1-20 OF 356 RESULTS FOR

Lone Pine Fault

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Save search
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article

Late Quaternary activity along the Lone Pine fault, eastern California

LESTER K.C. LUBETKIN, MALCOLM M. CLARK
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1988
GSA Bulletin (1988) 100 (5): 755–766.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1988)100<0755:LQAATL>2.3.CO;2
...LESTER K.C. LUBETKIN; MALCOLM M. CLARK Abstract The Lone Pine fault is a north-trending secondary break of the Owens Valley fault zone, 1.4 km west of Lone Pine, California. This fault forms an east-facing scarp as much as 6.5 m high across an abandoned outwash fan of the Tioga (latest Pleistocene...
PDF
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager
Journal Article

A 25,000-year record of earthquakes on the Owens Valley fault near Lone Pine, California: Implications for recurrence intervals, slip rates, and segmentation models

Steven N. Bacon, Silvio K. Pezzopane
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2007
GSA Bulletin (2007) 119 (7-8): 823–847.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/B25879.1
...Steven N. Bacon; Silvio K. Pezzopane Abstract Seven trenches in eastern California across the Owens Valley fault near Lone Pine expose two episodes of faulting since early Holocene time in the form of ∼1 m throw in lacustrine beds with liquefaction that were buried and then faulted again ∼1 m...
FIGURES | View All (10)
PDF
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager
Book Chapter

Late Quaternary fault scarp at Lone Pine, California; Location of oblique slip during the great 1872 earthquake and earlier earthquakes

Author(s)
Lester K. C. Lubetkin, Malcolm M. Clark
Book: Cordilleran Section of the Geological Society of America
Series: DNAG, Centennial Field Guides
Publisher: Geological Society of America
Published: 01 January 1987
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-5401-1.151
EISBN: 9780813754079
... Abstract To reach this site, drive west on Whitney Portal Road about 0.7 mi (1.2 km) from U.S. Highway 395 in the center of Lone Pine (Fig. 1). About 0.15 mi (0.2 km) west of the Los Angeles Aqueduct, park in the pavedarea northof the road. Walk north and then northeast about 0.3 mi (0.5 km...
Abstract
PDF
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager

Abstract To reach this site, drive west on Whitney Portal Road about 0.7 mi (1.2 km) from U.S. Highway 395 in the center of Lone Pine (Fig. 1). About 0.15 mi (0.2 km) west of the Los Angeles Aqueduct, park in the pavedarea northof the road. Walk north and then northeast about 0.3 mi (0.5 km) along the dirt roads that lead to the area just east of the main scarp.

Image
(a) Map views of the Lost River <span class="search-highlight">fault</span> segments and <span class="search-highlight">Lone</span> <span class="search-highlight">Pine</span> <span class="search-highlight">fault</span>, Idaho, ...

(a) Map views of the Lost River fault segments and Lone Pine fault, Idaho, ...

Published: 01 June 2004
Figure 11. (a) Map views of the Lost River fault segments and Lone Pine fault, Idaho, and the Monument Hill and Red Rock faults, Montana (see Fig. 1 for locations). (b) Schematic of conjugate normal fault geometries shown as ideal elliptical fault surfaces. Numbers indicate position
Journal Article

Stress Triggering of Conjugate Normal Faulting: Late Aftershocks of the 1983 M s 7.3 Borah Peak, Idaho, Earthquake

Suzette J. Payne, James E. Zollweg, David W. Rodgers
Published: 01 June 2004
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2004) 94 (3): 828–844.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120030122
...Figure 11. (a) Map views of the Lost River fault segments and Lone Pine fault, Idaho, and the Monument Hill and Red Rock faults, Montana (see Fig. 1 for locations). (b) Schematic of conjugate normal fault geometries shown as ideal elliptical fault surfaces. Numbers indicate position...
FIGURES | View All (11)
PDF
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager
Journal Article

Late Quaternary slip rates along the Sierra Nevada frontal fault zone, California: Slip partitioning across the western margin of the Eastern California Shear Zone–Basin and Range Province

Kimberly Le, Jeffrey Lee, Lewis A. Owen, Robert Finkel
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 2007
GSA Bulletin (2007) 119 (1-2): 240–256.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/B25960.1
... and geochronologic results indicate that the eastern escarpment of the southern Sierra Nevada has remained tectonically active throughout the late Quaternary. Combining our data with slip data from the Owens Valley and Lone Pine faults implies that slip along the eastern escarpment of the Sierra Nevada block...
FIGURES | View All (13)
PDF
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager
Image
Figure 12. Contours of constant R values (see equation 1 in text) on a ...

Figure 12. Contours of constant R values (see equation 1 in text) on a ...

Published: 01 January 2007
Figure 12. Contours of constant R values (see equation 1 in text) on a plot of fault-dip angle Δ vs. slip azimuth ψ. Given observed values of Δ and ψ on the Owens Valley fault, Lone Pine fault, and Sierra Nevada frontal fault zone (Table 6) , R for the Owens Valley and Lone Pine faults
Image
Plot of the number of earthquakes along the Challis Segment and <span class="search-highlight">Lone</span> <span class="search-highlight">Pine</span> f...

Plot of the number of earthquakes along the Challis Segment and Lone Pine f...

Published: 01 June 2004
Figure 10. Plot of the number of earthquakes along the Challis Segment and Lone Pine fault versus time for 237 aftershocks. The number of earthquakes along the Challis segment decreases after the 8 September 1984 M L 5.0 event on the Lone Pine fault.
Image
Map showing the location of the temporary seismic stations (black triangles...

Map showing the location of the temporary seismic stations (black triangles...

Published: 01 June 2004
of the ellipse). Hypocenters associated with the Challis Segment are shown as red circles, and those associated with the Lone Pine fault are shown as blue circles. Cross sections AA′ and CC′ are perpendicular to the N39°W strike of the Lone Pine fault, and A′A″ is perpendicular to the N25°W strike of the central
Image
Coulomb stress changes due to the 1984 M L 5.8 Devil Canyon earthquake wit...

Coulomb stress changes due to the 1984 M L 5.8 Devil Canyon earthquake wit...

Published: 01 June 2004
are computed for the orientation of the Lone Pine fault with strike N39°W, dip 58°NE, and rake –75°. (a) Map view at 7 km depth. Surface fault traces are shown and labels are the same as for Figure 4 . (b) Cross-section view CC′ perpendicular to the Lone Pine fault ( Fig. 4 ).
Image
Lower hemisphere focal mechanisms representing 35 Devil Canyon aftershocks ...

Lower hemisphere focal mechanisms representing 35 Devil Canyon aftershocks ...

Published: 01 June 2004
Figure 6. Lower hemisphere focal mechanisms representing 35 Devil Canyon aftershocks (M c ≥ 1.0) along the Challis segment and Lone Pine fault (compressional quadrants are shaded black). Focal mechanisms are identified by date (year, month, and day) and time (hour and minute in coordinated
Image
Coulomb stress changes due to the 1983 M s 7.3 Borah Peak earthquake and 1...

Coulomb stress changes due to the 1983 M s 7.3 Borah Peak earthquake and 1...

Published: 01 June 2004
, and the position of the Borah Peak mainshock relative to its two fault planes is consistent with the results of Barrientos et al. ( 1987 ). Stress changes are computed for the orientation of the Lone Pine fault with strike N39°W, dip 58°NE, and rake –75°. (a) Map view at 7 km depth. Surface fault traces are shown
Image
Cross sections plotted for Devil Canyon hypocenters (including the M L 5.0...

Cross sections plotted for Devil Canyon hypocenters (including the M L 5.0...

Published: 01 June 2004
) and depth of 12.8 ± 0.7 km (this study). Cross-section locations are shown in Figure 4 . Cross sections: (a) hypocenters associated with the Challis segment (red open circles) along A′A″ and Lone Pine fault (blue open circles) along AA′; (b) hypocenters associated with the Challis segment along BB′; (c
Image
Figure 13. Velocity vector diagram showing predicted motion of the Sierra N...

Figure 13. Velocity vector diagram showing predicted motion of the Sierra N...

Published: 01 January 2007
Figure 13. Velocity vector diagram showing predicted motion of the Sierra Nevada (dashed lines) along the Owens Valley, Lone Pine, and Sierra Nevada frontal faults with respect to a block east of the Owens Valley fault. Vector SN1 shows predicted motion of the Sierra Nevada, assuming that late
Image
Coulomb stress changes due to the 1983 M s 7.3 Borah Peak mainshock withou...

Coulomb stress changes due to the 1983 M s 7.3 Borah Peak mainshock withou...

Published: 01 June 2004
with strike N25°W, dip 75°SW, and rake –56°; (b) 7 km depth for the orientation of the Lone Pine fault with strike N39°W, dip 58°NE, and rake –75°. The Borah Peak mainshock is modeled as two fault planes (black boxes) described in the text, and its position relative to the fault planes is consistent
Journal Article

The Normal‐Faulting 2020 M w 5.8 Lone Pine, Eastern California, Earthquake Sequence

Egill Hauksson, Brian Olson, Alex Grant, Jennifer R. Andrews, Angela I. Chung, Susan E. Hough, Hiroo Kanamori, Sara K. McBride, Andrew J. Michael, Morgan Page, Zachary E. Ross, Deborah E. Smith, Sotiris Valkaniotis
Published: 16 December 2020
Seismological Research Letters (2021) 92 (2A): 679–698.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200324
... shadow ( Harris, 1998 ). The 2020 Lone Pine earthquake sequence is the largest to occur here, since the late nineteenth century, and provides a unique opportunity to better understand faulting and seismotectonics along the Owens Lake segment of the OVFZ, where it almost overlaps with the frontal fault...
FIGURES | View All (12)
PDF
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager
Image
Conceptual model shows the subsurface geometry of the Lost River <span class="search-highlight">fault</span> zone...

Conceptual model shows the subsurface geometry of the Lost River fault zone...

Published: 16 February 2022
Figure 11. Conceptual model shows the subsurface geometry of the Lost River fault zone and Arentson Gulch fault and the conditional failure of the subsidiary Arentson Gulch fault and southernmost Lone Pine fault (LPF; subsurface geometry is not shown for clarity) depending on rupture direction
Image
Figure 3. A: χ 2 misfit vs. slip rate for Owens Valley <span class="search-highlight">fault</span> zone; other p...

Figure 3. A: χ 2 misfit vs. slip rate for Owens Valley fault zone; other p...

Published: 01 January 2003
System data unless noted) and approximate one standard error, with arbitrary vertical location: A— Beanland and Clark (1994) ; B— Lee et al. (2001) , 2.6 ± 0.5 mm/yr, including Lone Pine fault, and increased upper limit (4.4 mm/yr) to account for possible nonuniform recurrence; C–E— McClusky et al. (2001
Image
A) Oblique aerial view of the distal Tuttle fan showing the Alabama Hills ...

A) Oblique aerial view of the distal Tuttle fan showing the Alabama Hills ...

Published: 01 September 2001
Figure 16 A) Oblique aerial view of the distal Tuttle fan showing the Alabama Hills including the upper bedrock knob (k), horseshoe scours (h), Lone Pine Creek (c), and the Pangborne (P) and Lone Pine Creek (L) lobes. Fault scarps cut the Pangborne lobe (shaded, right arrow), whereas abandoned
Image
Schematic cross-section of the study area, showing the Conglomerate Mesa Up...

Schematic cross-section of the study area, showing the Conglomerate Mesa Up...

Published: 16 December 2020
Figure 3 Schematic cross-section of the study area, showing the Conglomerate Mesa Uplift and the Lone Pine and Darwin Basins. First detrital zircon evidence of Cordilleran magmatic arc activity is shown by a zircon symbol in the Reward Conglomerate and Conglomerate Mesa Formation in the Lone Pine