1-20 OF 108 RESULTS FOR

Kermanshah Ophiolite

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 28 July 2023
Geology (2023) 51 (10): 941–946.
.... Abundant ophioliticlastics, detrital Cr-spinel geochemistry, and detrital zircons with positive εHf(t) values dated as 110–80 Ma, 180–160 Ma, and 260–200 Ma indicate that the Amiran Formation was derived from the obducted Kermanshah ophiolite and Sanandaj-Sirjan zone. Besides sharing similar composition...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2016
Mineralogical Magazine (2016) 80 (1): 127–142.
... manganese deposit (associated with the Kermanshah ophiolite). These data are used to gain an insight into the primary ore-forming processes that control the deposition of manganese ores. All of the selected manganese deposits have consistently high Ba contents and low concentrations of trace elements (Co...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 13 February 2019
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 56 (12): 1347–1365.
... a highly extended continental crust for the SCB crust along the profile. Low observed magnetic susceptibility of the Kermanshah ophiolites likely indicates that the ophiolite rocks only form a thin layer that has been thrust over the sedimentary cover. 1 This paper is part of a Special Issue entitled...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Image
Principal geological features and ophiolites of Iran. (a) Map showing the distribution of the inner (Nain–Dehshir–Baft–Shahr-e-Babak) and outer (Kermanshah–Neyriz–Haji–Abad) Zagros ophiolitic belts, the location of the Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic arc (Eocene–Quaternary), and Main Zagros Thrust (MZT). (b) Schematic cross-section showing the relationship between outer and inner Zagros ophiolitic belts and the Zagros thrust–fold belt (after Shafaii Moghadam et al. 2010). U–Pb and previous K–Ar and 40Ar–39Ar ages are shown. K–Ar and U–Pb zircon ages for the Nain and Dehshir ophiolites are from Shafaii Moghadam et al. (2009) and this study, respectively; K–Ar ages for the Kermanshah ophiolites are from Delaloye & Desmons (1980), and for Neyriz ophiolites are from Lanphere & Pamic (1983), Jannessary (2003) and Babaie et al. (2006).
Published: 01 January 2013
Fig. 2. Principal geological features and ophiolites of Iran. ( a ) Map showing the distribution of the inner (Nain–Dehshir–Baft–Shahr-e-Babak) and outer (Kermanshah–Neyriz–Haji–Abad) Zagros ophiolitic belts, the location of the Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic arc (Eocene–Quaternary), and Main Zagros
Image
Schematic model showing the opening and evolution of the Khoy back-arc basin with regard to the Zagros, Neotethyan Ocean (modified after Dercourt et al. 1986; Kazmin et al. 1986). BSB, Black Sea Basin; GCB, Great Caucasus Basin; SCB, South Caspian Basin; KB, Khoy Basin; KR, Kermanshah ophiolite; NY, Neyriz ophiolite; OM, Oman ophiolite; UDMB, Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic belt; MZT, Main Zagros Thrust.
Published: 05 February 2019
, Kermanshah ophiolite; NY, Neyriz ophiolite; OM, Oman ophiolite; UDMB, Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic belt; MZT, Main Zagros Thrust.
Image
Paleogeographic sketch maps envisage collision along the Zagros orogen. (A) Comparison between western (Lurestan region) and eastern (Fars region) parts of Zagros orogeny. These data were integrated from Homke et al. (2010); Mouthereau et al. (2012); Khadivi et al. (2012); and Pirouz (2013). (B) The Paleocene-Eocene in the Lurestan region. (C) The Paleocene-Eocene in the Fars region. (D) Earlier collision in the Lurestan and Kermanshah regions. (E) Later collision in the Fars and Neyriz regions (modified from Barrier et al., 2014). SaSZ—Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone; ZCZ—Zagros Crush Zone; SCB—South Caspian Basin; KO—Kermanshah ophiolite; NO—Neyriz ophiolite; Am.F—Amiran Formation; Sa.F—Sachun Formation; Ra.F—Razak Formation; As.f—Asmari Formation.
Published: 08 November 2021
Crush Zone; SCB—South Caspian Basin; KO—Kermanshah ophiolite; NO—Neyriz ophiolite; Am.F—Amiran Formation; Sa.F—Sachun Formation; Ra.F—Razak Formation; As.f—Asmari Formation.
... Supra-ophiolitic series Magmatic trend Influence of subduction components Khoy Senonian-Santonian-Campanian Lherzolite, cpx-bearing harzburgite Hectometric mass Absent Pillow lava, sheet flow, hyaloclastite breccia Extended N-MORB T-MORB — Kermanshah (Harsin) Late Cretaceous...
FIGURES | View All (36)
Journal Article
Published: 22 April 2024
Journal of the Geological Society (2024) 181 (4): jgs2023-209.
... gabbros, foliated gabbros and clinopyroxenites. Ultramafic cumulates from the crustal sequence of the Kermanshah ophiolite (ZOBO) have also been sampled. The ZOBO and ZIBO ophiolites are geographically divided by the SaSZ. However, in the Haji-Abad region (southern Iran), they are closely juxtaposed...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Image
Magnetic susceptibility models. (a) Susceptibility model with the Curie depth point (CDP) boundary at a constant depth of 40 km. The residual magnetic anomaly in the top panel (highlighted by thick gray line) includes long wavelength variations. (b) The final magnetic susceptibility model in which the Curie isotherm boundary is allowed to vary. The model shows shallowing of the CDP beneath the SSZ and the Alborz mountains at the two interpreted sutures along the profile. Black lines on the susceptibility models are from the density model (Fig. 6). Red lines mark the CDP and the green line shows the sediment–basement boundary. The numbers in the susceptibility models show susceptibility of a given layer in SI units. Susceptibility of the sedimentary layer is assumed to be 0.001 SI and is fixed to zero at depths below the Curie isotherm. The numbers 1, 2, and 3 on the susceptibility models (bottom panels) represent the Kermanshah ophiolite, Qorveh intrusion, and the Tertiary magmatic arc of Alborz, respectively. CI, Central Iran block; MMA, Mesozoic Magmatic Arc; MRF, Main Recent Fault; SCB, South Caspian Basin; SSZ, Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone; T, Tarom Valley; TMA, Tertiary Magmatic Arc; ZFTB, Zagros Fold Belt. [Colour online.]
Published: 13 February 2019
on the susceptibility models (bottom panels) represent the Kermanshah ophiolite, Qorveh intrusion, and the Tertiary magmatic arc of Alborz, respectively. CI, Central Iran block; MMA, Mesozoic Magmatic Arc; MRF, Main Recent Fault; SCB, South Caspian Basin; SSZ, Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone; T, Tarom Valley; TMA, Tertiary
Journal Article
Published: 08 September 2022
Journal of the Geological Society (2023) 180 (1): jgs2022-028.
... et al. (2013) and the locations of our sampling sites. The Bioclastic Belt hosts two ophiolitic complexes ( Fig. 2a ; Braud 1978 ) – namely, the Kamyaran and Harsein–Sahneh complexes ( Fig. 3 ), which lie c. 50 km north and c. 60 km east of Kermanshah City, respectively. Our detailed...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 29 June 2011
Geological Magazine (2011) 148 (5-6): 762–801.
... developed along the SW margin of Eurasia. Figure 2 (a) Map showing the distribution of the inner (Nain–Dehshir–Baft–Shahr-e-Babak) and outer (Kermanshah–Neyriz–Haji–Abad) Zagros ophiolitic belts, the location of the Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic arc (Eocene–Quaternary), and Main Zagros Thrust (MZT). (b...
Journal Article
Published: 18 June 2020
Journal of the Geological Society (2020) 177 (5): 955–964.
... are present in the Kurdistan region of eastern Iraq and western Iran, around Kermanshah and Sahneh–Harsin ( Fig. 1b ). These ophiolites continue to the SE towards Neyriz and Haji-Abad ophiolites ( Fig. 1a ). Ophiolites in the Kurdistan region are associated with thick Triassic–Cretaceous sequence of pelagic...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 08 November 2021
GSA Bulletin (2022) 134 (7-8): 1793–1810.
... Crush Zone; SCB—South Caspian Basin; KO—Kermanshah ophiolite; NO—Neyriz ophiolite; Am.F—Amiran Formation; Sa.F—Sachun Formation; Ra.F—Razak Formation; As.f—Asmari Formation. ...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 19 May 2011
Geological Magazine (2011) 148 (5-6): 911–924.
...MARK B. ALLEN; MORTEZA TALEBIAN Abstract Structure varies along strike in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt of Iran, which is a principal element in the Arabia–Eurasia continental collision. Pre-collision, Late Cretaceous ophiolite nappes (Kermanshah, Neyriz) and related nappes of deep marine...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 March 2013
Geology (2013) 41 (3): 315–318.
... on to the Arabian margin is exemplified by the fully preserved Semail ophiolite of Oman (e.g., Searle and Cox, 1999 ). Using the preserved extent of the Oman ophiolite as the type example, the Late Cretaceous obduction may have emplaced Iranian ophiolites (Kermanshah and Neyriz) over ∼180 km of the Arabian...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 17 September 2021
GSA Bulletin (2022) 134 (5-6): 1414–1442.
... et al. (2016) , and Warren et al. (2005) ; and the OB and IB Zagros ophiolites (Iran) are from this study. The ophiolites of the Zagros outer belt (OB) include the Kermanshah ophiolites in the NW and the Neyriz ophiolites in the SE. The Neyriz ophiolites link to the Haji-Abad ophiolite...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Image
Figure 1.
Published: 29 June 2012
Figure 1. Distribution map of obducted ophiolites (Neyriz, Kermanshah and Khoy) along the Zagros Suture Zone and other ophiolitic assemblages in Iran (modified after Shafaii Moghadam, Stern & Rahgoshay, 2010 ).
Journal Article
Published: 05 February 2019
Journal of the Geological Society (2019) 176 (3): 517–529.
..., Kermanshah ophiolite; NY, Neyriz ophiolite; OM, Oman ophiolite; UDMB, Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic belt; MZT, Main Zagros Thrust. ...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2011
Journal of the Geological Society (2011) 168 (4): 979–994.
... water facies (Fig. 3 ), with marls and shales of the Gurpi Formation (Campanian–Maastrichtian). In the High Zagros Belt of Kermanshah, during late Maastrichtian time, obduction and subsequent erosion of the ophiolites and radiolarian cherts of the Neo-Tethyan basin ( Lippard et al. 1986 ; Braud 1987...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Image
Plate tectonic context of the Arabian-Eurasian collision zone. Approximate positions of main ophiolitic complexes and ophiolitic mélanges are given. N—Neyriz complex, K—Kermanshah complex, Ky—Koyi ophiolites, A—Ankara-Erzincan ophiolites, B—Berit ophiolite, H—Hatar and Baer-Bassit ophiolites, M—Mersin complex, T—Troodos ophiolite, EAAC—East Anatolian accretionary complex. Velocities of movement of Arabia with respect to Eurasia (in mm/yr) are from Sella et al. (2002).
Published: 01 July 2009
Figure 1. Plate tectonic context of the Arabian-Eurasian collision zone. Approximate positions of main ophiolitic complexes and ophiolitic mélanges are given. N—Neyriz complex, K—Kermanshah complex, Ky—Koyi ophiolites, A—Ankara-Erzincan ophiolites, B—Berit ophiolite, H—Hatar and Baer-Bassit