1-20 OF 830 RESULTS FOR

Lower Rhine Graben

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 24 January 2017
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (2): 563–580.
.... The Lower Rhine graben in the border region of Germany, The Netherlands, and Belgium provides a unique opportunity to explore Quaternary slip‐rate variations in a region of low strain using the basal ( 2.29 ± 0.29 Ma ) and surface ( 700 ± 80 ka ) contacts of the regionally extensive main terrace...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2017
DOI: 10.1144/SP432.11
EISBN: 9781862399648
... Abstract The Lower Rhine Graben (Central Europe) is a prime example of a seismically active low-strain rift zone characterized by pronounced anthropogenic and climatic overprint of structures, and long recurrence intervals of large earthquakes. These factors render the identification of active...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2013
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2013) 103 (2A): 984–1007.
...Kris Vanneste; Thierry Camelbeeck; Koen Verbeeck Abstract The Lower Rhine Graben ( LRG ) straddling the border zone of Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany, is an active tectonic structure in continental northwest Europe. It is characterized by northwest–southeast oriented normal faults...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Image
Map of the southern Lower Rhine graben. (a) Quaternary fault traces, mapped at a scale of 1:15,000 using geomorphology visible in a light detection and ranging (lidar)‐derived 1‐m bare‐earth digital terrain model (Geodatenzentrum Nordrhein‐Westfalen) and previous work (Ahorner, 1962; Knapp et al., 1978; Zitzmann, 1984, 2002; Burghardt, 1987; Nordrhein‐Westfalen, 2003; Vanneste et al., 2013). (b) Simplified distribution of primary Quaternary terrace surfaces, including the main, middle, and lower terraces. The focus of this study is the regionally extensive main terrace, in which the Quaternary fault traces are concentrated. The fault and lineament mapping, along with the confidence level information, is included as a KML file in the Ⓔ electronic supplement to this article..The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 24 January 2017
Figure 3. Map of the southern Lower Rhine graben. (a) Quaternary fault traces, mapped at a scale of 1:15,000 using geomorphology visible in a light detection and ranging (lidar)‐derived 1‐m bare‐earth digital terrain model (Geodatenzentrum Nordrhein‐Westfalen) and previous work ( Ahorner, 1962
Image
(a) Location of the Lower Rhine graben in the context of the European Cenozoic rift system. URG, Upper Rhine graben; HG, Hessian graben. (b) Simplified map of Quaternary normal faults in the Lower Rhine graben, compiled from Ahorner (1962) and Vanneste et al. (2013), and mapping from this study.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 24 January 2017
Figure 1. (a) Location of the Lower Rhine graben in the context of the European Cenozoic rift system. URG, Upper Rhine graben; HG, Hessian graben. (b) Simplified map of Quaternary normal faults in the Lower Rhine graben, compiled from Ahorner (1962) and Vanneste et al. (2013) , and mapping
Image
Location of the Lower Rhine Graben in the European Cenozoic Rift System. BG, Bresse Graben; DCG, Dutch Central Graben; EG, Eger Graben; HG, Hessian Graben; LG, Limagne Graben; LRG, Lower Rhine Graben; URG, Upper Rhine Graben; WNB, West Netherlands Basin. Modified from Dèzes et al. (2004). The dashed rectangle corresponds to the map in Figure 2. Outline of DCG in the North Sea corresponds to the 2000‐m contour line of the Cenozoic isopach map of Ziegler (1990). Faults in the North Sea are after Van Adrichem Boogaert and Kouwe (1993). Circles represent epicenters of earthquakes with magnitude Mw≥5.0 from the CENEC catalog (Grünthal et al., 2009).
Published: 01 April 2013
Figure 1. Location of the Lower Rhine Graben in the European Cenozoic Rift System. BG, Bresse Graben; DCG, Dutch Central Graben; EG, Eger Graben; HG, Hessian Graben; LG, Limagne Graben; LRG , Lower Rhine Graben; URG, Upper Rhine Graben; WNB, West Netherlands Basin. Modified from Dèzes et al
Image
Overview map of the Cenozoic volcanic fields in NW Germany. From west to east: West Eifel Volcanic Field, Hocheifel, East Eifel Volcanic Field (including Lacher See volcano), Westerwald and Volgelsberg; Siebengebirge is located north of the East Eifel Volcanic Field. The uplifted Paleozoic rocks of the Rhenish Massif are shown along with the adjacent parts of the Upper Rhine Graben and the Lower Rhine Graben as part of the Central European Cenozoic rift system. Geology modified after Pawlewicz et al. (2002); hillshade derived from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 3 arcsec digital elevation model (NASA JPL 2018), Albers Equal Area Conic Europe, European Datum 1950, geographic grid in WGS84. EEVF, East Eifel Volcanic Field; LRG, Lower Rhine Graben; NB, Neuwied Basin; URG, Upper Rhine Graben; WEVF, West Eifel Volcanic Field.
Published: 19 October 2022
Paleozoic rocks of the Rhenish Massif are shown along with the adjacent parts of the Upper Rhine Graben and the Lower Rhine Graben as part of the Central European Cenozoic rift system. Geology modified after Pawlewicz et al. (2002) ; hillshade derived from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 3
Image
Map showing major eruptive centers of Quaternary West and East Eifel Volcanic Fields and study sites (after Mertes, 1983). Inset: Rhine Graben rift system (light gray shading) and location of Tertiary and Quaternary volcanism (black). Dark gray shading represents Rhenish massif, which forms part of Hercynian orogeny (after Ziegler et al., 2004). URG—Upper Rhine Graben; LRG—Lower Rhine Graben; NL— Netherlands; L—Luxembourg.
Published: 01 December 2011
forms part of Hercynian orogeny (after Ziegler et al., 2004 ). URG—Upper Rhine Graben; LRG—Lower Rhine Graben; NL— Netherlands; L—Luxembourg.
Image
Geology of the Kaiserstuhl volcanic complex: (A) position of the Kaiserstuhl volcanic complex in the European Cenozoic rift system (adapted after Dèzes et al., 2004); (B) slope-dip analysis of the Kaiserstuhl volcanic complex based on light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data (source: Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landentwicklung of Baden-Württemberg [Baden-Württemberg State Office of Geoinformation and Land-development]); and (C) simplified geological map of the Kaiserstuhl (adapted after Wimmenauer and Schreiner, 2003; field observations and mapping [this study]). BF—Black Forest; BG—Bresse graben; HG—Hessian graben; LG—Limagne graben; LRG—Lower Rhine graben; URG—Upper Rhine graben; VG—Vosges.
Published: 06 October 2023
; BG—Bresse graben; HG—Hessian graben; LG—Limagne graben; LRG—Lower Rhine graben; URG—Upper Rhine graben; VG—Vosges.
Image
(a) Comparison of slip rates calculated using the new main terrace surface offset measurements (this study) to previous values reported by Vanneste et al. (2013) for selected faults in the southern Lower Rhine graben. The new slip rates (since 700 ka) are generally higher than those previously reported for the graben‐bounding faults. However, most slip rates overlap within uncertainty. Calculation details are contained in Table 1. (b) Measurement locations along mapped fault traces used in this study for the slip‐rate calculations.
Published: 24 January 2017
Figure 13. (a) Comparison of slip rates calculated using the new main terrace surface offset measurements (this study) to previous values reported by Vanneste et al. (2013) for selected faults in the southern Lower Rhine graben. The new slip rates (since 700 ka) are generally higher than
Image
Published: 01 January 2014
Southwest edge of Humber Basin (half‐graben) Within 60 km 5 Roermond Netherlands 1992/04/13 M w  5.3 ∼17 Lower Rhine Graben At ∼70  km, toward the north 6 Aachen (Aix) West Germany 1755/12/27 MSK VI–VII Unknown Lower Rhine Graben Within about 145 km 7 Düren West Germany 1756
Image
Published: 01 January 2014
Southwest edge of Humber Basin (half‐graben) Within 60 km 5 Roermond Netherlands 1992/04/13 M w  5.3 ∼17 Lower Rhine Graben At ∼70  km, toward the north 6 Aachen (Aix) West Germany 1755/12/27 MSK VI–VII Unknown Lower Rhine Graben Within about 145 km 7 Düren West Germany 1756
Image
Published: 01 January 2014
Southwest edge of Humber Basin (half‐graben) Within 60 km 5 Roermond Netherlands 1992/04/13 M w  5.3 ∼17 Lower Rhine Graben At ∼70  km, toward the north 6 Aachen (Aix) West Germany 1755/12/27 MSK VI–VII Unknown Lower Rhine Graben Within about 145 km 7 Düren West Germany 1756
Image
Published: 01 January 2014
Southwest edge of Humber Basin (half‐graben) Within 60 km 5 Roermond Netherlands 1992/04/13 M w  5.3 ∼17 Lower Rhine Graben At ∼70  km, toward the north 6 Aachen (Aix) West Germany 1755/12/27 MSK VI–VII Unknown Lower Rhine Graben Within about 145 km 7 Düren West Germany 1756
Image
(a) Graphical illustration of three options for calculating slip rate from the offset main terrace surface and basal contact: (1) 700 ka to present, calculated using the displacement and age of the main terrace surface; (2) 2.3 Ma–700 ka, calculated from the difference in recorded displacement between the surface and basal contacts of the main terrace and the intervening time interval (1590 kyr); (3) slip rate from 2.3 Ma to present, calculated using the displacement and age of the main terrace basal contact. Option 3 was largely used by Vanneste et al. (2013) in their synthesis of slip‐rate information for the southern Lower Rhine graben. Histogram plots, showing the distribution of slip rates: (b) 700 ka to present, (c) 2.3 Ma–700 ka, and (d) 2.3 Ma to present.
Published: 24 January 2017
of slip‐rate information for the southern Lower Rhine graben. Histogram plots, showing the distribution of slip rates: (b) 700 ka to present, (c) 2.3 Ma–700 ka, and (d) 2.3 Ma to present.
Image
Schematic state of stress in France from published focal mechanism inversions. Thick dashed lines with inward-pointing arrows indicate the general direction of maximum horizontal compressive stress for Western Europe (e.g., Heidbach et al., 2018). Small bars show the orientations of maximum horizontal compressive stress from published regional focal mechanism inversions, with the deformation regime indicated in color: green = strike slip, blue = extension, red = shortening. Numbers indicate the reference for the nearest stress indicator: 1 – Baroux et al. (2001); 2 – Mazabraud et al. (2005); 3 – Rigo et al. (2015); 4 – Sue et al., (1999); 5 – Eva et al. (1997); 6 – Delouis et al. (1993); 7 – Hinzen (2003); 8 – Plenefisch and Bonjer (1997); 9 – Rabin et al. (2018). URG and LRG: Upper and Lower Rhine Graben.
Published: 23 March 2021
et al. (2005) ; 3 – Rigo et al. (2015) ; 4 – Sue et al. , (1999) ; 5 – Eva et al. (1997) ; 6 – Delouis et al. (1993) ; 7 – Hinzen (2003) ; 8 – Plenefisch and Bonjer (1997) ; 9 – Rabin et al. (2018) . URG and LRG: Upper and Lower Rhine Graben.
Image
End‐member models of fluvial terrace deposition, erosion, and faulting, with time proceeding from the start of the Quaternary in the upper panels to present day in the lower panels. The lowest panels depict temporal history and percent faulting. (a) Scenario 1: Pre‐existing scarp, implying that the displacement recorded by the basal contact of the main terrace is purely apparent. (b) Scenario 2: Apparent displacements provide an accurate record of faulting. This model is troubled by its requirement of no footwall erosion prior to deposition of the upper main terrace sediments around 700 ka. (c) Scenario 3: Footwall erosion such that the apparent displacement of the main terrace basal contact is less than the true displacement. We propose that some intermediate version of these scenarios, especially the existence of small pre‐existing scarps (scenario 1) and footwall erosion (scenario 3), most likely captures the true history of the Lower Rhine graben. Poor constraints on the magnitude of these sources of epistemic uncertainty limit the utility of the main terrace basal contact for reconstructing Quaternary slip records using this marker. An additional scenario (scenario 4) is presented in Ⓔ Figure S1, where all Quaternary faulting is concentrated in the interval from 2.3 Ma to 700 ka. This scenario is invalid, based on regional mapping and paleoseismic trenching studies. In all of the scenarios, deposition of the older main terrace gravels from 2.3 Ma to 700 ka was likely episodic and, at least in part, correlated with global climatic variations.
Published: 24 January 2017
(scenario 3), most likely captures the true history of the Lower Rhine graben. Poor constraints on the magnitude of these sources of epistemic uncertainty limit the utility of the main terrace basal contact for reconstructing Quaternary slip records using this marker. An additional scenario (scenario 4
Published: 01 January 2007
DOI: 10.1130/2007.2425(14)
... on strong historical earthquakes and on the Quaternary faults in the Lower Rhine Embayment. Two regional examples, the north of France and the Roer graben, explain how we define seismogenic sources and capable faults. In section 2.3, we discuss the arguments supporting the occurrence of large earthquakes...
Image
A structural map of the European Cenozoic Rift System. At its northern end the Upper Rhine Graben bifurcates into the Hessen and Leine grabens to the NE, and the Lower Rhine Basin in the NW (Rhenish Triple Junction in the area of Frankfurt; after Schumacher, 2002; Sissingh, 2003; Rasser et al.2008).
Published: 23 November 2016
Figure 1. A structural map of the European Cenozoic Rift System. At its northern end the Upper Rhine Graben bifurcates into the Hessen and Leine grabens to the NE, and the Lower Rhine Basin in the NW (Rhenish Triple Junction in the area of Frankfurt; after Schumacher, 2002 ; Sissingh, 2003
Image
Map showing the epicenters of 14 training-set earthquakes and 23 intensity centers of test-set earthquakes as triangles and circles, respectively. The symbols are labeled with the year of occurrence of the events. Dashed lines show the state borders. Continuous lines show active faults in the Northern Rhine Area and the rivers Rhine, Mosel, Maas, and Ruhr. The insert shows an overview of the Rhine Graben system in northwest Europe, R.V.G., Roer Valley Graben; L.R.E., Lower Rhine Embayment (after Ziegler, 1982, and Geluk et al., 1994).
Published: 01 February 2001
in the Northern Rhine Area and the rivers Rhine, Mosel, Maas, and Ruhr. The insert shows an overview of the Rhine Graben system in northwest Europe, R.V.G., Roer Valley Graben; L.R.E., Lower Rhine Embayment (after Ziegler, 1982 , and Geluk et al., 1994 ).