1-20 OF 1144 RESULTS FOR

Livingstone Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 September 1910
Economic Geology (1910) 5 (6): 551–557.
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1965
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1965) 13 (3): 441–447.
... than 400 feet thick. The described section includes strata of the Mississippian Mount Head and Livingstone Formations. GeoRef, Copyright 2004, American Geological Institute. Reference includes data from Bibliography and Index of North American Geology, U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, United...
Image
Depositional texture and composition of the Livingstone Formation (A, B) and middle Opal Member (C–F) at Cougar Creek. A) Pelmatozoan grainstone that is typical of units in the Livingstone Formation that contain physical sedimentary structures (Facies 1–4). B) Pelmatozoan wackestone with a dolomitic lime mud matrix typical of structureless units (Facies 6) in the Livingstone Formation. C) Middle Opal Member SCS grainstone (Facies 2). D) Mud preserved beneath a horizontal fenestrate bryozoan in an SCS grainstone (Facies 2). E) Cross-bedded pelmatozoan–bryozoan grainstone (Facies 1). F) Structureless pelmatozoan–bryozoan grainstone (Facies 6). BF, benthic foraminifera; Bi, bivalve (micrite envelope preserving shape); Br, bryozoan; G, gastropod; P, pelmatozoan; and T, trilobite. Brightness and contrast of the all images were modified to make viewing easier.
Published: 01 August 2016
Fig. 5.— Depositional texture and composition of the Livingstone Formation (A, B) and middle Opal Member (C–F) at Cougar Creek. A) Pelmatozoan grainstone that is typical of units in the Livingstone Formation that contain physical sedimentary structures (Facies 1–4). B) Pelmatozoan wackestone
Image
Published: 01 August 2016
Table 1.— Facies of the Livingstone Formation and middle Opal Member .
Image
Paired field photographs and tracings of the Livingstone Formation facies showing sedimentary structures with representative laminations highlighted. All bedding is structurally inclined; the original vertical up direction is indicated. A) Cross-bedded pelmatozoan grainstone (Facies 1) in the youngest Livingstone Formation section at Cougar Creek. This example contains modern vuggy porosity that accentuates the cross-beds. B) Swaly cross-stratified grainstone (Facies 2) in the middle Livingstone Formation outcrop at Cougar Creek. The darker patches are wet rock, and the thick black bed near the top right is a chert layer. C) Horizontal planar lamination (Facies 4) in the oldest Livingstone Formation section along Cougar Creek. Not all laminations are visible in the image; the most prominent laminations are accentuated by stylolites; the true spacing of the laminations is sub-centimeter. D) Normally graded event beds (Facies 5) in the oldest Livingstone Formation outcrop at Cougar Creek (left) and a slab of a single event bed with normal grading (right) from the same unit. The dark layers in the outcrop photo are styloseams composed of the fine-grained deposits that accumulated between events. In the slab dark patches near the top of the event bed are lime mud lacking pelmatozoans that are interpreted as burrows. The thin dark rock at the left of the slab is one of the fine-grained stylolitized intervals that occur between the individual event beds in outcrop. Scale-bar subdivisions are 2 cm. See Figure 9 for locations of photos.
Published: 01 August 2016
Fig. 6.— Paired field photographs and tracings of the Livingstone Formation facies showing sedimentary structures with representative laminations highlighted. All bedding is structurally inclined; the original vertical up direction is indicated. A) Cross-bedded pelmatozoan grainstone (Facies 1
Image
Simplified measured sections for Livingstone Formation outcrops at Cougar Creek and Three Lakes Valley. Sections show the correspondence between lithology (section profile and color) and sedimentary structures. Rose diagrams and approximate paleocurrent directions for individual units of Facies 1 are shown beside the measured sections. The grain composition is relatively uniform throughout each section, consisting predominantly of pelmatozoan and bryozoan fragments; see text and Supplement 2 for details. The Locations of the images in Figure 6 are shown. M, lime mudstone; W, wackestone; Pk, packstone; Gr, grainstone.
Published: 01 August 2016
Fig. 9.— Simplified measured sections for Livingstone Formation outcrops at Cougar Creek and Three Lakes Valley. Sections show the correspondence between lithology (section profile and color) and sedimentary structures. Rose diagrams and approximate paleocurrent directions for individual units
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1965
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1965) 13 (3): 441–447.
..., (SEPTEMBER, 19651, PP . 441-447 . GEOLOGICAL NOTE A . CORE OF THE MOUNT HEAD AND LIVINGSTONE FORMATIONS . HIGHWOOD RIVER . AREA, ALBEWPAT- GRANT L . T\1EI SEN 2 Department of Water Resource s Edmonton, Alberta During the winter and spring of 1964-65, the Department of Water Resource s drilled some thirty...
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 December 1910
Economic Geology (1910) 5 (8): 741–764.
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 October 1910
Economic Geology (1910) 5 (7): 652–669.
Image
Marker lithologies for (A) Mount Head Formation, (B) Upper Livingstone Formation, (C) “Middle” Livingstone Formation, (D) Lower Livingstone, (E–F) Banff Formation.
Published: 01 January 2016
Figure 3. Marker lithologies for (A) Mount Head Formation, (B) Upper Livingstone Formation, (C) “Middle” Livingstone Formation, (D) Lower Livingstone, (E–F) Banff Formation.
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1970
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1970) 18 (1): 84–103.
..., Livingstone Formation, as recently indicated by lithostratigraphic and macrofaunal studies. Preliminary foraminiferal zonation suggests the following ages: The uppermost Banff Formation is middle Tournaisian, whereas the overlying Pekisko Formation and the lower part of the Livingstone Formation are late...
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1970
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1970) 7 (5): 1308–1316.
... sample from the Livingstone Formation (Osage), echinoderm grains show large Mg variation with a mean of 0.95; sparry calcite cement shows more uniform values with a mean of 0.50. A second, highly recrystallized sample from the Livingstone Formation has echinoderm grains which show large Mg variation...
Series: AAPG Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1958
DOI: 10.1306/SV17349C11
EISBN: 9781629812441
..., these variations being, in part, of economic interest. The Banff formation is Kinderhookian in age. The Rundle formation is raised to group status to include three formations, the Livingstone, Mount Head, and Etherington. The Livingstone formation, of Osagean age, is divided into two members, Pekisko and Turner...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1956
AAPG Bulletin (1956) 40 (2): 418.
... that of the type region at Banff, these variations being, in part, of economic interest. The Banff formation is Kinderhookian in age. The Rundle formation is raised to group status to include two formations, the Livingstone and Mount Head. The Livingstone formation, of Osagian age, is divided into two members...
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 1972
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1972) 9 (7): 767–802.
... Formations. They are generally conspicuous throughout the Banff Formation, scarce in the Livingstone Formation, but are rather abundant in the upper parts of the Pekisko and Shunda Formations, and in the Loomis, Opal, Marston, and Carnarvon Members of the Mount Head Formation.The most favorable facies...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1968
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1968) 16 (3): 225–287.
... the formation contains six members -- the Wileman, Baril, Salter, Loomis, Marston, and Carnarvon (Douglas, 1958) -- which are clearly recognizable from the southern Livingstone Range near Crowsnest Pass to the eastern Fairholme Range in the Bow Valley, north of which they lose their distinctive character...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (7): 947.
... Formation, not the Mississippian Livingstone Formation as previously mapped. The panel of Livingstone rocks west of the heart is stratigraphically up to the east. Based on both stratigraphic and structural considerations, the thrust stack formed in an east-to-west sequential development from rock panels...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1986
GSA Bulletin (1986) 97 (7): 859–868.
... of the Livingston Formation, a volcanic and volcaniclastic assemblage that is conformable with underlying Cretaceous clastic rocks and with the overlying Sphinx Conglomerate. No datable materials were obtained from the Sphinx, but both it and the Livingston were deformed by the Hilgard fault system, a series...
Image
Detailed graphical log combining field data and petrographic observations for the stratigraphically lowest Livingstone Formation section at Cougar Creek. Allochem percentages (number after symbol) are from petrographic data (Supplement 2) where present or from field observations if not. See Supplement 1 for graphical logs of the other Livingstone Formation outcrops. Tr, trace.
Published: 01 August 2016
Fig. 4.— Detailed graphical log combining field data and petrographic observations for the stratigraphically lowest Livingstone Formation section at Cougar Creek. Allochem percentages (number after symbol) are from petrographic data (Supplement 2) where present or from field observations
Image
View south at the core of the Centre Peak anticline, a typical chevron-style thrust-propagation fold in the Livingstone Range anticlinorium. The thin solid lines represent stratigraphic contacts. Stratigraphic units (Cbg, Cbm, Clvtv, Clvtv-b, and Cmh) are described in the legend in Figure 3. The x and x′ mark the top of the Banff Formation that has been offset by approximately 250 m (∼820 ft) by a thrust fault that propagated out of the backlimb of the fold. Thrust faults are represented by thick dashed lines. Cmh = undivided Mount Head Formation; Clvtv = Turner Valley Member of the Livingstone Formation; Clvtv = Brown marker unit within the Turner Valley Member of the Livingstone Formation; Cbm = Banff Formation micrite unit; Cbg = Banff Formation grainstone unit.
Published: 01 November 2011
of the Livingstone Formation; Clvtv = Brown marker unit within the Turner Valley Member of the Livingstone Formation; Cbm = Banff Formation micrite unit; Cbg = Banff Formation grainstone unit.