1-20 OF 69 RESULTS FOR

Kibbey Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Isopach map (in feet) of the base of the Kibbey Formation to top Bakken Formation. Four discrete structural zones are present within the Red Wing Creek structure: (1) outer rim, (2) annular trough and the central uplift complex composed of a raised inner rim, and (3) central core. Locations of Figures 13–15 are shown. C.I. = contour interval.
Published: 01 July 2022
Figure 12. Isopach map (in feet) of the base of the Kibbey Formation to top Bakken Formation. Four discrete structural zones are present within the Red Wing Creek structure: (1) outer rim, (2) annular trough and the central uplift complex composed of a raised inner rim, and (3) central core
Image
Depth structure map (in feet) of base of Kibbey Formation/top Charles Formation. Four major fault styles are present at this level: (1) listric normal faults (LN) at the rim edge, (2) antithetic faults (AN) at the inner edge of the annular trough, (3) outward verging thrust faults (TF) in the inner rim of the central uplift complex, and (4) radial thrust faults (RT). The inner rim comprises eight structural zones (N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, NW) formed by radial thrust faults. Red lines show the locations of the cross sections shown in Figure 21. C.I. = contour interval; FW = footwall; HW = hanging wall; MD = measured depth.
Published: 01 July 2022
Figure 11. Depth structure map (in feet) of base of Kibbey Formation/top Charles Formation. Four major fault styles are present at this level: (1) listric normal faults (LN) at the rim edge, (2) antithetic faults (AN) at the inner edge of the annular trough, (3) outward verging thrust faults (TF
Image
Depth structure map (in feet) of the base of the Kibbey Formation showing radial thrust faults or “transpressional ridges.” These faults divide the thickened section into separate structural zones, which are annotated according to their respective locations around the central core (N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, NW). Major structural zones are annotated: central core (C.C.), inner rim (I.R.), and annular trough (A.T.). Major thrust faults are numbered (1–9). Locations of Figures 17 and 18 (18a, 18b, 18c) are shown. Fm. = Formation; FW = footwall; HW = hanging wall; MD = measured depth.
Published: 01 July 2022
Figure 16. Depth structure map (in feet) of the base of the Kibbey Formation showing radial thrust faults or “transpressional ridges.” These faults divide the thickened section into separate structural zones, which are annotated according to their respective locations around the central core (N
Image
—Correlation data on four oil samples from Weldon field, Kibbey Formation, Williston basin, Montana. Data suggest that Type I oil entered reservoir after Type II oil; former probably represents remigrated oil.
Published: 01 July 1974
Fig. 9 —Correlation data on four oil samples from Weldon field, Kibbey Formation, Williston basin, Montana. Data suggest that Type I oil entered reservoir after Type II oil; former probably represents remigrated oil.
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (5): 850.
...Gary E. Guthrie ABSTRACT Isopachs and lithofacies of the Big Snowy Group in the Bridger Range of southwestern Montana reflect subtle shifting of tectonic elements along an ancient structural lineament. The group comprises a transgressive series informally divided into the Kibbey Formation (with two...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1946
AAPG Bulletin (1946) 30 (8): 1294–1305.
... to show the lateral extent, thickness, and lithologic character of the Jurassic Ellis formation, the lower Pennsylvanian Amsden formation, the upper to middle Mississippian Big Snowy group. The Big Snowy group, which is divided into the Heath, Otter, Kibbey and Charles formations in descending order...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1960
AAPG Bulletin (1960) 44 (6): 959–960.
.... The Mississippian Big Snowy group-Pennsylvanian have been divided as follows. The Big Snowy group has been subdivided into the Kibbey, Otter, and Heath formations. The Kibbey formation contains a lower, middle and upper member. The Pennsylvanian sediments comprisethe Tyler and Minnelusa-Amsden formations. ...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1959
AAPG Bulletin (1959) 43 (8): 1940–1966.
...: Kibbey, Otter, and Heath, and the group reaches an aggregate thickness of approximately 1,000 feet. Seager (1942) included the Charles formation in the Big Snowy group, but this interpretation has not found wide acceptance, and the Charles formation is generally considered to be lithologically...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1959
AAPG Bulletin (1959) 43 (2): 329–349.
... the now mainly buried shelf-edges of this irregular basin. As a name for the entire intergrading sequence, the Big Snowy group of Scott is expanded and redefined to include, in ascending order, not only the Kibbey sandstone, Otter formation, and Heath formation of his original report, but also three...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1939
AAPG Bulletin (1939) 23 (8): 1247–1249.
... favor including in the Heath the beds at 6,762–6,766 feet containing scolecodonts, but consider the decision somewhat arbitrary. As to the boundary between the Otter and Kibbey formations in the N.P. well No. 1 and the Porcupine well, we suggest that a satisfactory basis for a decision is lacking...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (2): 178–195.
... to reconstruct the geometry of the trough in Chesterian time has been destroyed, especially the evidence that could have been determined from the sedimentary facies within the Big Snowy Group. The Big Snowy Group, comprised from base to top of the Kibbey, Otter, and Heath Formations ( Figure 2 ), probably...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1943
AAPG Bulletin (1943) 27 (10): 1287–1304.
... formation of central Montana has been designated the Big Snowy group, because of its extensive distribution and excellent exposures in the Big Snowy Mountains. Scott divided the group into three formations which, in descending order, are: Heath, Otter, and Kibbey. The names, Kibbey and Otter, had...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (5): 858–859.
... Kinderhookian to lower Meramecian (Mississippian) carbonate rocks as well as Upper Devonian rocks. The floor thrust of this imbricate stack appears to lie within the Upper Devonian Three Forks Formation; the roof thrust lies within the middle Meramecian Kibbey Sandstone. The upper duplex involves Upper...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1948
AAPG Bulletin (1948) 32 (6): 886–892.
... formation (Pennsylvanian) at Herrick Dome in the Laramie Basin, Wyoming, opened another producing zone in this area that had heretofore been considered doubtful. Production of oil from the Kibbey sand (upper Mississippian) at Ragged Point, Montana, can be classed as a new producing zone in that state...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2022
AAPG Bulletin (2022) 106 (7): 1499–1546.
...Figure 12. Isopach map (in feet) of the base of the Kibbey Formation to top Bakken Formation. Four discrete structural zones are present within the Red Wing Creek structure: (1) outer rim, (2) annular trough and the central uplift complex composed of a raised inner rim, and (3) central core...
FIGURES | View All (36)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1954
AAPG Bulletin (1954) 38 (9): 1997–2010.
... (Charles, Mission Canyon, and Lodgepole) isopachous map. The Big Snowy group of Chester, Upper Mississippian age includes the Kibbey, Otter, and Heath formations ( Perry and Sloss, 1943 ). The Kibbey formation consists of limestone and sand, and unconformably overlies the Charles. An erosional...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1943
AAPG Bulletin (1943) 27 (12): 1618–1622.
... of dolomite; Orbiculoidea sp. and conodonts 4,830–4,935 Otter formation—red, purple, orange, yellow, green, buff, and gray shale; small amounts of anhydrite 4,935–5,050 Kibbey formation—varicolored shale, like Otter; considerable fine gray argillaceous sandstone, increasing near base 5,050–5,603 Charles...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1956
AAPG Bulletin (1956) 40 (8): 1915–1934.
... is included in a stratigraphically distinct unit which should be recognized as a new formation. The Kibbey formation is characterized by sandstone, siltstone, reddish brown shale, dolomitic limestone, and variable amounts of anhydrite. Various workers have suggested several possible source areas...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1939
AAPG Bulletin (1939) 23 (4): 461–475.
... Section 1 is in the Big Snowy Mountains, Sec. 6, T. 12 N., R. 20 E., as measured by Scott. 5 It illustrates the Big Snowy group at the type locality, beneath the Amsden, including the three formations in ascending order, Kibbey, Otter, and Heath. Scott emphasizes the occurrence of black shales...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1960
AAPG Bulletin (1960) 44 (6): 956.
...Frank W. Foster ABSTRACT The strata discussed in this paper belong to the shale and lenticular sandstone sequence which has been called the Heath formation of Mississippian age in the Williston Basin. This unit is of economic importance as a source of oil in southwestern North Dakota. Information...