ABSTRACT The geometry of the Middle Jurassic Yerington Batholith has been reconstructed by removing the effects of Ceno-zoic normal faulting, which has exposed a cross section of the batholith from less than 1 to more than 6 kilometers paleodepth. The batholith is a composite pluton approximately 15 kilometers in diameter and extends at least 6 and possibly 8 to 9 kilometers in vertical dimension. Total volume of the batholith exceeds 1,000 cubic kilometers. It was emplaced into a Triassic-Jurassic volcanic and sedimentary rock sequence by bulk assimilation and ductile deformation of wallrocks. The roof is at approximately 1 kilometer depth and is formed by cogenetic volcanic sequences. The upper mineralized portion of the batholith and its roof are preserved because the batholith has dropped down more than 2.5 kilometers along steeply dipping faults. Porphyry copper and copper skarn mineralization are spatially and temporally associated with emplacement of granite porphyry dikes that are cogenetic with and grade downward into the Luhr Hill Granite. This youngest phase of the batholith is estimated to be about 65 cubic kilometers in volume and was emplaced into the center of the batholith, largely at depths of 5 to 9 (?) kilometers. The Luhr Hill Granite has low copper content (10 ppm) and copper-zinc ratio (0.25) relative to the early and voluminous McLeod Hill Quartz Monzodiorite phase of the batholith (60 ppm copper and copper-zinc ratio of 1). Zinc decreases with differentiation and increasing silica content in the batholith and thus behaves compatibly, whereas copper content does not vary significantly with differentiation except for its sharp decrease in the Luhr Hill Granite. Whole rock chemical variations are consistent with low contents of copper (less than 150 ppm) and significant contents of zinc (about 350-800 ppm) in biotite, one of the early crystallizing and fractionating phases. Application of the theoretical model of Cline and Bodnar (1991) for crystallization of granite at 2 kilobars pressure indicates that hypersaline magmatic ore fluids would have separated late during crystallization and extracted most copper but less than 25 percent of zinc from the magma; zinc would have been sequestered in earlier-crystallized biotite. The fluids from the Luhr Hill Granite apparently migrated from 5 to 9 kilometers depth upward into granite cupolas at 4 to 5 kilometers depth, where they caused hydrofracturing leading to emplacement of granite porphyry dikes along which fluids continued to move upward and outward from the cupolas. The dominance of copper sulfide and lack of zinc sulfide in the Yerington District is consistent with mineralization caused by magmatic ore fluids rich in copper and sulfur but poor in zinc. Metal zoning from inner porphyry copper with or without molybdenum to intermediate skarn copper to outer replacement/skarn copper-iron and vein copper-gold is generally consistent with declining temperature of magmatic hydrothermal fluids, but magnetite-rich iron-replacement ores poor in sulfide may be derived in part from non-magmatic fluids that stripped iron during sodic-calcic alteration of the batholith. Exploration criteria for porphyry copper deposits following the Yerington model should focus on shallowly’ emplaced batholiths with a late and relatively deep granite phase depleted in copper and having a low copper-zinc ratio.

Abstract The Yerington district, Nevada, hosts at least four porphyry copper deposits and several small Fe oxide-copper-gold lodes within a middle Jurassic batholith and its volcanic cover. The contact aureole of the batholith contains early garnet-pyroxene hornfels and endoskarn, later copper-bearing andradite skarn deposits, and latest-stage large Fe oxide-copper-gold replacement deposits. The Jurassic host rocks have been faulted and tilted 60° to 90° W by Cenozoic normal faulting ( Proffett, 1977 ) so that the modern exposures represent cross sections of a complex paleohydrothermal system from the volcanic environment to about 7 km depth. This paper summarizes field, petrologic, and geochemical data that support the origin of hydrothermal wall-rock alteration and ore deposition due to two different types of fluids. Magmatic brines were derived from the crystallization of the youngest equigranular intrusion of the Yerington batholith, the Luhr Hill granite. Brines separated from the granite and were emplaced upward together with granite porphyry dikes to produce copper-iron sulfdes and associated K silicate alteration in the porphyry copper deposits and copper skarns. In the upper part of the hydrothermal system, magmatic fluids are an important source of acids and sulfur that produced sericitic and advanced argillic alteration. A second type of ore fluid is brine derived from formation waters trapped in the Triassic-Jurassic sedimentary section intruded by the batholith. These fluids were heated by the batholith and circulated through its crystalline parts. Hornfels and endoskarn were produced along the contact of an early intrusion. Following intrusion of the porphyry dikes, sedimentary brines circulated up to 3 km into the batholith and upon heating produced sodic-calcic alteration there. Ascent of these brines, particularly after the waning of magmatic fluid input, may have caused shallow-level chlorite-dominated alteration in igneous host rocks and Fe oxide-Cu-Au lodes and replacement deposits in the batholith and its contact aureole, respectively.

THE PURPOSE of this one-day tour is to examine time-space relationships of hydrothermal alteration features and associated porphyry Cu(Mo) and Cu-Fe-Au mineralization, and the relationship of these hydrothermal features to the magmatic history of the Yerington batholith. The batholith exposures we will examine represent an intermediate between the Birch Creek and Buena Vista end members. At Yerington, mag-matic brines were essential to formation of porphyry Cu(Mo) deposits, but at the same time a huge hydrothermal system driven by the batholithic heat was dominated by sedimentary brines and produced Fe oxide-Cu-Au ores distal to the porphyry centers. It will be advantageous to read the papers in this guidebook by Dilles and Proffett (1995) and Dilles et al. (2000) that provide summaries of the magmatic and hy-drothermal histories, respectively, of the Yerington batholith. The descriptions and maps below are lengthy because of the complexity of the exposures and large size of the intrusion-related hydrothermal system. This tour can be accomplished in a leisurely fashion in two days, but can be done in one. There are two short hikes and nine roadside stops.