1-20 OF 31 RESULTS FOR

Lasiodiscidae

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2020
Journal of Foraminiferal Research (2020) 50 (2): 141–173.
...Elena I. Kulagina; Tatiana V. Filimonova ABSTRACT The study of the test morphology of type specimens and newly collected foraminiferal material of the family Lasiodiscidae Reitlinger, 1956 , from the Carboniferous (Visean Stage, Mississippian Subsystem) to Permian (Roadian Stage, Guadalupian Series...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2001
Journal of Foraminiferal Research (2001) 31 (3): 228–232.
...Pedro Cózar; Bernard L. Mamet Abstract Planohowchinia n. gen. is a foraminiferal genus (Lasiodiscidae) identified from upper Viséan rocks of the Guadiato Area (SW Spain), for which a new species, Planohowchinia espielensis, is proposed. Previous authors had discovered the taxon, although...
FIGURES
Image
Geographical distribution of the genera of Lasiodiscidae.
Published: 01 April 2020
Figure 11. Geographical distribution of the genera of Lasiodiscidae.
Image
Phylogenetic evolution of Planohowchinia from Howchinia, and other primitive Lasiodiscidae. The microfossil drawings are modified from Vachard and Beckary (1991).
Published: 01 July 2001
F igure 2. Phylogenetic evolution of Planohowchinia from Howchinia, and other primitive Lasiodiscidae. The microfossil drawings are modified from Vachard and Beckary (1991) .
Image
Evolution of the Lasiodiscidae. 1Vissariotaxis exilis (Vissarionova, 1948), South Urals, Uvelka Section, Visean, Tulian. 2Hemidiscopsis caprariensis (Vachard, 1977) from Cózar et al. (2015, fig. 5.15), Vegas de Sotres, section, Cantabrian Mountains, NW Spain, Alba Formation, Serpukhovian. 3Planohowchinia espielensis (Cózar & Mamet, 2001, pl. 1, fig. 1) Camino del Águila 1, Spain, late Viséan. 4Howchinia bradyana (Howchin, 1888), emend. Davis, 1951. South Urals, Muradymovo Section, Bashkirian, Bogdanovkian. 5Turrispiroides multivolutus (Reitlinger, 1949) from Groves (1992, pl. 3, fig. 24), Zesch Ranch Section, Marble Falls Limestone, Western Llano Region, central Texas, Lower–Middle Pennsylvanian, Atokan. 6Eolasiodiscus donbassicusReitlinger, 1956, paratype (Reitlinger, 1949, pl. 2, fig.1), Donets Basin, Belo-Kalitvenskyi area, Moscovian, Vereian, Limestone K8. 7Monotaxinoides transitoriusBrazhnikova & Jartzeva, 1956. South Urals, Bolshoi Kizil Section, Upper Serpukhovian, Chernyshevkian. 8Mesolasiodiscus tenuis (Reichel, 1946), holotype (Reichel, 1946, pl. 19, fig. 3), Tatoi, Greece, Upper Permian. 9Postmonotaxinoides horridus (Lipina, 1949), holotype (Lipina, 1949, pl. 1, fig.4), Preuralian Foredeep, Bashkortostan Republic, Tratau reef mound, Asselian. 10Lasiodiscus medusa Miklukho-Maclay, 1954, pl. 1, fig. 4, northern Caucasus, upper Permian.
Published: 01 April 2020
Figure 10. Evolution of the Lasiodiscidae. 1 Vissariotaxis exilis ( Vissarionova, 1948 ), South Urals, Uvelka Section, Visean, Tulian. 2 Hemidiscopsis caprariensis ( Vachard, 1977 ) from Cózar et al. (2015 , fig. 5.15), Vegas de Sotres, section, Cantabrian Mountains, NW Spain, Alba
Image
Selected Lasiodiscidae, Archaediscidae, Biseriamminidae and Palaeotextulariidae from the Carlow district. In all plates the species name is followed by the thin-section sample number, stratigraphic section (quarry, unless a named borehole), horizon (these were documented in Cózar & Somerville, 2005b) and limestone unit (see Fig. 2) (scale bar 100 µm, except for figs 29–33, where scale bar 150 µm; all the thin sections are housed in the Department of Palaeontology Madrid, UCM): 1, cf. ‘Monotaxinoides’ sp., DPM-PC-1269, Dunamase, horizon 25 (unit 5); 2, Vissariotaxis sp., DPM-PC-27/8/93, Ballyadams 2, horizon 61 (unit 2); 3, Howchinia bradyana (Howchin) emend. Davis, DPM-PC-944, Clogrenan, horizon 55 (unit 3); 4, Howchinia gibba (von Moeller), DPM-PC-20/8/24, Paulstown, horizon 20 (unit 4); 5, Glomodiscus rigens (Conil & Lys), DPM-PC-27/8/85, Ballyadams 2, horizon 53 (unit 2); 6, Uralodiscus adindanii Brenckle & Marchant, DPM-PC-27/8/25, Ballyadams 1, horizon 30 (unit 1); 7, Archaediscus chernoussovensis Mamet, DPM-PC-1430, Dunamase, horizon -5 (unit 3); 8, Archaediscus karreri grandis Conil & Lys, DPM-PC-8/ 8/71, Clogrenan, horizon 58 (unit 4); 9, Archaediscus at ‘angulatus’ stage (Archaediscus krestovnikovi Rauzer-Chernousova), DPM-PC-8/8/72, Clogrenan, horizon 59 (unit 3); 10, ‘Nodosarchaediscus’ convexus (Grozdilova & Lebedeva), DPM-PC-9/8/7, Bannagogle, horizon 2 (unit 3); 11, Tubispirodiscus aff. simplicissimus Browne & Pohl, DPM-PC-24/9-2/25, Dunamase, horizon 16 (unit 4); 12, Tubispirodiscus aff. simplicissimus Browne & Pohl, DPM-PC-24/9-2/25, Dunamase, horizon 16 (unit 4); 13, Neoarchaediscus occlusus (Hallett), DPM-PC-8/8/45, Clogrenan, horizon 40 (unit 4); 14, Neoarchaediscus parvus (Rauzer-Chernousova), DPM-PC-8/8/66, Clogrenan, horizon 54 (unit 4); 15, Neoarchaediscus regularis (Suleimanov), DPM-PC-8/8/36, Clogrenan, horizon 33 (unit 3); 16, Neoarchaediscus ovoides (Rauzer-Chernousova), DPM-PC-8/8/44, Clogrenan, horizon 39 (unit 4); 17, Neoarchaediscus cf. karreriformis (Reitlinger), DPM-PC-1286, Dunamase, horizon 43 (unit 5); 18, Neoarchaediscus subbaschkiricus (Reitlinger), DPM-PC-1335, Clogrenan B Borehole, horizon 5 (unit 2); 19, Asteroarchaediscus rugosus (Rauzer-Chernousova), DPM-PC-20/8/12, Paulstown, horizon 8 (unit 3); 20, Asteroarchaediscus baschkiricus (Krestovnikov & Theodorovich), DPM-PC-9/8/15, Bannagogle, horizon 7 (unit 3); 21, Planospirodiscus aff. taimyricus Sossipatrova, DPM-PC-8/8/52, Clogrenan, horizon 45 (unit 4); 22, Neoarchaediscus incertus (Grozdilova & Lebedeva), DPM-PC-20/8/1, Paulstown, horizon 1 (unit 3); 23, Neoarchaediscus aff. borealis (Reitlinger), DPM-PC-8/8/59, Clogrenan, horizon 50 (unit 4); 24, Biseriammina sp. 1, DPM-PC-24/9-2/65, Dunamase, horizon 54 (unit 6); 25, Planospirodiscus minimus (Grozdilova & Lebedeva), DPM-PC-1386, Guileen-1 Borehole, horizon 8 (unit 4); 26, Planospirodiscus gregorii (Dain), DPM-PC-1373, Clogrenan, horizon 9 (unit 3); 27, Planospirodiscus cf. gregorii (Dain), DPM-PC-1273, Dunamase, horizon 28 (unit 5); 28, Planospirodiscus taimyricus Sossipatrova, DPM-PC-24/9-2/74, Dunamase, horizon 62 (unit 6); 29, Cribrostomum lecomptei Conil & Lys, DPM-PC-27/8/36, Ballyadams 2, horizon 10 (unit 1); 30, Koskinobigenerina prisca (Lipina), DPM-PC-8/8/36, Clogrenan, horizon 33 (unit 3); 31, Palaeotextularia longiseptata Vissarionova, DPM-PC-27/8/31, Ballyadams 2, horizon 5 (unit 1); 32, Climacammina sp., DPM-PC-1448, Aghamaddock, horizon 17 (unit 6); 33, Koskinotextularia cribriformis Eickhoff, DPM-PC-27/8/43, Ballyadams 2, horizon 18 (unit 1).
Published: 01 October 2005
Explanation of Plate 1. Selected Lasiodiscidae, Archaediscidae, Biseriamminidae and Palaeotextulariidae from the Carlow district. In all plates the species name is followed by the thin-section sample number, stratigraphic section (quarry, unless a named borehole), horizon (these were documented
Image
Facies with lasiodiscids, scale bar = 0.2 mm. 1 Boundstone with different section of Lasiodiscidae, South Urals, Uvelka Section, sample 47-1, Bashkirian, Syuranian. 2 Boundstone with Postmonotaxinoides, Preuralian Foredeep, Bashkortostan, 20 Muraptalovo Borehole, sample 45, Cisuralian.
Published: 01 April 2020
Figure 12. Facies with lasiodiscids, scale bar = 0.2 mm. 1 Boundstone with different section of Lasiodiscidae, South Urals, Uvelka Section, sample 47-1, Bashkirian, Syuranian. 2 Boundstone with Postmonotaxinoides , Preuralian Foredeep, Bashkortostan, 20 Muraptalovo Borehole, sample 45
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2014
Journal of Paleontology (2014) 88 (3): 588–605.
..., Lasiodiscidae, Palaeotextulariidae, Pseudotaxidae, Ozawainellidae, Schubertellidae, Schwagerinidae, Staffellidae and Textrataxidae are present, including 21 species referred to known types and 12 species left in open nomenclature. Two new Schwagerina species are described: Schwagerina timorensis new species...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2017
Journal of Foraminiferal Research (2017) 47 (3): 279–283.
... from the Early Permian of China. Xingshandiscus originally was assigned by Zheng (1986) to the family Lasiodiscidae and later included in the Pseudovidalinidae by Brenckle & Wahlman (1994) and Pinard & Mamet (1998) . The synonymy previously proposed is not retained because...
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2020
Journal of Foraminiferal Research (2020) 50 (4): 413–414.
...) Lasiodiscidae……………v. 50, no. 2, p. 141–173. Li, M., Lei, Y., Li, T., and Dong, S., Response of intertidal foraminiferal assemblages to salinity changes in a laboratory culture experiment……………v. 50, no. 4, p. 319–329. Mikhalevich, V., Bugrova, E., Basov, V., Zakrevskaya, E., Dmitrieva, T., and Barash...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2016
Journal of Foraminiferal Research (2016) 46 (2): 171–192.
... Sotres section contains highly diverse foraminiferal assemblages. Representatives and evolution of the family Lasiodiscidae are closely related to the FO of L. ziegleri , as described in Cózar et al. (2015) . The most significant lasiodiscids will be further described here, together with other...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2007
Micropaleontology (2007) 53 (4): 311–330.
... specimens are the most useful in the study of Late Permian small foraminifers because both internal and external features can be studied. When free specimens are not available, at least well-oriented thin sections should be used. Family LASIODISCIDAE Reitlinger 1956 Genus Lasiodiscus Reichel...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2005
Journal of Micropalaeontology (2005) 24 (2): 131–144.
...Explanation of Plate 1. Selected Lasiodiscidae, Archaediscidae, Biseriamminidae and Palaeotextulariidae from the Carlow district. In all plates the species name is followed by the thin-section sample number, stratigraphic section (quarry, unless a named borehole), horizon (these were documented...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2001
Journal of Micropalaeontology (2001) 20 (1): 13–28.
... Superorder Archaediscoida Orders Lasiodiscida , Archaediscida Shells predominantly multichambered with the prevalence of elongated, mostly monoaxial (uni-, bior triserial) arrangements, sometimes in polymorphinoid or plectofrondicularian arrangements, more rarely planispiral (usually involute...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1968
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1968) 16 (2): 167–179.
...-26) are scarce but present throughout the entir e succession. The upper Lower, Middle, and Upper Etherington are char- acterized by the presence of Monotavinoides (26), which link the Tetra- taxidae and the Lasiodiscidae . Biseriamminidae (27-28) have not been observed in the lower part...
Journal Article
Published: 11 September 2023
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society (2023) 64 (3-4): pygs2023-003.
... 2004 ), although this foraminifer, like all members of the family Lasiodiscidae, seem to be strongly facies-controlled, only occurring in quiet-water environments (cf. Cózar et al. 2019 ). This predilection for low-energy environments does not make it suitable as a potential marker...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 18 April 2019
Journal of Foraminiferal Research (2019) 49 (2): 107–130.
... taken using Superior Statistical Analysis Pro (with version 9.0 of LIMDEP, 2008) Phylum FORAMINIFERA d'Orbigny, 1826 emend. Cavalier-Smith, 2003 Superfamily ?LASIODISCOIDEA Reitlinger in Vdovenko et al., 1993 Family ?LASIODISCIDAE Reitlinger, 1956 emend. Gaillot & Vachard, 2007...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 28 April 2023
Geological Magazine (2023) 160 (6): 1131–1143.
... of the Serpukhovian in shallow-water facies (e.g. Gibshman, 2003 ; Groves et al. 2012 ), whereas in deeper-water facies, representatives of the family Lasiodiscidae (as Howchinia subplana and Eolasiodiscus ) are usually more robust markers (Nikolaeva et al. 2009 , 2020 ; Kulagina et al. 2011 ; Cózar et al...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2021
Journal of Paleontology (2021) 95 (4): 653–672.
... of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 83, p. 155–169. Cózar , P. , and Mamet , B.L. , 2001 , Planohowchinia (Lasiodiscidae, Foraminiferida), a new late Viséan genus, southwestern Spain : Journal of Foraminiferal Research , v. 31 , p. 228 – 232 , https://doi.org/10.2113/31.3.228 . Cózar...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2012
Journal of Paleontology (2012) 86 (5): 753–774.
... Platform (exclusive of the family Fusulinidae) . Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, Geologicheskaya Seriya 47 , No. 126 , 126 p. (In Russian) Reitlinger E. A. 1956 . Lasiodiscidae...
FIGURES | View All (16)