1-20 OF 515 RESULTS FOR

Long Beach earthquake, 1933

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 14 June 2023
The Seismic Record (2023) 3 (2): 171–181.
... studies. The year 2023 marked the ninetieth anniversary of the 11 March 1933 Long Beach, California, earthquake. This anniversary provided the impetus to update ANSS products, drawing on archived and published data. Here, we describe the updated ShakeMap, shaking recordings and intensities...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Modern Products for a Vintage Event: An Update on ...
Second thumbnail for: Modern Products for a Vintage Event: An Update on ...
Third thumbnail for: Modern Products for a Vintage Event: An Update on ...
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2012
Earthquake Spectra (2012) 28 (1): 347–365.
...Jennifer Swift; John Wilson; Toan Nguyen Le The temporal variation of damage and loss estimates are presented in decadal increments since 1950 for an earthquake on the Newport-Inglewood Fault (NIF) equivalent to the M w 6.4 1933 Long Beach earthquake. Deterministic damage and loss calculations were...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Estimated Temporal Variation of Losses Due to a Re...
Second thumbnail for: Estimated Temporal Variation of Losses Due to a Re...
Third thumbnail for: Estimated Temporal Variation of Losses Due to a Re...
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 1991
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1991) 81 (1): 81–98.
...Egill Hauksson; Susanna Gross Abstract Regional seismographic network and teleseismic data for the 1933 ( M L = 6.3) Long Beach earthquake sequence have been analyzed. Both the teleseismic focal mechanism of the main shock and the distribution of the aftershocks are consistent with the event having...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1976
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1976) 66 (3): 1001–1005.
... , Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 28 , 77 - 84 . Eaton J. E. (1933) . Long Beach, California earthquake of March 10, 1933 , Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 17 , 732 - 740 . Martel R. R...
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 1941
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1941) 31 (1): 9–12.
...A. C. Du Ree FIRE-DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS DURING THE LONG BEACH EARTHQUAKE OF 1933" By A. C. Du RE~, TmR~Y YEA~Sago today, I came to California with my parents. We terminated our westward migration at Stockton on that date. Five days later, April 18, we were awakened by what I thought the most...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1933
AAPG Bulletin (1933) 17 (6): 732–738.
... that the epicenters of the Long Beach earthquake aftershocks varied from 5 to 10 miles along the strike of the shear zone. The after-shocks of the Great Basin earthquake seem, by their merely local significance, to reveal secondary adjustment along secondary surface fractures. The Long Beach earthquake after...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: <span class="search-highlight">Long</span> <span c...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1933
Seismological Research Letters (1933) 5 (1-2): 273–284.
...A. C. Chick * Engineer, Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Providence, Rhode Island; Junior Member, Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng. © 1933 by the Seismological Society of America 1933 ...
Image
Damage to wood-framed building, 1933 Long Beach earthquake (photo from USGS).
Published: 01 May 2011
Figure 1. Damage to wood-framed building, 1933 Long Beach earthquake (photo from USGS).
Image
The 10 March 1933 Long Beach earthquake. (a) mmi intensity assignments (circles), epicenter (red star), and intensity center IC (red triangle) are relative to Jenning’s (1994) active faults (black lines). The contours of MI (dashed red lines) are the best estimates of M from the mmi assignments for assumed epicenters on that contour. The rms [MI] contours corresponding to the 67% (innermost contour) and 95% confidence contours (outermost contour) for location (Bakun and Wentworth, 1999) are shown as solid green lines. (b) 1000 intensity centers (circles) obtained by bootstrap resampling of the intensity assignments. The outermost red contour and innermost red contour are the rms [MI] contours that contain 95% and 67% of the bootstrap intensity centers, respectively. (c) is b with empirical site corrections applied.
Published: 01 August 2006
Figure 5. The 10 March 1933 Long Beach earthquake. (a) mmi intensity assignments (circles), epicenter (red star), and intensity center IC (red triangle) are relative to Jenning’s (1994) active faults (black lines). The contours of M I (dashed red lines) are the best estimates of M from
Image
Jefferson Junior High School following the Long Beach earthquake of 1933. Courtesy of the Portland Cement Association.
Published: 01 January 2003
Figure 1. Jefferson Junior High School following the Long Beach earthquake of 1933. Courtesy of the Portland Cement Association.
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 1983
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (1983) xx (1): 9–94.
... for these potential constraints can only be generalized with the present data base. Most mitigation measures take the form of proper land-use planning and sound engineering design. Long Beach is located in an area of known historic seismicity. The 1933 Long Beach earthquake (M = 6.3), which occurred offshore Newport...
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 1983
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1983) 73 (4): 953–978.
...Apostolos S. Papageorgiou; Keiiti Aki abstract The specific barrier model, which was described in detail by Papageorgiou and Aki (1983), is applied to a set of five moderate to strong Californian earthquakes: Kern County (1952); San Fernando (1971); Borrego Mountain (1968); Long Beach (1933...
Journal Article
Published: 12 April 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (4): 1941–1965.
... Angeles and poses one of the greatest deterministic seismic hazards in the United States ( California Division of Mines and Geology, 1988 ). Part of the NIF sourced the 1933 M 6.4 Long Beach earthquake, which claimed ∼120 lives and remains one of the deadliest events in California history ( Barrows, 1974...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: 3D Geometry and Slip Distribution in the <span cla...
Second thumbnail for: 3D Geometry and Slip Distribution in the <span cla...
Third thumbnail for: 3D Geometry and Slip Distribution in the <span cla...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1933
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1933) 23 (2): 43–56.
...Harry O. Wood Summary The “Long Beach Earthquake” occurred on March 10, 1933, at 5:54:08 p.m., P.S.T. , very nearly. Its origin was very near to 33° 34′.5 north latitude, 117° 59′ west longitude, at a depth of about ten kilometers (6 miles). Previous shocks, emanating from sources not far distant...
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2016
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2016) 106 (6): 2419–2435.
... June 1920 Inglewood and 8 July 1929 Whittier earthquakes. We further consider whether the 1933 M w 6.4 Long Beach earthquake might have been induced, and show some evidence that points to a causative relationship between the earthquake and activities in the Huntington Beach oil field. The hypothesis...
Book Chapter

Author(s)
Hugo Benioff
Series: GSA Special Papers
Published: 01 January 1955
DOI: 10.1130/SPE62-p61
... The elastic-strain rebound characteristic of the aftershock sequence of the Kern County, California, earthquake of July 21, 1952, was of the dual type first observed in the Long Beach earthquake of 1933. Availability of precise epicenters for this sequence brought to light the fact that the two...
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2003
Earthquake Spectra (2003) 19 (1): 111–131.
.... The foundation for its enactment a month after the 10 March 1933 Long Beach earthquake was laid earlier by the 29 June 1925 Santa Barbara earthquake, the Dam Act of 1929, the drafting of a proposed Building Code for California , the formation of the Structural Engineers Association of California, and general...
Image
The Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) loss estimates calculated (this study) for a repeat of the 1933 Long Beach earthquake with current (2023) exposure models (Earle and Wald, 2007; Jaiswal and Wald, 2010).
Published: 14 June 2023
Figure 4. The Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) loss estimates calculated (this study) for a repeat of the 1933 Long Beach earthquake with current (2023) exposure models ( Earle and Wald, 2007 ; Jaiswal and Wald, 2010 ).
Image
(a) Map showing study area, including locations of independent ML ≥ 4 earthquakes between 1935 and 1944 and location of 1933 ML 6.4 Long Beach earthquake (circles with event magnitudes indicated) and between 1945 and 31 December 2016 (black stars) (Hough and Bilham, 2017). Circled black star indicates our preferred location of the 20 October 1961 M 4.0 event (preceded by an M 4.6 to the east of this figure; see text). Mapped extent of zones of oil production in 1930 (darker gray shading) and in the present time (light gray shading) are shown. Parameters for these earthquakes are listed in Table 1 (also see Figure 4). Regional faults shown, from Jennings, 1994. (b) Timeline of MW ≥ 4 earthquakes, including presumed aftershocks of the 1933 Long Beach earthquake that occurred within the inset area (dashed box) shown in Figure 1a.
Published: 01 February 2018
Figure 1. (a) Map showing study area, including locations of independent M L ≥ 4 earthquakes between 1935 and 1944 and location of 1933 M L 6.4 Long Beach earthquake (circles with event magnitudes indicated) and between 1945 and 31 December 2016 (black stars) ( Hough and Bilham, 2017 ). Circled
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 February 2018
The Leading Edge (2018) 37 (2): 108–116.
...Figure 1. (a) Map showing study area, including locations of independent M L ≥ 4 earthquakes between 1935 and 1944 and location of 1933 M L 6.4 Long Beach earthquake (circles with event magnitudes indicated) and between 1945 and 31 December 2016 (black stars) ( Hough and Bilham, 2017 ). Circled...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Poroelastic stress changes associated with primary...
Second thumbnail for: Poroelastic stress changes associated with primary...
Third thumbnail for: Poroelastic stress changes associated with primary...