimeters) at the Madison Bay wetland loss hot spot. The upper stratigraphic unit represents the peat and organic mud facies, whereas the lower unit includes the three other facies. Locations shown in Figure 2.
Published: 01 June 2003
Figure 4 Stratigraphic correlations for marsh and open-water core pairs illustrate the magnitude of subsidence and wetland erosion (in centimeters) at the Madison Bay wetland loss hot spot. The upper stratigraphic unit represents the peat and organic mud facies, whereas the lower unit includes
Published: 01 March 2016
DOI: 10.1130/2016.2519(05)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2022
American Mineralogist (2022) 107 (5): 930–935.
... (IMA 2018-135a) ( Lee and Guo 2021 ). The mineral was named after Huifang Xu of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, U.S.A., and Hongwu Xu of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, U.S.A., in honor of their sustained contributions to minerals research, including the discovery of two other Fe-bearing...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Series: GSA Field Guide
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1130/2011.0024(15)
EISBN: 9780813756240
... To Agassiz Transition Site 3-5. UTM Location 719848 E 5301739 N 15T Site 3-7. Chicago Bay Café (Rest Stop/Lunch) Hovland, Minnesota Site 3-8. UTM Location 280358 E 5303895 N 16T Site 3-9 (Drive-By). UTM Location 279275 E 5308002 N 16T Site 3-6. UTM Location 670373 E 5308653 N 15T Site 3-10...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Published: 01 October 2015
DOI: 10.1130/2015.2518(01)
Image
Box-and-whisker plots for volume magnetic susceptibility measurements on sedimentary rocks and sediments. Statistics by rock type are from Hansen et al. (2005), who combined several earlier compilations. Statistics for other units include several stratigraphic units for each of three study areas and shallow cores from coastal areas. Individual samples, core, or outcrops were measured for the three study areas and nine cores from Madison Bay. Nine cores for Chesapeake Bay were measured by a downhole logging tool. Pink shading highlights the general range of typical susceptibility values. Red boxes indicate the range of potential magnetic-susceptibility contrast between the units plotted above and below. N is the number of samples. Dashed red line (3 × 10−4 SI or 24 × 10−6 cgs) is for comparison to Figure 5.
Published: 01 November 2011
of three study areas and shallow cores from coastal areas. Individual samples, core, or outcrops were measured for the three study areas and nine cores from Madison Bay. Nine cores for Chesapeake Bay were measured by a downhole logging tool. Pink shading highlights the general range of typical
Series: GSA Field Guide
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1130/2011.0024(08)
EISBN: 9780813756240
... Bay, Ontario (black boxes). Gray bold lines represent the strike of iron-formations. Gradient circle surrounding Sudbury approximates estimated size of final crater (250 km diameter). Figure 2. Qualitative models for the emplacement of ejecta, showing the effect of an atmosphere...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1960
AAPG Bulletin (1960) 44 (6): 960–961.
...-central North Dakota. The Middle Devonian series is divided into the Winnipegosis and Prairie formations of the Elk Point group and the overlying Dawson Bay formation. Upper Devonian rocks underlie most of the area studied and make up most of the outcrops. They attain a maximum thickness of about...
Series: SEPM Special Publication
Publisher: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists
Published: 01 January 1988
DOI: 10.2110/pec.87.40.0311
EISBN: 9781565761681
... Abstract Five depositional facies occur in five oriented cores obtained from the Bartlesville Sandstone (Cherokee Group, Middle Pennsylvanian) in the Madison Unit “B” enhanced recovery pilot project in Greenwood County, Kansas. By orienting the cores and studying the flow directions determined...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1966
AAPG Bulletin (1966) 50 (6): 1244–1247.
... in the Bay Springs (Cotton Valley) field, Jasper County, Mississippi; the Flora (Gas Rock) field, Madison County, Mississippi; and the Sunoco-Felda (Glen Rose) field, Hendry County, Florida. Jurassic trend. —A total of 38 Jurassic tests was drilled in the southeastern states during 1965. Of these, 21 were...
FIGURES
Image
Sampling locations, 2022–2023: 1) Little Neck Bay, NY; 2) Captain’s Cove, Bridgeport, CT; 3) Jarvis Creek, Branford, CT; 4) Neck Road, Madison, CT; 5) CT NERR, Old Lyme, CT; 6) Mystic, CT; 7) North Sea Harbor, NY; 8) Strongs Neck, NY.
Published: 28 January 2025
Figure 1. Sampling locations, 2022–2023: 1) Little Neck Bay, NY; 2) Captain’s Cove, Bridgeport, CT; 3) Jarvis Creek, Branford, CT; 4) Neck Road, Madison, CT; 5) CT NERR, Old Lyme, CT; 6) Mystic, CT; 7) North Sea Harbor, NY; 8) Strongs Neck, NY.
Image
 Figure 2. A: Estimated air temperature at Madison, Wisconsin, from 65 to 18 ka (see text for details). B: Simulated extent of Green Bay lobe from 65 to 18 ka, driven by temperatures shown in A. No sliding is allowed. Runs feature no calving or morainal-bank growth (dashed line), calving only (dotted line), and calving with morainal-bank growth (solid line). Gray shading shows extent of Lake Superior. C: Simulated extent of Green Bay lobe (GBL, solid line), Lake Michigan lobe (LML, dotted line), and Langlade lobe (LL, dashed line) from 65 to 18 ka, with sliding. D: Profiles of Green Bay lobe (solid line), Lake Michigan lobe (dotted line), and Langlade lobe (dashed line) at their maximum extent. Triangles show position of actual Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) moraines
Published: 01 November 2001
Figure 2. A: Estimated air temperature at Madison, Wisconsin, from 65 to 18 ka (see text for details). B: Simulated extent of Green Bay lobe from 65 to 18 ka, driven by temperatures shown in A. No sliding is allowed. Runs feature no calving or morainal-bank growth (dashed line), calving only
Image
Figure 2. (A) High-resolution seismic reflection and sidescan swath imagery track lines used to map landslides and structures in Lake Washington. Stippled patterns show exposures of Tertiary volcanic and sedimentary units mapped by Yount et al. (1993). (B) Location map of high-resolution profiles to west of Mercer Island (A–A′, Fig. 4); north of Mercer Island (B–B′, C–C′, Figs. 5 and 6); Andrews Bay (D–D′, Fig. 7); Madison Park (E–E′, Fig. 8); northern sunken forest (F–F′, Fig. 9); and Wolf Bay (G–G′, Fig. 12). Locations of four strands of Seattle fault identified by Johnson et al. (1999) are shown as dashed lines and labeled in italics
Published: 01 January 2004
to west of Mercer Island (A–A′, Fig. 4 ); north of Mercer Island (B–B′, C–C′, Figs. 5 and 6 ); Andrews Bay (D–D′, Fig. 7 ); Madison Park (E–E′, Fig. 8 ); northern sunken forest (F–F′, Fig. 9 ); and Wolf Bay (G–G′, Fig. 12 ). Locations of four strands of Seattle fault identified by Johnson et al
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 November 2011
The Leading Edge (2011) 30 (11): 1242–1252.
... of three study areas and shallow cores from coastal areas. Individual samples, core, or outcrops were measured for the three study areas and nine cores from Madison Bay. Nine cores for Chesapeake Bay were measured by a downhole logging tool. Pink shading highlights the general range of typical...
FIGURES | View All (8)