1-20 OF 82 RESULTS FOR

Kharaulakh Uplift

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2021
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2021) 62 (03): 377–387.
...B.B. Kochnev; A.B. Kuznetsov; D.R. Sitkina; A.Yu. Kramchaninov Abstract —The least altered limestones of the Ukta and Eselekh formations in the Precambrian section of the Kharaulakh uplift have a minimum 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratio of 0.70673–0.70715. The lowest 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratio of the overlying Neleger...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Image
Map of Riphean sections in the northeastern Siberian Platform (a); b, schematic geologic structure of the Chekurovka anticline of the Kharaulakh uplift, after State Geological Map, Scale of 1:200,000. a: 1, Kharaulakh uplift (see Fig. 2); 2, Olenek uplift; 3, Burskaya BH-341-0; 4, Khastakhskaya BH-930; b: 1, Ikta Formation; 2, Eselekh Formation; 3, Neleger Formation; 4, Sietachan Formation; 5, Kharayutekh Formation; 6, Phanerozoic deposits; 7, major faults; 8, studied sections.
Published: 01 March 2021
Fig. 1. Map of Riphean sections in the northeastern Siberian Platform ( a ); b, schematic geologic structure of the Chekurovka anticline of the Kharaulakh uplift, after State Geological Map, Scale of 1:200,000. a : 1, Kharaulakh uplift (see Fig. 2 ); 2, Olenek uplift; 3, Burskaya BH-341-0; 4
Image
207Pb/204Pb–206Pb/204Pb plot for carbonate rocks of the Eselekh Formation of the Kharaulakh uplift.
Published: 01 March 2021
Fig. 4. 207 Pb/ 204 Pb– 206 Pb/ 204 Pb plot for carbonate rocks of the Eselekh Formation of the Kharaulakh uplift.
Image
Lithologic column and isotope-geochemical parameters of Precambrian sediments of the Kharaulakh uplift, compiled after our observation data and supplemented after Pelechaty et al. (1996) and Khabarov and Izokh (2014). 1, limestones; 2, dolomites; 3, argillaceous limestones/dolomites; 4–7, structures of carbonate rocks: 4, breccial and intraclastic, 5, biolaminitic, 6, oolitic and oncolitic, 7, stromatolitic; 8, siltstones and mudstones; 9, sandstones; 10, silicification; 11, basic intrusions and their thickness, m; 12, red-colored deposits; 13, δ13С and 87Sr/86Sr values of limestones: a, unchanged, b, changed; 14, δ13С values in dolomites: a, unchanged, b, changed. ICC, International Chronostratigraphic Chart, GSSR, General Stratigraphic Scale of Russia, hr, Kharayutekh Formation, uk, Ukta Formation.
Published: 01 March 2021
Fig. 2. Lithologic column and isotope-geochemical parameters of Precambrian sediments of the Kharaulakh uplift, compiled after our observation data and supplemented after Pelechaty et al. ( 1996 ) and Khabarov and Izokh ( 2014 ). 1 , limestones; 2 , dolomites; 3 , argillaceous limestones
Image
Location map of study area in the Siberian Platform. 1, box contours area of Figs. 3 and 4; 2, sampled boreholes (A-703, Aikhalskaya-703; ZB-362-0, Zapadno-Botuobinskaya-362-0; M-223-0, Meikskaya-223-0; O-286-1, Onkuchakhskaya-286-1; O-252-0, Onkhoidokhskaya-252-0; S-706, Sokhsolokhskaya-706; SM-225-0, Srednemarkhinskaya-225-0; Kh-322-0, Khanninskaya-322-0; Ch-279, 367, Chaikinskaya-279 and 367; Sh-471, Sheinskaya-471; E-343-0, Eyikskaya-343-0); 3, Vendian sections characterized previously by chemostratigraphic data and mentioned in the text (Arabic numerals in circles): Igarka Uplift (1), Turuhansk Uplift (2), northern Yenisei Ridge, Teya–Chapa basin (3), southern Yenisei Ridge (4), Irkutsk Amphitheater basin (5), Pribaikalia (6), western Patom basin (7), eastern Patom basin (8), Aldan Shield (9), Yudoma–Maya basin (10), western slope of Anabar Uplift (11), eastern slope of Anabar Uplift (12), Olenek Uplift (13), Kharaulakh Uplift (14). AlSh, Aldan Shield; AnSh, Anabar Shield; NBU, Nepa–Botuobiya Uplift.
Published: 01 June 2018
of Anabar Uplift (12), Olenek Uplift (13), Kharaulakh Uplift (14). AlSh, Aldan Shield; AnSh, Anabar Shield; NBU, Nepa–Botuobiya Uplift.
Image
Lithostratigraphic subdivision and correlation of the Precambrian and Cambrian deposits in the Lena-Anabar trough (compiled by V. V. Shishkin). 1 – boundaries of occurrence of Riphean deposits; 2 – occurrence of Riphean deposits in natural sections; 3 – CDP profile; 4 – boreholes that penetrated Riphean and Cambrian deposits; 5 – dolomites; 6 – limestones; 7 – calcareous dolomites; 8 – dolomites and algal limestones; 9 – dolomites and bolitic limestones; 10 – dolomites and dolomitic limestones; 11 – dolomites and sandy limestones; 12 – dolomitic marls; 13 – calcareous marls; 14 – mudstones; 15 – siltstones; 16 – sandstones; 17 – intrusions of basic rocks; 18 – cavernosity; 19 – flinty rocks; 20 – skeletal organic remains. Inset: Ud – Udzha uplift; OI – Olenek arch; S – Solooli arch; K-D – Kuoika-Daldyn rampart; Kt – Kyutingde trough; Khr – Kharaulakh uplift. Boreholes: Kh – Khastakhskaya; Ch – Charchikskaya; B – Burskaya; R-50 – Razvedochnaya R-50; D – D’yappal’skaya; G – Govorovskaya.
Published: 01 December 1999
marls; 14 – mudstones; 15 – siltstones; 16 – sandstones; 17 – intrusions of basic rocks; 18 – cavernosity; 19 – flinty rocks; 20 – skeletal organic remains. Inset: Ud – Udzha uplift; OI – Olenek arch; S – Solooli arch; K-D – Kuoika-Daldyn rampart; Kt – Kyutingde trough; Khr – Kharaulakh
Image
Lithostratigraphic subdivision and correlation of the Precambrian and Cambrian deposits in the Lena-Anabar trough (compiled by V. V. Shishkin). 1 – boundaries of occurrence of Riphean deposits; 2 – occurrence of Riphean deposits in natural sections; 3 – CDP profile; 4 – boreholes that penetrated Riphean and Cambrian deposits; 5 – dolomites; 6 – limestones; 7 – calcareous dolomites; 8 – dolomites and algal limestones; 9 – dolomites and bolitic limestones; 10 – dolomites and dolomitic limestones; 11 – dolomites and sandy limestones; 12 – dolomitic marls; 13 – calcareous marls; 14 – mudstones; 15 – siltstones; 16 – sandstones; 17 – intrusions of basic rocks; 18 – cavernosity; 19 – flinty rocks; 20 – skeletal organic remains. Inset: Ud – Udzha uplift; OI – Olenek arch; S – Solooli arch; K-D – Kuoika-Daldyn rampart; Kt – Kyutingde trough; Khr – Kharaulakh uplift. Boreholes: Kh – Khastakhskaya; Ch – Charchikskaya; B – Burskaya; R-50 – Razvedochnaya R-50; D – D’yappal’skaya; G – Govorovskaya.
Published: 01 December 1999
marls; 14 – mudstones; 15 – siltstones; 16 – sandstones; 17 – intrusions of basic rocks; 18 – cavernosity; 19 – flinty rocks; 20 – skeletal organic remains. Inset: Ud – Udzha uplift; OI – Olenek arch; S – Solooli arch; K-D – Kuoika-Daldyn rampart; Kt – Kyutingde trough; Khr – Kharaulakh
Image
Lithostratigraphic subdivision and correlation of the Precambrian and Cambrian deposits in the Lena-Anabar trough (compiled by V. V. Shishkin). 1 – boundaries of occurrence of Riphean deposits; 2 – occurrence of Riphean deposits in natural sections; 3 – CDP profile; 4 – boreholes that penetrated Riphean and Cambrian deposits; 5 – dolomites; 6 – limestones; 7 – calcareous dolomites; 8 – dolomites and algal limestones; 9 – dolomites and bolitic limestones; 10 – dolomites and dolomitic limestones; 11 – dolomites and sandy limestones; 12 – dolomitic marls; 13 – calcareous marls; 14 – mudstones; 15 – siltstones; 16 – sandstones; 17 – intrusions of basic rocks; 18 – cavernosity; 19 – flinty rocks; 20 – skeletal organic remains. Inset: Ud – Udzha uplift; OI – Olenek arch; S – Solooli arch; K-D – Kuoika-Daldyn rampart; Kt – Kyutingde trough; Khr – Kharaulakh uplift. Boreholes: Kh – Khastakhskaya; Ch – Charchikskaya; B – Burskaya; R-50 – Razvedochnaya R-50; D – D’yappal’skaya; G – Govorovskaya.
Published: 01 December 1999
marls; 14 – mudstones; 15 – siltstones; 16 – sandstones; 17 – intrusions of basic rocks; 18 – cavernosity; 19 – flinty rocks; 20 – skeletal organic remains. Inset: Ud – Udzha uplift; OI – Olenek arch; S – Solooli arch; K-D – Kuoika-Daldyn rampart; Kt – Kyutingde trough; Khr – Kharaulakh
Image
A scheme of Neoproterozoic structures in the northern Siberian craton. 1–2 — Northern belt of intracratonic basins: 1 — nonexposed, 2 — denuded and exposed by drilling; I — Anabar uplift, II — Olenek uplift, III — Kharaulakh uplift, IV — Udzha uplift; pericratonic trough; 3 — nonexposed, V — denuded Igarka-Noril’sk district (outcrops, drilling data); 4 — paleostructures of northern Taimyr—oceanic block: A — Shrenkov-Leningrad microcontinent, basement inliers; F — Faddeev, G — Shrenkov-Mamontov; E — territory buried beneath the Upper Vendian-Carboniferous deposits; B — Chukchi-Borzov SFZ; C — Zhdanov CFZ; D — Kara microcontinent; 5–11 — lithostratigraphic complexes: 5 — Lower Precambrian crystalline rocks; 6–11 — Neoproterozoic rocks: 6 — terrigenous and carbonate units, 7 — volcanogenic sequences, 8 — volcanogenic-shale-carbonate deposits, 9 — terrigenous deposits; 10 — flysch; 11 — alternating terrigene-carbonate and volcanogenic sequences. 12–15 — tectonic elements: 12 — master faults of northern Taimyr: a — Main Taimyr, b — Pyasino-Faddeev, c — Diabazovy; 13 — structural lines; 14 — boreholes: 1 — Khastyrskaya BH-930, 2 — Burskaya BH-3410, 3 — Diapol’skaya BH-1; 15 — conventional boundary between pericratonic trough and intracratonic basins.
Published: 01 July 2006
Fig. 1. A scheme of Neoproterozoic structures in the northern Siberian craton. 1–2 — Northern belt of intracratonic basins: 1 — nonexposed, 2 — denuded and exposed by drilling; I — Anabar uplift, II — Olenek uplift, III — Kharaulakh uplift, IV — Udzha uplift; pericratonic trough; 3
Image
Schematic location of structure-facies features of Mayanian. 1, 2 — intracratonic depressions, 3, 4 — pericratonic troughs: 1, 3 — outlined according to outcrops and boreholes, 2, 4 — tentative contour beneath younger deposits; 5 — marginal oceanic blocks; 6 — microcontinents; 7 — Early Precambrian sequences; 8 — major faults; 9 — boundaries of Baikalian structures (Teya and Vorogovka troughs of the Yenisei-Angara SFA). Digital symbols of the structures. Uchur-Yudoma SFA: 1 — Omnya uplift. Baikal-Lena SFA (2–8): 2 — Lena SFR: 2a — Kirensk-Nyuya SFZ, 2b — Berezovo SFZ; 3 — Baikal-Patom pericratonic trough: 3a — Patom SFZ, 3b — Bodaibo-Mama SFZ, 3c — Baikal SFZ; 4 — Baikal-Vitim SFR: 4a — Olokit SFZ, 4b — Baikal-Muya volcanoplutonic belt, 4c — Mid-Vitim SFZ; 5 — Dzhida-Vitim SFR; 6–7 — microcontinents: 6 — Barguzin, 7 — Stanovoi, 8 — Kodar-Udokan block. Yenisei-Angara SFA (9–14): 9 — Mid-Angara depression; 10 — Yenisei pericratonic trough: 10a — Kamenka SFZ, 10b — Gorbilok SFZ, 10c — Kait’ba SFZ, 10d — Glushikha SFZ; 11 — Upper Vorogovka-Shilka SFR: 11a — Upper Vorogovka SFZ, 11b — Shilka SFZ; 12 — Isakovka-Predivinsk SFR: 12a — Isakovka SFZ, 12b — Predivinsk SFZ; 13 — Kas microcontinent; 14 — Kan microcontinent. Northern SFA (15–20): 15 — Anabar uplift; 16 — Olenek uplift; 17 — Kharaulakh uplift; 18 — Turukhan uplift; 19 — Igarka uplift; 20 — Northern Taimyr.
Published: 01 January 2008
SFZ; 13 — Kas microcontinent; 14 — Kan microcontinent. Northern SFA (15–20): 15 — Anabar uplift; 16 — Olenek uplift; 17 — Kharaulakh uplift; 18 — Turukhan uplift; 19 — Igarka uplift; 20 — Northern Taimyr.
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2014
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2014) 55 (5-6): 531–533.
..., which can be considered as potential exploration targets. E.M. Khabarov and O.P. Izokh presents carbon isotope data on Precambrian shelf carbonate rocks of the Kharaulakh uplift in Arctic Yakutia. In recent stratigraphic schemes, these sediments are assigned to the Lower and Middle Riphean...
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2006
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2006) 47 (7): 865–880.
...Fig. 1. A scheme of Neoproterozoic structures in the northern Siberian craton. 1–2 — Northern belt of intracratonic basins: 1 — nonexposed, 2 — denuded and exposed by drilling; I — Anabar uplift, II — Olenek uplift, III — Kharaulakh uplift, IV — Udzha uplift; pericratonic trough; 3...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2014
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2014) 55 (5-6): 629–648.
... strata cropping out along the flanks of Anabar Anticlise and within the Udzha and Olenek Uplifts and the Kharaulakh Range ( Fig. 1 ), is of particular importance ( Dobretsov and Kontorovich, 2013 ; Kontorovich, 2008 ; Kontorovich et al., 2013 ; Surkov et al., 1991 ). The Riphean strata...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2018
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2018) 59 (7): 813–826.
... et al., 2000 ; Imaeva et al., 2016b ; Zonenshain et al., 1990 ). The Kharaulakh autochthonous duplex, which occurs in the west as ramp anticlines of the Tuora-Sis uplift ( Figs. 1 , 2 ), is the main seismogenic structure of the region identified from structural and seismological data...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
Location map of the regions mentioned. 1 – Regions: I – Anabar Massif; II – Olenek Uplift; III – Kharaulakh Mts; IV – Yenisei Range; V – Baikit Arch; VI – Angara Range; VII – Katanga Saddle; VIII – Nepa-Botuobiya region; IX – Uchur-Maya region; 2 – Imbinskaya-2 Borehole.
Published: 01 November 1996
Fig. 1. Location map of the regions mentioned. 1 – Regions: I – Anabar Massif; II – Olenek Uplift; III – Kharaulakh Mts; IV – Yenisei Range; V – Baikit Arch; VI – Angara Range; VII – Katanga Saddle; VIII – Nepa-Botuobiya region; IX – Uchur-Maya region; 2 – Imbinskaya-2 Borehole.
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1996
GSA Bulletin (1996) 108 (8): 992–1003.
...Shane M. Pelechaty; Alan J. Kaufman; John P. Grotzinger Abstract Integrated sedimentologic, stratigraphic, and geochemical (δ 13 C, δ 18 O, Fe, Mn, and Sr) data from Vendian-Cambrian carbonate-ramp deposits of the northeast Siberian platform (Olenek uplift and Kharaulakh Mountains region) are used...
Journal Article
Published: 21 July 2022
Geological Magazine (2022) 159 (11-12): 2132–2156.
... Verkhoyansk FTB (Kharaulakh segment), the Early Cretaceous event ( c . 130–120 Ma) is supposed to have resulted in the most intense regional deformation. Similar uplift ages are reported from the southern part of the Taimyr – Novaya Zemlya FTB and the western part of the OFZ, but they are interpreted...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Image
Location of the Lower Cambrian key sections of the Siberian Platform. 1, location of the Lower Cambrian key sections: I, Lena River (middle reaches); II, Lena River (lower reaches, Kharaulakh Mts.); III, Olenek uplift (Khorbosuonka River); IV, Nekekit River (northeastern Siberian Platform); V, western Anabar region (Medvezh’ya and Eriechka River basins); VI, Sukharikha River (northwestern Siberian Platform); 2, Siberian Platform boundary.
Published: 01 July 2011
Fig. 1. Location of the Lower Cambrian key sections of the Siberian Platform. 1 , location of the Lower Cambrian key sections: I, Lena River (middle reaches); II, Lena River (lower reaches, Kharaulakh Mts.); III, Olenek uplift (Khorbosuonka River); IV, Nekekit River (northeastern Siberian
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2022
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2022) 63 (4): 417–434.
... material, its provenance arouses questions concerning its lithology, location, direction of transport, conditions of rapid erosion in uplifted hilly terrains which regularly supplied voluminous coarse clastics into the early Carboniferous Northern Kharaulakh basin. The Ordovician and Silurian sediments...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2020
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2020) 61 (12): 1391–1411.
...N.V. Sennikov; R.A. Khabibulina; T.V. Gonta; O.T. Obut Abstract —The origin and biostratigraphic constraints of the Krestyakh conglomerate remain among most controversial issues in the Late Paleozoic history of the Northern Kharaulakh basin. The Krestyakh conglomerate is a sequence of coarse sand...
FIGURES | View All (18)