1-20 OF 235 RESULTS FOR

Kumamoto earthquake 2016

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2020
Earthquake Spectra (2020) 36 (4): 1670–1694.
...Nebil Achour; Masakatsu Miyajima The Japanese Prefecture of Kumamoto experienced a series of strong earthquakes in April 2016 causing widespread damage and had a serious impact on local communities. The events caused over 3000 casualties and affected the continuity of healthcare services. Many...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 27 March 2019
Seismological Research Letters (2019) 90 (3): 1335.
... 20 March 2019 © Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters is retracting the article “Preliminary Analysis of Strong Ground Motions in the Heavily Damaged Zone in Mashiki Town, Kumamoto, Japan, during the Mainshock of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake ( M w...
Journal Article
Published: 10 August 2016
Seismological Research Letters (2016) 87 (5): 1044–1049.
...Yoshiya Hata; Hiroyuki Goto; Masayuki Yoshimi 24 May 2016 © Seismological Society of America ...
Journal Article
Published: 11 September 2018
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (6): 3457–3468.
..., then incorporated that attenuation structure in a simulation of ground‐motion prediction for the largest earthquake ( M w 7.0) of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence. The heterogeneous attenuation structure led to improvements over a homogeneous structure: the root mean square residuals of the predicted seismic...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2022
Earthquake Spectra (2022) 38 (1): 310–330.
... describes the data used in this study, the study area, and the preprocessing performed on the data. The first type of data used in this study is the field survey data. After the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake, the local governments of the Kumamoto Prefecture conducted field surveys, and the collected...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 20 July 2021
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (5): 2426–2440.
...Kimiyuki Asano; Tomotaka Iwata ABSTRACT Strong near‐fault ground motions associated with the M JMA 7.3 mainshock of the 2016 Kumamoto, central Kyushu, Japan, earthquake sequence have received attention by seismological and engineering communities. In this study, the kinematic source rupture process...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 06 July 2021
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (5): 2546–2558.
... and suggest that physics‐based rupture modeling is critical to account for them. Here, we develop dynamic rupture models to simulate the near‐fault ground motions generated by the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquake ( M w 7.0) at Nishihara village, which feature a large‐amplitude velocity pulse. Comparison...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 18 August 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (6): 2647–2660.
...Nikolaj Dahmen; Roland Hohensinn; John Clinton ABSTRACT The 2016 M w 7.0 Kumamoto earthquake resulted in exceptional datasets of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and seismic data. We explore the spatial similarity of the signals and investigate procedures for combining collocated sensor...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 26 March 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (3): 1180.
... 20 March 2019 © Seismological Society of America At the request of the authors, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America is retracting the article “Nonlinear Site Response at KiK‐net KMMH16 (Mashiki) and Heavily Damaged Sites during the 2016 M w  7.1 Kumamoto...
Journal Article
Published: 28 August 2018
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (5A): 2675–2686.
...Yingfeng Zhang; Xinjian Shan; Guohong Zhang; Wenyu Gong; Xiaodong Liu; Hao Yin; Dezheng Zhao; Shaoyan Wen; Chunyan Qu Abstract The 2016 Kumamoto earthquake is the largest event that ever happened since 1900 in the central part of Kyushu Island, Japan. It involves the Futagawa and Hinagu fault zones...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 31 October 2017
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (6): 2687–2702.
...Aiming Lin; Peng Chen; Takako Satsukawa; Koichiro Sado; Nobukazu Takahashi; Soichiro Hirata Abstract The 2016 M w 7.1 ( M j 7.3) Kumamoto earthquake, which occurred in central Kyushu Island, southwest Japan, produced an ∼ 40 ‐ km ‐ long surface rupture along the Hinagu–Futagawa fault zone (HFFZ...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Journal Article
Published: 04 July 2017
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (4): 1802–1816.
...Hiroyuki Goto; Yoshiya Hata; Masayuki Yoshimi; Nozomu Yoshida 12 October 2016 © Seismological Society of America ...
Journal Article
Published: 04 May 2017
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2017) 50 (2): 111–116.
...Zili Dai; Fawu Wang; Kun Song; Akinori Iio Abstract On 16 April 2016, a strong earthquake occurred in Kumamoto, Japan, resulting in 97 landslides in the vicinity of the Aso Volcanological Laboratory. This paper reports the initial photographs and preliminary field investigation of a typical...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 21 March 2017
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (3): 1265–1276.
...Junju Xie; Paolo Zimmaro; Xiaojun Li; Zengping Wen Abstract The M w 7.0 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquake occurred on 15 April 2016 at 16:25 UTC. Using ground accelerations recorded by 104 near‐field stations, we investigate spatial variability of observed ground motions, apparent period dependence...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2017
Earthquake Spectra (2017) 33 (4): 1555–1572.
...Masumi Yamada; Junzo Ohmura; Hiroyuki Goto The 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes caused serious building damage in Mashiki town. Because two large earthquakes occurred within an interval of 28 hours, it is difficult to separate the damage caused by each of these earthquakes. We analyzed aerial photos...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Published: 12 November 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (6): 2674–2690.
... standard geotechnical practice and that a more sophisticated rheology may better represent laboratory and earthquake date. A purely theoretical discussion without data would be sterile. We thus examine seismic records from the 2016 Kumamoto large foreshock (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] M w...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Image
(a) Characterized source model of the <span class="search-highlight">2016</span> <span class="search-highlight">Kumamoto</span> <span class="search-highlight">earthquake</span> (modified fr...
Published: 06 July 2021
Figure 3. (a) Characterized source model of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake (modified from Satoh, 2017 ). The red circles denote the location of Nishihara village where we show the simulated ground motions later. The white words correspond to the name of each strong‐motion generation areas (SMGAs
Image
Map of the vertical coseismic displacement of the <span class="search-highlight">2016</span> <span class="search-highlight">Kumamoto</span> <span class="search-highlight">earthquake</span> ...
Published: 13 November 2019
Figure 8. Map of the vertical coseismic displacement of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence derived from InSAR ( Jiang et al. , 2017 ). The surface rupture of the mainshock is indicated by the sudden displacement offset. Locations of major events (Table  1 ) are shown as stars. InSAR
Image
Results for the <span class="search-highlight">2016</span> <span class="search-highlight">Kumamoto</span> <span class="search-highlight">earthquake</span> sequence. (a) The magnitude–time p...
Published: 31 October 2018
Figure 5. Results for the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence. (a) The magnitude–time plot of earthquakes in a square area indicated in the inset. Two stars represent the M  6.5 largest foreshock and the M  7.3 mainshock, respectively. (b) Aftershock forecasting for the M  6.5 and 7.3
Image
Interferograms of coseismic deformation of the <span class="search-highlight">2016</span> <span class="search-highlight">Kumamoto</span> <span class="search-highlight">earthquake</span> alo...
Published: 28 August 2018
Figure 2. Interferograms of coseismic deformation of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake along the (a) descending and (b) ascending orbits of Sentinel‐1; each color cycle represents 10 and 20 cm line‐of‐sight displacement in descending and ascending images, respectively. The temporal information