1-20 OF 42 RESULTS FOR

Lipak Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1983
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1983) 24 (9): 482–483.
...V. J. Gupta Journal Geological Society of India, Vol. 24, Sep. t983 pp. 482 to 485 Early lower carboniferous conodonts from the Lipak Formation of Spiti, Himalaya, India V. J. GUPTA Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India The present note records...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2011
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2011) 78 (3): 263–270.
... with a high textural and compositional maturity. The development of carbonate beds in the upper part of the Muth Formation separates it conformably from the overlying Lipak Formation. A variety of traces were observed throughout the succession, includes: Metaichna, Planolites, Skolithos, vertical...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 1986
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1986) 27 (2): 223–224.
... Universit y, Chandigarh 160014 The note records the occurrence of rugose corals from the basal part of the Lipak Formation exposed in the Baralacba Ban section, about 7 km southeast of Baralacha La (32 °45'30. : 77 c25'30") in tbe Labaul Valley, Himachal Pradesh . The Lipak Formation in the Baralacba Ban...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1986
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1986) 28 (6): 467–472.
... below the contact of the Muth Formation with the Lipak Formation (Ahluwaliaet al, 1983). The Lipak Formation consists of 100 metres thick succession of dark grey, black and pink limestone which at 0016 -7622/86/28-6-467/$1.00 © Geol. Soc. India. 3* 468 V. J. GUPTA FORMATION LITHOLOGY LIPAK '-rrf Grey...
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1987
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1987) 30 (4): 315–316.
... the Muth Quartzite below and Lipak Formation above. The occurrence of Devonian brachiopods (Atrypaaspera Schl., Orthothetes aft". crenistria Phill, and Productella or Strophpiosia sp stromatoporids (Jdiostroma yuiangensis Reed), a simple turbinate cyatbopbyJloid coral and crinoid stems was recorded from...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1990
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1990) 35 (6): 661–664.
... elements in the normally overlying Lipak Formation in the Spiti basin (Hayden, 1904; Bassi, 1990). May I advise Prof. Gupta to kindly read this paper once again. 1t will make clear my stand on Heliolites. 4. The stratigraphic positions of the Gechang and Gungri Members of theKuling Formation are well...
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2004
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2004) 74 (2): 191–202.
... sediments with an overall transgressive trend and a gradational contact to the peritidal deposits of the overlying Lipak Formation (Draganits et al. 2002). The Muth Formation is almost devoid of fossils. Rare fossils with little age information include poorly preserved brachiopods and corals from...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 01 April 2001
PALAIOS (2001) 16 (2): 126–147.
... can be correlated readily due to the laterally extensive architecture of the Formation. Both sections display a distinctive lower boundary with the Pin Formation and a gradual transition into the overlying Lipak Formation. With the exception of a thin horizon of sandy/silty dolomites in the uppermost...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1988
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1988) 32 (3): 227–238.
... marks in end-row are not well preserved and the central marking is in the form of an imperfect' V '. Remarks: These have b{en found in the Muth Formation, exposed about 4.5 km, S 75°W of Leo village along the right flank of the Leo stream. The traces occur approximately 15 m below the Muth-Lipak contact...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1982
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1982) 23 (9): 465–466.
... (Srikantia and Sharma, 1972) and the sulphate basin of the Lipak Formation (Lower Carboniferous) (Srikantia, 1981) in the Tethys belt of the Himalaya as also the evaporite basin of Rajasthan do not find a place in the catalogue or in the discussion. The book gives an insight into many evaporite occurrences...
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 31 March 2023
DOI: 10.1144/SP515-2020-108
EISBN: 9781786205872
... and Ganmachidam formations ( Table 1 ). As the Lipak Formation has a conformable and gradational contact with the underlying Muth Formation, the Muth Formation was also placed in the Kanawar Group ( Bhargava 2008 ). The age of the Kanawar Group ranges from Late Devonian to Permo-Carboniferous. Muth Formation...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1990
Journal of the Geological Society (1990) 147 (6): 989–997.
... thick ?Upper Silurian Kurgiakh Formation is absent from the Phuctal area (Gaetani et al. 1985). An erosional unconformity separates the Karsha Formation from an 800 m thick sequence divided by previous authors into the Thaple, Muth, PO and Lipak Formations. A Devonian to Carboniferous age is generally...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1998
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1998) 51 (6): 777–784.
.... The Haimanta Group in Zanskar consisting of Batal, Kunzum La and Thango Formations is overlain by the Kanawar group (Srikantia et a1. 1978) which is divided into Lipak, Po, and Ganmachidam Formations. Kanwar Group directly overlaps the Thango Formation in most of Zanskar Basin particularly in the NW side...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1969
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1969) 10 (1): 88–94.
... that the Muth Quartzite represents a shallow water marine pevonian succession extending from Kashmir to the western border of Nepal, a distance of 550 miles through the Himalayas. The faunas from Kashmir suggest a Middle Devonian age for the Muth Quartzite; and those from the lower part of the Lipak Formation...
Book Chapter

Series: Text Book
Published: 01 January 2021
DOI: 10.17491/bgsi.2021.9857.06
EISBN: 9789380998572
..., 3. Batal Formation (Haimanta Group), 4. Kunzam La Formation (Haimanta Group), 5. Thango and Takche formations (Sanugba Group), 6. Muth Formation (Kanawar Group), 7. Lipak Formation (Kanawar Group), 8. Po Formation (Kanawar Group), 9. Ganmachidam Formation (Kanawar Group), 10. Kuling Group, l0a...
FIGURES | View All (50)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1989
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1989) 34 (6): 575–586.
... Society of India. These corals and associated fauna were ~aid to "suggest a Tournasian to Lower Visean age for the Lipak Formation" from which they were said to have come. On 14 June 1985, one of us (M.K.) sent Gupta a first draft of conti descriptions and the plates for a joint paper on Late Palaeozoic...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1985
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1985) 26 (12): 880–886.
..., Eastern Lahaul, Himachal Himalaya. 1. Alluvium; 2. Lipak Formation; 3. Muth Formation; 4. Takchc Formation j 5. Thaogo Formation; 6-7. Kunzam La Formation~ 6. Parahio Member, 7. Debsa Khad Member; 8. Batal Formation; 9. Schists and Gneisses; to. Gneisses and Migmatites; 11. Granitoids; 12. T.F: Trace...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1990
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1990) 35 (6): 569–585.
... prima t HIMALAYAN PALAEONTOLOGIe DATABASE POLLUTED From the Bird Spring Formation, Arrow Canyon, southern Nevada: Figs. 9, 10 Gnathodus defectus [act~ally Delicognathus noduliferusJ 571 From the Battleship Wash Formation, Arrow Canyon, southern Nevada: Figs. 12, 13 Spathognathodus campbelli...
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2005
Geological Magazine (2005) 142 (6): 765–781.
... unconformity and were interpreted by these authors as deformation structures related to the Cambrian/Ordovician hiatus. Jain, Goel & Nair (1980 , fig. 5) described another angular unconformity between the Muth and the Lipak formations on the right bank of the Pin River, opposite Muth village. However...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Book Chapter

Published: 01 January 2010
DOI: 10.17491/bgsi.2010.9865.01
EISBN: 978-93-80998-65-7
... with Lipak Formation is intercalated. Near Guimdo (Spiti valley) it rests over the Precambrian Vaikrita Group. In Kinnaur, along an unconformity, it is succeeded by the Kuling Formation. Along the upper contact, the Lipak, Gechang and Gungri Formations invariably overlap the Kuling, and the contact is sharp...
FIGURES | View All (18)