1-20 OF 166 RESULTS FOR

Kuparuk River Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (4): 664.
...Eggert, J. Thomas © 1985 American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved 1985 American Association of Petroleum Geologists The Kuparuk River formation consists of upper and lower members separated by an intraformational unconformity. Marine sandstone in each...
Series: SEPM Core Workshop Notes
Published: 01 January 1988
EISBN: 9781565761001
... Abstract Sandstones of the Lower Cretaceous Kuparuk River Formation comprise major reservoirs on the North Slope of Alaska. Original oil-in-place for the Kuparuk field is estimated at approximately 5 billion barrels. The Kuparuk field provides an excellent example of large scale reservoir...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (5): 577.
..., is in Early Cretaceous clastics of the Kuparuk River Formation, stratigraphically higher than at Prudhoe. The origin of the oil is believed to be predominantly from the Jurassic Kingak Formation with migration occurring along the basal Cretaceous unconformity. The dominant trapping mechanism is stratigraphic...
Image
—Contour map of depth to Eocene unconformity as interpreted from logs in 65...
Published: 01 May 1993
Figure 5 —Contour map of depth to Eocene unconformity as interpreted from logs in 65 wells (contour interval = 100 m). The fault traces in the western part of the map are faults that transect the Kuparuk River Formation ( Carman and Hardwick, 1983 ), and the faults in the east cut the deeper
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2004
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.237.01.05
EISBN: 9781862394858
... in the Kuparuk River Formation, Kuparuk River Field, North Slope, Alaska (Fig. 1 ), was first observed in 1971 in a cored well, West Sak 1. A number of subsequent wells have encountered viscous oils and occasionally tar staining. Most of these wells are located at the periphery of the field, and generally...
FIGURES | View All (22)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (4): 674.
... Cretaceous Kuparuk River formation. The lower member of the Kuparuk is a sequence of interbedded sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone. Individual sandstone beds in the lower member are up to 5 ft (1.5 m) thick and consist of fine-grained, well-sorted quartzarenite. The basal part of the lower member contains...
Image
Subsurface faults mapped from seismic data that displace (A) Top Sag <span class="search-highlight">River</span> ...
Published: 15 June 2021
Figure 7. Subsurface faults mapped from seismic data that displace (A) Top Sag River Sandstone, (B) Top Kuparuk Formation (faults east of Kuparuk River field are not shown), and (C) Top West Sak Sands, Kuparuk Formation, and Sag River Sandstone.
Image
Reconstructed generalized structural cross section through <span class="search-highlight">Kuparuk</span> <span class="search-highlight">River</span> an...
Published: 15 June 2021
Figure 25. Reconstructed generalized structural cross section through Kuparuk River and Prudhoe Bay fields during the late Eocene (40 Ma), after the onset of uplift and eastward tilting. The Kuparuk River field closure has started to form, and Shublik source rock is modeled to be within the oil
Image
Reconstructed generalized structural cross section through <span class="search-highlight">Kuparuk</span> <span class="search-highlight">River</span> an...
Published: 15 June 2021
Figure 22. Reconstructed generalized structural cross section through Kuparuk River and Prudhoe Bay fields during development of the Lower Cretaceous unconformity (LCU) in the Early Cretaceous (125 Ma). The line of cross section is shown in Figure 3 . Kuparuk A = Kuparuk Formation unit
Image
Generalized stratigraphic column for the Prudhoe Bay and <span class="search-highlight">Kuparuk</span> <span class="search-highlight">River</span> area...
Published: 15 June 2021
Figure 4. Generalized stratigraphic column for the Prudhoe Bay and Kuparuk River area of the central Alaskan North Slope. Modified from Bird (2001b) and Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. (2012) . BCU = Base Cretaceous unconformity; Fm = Formation; HRZ = highly radioactive zone; Kuparuk
Image
Generalized structural cross section through <span class="search-highlight">Kuparuk</span> <span class="search-highlight">River</span>, West Sak, Borea...
Published: 15 June 2021
Figure 5. Generalized structural cross section through Kuparuk River, West Sak, Borealis, Orion, Polaris, Lisburne, and Prudhoe Bay fields. The line of cross section is shown in Figure 3 . HRZ = highly radioactive zone; Kuparuk A = Kuparuk Formation unit A sandstone; Kuparuk C = Kuparuk
Image
Reconstructed generalized structural cross section through <span class="search-highlight">Kuparuk</span> <span class="search-highlight">River</span> an...
Published: 15 June 2021
Figure 23. Reconstructed generalized structural cross section through Kuparuk River and Prudhoe Bay fields during the Late Cretaceous (66 Ma). Oil expelled from Shublik, Kingak, and highly radioactive zone (HRZ) source rocks from downdip in the Colville foreland basin is modeled to have migrated
Image
(A) Location map showing the key structural features of the Alaska North Sl...
Published: 01 October 2014
shale are highlighted as important source rock formations for the Prudhoe Bay, Milne Point, and Kuparuk River oil fields. The KUP and SAG horizons are indicated as the bottom and top of the Kuparuk River and Sag River reservoir sandstone formations, respectively.
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1971
Journal of the Geological Society (1971) 127 (2): 193–196.
..., and less important accumulations are found in the Carboniferous Lisburne Group and in the Kuparuk River Formation. The field was first outlined as a positive struc- tural feature by reconnaissance seismic work, which was carried out over the whole area between the Colville and Canning rivers on a wide grid...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 15 June 2021
AAPG Bulletin (2021) 105 (6): 1233–1291.
...Figure 7. Subsurface faults mapped from seismic data that displace (A) Top Sag River Sandstone, (B) Top Kuparuk Formation (faults east of Kuparuk River field are not shown), and (C) Top West Sak Sands, Kuparuk Formation, and Sag River Sandstone. ...
FIGURES | View All (30)
Image
(A) Creaming curve for central Alaskan North Slope fields in Trinity basin ...
Published: 15 June 2021
the “No Decline After ‘99” exploration program. The Tarn Oil Pool was brought on production as a satellite field through Kuparuk River Unit (KRU) infrastructure in only 15 months. Palm is a satellite exploration discovery in the Kuparuk Formation that was developed with a new drill site at Kuparuk River field
Series: AAPG Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1991
DOI: 10.1306/SP535C19
EISBN: 9781629811192
... Abstract The Kuparuk River field on the North Slope of Alaska (Figure 1) is the second largest producing oil field in North America. Currently the production from the Lower Cretaceous Kuparuk formation exceeds 300,000 barrels of oil per day under waterflooding. This reservoir is overlain...
Series: AAPG Studies in Geology
Published: 01 January 1987
DOI: 10/1306/St25468C35
EISBN: 9781629811406
... Abstract The occurrence of heavy oil in the Tertiary and Upper Cretaceous sands of the Kuparuk River area, North Slope of Alaska, has been known since 1969. It was not until 1981 that delineation and development drilling for the deeper Kuparuk Formation was sufficient to demonstrate the wide...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 2010
AAPG Bulletin (2010) 94 (11): 1761–1778.
...Leon I. Dzou Abstract Kuparuk River is a giant oil field located on the Colville High, west of Prudhoe Bay field, on the North Slope of Alaska. The Kuparuk oils have values greater than 0.5 for the aromaticity (B) parameter (= toluene/n-C 7 ) and less than 1 for the paraffinicity (F) parameter (= n...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 January 2025
The Leading Edge (2025) 44 (1): 7–14.
.... No significant fault or compartmentalization is observed in these extractions. The Ivishak Formation is indeed a prolific sandstone across the Kuparuk River Unit. Estimates show between 1 and nearly 4 GT of CO 2 storage in the study area. This estimate is based on supervised neural network results trained...
FIGURES | View All (10)