1-20 OF 56 RESULTS FOR

Kemin earthquake 1911

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2017
DOI: 10.1144/SP432.10
EISBN: 9781862399648
... Abstract The 1911 Chon–Kemin (Kebin) earthquake culminated c. 30 years of remarkable earthquakes in the northern Tien Shan (Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan). Building on prior mapping of the event, we traced its rupture in the field and measured more than 50 offset landforms. Cumulative fault...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2016
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2016) 57 (2): 337–343.
...E.V. Deev; A.M. Korzhenkov Abstract The area of the Chon-Aksu and Kichi-Aksu grabens abounds in seismic deformation produced by historic and prehistoric events, among which the great Kemin (Kebin) earthquake of 1911, with a magnitude of Ms ≈ 8 and a shaking intensity of I 0 = 10–11, generated...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2001
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2001) 42 (10): 1583–1592.
...D. Delvaux; K. E. Abdrakhmatov; I. N. Lemzin; A. L. Strom The 1911 M s = 8.2 Kemin (Kebin) earthquake in the northern Tien Shan (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan) formed a complex system of surface ruptures nearly 190 km long and numerous landslides and rock avalanches up to tens of millions of cubic meters...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Image
Ground failure effects documented after the 3 January 1911 Kemin earthquake (modified from Nurmagambetov et al., 1999).
Published: 06 November 2019
Figure 2. Ground failure effects documented after the 3 January 1911 Kemin earthquake (modified from Nurmagambetov et al. , 1999 ).
Image
Anan’evo rock slide of the Kemin earthquake of 1911.
Published: 01 February 2016
Fig. 2. Anan’evo rock slide of the Kemin earthquake of 1911.
Image
A, Fragment of a fault scarp produced by 1911 Kemin earthquake that delineates a slope between Siutu-Bulak and Dzhel-Karagai Rivers. Solid line traces scarp toe. Dashed line traces erosion scarp toe. View to northeast. B, Fragment of a fault scarp (arrows) at Tash-Bulak locality. View to north.
Published: 01 February 2016
Fig. 3. A , Fragment of a fault scarp produced by 1911 Kemin earthquake that delineates a slope between Siutu-Bulak and Dzhel-Karagai Rivers. Solid line traces scarp toe. Dashed line traces erosion scarp toe. View to northeast. B , Fragment of a fault scarp (arrows) at Tash-Bulak locality. View
Image
Fragments of a fault scarp rejuvenated by 1911 Kemin earthquake, on a step between Kichi-Aksu and Chon-Aksu segments (view to northwest) (A) and downslope between Kok-Bel pass and Chon-Aksu valley (view to east) (B). Heavy line marks scarp toe; dash line traces paleoscarp fragments.
Published: 01 February 2016
Fig. 4. Fragments of a fault scarp rejuvenated by 1911 Kemin earthquake, on a step between Kichi-Aksu and Chon-Aksu segments (view to northwest) ( A ) and downslope between Kok-Bel pass and Chon-Aksu valley (view to east) ( B ). Heavy line marks scarp toe; dash line traces paleoscarp fragments.
Image
Surface ruptures and landslides of the 1911 Kemin earthquake in the upper Chon-Kemin, Chilik and Chon-Aksu valleys. 1 – peaks (m), 2 – glaciers, 3 – late Pleistocene moraines, 4 – main surface ruptures (upthrusts and thrusts), 5 – feather joints, 6 – scarps, 7 – active moraines.
Published: 01 October 2001
Fig. 5. Surface ruptures and landslides of the 1911 Kemin earthquake in the upper Chon-Kemin, Chilik and Chon-Aksu valleys. 1 – peaks (m), 2 – glaciers, 3 – late Pleistocene moraines, 4 – main surface ruptures (upthrusts and thrusts), 5 – feather joints, 6 – scarps, 7 – active moraines.
Image
Surface ruptures of the 1887 Verny and 1911 Kemin earthquakes, compiled from 1:200,000 scale map [4]. 1 – supposed position of seismogenic rupture caused by the 1887 Verny earthquake [4]; 2 – seismogenic ruptures caused by the 1911 Kemin earthquake, after [4] and our data; 3 – supposed position of segments of the 1911 ruptures. 1–6 – different fault segments activated by the 1911 Kemin event: 1 – Dzhil’-Aryk, 2 – Lower Chon-Kemin, left bank, 3 – Lower Chon-Kemin, right bank, 4 – Upper Chon-Kemin-Chilik, 5 – Chon-Aksu, 6 – Aksu.
Published: 01 October 2001
Fig. 3. Surface ruptures of the 1887 Verny and 1911 Kemin earthquakes, compiled from 1:200,000 scale map [ 4 ]. 1 – supposed position of seismogenic rupture caused by the 1887 Verny earthquake [ 4 ]; 2 – seismogenic ruptures caused by the 1911 Kemin earthquake, after [ 4 ] and our data; 3
Journal Article
Published: 06 November 2019
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (1): 415–426.
...Figure 2. Ground failure effects documented after the 3 January 1911 Kemin earthquake (modified from Nurmagambetov et al. , 1999 ). ...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2002
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2002) 92 (8): 3190–3209.
...Hans-Balder Havenith; Denis Jongmans; Ezio Faccioli; Kanatbeck Abdrakhmatov; Pierre-Yves Bard Abstract In 1911, the surface-wave magnitude 8.2 Kemin earthquake hit northeastern Tien Shan (Kyrgyzstan), close to the cities of Bishkek and Almaty, the capitals of Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, respectively...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Image
Time series of the 1999 Chi‐Chi earthquake (top panel) selected to represent the ground motion experienced in Verny during the Kemin and Verny events. The results of the spectral matching are shown in the central panel for the 1887 Verny earthquake and in the bottom panel for the 1911 Kemin earthquake.
Published: 06 November 2019
Figure 6. Time series of the 1999 Chi‐Chi earthquake (top panel) selected to represent the ground motion experienced in Verny during the Kemin and Verny events. The results of the spectral matching are shown in the central panel for the 1887 Verny earthquake and in the bottom panel for the 1911
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2017
DOI: 10.1144/SP432.8
EISBN: 9781862399648
... from the Chilik and the 1911 Chon-Kemin earthquakes. Scaling of these historic records confirm a magnitude of about 8 for the 1889 Chilik earthquake, pointing towards a lower crustal contribution to the fault area. At the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the northern Tien-Shan...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
(a) Target and matched response spectrum for the 1887 Verny earthquake (distance 23 km). (b) Target and matched response spectrum for the 1911 Kemin earthquake (distance 40 km).
Published: 06 November 2019
Figure 7. (a) Target and matched response spectrum for the 1887 Verny earthquake (distance 23 km). (b) Target and matched response spectrum for the 1911 Kemin earthquake (distance 40 km).
Image
Location map of large historic earthquakes (120 years) and radon stations in northern Tien Shan. 1, earthquakes, with Arabic numerals standing for Belovodsk, M = 6.9, 1885 (1), Kemin-Chu, M = 6.9, 1938 (2), Vernen, M = 7.3, 1887 (3); Kemin, M = 8.2, 1911 (4), Baisorun, M = 6.4, 1990 (5), Chilik, M = 8.3, 1889 (6), Zalanash, M = 7.1, 1978 (7), Sarykamysh, M = 6.8, 1970 (8); 2, radon stations; 3, transform faults.
Published: 01 February 2010
Fig. 7. Location map of large historic earthquakes (120 years) and radon stations in northern Tien Shan. 1 , earthquakes, with Arabic numerals standing for Belovodsk, M = 6.9, 1885 (1), Kemin-Chu, M = 6.9, 1938 (2), Vernen, M = 7.3, 1887 (3); Kemin, M = 8.2, 1911 (4), Baisorun, M = 6.4
Image
Distribution of Medvedev–Sponheuer–Karnik‐64 (MSK‐64) intensity for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 Chon‐Kemin earthquake. The white star indicates the city of Almaty. The white dot and the white line describe the epicenter and the fault rupture, respectively.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 05 March 2019
Figure 5. Distribution of Medvedev–Sponheuer–Karnik‐64 (MSK‐64) intensity for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 Chon‐Kemin earthquake. The white star indicates the city of Almaty. The white dot and the white line describe the epicenter and the fault
Image
Estimated peak ground acceleration (PGA) for the 1887 Mw 7.3 Verny and the 1911 Mw 7.8 Kemin earthquakes (Bindi et al., 2014) using the ground‐motion prediction equation (GMPE) proposed by Boore and Atkinson (2008), as suggested for intraplate areas by the Global Earthquake Model (GEM). R is the closest horizontal distance to the earthquakes’ epicenters.
Published: 06 November 2019
Figure 3. Estimated peak ground acceleration (PGA) for the 1887 M w  7.3 Verny and the 1911 M w  7.8 Kemin earthquakes ( Bindi et al. , 2014 ) using the ground‐motion prediction equation (GMPE) proposed by Boore and Atkinson (2008) , as suggested for intraplate areas
Image
(a) Almaty (formerly Verny), southern Kazakhstan. The white stars indicate the epicenters of the two large earthquakes considered in this study: the 9 June 1887 Mw 7.3 Verny and the 3 January 1911 Mw 7.8 Kemin events. (b) Present urban area of Almaty and the position of the epicenters. The ancient urban settlement of Verny is marked by the gray box. The known active faults are shown as thin black lines. (c) Distribution of macroseismic intensity in the Verny area due to the Kemin event (redrawn after Nurmagambetov et al., 1999). The black lines indicate the areas where liquefaction and ground failures occurred.
Published: 06 November 2019
Figure 1. (a) Almaty (formerly Verny), southern Kazakhstan. The white stars indicate the epicenters of the two large earthquakes considered in this study: the 9 June 1887 M w  7.3 Verny and the 3 January 1911 M w  7.8 Kemin events. (b) Present urban area of Almaty and the position
Image
Distribution of peak ground acceleration (PGA), together with its standard deviation, for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 Chon‐Kemin earthquake. The mean ground motions and their standard deviations have been computed from 1000 scenarios. The white star indicates the city of Almaty. The white dot and the white line describe the epicenter and the fault rupture, respectively.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 05 March 2019
Figure 4. Distribution of peak ground acceleration (PGA), together with its standard deviation, for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 Chon‐Kemin earthquake. The mean ground motions and their standard deviations have been computed from 1000 scenarios
Image
Distribution of 1.0 s SA, together with its standard deviation, for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 Chon‐Kemin earthquake. The mean ground motions and their standard deviations have been computed from 1000 scenarios. The white star indicates the city of Almaty. The white dot and the white line describe the epicenter and the fault rupture, respectively.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 05 March 2019
Figure C2. Distribution of 1.0 s SA, together with its standard deviation, for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 Chon‐Kemin earthquake. The mean ground motions and their standard deviations have been computed from 1000 scenarios. The white star